Posts in Category: Trumps Soldiers

Making America Sick — Part 4 of 4: The Fight Back

On - Commentary, Healthcare, Mental Healthcare, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

If you have read this far and are feeling the particular kind of helplessness that comes from watching something important being dismantled by someone who cannot be reasoned with, this part is for you.

Because the resistance is real, it is organized, and some of it is winning.

The most important thing to understand is that Kennedy overplayed his hand legally, repeatedly, and the courts have noticed. He did not just pursue aggressive policy changes, he pursued them sloppily, skipping the procedural requirements that exist precisely to prevent any single person from unilaterally rewriting public health infrastructure. That sloppiness has created legal openings that are now being used effectively.

In March 2026 a federal judge in Massachusetts sided with the American Academy of Pediatrics and blocked Kennedy’s overhaul of the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, the one he had stacked with skeptics after firing all 17 original members. The judge invalidated votes the reconstituted panel had already taken, including decisions to downgrade hepatitis B and COVID recommendations. More significantly, the same ruling found that the CDC had exceeded its legal authority when it unilaterally reduced the childhood vaccine schedule from 17 to 11 vaccines in January, because it did so without going through the proper advisory process. The mechanism Kennedy used to do the most damage to vaccine policy is the same mechanism that is now being used to undo it.

The states have mobilized in ways that matter. Fifteen states have sued to rescind the new vaccine schedule entirely and dismantle Kennedy’s replacement advisory committee. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia are separately fighting the HHS restructuring and mass layoffs on constitutional grounds, arguing the administration violated the separation of powers and the appropriations clause, essentially that Kennedy dismantled agencies Congress had funded and mandated without the legal authority to do so. A judge has already blocked further reorganization while that case proceeds. These are not symbolic lawsuits. They are methodical, well-resourced legal challenges built on solid procedural ground, and they are advancing.

Perhaps the most quietly encouraging development is what the medical establishment itself has done. When Kennedy changed the vaccine schedule, major hospital systems and clinicians across the country simply ignored it. The American Academy of Pediatrics published its own independent vaccine schedule, declaring the federal process no longer credible, and told its members to follow that instead. This matters more than it might seem. The federal government can change its recommendations, but it cannot force pediatricians to follow them. The professional infrastructure of American medicine, the societies, the hospitals, the training programs, the peer review systems, is largely intact and largely in open rebellion against what Kennedy is doing. That infrastructure is where the actual practice of medicine happens, and it is not waiting for federal permission to protect children.

Were the signs obvious? Yes. Could this have been prevented? Yes. Did it happen purely because of politics? Yes. But we also knew who Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was before he was confirmed, and we knew he was Trump’s chosen instrument for reshaping American public health. That makes all of us who watched and waited at least a little complicit in the complacency that allowed it to happen.

Casting blame now doesn’t cure a child with measles or restore a cancer research grant. It doesn’t rebuild the institutional knowledge that walked out the door with the scientists who were fired. The courts are working, and working effectively, but they are slow by design. The best and most immediate course of action is the one closest to home, your doctor, your pediatrician, your state legislature, your voice used early rather than late.

We knew. Now we act.

Know the insurance cliff and act before it hits. Major insurers pledged to keep covering the old vaccine schedule through end of 2026. That pledge expires in December. Before then, contact your state insurance commissioner and ask specifically what protections your state is putting in place to ensure continued vaccine coverage after the federal schedule changes. If your state has not addressed this, say so publicly and say it to your state legislators by name. This is the kind of specific, time-bound pressure that actually moves state government.

Talk to your pediatrician directly. Ask them which schedule they are following. The answer in most cases will be the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule, not the federal one. But parents who don’t ask won’t know, and parents who don’t know may make decisions based on federal guidance that their own doctor has already rejected. This is a conversation that takes five minutes and could matter enormously.

Support the organizations doing the legal work. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Public Health Association, and American Oversight are carrying the heaviest load in court right now. They are nonprofit organizations fighting well-funded federal legal teams. They need resources and they need visibility. Sharing their work, citing their findings, and donating if you are able is not performative, it is direct support for the people holding the legal line.

Pay attention to your state legislature. Anti-vaccine activists are already moving into statehouses to use the federal schedule changes as leverage to loosen school vaccine requirements. This is happening right now in Florida and Texas and it will spread. School board meetings and state legislative hearings are where this battle will be won or lost at the community level, and they are chronically under-attended by the people who would push back. You do not have to become an activist. You have to show up once and bring two people who agree with you.

Understand what is reversible and what isn’t. The legal framework to restore the vaccine schedule exists and is being actively pursued. The court victories so far suggest it is achievable. What is harder to reverse is the institutional knowledge that walked out the door with the fired scientists, the research that wasn’t funded, the surveillance systems that went dark, and the public trust that eroded while the outbreaks spread. Those are long term repair projects that will require sustained political will across multiple administrations. That is not a reason for despair. It is a reason to vote in every election at every level with health policy as a primary consideration, and to say so out loud when you do.

The measles outbreak will not be the last consequence we see from what has happened at HHS over the past year. The cancer research that wasn’t funded will show up in treatment outcomes years from now. The children who didn’t get vaccinated because their parents received confusing guidance from the federal government will be vulnerable in ways that won’t be visible until the next outbreak arrives. The damage has a long tail.

But so does the resistance. The courts are not done. The states are not done. The medical establishment is not done. And the accumulated weight of evidence-based medicine, built over more than a century by people who understood that complexity requires sustained attention rather than simple answers, does not disappear because one man with a broken compass was handed the keys for a few years.

He was given those keys through a political transaction. They can be taken back through a democratic one.

That is not optimism. That is how the system is supposed to work, and right now, imperfectly and under enormous pressure, it is working.

Pay attention. Show up. Talk to your pediatrician.

The burger and the shake are not going to fix this either.

Making America Sick — Part 3 of 4: Why He’s Doing It? The Broken Compass

On - Commentary, Healthcare, Mental Healthcare, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

There is a question that stops most people when they look at the measles outbreaks, the whooping cough deaths, the hollowed out research institutions and the children who will go unvaccinated this fall because their parents received confusing guidance from the federal government. The question is simple and almost impossible to answer through a normal political lens.

How does he look at this and not stop?

It is the right question. And if you are looking for the answer in conventional political motivation — ambition, corruption, cynicism — you will not find it, or at least not find enough of it to explain what we are watching. Kennedy is not profiting directly from dismantling vaccine policy. He is not, by any reasonable measure, doing this for personal financial gain. He genuinely believes, as far as anyone can tell, that he is helping.

That is what makes him so dangerous.

To understand what is actually happening you have to set aside the political framework entirely and pick up a different one. Those who have spent careers working in mental health and addiction treatment will recognize the pattern immediately, not because Kennedy is simply an addict — recovery is real and people rebuild their lives completely — but because there is a specific kind of cognitive reorientation that prolonged substance use can produce in certain people, particularly those who were already wired toward intensity, pattern recognition, and distrust of authority. It does not announce itself. It does not look like impairment from the outside. It looks, in fact, like conviction.

Here is how it works. The brain’s threat assessment system, disrupted by years of substance use, can become permanently recalibrated. Not broken exactly — still functional, still capable of sophisticated reasoning — but reset to a baseline of suspicion that a normal risk environment cannot satisfy. Everything gets filtered through a framework that asks not “what does the evidence show” but “who benefits from me believing the evidence.” Once that filter is in place it is essentially self-sealing. Contradicting evidence doesn’t weaken the belief — it strengthens it, because contradiction becomes proof that the threat is real enough to require active suppression.

Kennedy wrote in a 2021 book that he rejected germ theory — one of the foundational principles of modern medicine, established over 150 years ago — in favor of miasma theory, the pre-scientific idea that disease arises from environmental corruption rather than specific pathogens. This is not a fringe position he stumbled into. He argued for it at length, in print, under his own name. And yet he continues to insist he is following the science. From inside that framework, he is. The science he trusts is the science that confirms what his recalibrated threat assessment already told him was true. Everything else is captured, corrupted, or bought.

This is not unique to Kennedy and it is not unique to addiction. It is a well-documented feature of how human cognition responds to prolonged trauma, chronic stress, and certain kinds of neurological disruption. What is unusual is the scale at which we are now watching it operate. Most people who develop this kind of framework do so in private, or in communities of like-minded believers, where the consequences are limited. Kennedy developed it in public, refined it over decades, built a following around it, and then traded that following for the most powerful public health position in the world.

The cruelest irony is that his instincts were not entirely wrong at the start. Corporate influence on research is real. The pharmaceutical industry has a documented history of suppressing inconvenient findings. Public health institutions did make serious errors during the pandemic that damaged trust. Kennedy’s original antenna was picking up genuine signals. But a broken compass that points slightly wrong will take you further and further from your destination the longer you follow it. By the time you are rejecting germ theory and redesigning the childhood vaccine schedule based on a country that provides universal free healthcare and has a population smaller than Texas, you are not where you started. You are somewhere that looks nothing like the riverbanks you once protected.

And the children getting measles in South Carolina cannot tell the difference between a broken compass and a working one. They just get sick.

What makes this particularly resistant to the normal corrective mechanisms of democratic accountability is that Kennedy speaks the language of his critics fluently. He knows what evidence-based medicine sounds like. He knows how to invoke transparency and scientific rigor and institutional accountability. He uses that language not to engage with the evidence but to reframe his rejection of it as a higher form of engagement. This is not stupidity. It is something more difficult to counter than stupidity, because you cannot simply show him the data. The data is part of the system he has already decided cannot be trusted.

Which brings us to the only thing that has ever worked against this kind of entrenchment — not argument, not outrage, not the correct facts delivered with sufficient force. What works is structure. Rules. Institutions with enough independence and enough legal authority to say no regardless of what any individual believes. Courts. Professional bodies. State governments. The accumulated weight of democratic process applied with enough consistency that no single broken compass can redirect the whole ship.

Those structures exist. They are fighting back. And that is where we are going next.

Making America Sick — Part 2 of 4: The Damage

On - Commentary, Healthcare, Mental Healthcare, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took office in February 2025, the Department of Health and Human Services oversaw food and hospital inspections, health insurance for roughly half of the American population, vaccine recommendations, and the scientific research infrastructure that underpins most of what your doctor tells you. It was imperfect, often bureaucratic, and in genuine need of reform in places. What it did not need was to be systematically dismantled by someone who rejected the scientific foundations it was built on.

That is what happened anyway.

Within his first two months Kennedy announced the elimination of approximately 10,000 HHS jobs on top of another 10,000 employees who had already taken buyouts, collapsed 28 agencies into 15, and closed half of HHS’s regional offices. The cuts did not fall evenly. They targeted, as 19 state attorneys general would later document in federal court, specific programs and areas of expertise — the ones Kennedy had already decided were part of the problem. Infectious disease surveillance. Vaccine research. The scientific advisory infrastructure that had taken decades to build.

The research bleeding is quieter than the vaccine headlines but may prove more lasting. The National Institutes of Health cut approximately $2.7 billion in research funding, including a 31 percent reduction in cancer research. Five hundred million dollars in contracts to develop vaccines using mRNA technology, the same technology that saved millions of lives during the pandemic were canceled. Four NIH directors were fired or forced out. The FDA’s vaccine chief was removed. A CDC director Kennedy himself had hired was gone within a month. As one Georgetown University public health law professor put it, America is being hollowed out of its scientific leadership, and it will be extraordinarily difficult to reverse.

But it is the vaccine story that will be most immediately felt in pediatricians’ offices and school hallways across the country.

Kennedy promised during his confirmation hearings that he would not touch vaccine policy. Instead he fired all 17 sitting members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the expert body that has guided vaccine recommendations since 1964 and replaced them with known vaccine skeptics. The reconstituted committee promptly began downgrading recommendations. Then in January 2026, the CDC unilaterally reduced the universally recommended childhood vaccine schedule from 17 vaccines to 11, cutting protection against rotavirus, influenza, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and meningococcal disease from routine recommendations, not based on any new safety data, but modeled after Denmark, a country with universal free healthcare that is an outlier even among its European peers.

The consequences are not theoretical. A measles outbreak has spread to 26 states with over 960 confirmed cases centered in South Carolina. Two children have died from whooping cough. Vaccination rates have been falling since Kennedy took office. Last flu season saw 280 child deaths from influenza, the highest toll in more than a decade, and the federal government has now made the flu vaccine a matter of parental discretion rather than routine recommendation.

There is a clock ticking that most people don’t know about. Major health insurers pledged to keep covering the old vaccine schedule through the end of 2026. That pledge expires in December. After that, whether parents pay out of pocket for vaccines that were covered last year is an open question, and in a country where cost is already a barrier to preventive care for millions of families, the answer will show up in infection rates within a year or two.

None of this happened by accident. None of it happened without warning. Kennedy’s record as a vaccine skeptic was not hidden during his confirmation process, it was the central concern of every senator who questioned him, and he addressed each concern with a promise he did not keep. The damage being done to American public health is real, it is documented, and it is the direct result of placing ideological conviction above scientific evidence at the highest level of the public health system.

The question worth asking, and the one we will address next, is not whether Kennedy knows what he is doing. He does. The more useful question is why a genuinely intelligent person, with a real history of fighting for public health, arrived here. Because the answer to that question is the one that might actually help us understand how to stop it from happening again.

Making America Sick — Part 1 of 4: The Man Who Knew Better

On - Commentary, Healthcare, Mental Healthcare, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

There is a version of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that history should remember favorably.

As an environmental attorney in the 1980s and 90s, Kennedy was the real thing. He sued polluters, won, and made them pay. He fought corporations that dumped toxins into waterways serving poor communities who had no other advocate. He understood science, used it rigorously, and trusted it when it supported the case he was making, which it usually did, because the science on industrial pollution is not complicated. Corporations were poisoning people, Kennedy proved it, and he made them stop. That is not the biography of a crank. That is the biography of someone who understood exactly how institutions can be corrupted by money and power, and fought back effectively.

That understanding, that institutions lie when money is involved, is important. Because it wasn’t wrong. It was the seed of everything that came later, and like a lot of things that start from a kernel of truth, it eventually grew into something that consumed the original plant entirely.

Somewhere between the courtroom victories and the podcast appearances, Kennedy’s working theory shifted. Institutions sometimes lie became institutions always lie. Follow the money when evaluating a specific claim became follow the money as a substitute for evaluating evidence at all. The man who once used science as a sword against corporate corruption began using corporate corruption as a reason to reject science itself.

The drug years almost certainly played a role. Kennedy has spoken openly about his heroin addiction and recovery, and deserves credit for that honesty. But what he has never fully reckoned with publicly, and what anyone who has worked in addiction and mental health will recognize immediately, is that sustained substance use doesn’t just damage the body. It rewires the framework through which a person processes trust, authority, and risk. It can leave someone genuinely intelligent operating from a threat-assessment system that is permanently calibrated too high. Everything becomes suspect. Every institution becomes an enemy. Every simple answer becomes more trustworthy than a complex one, because complexity itself starts to feel like manipulation.

This is not a diagnosis. It is a pattern that professionals in mental health and addiction recognize, and it matters here because it explains something important: Kennedy is not stupid. He is not simply corrupt. He is a genuinely intelligent person operating from a framework that was damaged long before he ever set foot in the Department of Health and Human Services, and that framework is now being applied to the health of 330 million Americans.

He was confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services in February 2025, after a Senate process in which he promised, repeatedly, that he would not dismantle vaccine policy, would not politicize public health, and would bring transparency and accountability to institutions that had lost public trust during the pandemic. Those were not unreasonable promises. Some of them were even things his critics could agree were worth doing.

He has broken nearly all of them.

What is less often discussed is how he got there. Kennedy’s path to confirmation ran directly through his decision to drop his independent presidential campaign and deliver his followers to Trump. The job was, by most credible accounts, the arrangement. Not a reward for expertise in public health. Not a record of administrative competence. A political transaction between two men who had spent years distrusting the same institutions, for very different reasons, and who each believed they were the one doing the using.

1710801629903

A Text Message and FDA Approval – A COMPANION PIECE TO THE SERIES: MAKING AMERICA SICK — ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.

On - Commentary, Healthcare, Mental Healthcare, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers, Veterans News

When good things happen for the wrong reasons, and the wrong things happen anyway

On Saturday, April 18, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order directing the FDA to fast-track its review of psychedelic drugs including ibogaine, psilocybin, and MDMA for the treatment of PTSD, depression, and traumatic brain injuries in military veterans. He stood in the Oval Office flanked by RFK Jr., Dr. Oz, podcaster Joe Rogan, and Marcus Luttrell, the decorated Navy SEAL whose story became the film Lone Survivor. It was, by any measure, a striking scene.

And here is the uncomfortable truth: the science behind this decision has genuine merit. A 2024 Stanford study found that veterans treated with ibogaine showed an 80 to 90 percent reduction in symptoms of depression and anxiety within a single month. For over twenty years, more than 6,000 veterans per year have died by suicide, a rate more than twice that of the civilian population. When people are dying at that scale, the calculus around acceptable risk changes. Sometimes you take the risk. Sometimes you throw the dice.

So credit where it is due: if this research is conducted properly, it could save lives. That matters. That is real.

“Sounds great. Do you want FDA approval? Let’s do it.” — President Trump, responding to a text from Joe Rogan

Policy by Text Message

But here is where the story gets complicated, and where the parallels to my ongoing series on Robert F. Kennedy Jr. become impossible to ignore.

This executive order, according to officials present, was written in less than a week. Its genesis was not a briefing from the VA, or a report from the National Institutes of Health, or years of advocacy from veterans’ organizations, though those voices exist and have been pushing for this research for years. Its genesis was a text message from Joe Rogan. Trump’s reply, as Rogan told it from the Oval Office: “Sounds great. Do you want FDA approval? Let’s do it.”

This is the same governing philosophy we see throughout this administration’s approach to public health. RFK Jr. didn’t dismantle vaccine confidence programs because of rigorous scientific review. He did it because of ideology, grievance, and the gravitational pull of a particular media universe. Trump didn’t fast-track psychedelic research because of a systematic review of veteran health outcomes. He did it because a podcaster texted him and it sounded good.

The mechanism is identical. The outcomes just happen to point in opposite directions.

The Hypocrisy the Headlines Won’t Tell You

While this announcement was being celebrated and it deserves some celebration the Department of Veterans Affairs has been quietly hemorrhaging the people who actually serve veterans every single day. Thousands of VA employees have been cut or are under threat as part of the administration’s broader federal workforce reductions. These are the people who answer phones, process disability claims, run mental health clinics, and sit across from veterans in crisis.

Ibogaine, even under an optimistic timeline, will not be widely available to veterans for years. The research still needs to be done properly. The cardiac risks, ibogaine has been linked to fatal heart arrhythmias and is connected to over thirty deaths in the medical literature — need to be understood and managed. The FDA approval process, even a fast-tracked one, takes time.

So what happens to the veteran who calls the VA crisis line next Tuesday and nobody answers? What happens to the veteran waiting eighteen months for a disability claim decision while staff positions sit empty? They don’t have Joe Rogan’s number. They don’t have a Lone Survivor story to tell in the Oval Office. They have a phone number and a waiting list.

This administration has demonstrated, repeatedly, that access to presidential attention and federal resources is mediated not by need, but by platform. By visibility. By whether you are useful to the political performance of the moment. Veterans, as a group, are enormously useful as symbols. As a bureaucratic constituency with daily, grinding needs they are less convenient.

The Thalidomide Shadow

Those of us old enough to remember thalidomide understand the cost of moving too fast. That drug approved in Europe, thankfully blocked in the US by one courageous FDA reviewer caused severe birth defects in thousands of children. The FDA’s deliberate pace exists for a reason. It was written in tragedy.

Ibogaine is not thalidomide. But it carries real risks, and the pressure now being applied to the FDA approve this in “weeks, not years” as the FDA commissioner suggested should make anyone who remembers that history uneasy. Speed driven by political momentum is not the same as speed driven by scientific confidence.

The research should proceed. The clinical trials should be funded. The veterans who have traveled to Mexico to access ibogaine treatments because they had no legal option at home deserve a legitimate pathway. All of that is true.

But “do you want FDA approval? Let’s do it” is not a drug approval process. It is a vibe. And we have seen, in this administration’s approach to public health writ large, what governing by vibe costs us.

Hold Both Truths

The hardest intellectual task in political commentary right now is holding two truths simultaneously when one of them gives comfort to people you disagree with. So let me be clear one final time: this research, done properly, could save veteran lives. That is good. That is worth fighting for regardless of who signs the order.

But the way it was done, by text message, in a week, surrounded by cameras and celebrities, while the VA workforce is being dismantled behind the scenes, is not a veterans policy. It is a veterans performance. And the veterans who will be waiting for ibogaine to navigate clinical trials and FDA approval while their local VA mental health clinic loses half its staff deserve to know the difference.

Good outcomes for bad reasons are still good outcomes. But they do not absolve the bad reasons. And they do not fill the staff positions that were cut last month.

This is a companion piece to the ongoing series Making America Sick: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., examining the Trump administration’s approach to public health, science, and the machinery of medical governance.

Published April 2026

Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies at a hearing examining the Missouri v. Biden case

Robert F. Kennedy Jr – Making America Sick

On - Commentary, Healthcare, Mental Healthcare, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

Our next series will take on Robert F. Kennedy Jr and what he has done to America’s Health and Youth, and why, in the year he has been in Office.

This is a 4 part series.

Making America Sick — Part 1 of 4: The Man Who Knew Better

Making America Sick — Part 2 of 4: The Damage

Making America Sick — Part 3 of 4: Why He’s Doing It? The Broken Compass

Making America Sick — Part 4 of 4: The Fight Back

White House Planning Commisions Recomendations.

On - Commentary, Politics, Protest 2025, Trumps Soldiers

White House Planning Commisions Recomendations. Room for the entire administration. And he can keep his name on it.

So WOKE, unmanly, not pointy and unreadable.

On - Commentary, Protest 2025, purple, Trumps Soldiers

Tiny Tim Cratchit finally gets a new pencil, farmers get a 30% “bailout” that’s really their own money, and Marco Rubio… well, he’s still agonizing over whether the font says “leadership” or “panic.” Welcome to America 2025: where the little guy barely moves forward, the big guy skims the safety net, and the political class debates kerning while the country burns.

U.S. Navy is “too intimidated” so they have to KILL THEM ALL

On - Commentary, International, Politics, Protest 2025, Trumps Soldiers

You try to write a joke about the U.S. Navy being “too intimidated” to capture those big, bad, fiberglass outboard-powered drug boats — you know, the ones running on lawnmower engines and vibes — but then reality steps in and writes something better.

Apparently the Navy’s standard operating procedure now is:
See fast boat → panic → blow it up → hope nobody asks questions.
All hands lost, problem solved, paperwork minimal.

Meanwhile, Little Sister Coast Guard didn’t get the memo.

They stroll out there in their white hulls, sunglasses on, probably listening to classic rock, and say:
“Hey, is that a massive oil tanker violating sanctions?”
Then they just… take it.
No shots.
No explosions.
No Hollywood soundtrack.
Just: “Sir, we’re boarding your ship now.”
And the Venezuelan captain — what, was he smoking a joint the size of a flare gun? — basically shrugs and lets them.

You can’t even parody this anymore.
The Navy vaporizes fishing boats like they’re the Death Star, and the Coast Guard arrests an entire tanker crew like they’re checking fishing licenses.

When the joke becomes more realistic than the real event, satire just packs up and goes home.

Could it be, Trump wants the Oil and there wasn’t any Drugs?

To stay in the fight, just what fight where they staying in?

On - Commentary, Daily, or my first cup of coffee, Politics, Protest 2025, Trumps Soldiers

So: Was this “they were in a fight,” or people just trying to survive / not drown?

From what’s publicly documented:

The two survivors reportedly were clinging to wreckage, not visibly armed or engaged in combat. The Washington Post+2Al Jazeera+2
Their being in the water after the first strike — wounded or shipwrecked — should legally make them non-combatants, under laws protecting shipwrecked persons, unless they were actively hostile (which has not been shown). Legal experts say targeting them in that condition would likely be a war crime. The Washington Post+2Foreign Policy+2
So yes — there is a credible, public-report based interpretation that they were trying to stay alive, not fight, when the second strike happened.

That means the narrative of “stay in the fight” — or justification of the strike as combat — is highly contested, deeply ambiguous, and legally dubious given what is known so far.

Got news for you folks, it’s up to you now. accept this obvious coverup or force it out, force it to stop. It’s up to us to stop Pumpkin because the Republican castrated cowards aren’t doing it. The great Pumpkin isn’t God, although he thinks so.

Impeachment is a right.

We invoked the “Nuclear Option.”

On - Commentary, Trumps Soldiers

Democrats have been throwing a temper tantrum to try and thwart President Trump’s agenda.

And so, Senate Republicans did what we had to do…

…We invoked the “Nuclear Option.”

Please read my emergency briefing to you >>

Thank you,

Ted Cruz

After recieving this (another plea for more money) my first reaction was unprintable. So in the spirit of sharing, may I just say AFTER YOU.

And as a after thought, have you ever noticed how Trump Supporters always repeat the last stupid word Trump uses. maybe it’s so fearless leader thinks he’s smart. Golly Jee Louise, Groceries, a new word, I think I'[ll say it at least a godzillion times everyday, pass it around. Putz

Robert F. Kennedy Independent Thinker, I Think Not – Part 3

On - Commentary, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

Michael and Sarah Walker

Robert F. Kennedy Independent Thinker, I Think Not - Part 3

00:00 / 3:45

The Dangerous Allure of “Independent Thinking” — When Anti-Establishment Becomes Anti-Truth

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has built his entire campaign on one central appeal: “I don’t trust them, and you shouldn’t either.” Them, of course, being the government, the media, public health officials, scientists, pharmaceutical companies, and in some cases even common sense. It’s a seductive narrative. It gives people permission to throw away anything that makes them uncomfortable — and label it a lie.

Kennedy isn’t just tapping into populist skepticism. He’s exploiting it.

And that exploitation is dangerous.

He’s framed himself as the truth-teller in a sea of deception. But the truths he’s telling aren’t based in fact. They’re based in fear. And fear spreads faster than reason.

The Myth of the Medical Maverick

RFK Jr. has no medical degree. No epidemiological background. No formal training in public health.

What he does have is a recognizable name, a passionate speaking style, and decades of practice weaving compelling-sounding arguments from cherry-picked data and fringe science. And when that doesn’t suffice, he leans on conspiracy.

Let’s be clear: questioning authority is healthy in a democracy. But rejecting every expert opinion as “part of the machine” while offering no credible alternative is not courageous — it’s reckless.

Anti-Vax, Rebranded

RFK Jr. claims he’s “not anti-vaccine.” He says he’s just asking questions.

But those questions often come laced with misinformation:

That vaccines are causing autism (a claim long debunked).

That the COVID vaccine is more dangerous than the virus itself (false).

That government and pharma are in secret cahoots to suppress natural immunity (no evidence).

This isn’t healthy skepticism. This is repackaged paranoia.

And worse, he’s giving it a respectable face — one the public instinctively associates with credibility because of his family name.

When Influence Outpaces Integrity

With social media reach, podcast appearances, and alternative media platforms, Kennedy’s views are no longer fringe. They’re front and center. And when people make healthcare decisions based on his claims, real people suffer.

Parents skip vaccinations, endangering herd immunity.

Vulnerable communities turn to unproven treatments.

Trust in public health institutions erodes further — even when they’re telling the truth.

Freedom of speech is sacred. But freedom to deceive should not be without scrutiny.

A Country Starved for Trust

What makes Kennedy so appealing to many voters isn’t his policies, which are vague or self-contradictory. It’s his posture. He positions himself as the last honest man in a dishonest world.

And for people who feel lied to by politicians, doctors, or the media — that’s intoxicating.

But it’s a mirage.

He’s not offering independence. He’s selling suspicion.

He’s not empowering people. He’s leaving them lost — unsure who to believe, who to trust, or whether truth even exists anymore.

And in a democracy, that’s a dangerous place to be.

RFK Jr. and the Weaponization of Doubt – Part 2

On - Commentary, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

Michael and Sarah Walker

RFK Jr. and the Weaponization of Doubt - Part 2

00:00 / 3:44

RFK Jr. and the Weaponization of Doubt – Part 2

When Mistrust Becomes a Business Model

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was once a respected environmental attorney and activist. But today, he’s better known for something else: a steady stream of anti-science rhetoric dressed in the language of rebellion and “truth-telling.” What began as skepticism has now hardened into dogma — and the consequences are not harmless. They’re deadly.

RFK Jr. has no medical degree, no epidemiological credentials, and no experience treating illness — yet he presents himself as a public health expert, urging millions to ignore doctors, scientists, and regulatory agencies in favor of his own conspiratorial worldview. And it’s working. His brand is thriving. He’s become a symbol for those who distrust institutions — not because he’s offering real answers, but because he’s selling fear.

The Vaccine Misinformation Machine

Kennedy’s primary claim to fame in recent years has been his crusade against vaccines — long before COVID-19, he was peddling disproven theories linking childhood vaccines to autism. Study after study refuted his claims. Major platforms removed his content for spreading dangerous misinformation. Even members of his own family publicly denounced him. But none of that slowed him down.

In fact, he built an empire around it.

Through his organization Children’s Health Defense, Kennedy amplified falsehoods and sowed doubt — not just about the COVID vaccine, but about vaccine science as a whole. In 2021 alone, his group earned tens of millions in donations, a sign not of legitimacy, but of how profitable paranoia has become. And in a country where millions were desperate for clarity during a global health crisis, Kennedy gave them seductive chaos.

The result? Higher vaccine hesitancy. Lower trust in science. And a pandemic death toll that might have been lower if fewer people had listened to voices like his.

Turning Doubt into Doctrine

This isn’t just about vaccines. Kennedy has claimed that Wi-Fi causes cancer, that COVID was engineered to spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people, and that mass shootings are often tied to antidepressants. He paints a picture of a shadowy cabal controlling everything from medicine to media, and he sells himself as the lone voice of truth.

It’s an effective strategy — not because it’s true, but because it plays into a primal instinct: fear of betrayal. But governing a nation, leading people, or protecting lives requires more than just triggering emotions. It requires evidence. It requires humility. It requires some tether to reality.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has severed that tether.

RFK Jr. and the Collapse of Credibility — When Fringe Becomes Dangerous – Part 4

On - Commentary, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

Michael and Sarah Walker

RFK Jr. and the Collapse of Credibility — When Fringe Becomes Dangerous - Part 4

00:00 / 3:57

RFK Jr. and the Collapse of Credibility — When Fringe Becomes Dangerous

In a time when science is under siege and public health hinges on trust, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has chosen to go to war with the very idea of consensus. He frames himself as a whistleblower, a rebel against corrupt institutions—but his rebellion is less about truth and more about traction. And the cost? The safety of Americans who take him at his word.

Kennedy has claimed, without evidence, that both COVID-19 and AIDS were possibly engineered or exaggerated for profit. He’s promoted the long-debunked link between vaccines and autism. He’s suggested that chemicals in the water supply are feminizing boys and harming masculinity. Each claim might be brushed off if he were just another internet crank—but this is a man who ran for President of the United States but became Voodoo Doctor extrodinaire, he became Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. And that makes the danger real.

RFK Jr. is a master of half-truths—statements that contain just enough kernel of reality to confuse the public and just enough innuendo to suggest shadowy forces at work. He constantly positions himself as the last honest man standing, the one voice willing to speak “what others won’t.” But his rhetoric is not grounded in evidence—it’s grounded in performance.

This isn’t an intellectual pursuit. It’s a campaign strategy based on distrust. And it’s working—because distrust is a potent political fuel, especially when people are hurting, confused, and exhausted from years of whiplash-inducing headlines.

But here’s what that strategy is really doing:

It erodes the fragile trust we need during public health emergencies.

It leads people to delay or refuse life-saving vaccines, tests, and treatments.

It undermines legitimate scientists and doctors who are already overburdened and under attack.

RFK Jr. argues he’s just asking questions. But when a public figure with the Kennedy name spreads misinformation in the form of questions, the consequences are no less severe than if they were shouting lies outright.

This isn’t harmless curiosity. It’s weaponized doubt.

And while the public may enjoy the drama, or feel validated by the suspicion, we can’t ignore the end result: Americans will die because of what they didn’t believe—because a trusted name told them not to.

This isn’t theory. It’s already happening.

RFK Jr. is not a doctor. He is not an epidemiologist. He is not an expert in pharmacology, virology, or public health. What he is, is a celebrity with a platform—and that platform is now being used to sow mistrust that costs lives.

And now in a position of power, he is dismatling what took us decades and billions of dollars to accomplish, He will single handly be resposible for the deaths of millions of Americans, many to youmg to make their own decisions.

This isn’t about politics anymore. It’s about the line between skepticism and sabotage.

If Kennedy truly cared about the public, he would amplify evidence—not conspiracy. He would platform facts—not fear. And he would take responsibility for the real-world effects of his words.

Until then, he remains not a public servant—but a public threat.

Do some elites or movements support depopulation — quietly or not?

On - Commentary, Politics, Trumps Soldiers

Do some elites or movements support depopulation — quietly or not?

Yes, in the shadows of policy — though rarely called that:

Through environmental Malthusianism: “Too many people, not enough resources.”
Through selective policy neglect: Cutting public health programs or social safety nets knowing full well which populations will suffer.
Through experimentation: Historically, there’s a dark record — from Tuskegee to forced sterilizations — where “health” was used to justify control or reduction.

RFK Jr.’s rhetoric around detoxing children, rejecting vaccines, and elevating “natural immunity” taps into those old, unscientific veins — and when implemented from a position of power, they do carry population-level consequences.

It’s not always a Bond villain with a red button — sometimes it’s slow, ideological erosion of protections that keeps the vulnerable… vulnerable.

Mike Johnson, The Speaker Who Took Dictation

On - Trumps Soldiers

Mike Johnson didn’t rise through Congress.
He floated.
Upward. Quietly. Obediently.

No legislation of note. No leadership challenge. Just years of loyal, low-profile maneuvering — until the hardliners needed a soft spine in a suit.

Now he holds the gavel.
But not the power. That belongs to the man in Florida, who issues commands like prophecy, and Johnson… transcribes them.

Quick Background

Position: Speaker of the House (2023–Present)
Party: Republican
State: Louisiana (4th District)
First Elected to Congress: 2016
Former Constitutional lawyer, deeply religious, and once relatively unknown outside conservative circles.

Pros (Depending on Your Viewpoint)

Strength	Notes
Deeply religious and values-driven	Evangelical Christian, promotes a traditional worldview.
Disciplined, soft-spoken demeanor	Seen as a contrast to the more combative MAGA style.
Strong legal background	Constitutional law expertise; argues positions in legalistic terms.
Unified Republicans (briefly)	After speaker chaos in 2023, Johnson was a surprise consensus candidate.
Loyal to Trump but less brash	Appears more palatable to moderates—but still pushes Trump’s agenda.

Cons (Depending on Your Viewpoint)

Concern	Notes
Architect of election denialism	Played a major role in attempts to overturn 2020 results—drafted amicus brief supporting Texas lawsuit to void Biden votes.
No legislative experience before Speakership	Little leadership track record, virtually unknown nationally.
Hardline Christian nationalist ideology	Ties to groups advocating for biblical law in governance. Separation of church and state is fuzzy at best.
Anti-abortion, anti-LGBTQ+ positions	Co-sponsored or supported strict measures in both areas, including national abortion bans.
Thin resume, extreme views cloaked in calm	Critics argue he’s a “smiling theocrat” using politeness to push far-right goals.

Meta Perspective

Mike Johnson is not the firebrand chaos agent like Trump or Greene, but arguably more dangerous to democratic norms because:

He operates under a veneer of civility.
He believes his authority comes from God, not just voters.
He’s easier to underestimate.

J.D. Vance – Take Two

On - Trumps Soldiers

Understanding that Vance may end up President I did two different AI searches on him. You should read both to get a better idea of what kind of President he would make. I also did a mock-up of what to expect if Trump was impeached. When Sparky had finished I made the simple comment ‘were fucked’ and Sparky calmly replied ‘yes, were fucked’

Who Is J.D. Vance?Full name: James David Vance
Born: August 2, 1984 (Middletown, Ohio)
Occupation: U.S. Senator from Ohio (2023–present), author, venture capitalist
Military Service: U.S. Marine Corps, served in Iraq
Education: B.A. from Ohio State University, J.D. from Yale Law School
Claim to Fame: Author of Hillbilly Elegy, a bestselling 2016 memoir that explored working-class Appalachian struggles, later adapted into a Netflix film

Rise to Prominence

2016 – Hillbilly Elegy becomes a cultural lightning rod during the Trump-Clinton election, widely read as a decoder ring for the “white working class.”
2017–2020 – Vance positions himself as a thoughtful conservative outsider, often critical of Donald Trump’s tone and authoritarian drift.
2021 – Announces Senate run in Ohio and rapidly shifts tone to embrace Trumpism, earning Trump’s endorsement after public displays of loyalty.
2022 – Wins U.S. Senate seat.
2024 – Selected by Donald Trump as his running mate in the 2024 presidential election.

Pros (Supporter Perspective)

Self-Made Story: Rose from poverty and a chaotic upbringing to become a Marine, Yale Law grad, author, and senator — a genuine bootstrap narrative.
Understands Working-Class Issues: Seen by many as having authentic insight into the cultural and economic struggles of rural America.
Military Experience: His Marine Corps service lends him credibility on foreign policy and national security.
Populist Messaging: Emphasizes anti-globalism, American manufacturing, and conservative family values — appealing to MAGA and disaffected voters.
Effective Communicator: Intelligent, media-savvy, and articulate, especially in long-form interviews or debates.

Cons (Critic Perspective)

Flip-Flopper: Was a vocal critic of Trump (called him “cultural heroin,” “reprehensible”) — now one of his most loyal defenders. Seen as opportunistic.
Elitist Turned Populist: Critics say he rebranded to gain political capital, abandoning his earlier intellectual integrity for MAGA acceptance.
Dangerous Rhetoric: Since joining Trump’s orbit, has promoted election denialism, embraced far-right talking points, and downplayed January 6.
Questionable Judgment: Backed conspiracy theories and aligned with controversial figures like Tucker Carlson and Peter Thiel (his early funder).
Policy Inexperience: Aside from culture war rhetoric, hasn’t established a strong legislative track record in the Senate.

The Big Contradiction J.D. Vance is either:

a bold truth-teller who finally aligned with the political movement he believes can save America,

or
an ambitious chameleon who betrayed his values for power.

His selection as Trump’s VP may lock in his transformation — from analyst of populism to its full-blown avatar.

J.D. Vance, is he wearing Flip Flops or is that just Him?

On - Trumps Soldiers

Understanding that Vance may end up President I did two different AI searches on him. You should read both to get a better idea of what kind of President he would make. I also did a mock-up of what to expect if Trump was impeached. When Sparky had finished I made the simple comment ‘were fucked’ and Sparky calmly replied ‘yes, were fucked’

Candidate Profile: J.D. Vance

Full Name: James David Vance
Born: August 2, 1984 (age 40)
Home State: Ohio
Current Position: U.S. Senator (Ohio), elected in 2022
Affiliation: Republican Party
Occupation: Author, venture capitalist, Marine veteran
Education: B.A. in Political Science and Philosophy – Ohio State University
J.D. – Yale Law School

Overview

J.D. Vance rose to national prominence with his 2016 memoir Hillbilly Elegy, which explored the decline of white working-class communities in Appalachia and the cultural despair driving much of modern American politics. Initially seen as a thoughtful conservative voice, he later transformed into a staunch Trump loyalist, aligning himself with populist nationalism and becoming a regular presence in far-right political discourse.

In 2022, Vance won a contentious U.S. Senate race in Ohio with strong backing from Donald Trump, whom he had once criticized but now embraces enthusiastically. In 2024, Trump selected him as his running mate.

Strengths & Accomplishments

Compelling Personal Story: Vance’s rise from poverty and family instability to Yale Law School made Hillbilly Elegy a bestseller and positioned him as a unique conservative voice on class and culture.
Military Service: Served in the U.S. Marine Corps and did a tour in Iraq as a public affairs specialist.
Business Experience: Worked as a venture capitalist in Silicon Valley, co-founded the investment firm Narya Capital, and served on the board of various tech startups.
Senate Work: In his brief Senate career, Vance has focused on issues such as China policy, fentanyl trafficking, and American industrial decline — aligning himself with populist, anti-globalist conservatives.
Trump Endorsement Magnet: His Trump endorsement in 2022 was widely seen as pivotal in securing the GOP nomination in a crowded primary field.

Controