Heartland Grit Meets Alaskan Independence
Grounded Leadership for an Ungrounded Time
Jon Tester and Lisa Murkowski donโt just talk about bipartisanship โ theyโve lived it. With deep roots in Americaโs rural heartland and frontier state, they understand that real leadership means listening, working across divides, and protecting the values that hold this country together. No theatrics. No cults of personality. Just two seasoned lawmakers willing to work โ and work together.
What They Bring to the Table
Jon Tester
U.S. Senator from Montana | Farmer | Veteranโs Advocate
Lisa Murkowski
U.S. Senator from Alaska | Energy & Environment Expert
Shared Values
Rural dignity over urban elite pandering
Governing over grandstanding
Integrity, not infamy
Respect for process, institutions, and the Constitution
Who This Ticket Is For








Join the discussion. Share your thoughts. And if you’re waking up โ welcome.

| Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Assets (2023 disclosure) | Less than $50,000 |
| Student Loans | $15,000โ$50,000 |
| Retirement Savings (TSP) | Majority of net worth (~$100k) |
| Reported Net Worth Estimate | $25,000โ$125,000 |








Thomas Massie (R-KY), a libertarian-leaning Republican, has long advocated for abolishing or dramatically reforming the Federal Reserve. His reasons for calling for an end to the Fed stem from several ideological and economic beliefs:

Massie argues that the Federal Reserve operates with too much secrecy. He has supported legislation like the “Audit the Fed” bill (originally championed by Ron Paul) to bring more accountability and transparency to its operations. He believes Americans should know more about how the Fed sets monetary policy and manages trillions in assets.
Massie holds a strict interpretation of the Constitution and often claims the Fed has usurped powers not granted by the founding document. He believes that the Constitution grants Congress the power to coin money and regulate its valueโnot to delegate that power to an independent central bank.
Like many critics of the Fed, Massie argues that its policiesโespecially low interest rates and quantitative easingโdebase the dollar and lead to inflation. He views this as a hidden tax on Americans, especially the poor and those on fixed incomes.
Massie believes the Fed distorts the free market by manipulating interest rates, which he sees as a form of central planning. He argues this creates artificial booms and busts and misallocates capital, contributing to cycles of economic instability.
Philosophically, Massie is a small-government conservative. He views the Federal Reserve as a key pillar of centralized government control over the economy. By dismantling the Fed, he believes monetary power could be returned to the peopleโpossibly through a return to commodity-backed currency or market-based alternatives.
He is highly critical of how the Fed enables deficit spending by purchasing government debt. In his view, this removes fiscal discipline from Congress and allows for runaway national debt.
In short, Massieโs call to end the Fed aligns with a broader libertarian critique: that the Federal Reserve is unaccountable, unconstitutional, inflationary, and harmful to a truly free market. Whether one agrees or not, his position is rooted in a coherent ideological framework thatโs been shared by figures like Ron Paul and the Austrian school of economics.


Recent immigration policies have aggressively tightened borders and expanded enforcement efforts, but the human and societal costs are profound. The use of mass raids and detentions โ often described as paramilitary operations โ has sowed fear and mistrust in immigrant communities. These tactics disrupt families, undermine due process, and raise serious questions about civil rights and humane treatment.
While border security is a legitimate priority, enforcement must be balanced with respect for human dignity and the rule of law. Policies that prioritize harshness over compassion risk alienating vulnerable populations and weakening social cohesion. True security comes not from intimidation and separation, but from thoughtful, fair, and effective immigration reform.

1. Reduced Legal Immigration Levels:
The Trump administration implemented stricter visa restrictions and reduced refugee admissions significantly. Caps on asylum claims and travel bans on several majority-Muslim countries also curtailed legal immigration flows.
2. Tougher Border Enforcement:
There was a strong emphasis on โzero toleranceโ policies leading to family separations at the border, increased border wall construction, and heightened use of detention facilities.
3. Expanded ICE Enforcement:
ICE ramped up raids and deportations targeting undocumented immigrants, including those with minor offenses or no criminal records. This aggressive enforcement fueled widespread fear among immigrant communities.
4. Public Backlash and โICE-Gestapoโ Criticism:
Critics and immigrant advocates accused ICE of acting like a paramilitary โGestapo,โ citing reports of harsh raids, lack of due process, and aggressive tactics. This rhetoric highlighted the deep mistrust and fear generated by enforcement methods.
5. Impact on Communities and Economy:
The policies disrupted immigrant families, led to legal challenges, and created uncertainty for workers in industries reliant on immigrant labor. Some industries reported labor shortages and economic strain due to stricter enforcement.
Summary
Trumpโs immigration policies effectively tightened borders and reduced immigration numbers but at the cost of humanitarian concerns, legal challenges, and increased social polarization. The aggressive ICE tactics, often described by critics with terms like โGestapo,โ deepened fear and trauma within immigrant communities and sparked intense debate about the balance between enforcement and human rights.


Group |
Likely Impact |
|---|---|
Low-income individuals/families |
Reduced Medicaid coverage, higher out-of-pocket costs, risk of losing care |
Marketplace enrollees |
Less subsidy support, tighter enrollment rules, higher rates |
Rural communities |
Potential loss of local hospitals and services |
Insurers |
Margins under pressureโcould affect availability and competition |


When Donald Trump ran for president in 2016, he promised to fix Americaโs healthcare system with a bold pledge: โEverybodyโs going to be taken care of… better and cheaper.โ He said heโd repeal Obamacare and replace it with something โbeautiful.โ

So what happened after four years in office? What changed โ and what didnโt?
Letโs break it down.
The 2017 tax law eliminated the Affordable Care Actโs (ACA) penalty for not having insurance. That meant people no longer had to pay a fine for going uninsured.
Supporters saw it as a win for personal freedom.
Critics warned it would destabilize the insurance market โ and it did increase the number of uninsured Americans.
Trump allowed short-term health plans to last up to 12 months (renewable), instead of just 3. These plans came with lower premiums โ but they also didnโt have to cover things like:
Preexisting conditions
Mental health
Maternity care
They were cheaper because they covered less. Some called them โjunk insurance.โ
One area where Trump saw bipartisan praise was veteransโ care. He signed the MISSION Act, making it easier for vets to see private doctors if VA care wasnโt available quickly. He also boosted telehealth and pushed for tech upgrades at the VA.
Hospitals were ordered to disclose prices for procedures. Drug companies were told to include prices in TV ads (though that rule was blocked in court).
While helpful in theory, these moves didnโt bring major price relief to consumers โ but they did push the system toward more transparency.
Despite constant promises, Trump never unveiled a full replacement for the ACA.
In 2017, Republicans tried to repeal it โ but famously failed when Senator John McCain voted no.
Trump said a new plan was โcoming in two weeksโ multiple times. It never came.
Trump talked tough on drug companies and announced several plans, like international price indexing. But most were delayed, dropped, or blocked in court.
In the end, prescription drug prices remained a top concern for Americans โ with no real relief.
Trump pushed states to require Medicaid recipients to work. Some states implemented it, but federal courts blocked most of them.
These changes could have led to millions losing coverage, according to healthcare experts.
Trump repeatedly claimed he would protect people with preexisting conditions.
But โ his administration also backed a lawsuit to strike down the entire ACA, which includes those protections. Critics saw this as a dangerous contradiction. No replacement plan ever guaranteed the same level of coverage.
In 2020, Trump introduced what he called the โAmerica First Healthcare Plan.โ It was mostly a summary of past executive orders and ideas โ without new funding or legislation.
There were no major new policies. Just more promises.
Trump’s presidency saw:
Partial dismantling of the ACA
Looser insurance regulations
Expanded access for veterans
Some transparency reforms
But it did not deliver lower costs, better coverage, or a meaningful replacement plan.
Healthcare โ one of the top issues for voters โ remained deeply divided and unresolved after four years.
Bottom line:
Trump changed parts of the system, mostly by weakening what was already there. But he never built the โbeautifulโ new healthcare system he promised.

Got a convoy shirt and a sticker that screams, โHunterโs laptop stole my dreams!โ Q on the back and a donโt-tread patch, And a bumper that says โTRUMP: Rematch!โ



Part 2 – The Awakening of the Woke
Iโm building a political cartoon arc that speaks to the people everyone else has forgotten โ the voters who are done with performative politics and ready to rebuild, quietly and seriously.
Through 3 six-panel series (and growing), I show the parallel awakenings of MAGA and Woke Americans โ not to each otherโs flaws, but to their shared betrayal. From there, they move toward reluctant cooperation.
Part 1 – When MAGA Loyalty Meets Reality
Part 2 – The Awakening of the Woke Here
Part 3 –ย Come Together
Collaborate or feature this work through your channels to reach Americans ready to engage from the middle.
โThe Awakening of the Wokeโ
They marched for justice.
They voted with purpose.
They believed in something better.
The Woke generation wasnโt born from privilege or apathy โ it was built from protest, passion, and principle. They wanted a world that was more fair, more kind, more conscious. And for a while, it felt like progress was finally being made.
But the deeper they went, the more the cracks began to show.
Words like โequity,โ โrepresentation,โ and โinclusionโ became currency โ not values.
Corporate sponsors, celebrity hashtags, and carefully scripted candidates told them exactly what they wanted to hear โ while behind closed doors, very little actually changed.
Student debt ballooned. Housing costs soared. Foreign wars expanded.
And the people who promised change?
They padded their resumes, their portfolios, and their polling numbers.
What began as a moral movement slowly became a marketing campaign.
And then the disillusionment set in.
This isnโt a story about flipping sides or giving up.
Itโs a story about waking up โ about realizing that being โon the right side of historyโ means little if history keeps repeating itself.
This cartoon series doesnโt mock idealism. It mourns what was done to it.
And it dares to ask: what happens when the Woke stop performing and start rebuilding?
The answer, as it turns out, may be the same one their so-called opponents have already begun to discover:
That truth is louder than branding.
That justice isnโt handed down โ itโs built together.
And that real change doesnโt begin in party headquarters.
It begins at a table โ across from someone you were once told to hate.
โVoices of Promiseโ (The Idealism)
We believed in justice. We believed we were being heard.
โThe Curtain Fallsโ (The Betrayal)
We believed the words. But we watched what they did.
โOff the Podiumโ (Facing the Truth)
We were never enemies. Just two sides of a broken promise.
โIdentity Inc.โ (Realization of Exploitation)
โThey didnโt co-opt our values. They monetized them.โ
โThe Bubble Burstsโ (Disillusionment Becomes Anger)
โWhen slogans became sedatives.โ
โHard Conversationsโ (Facing Reality Together)
โReal change starts when the scripts stop.โ
Share this:
Like this: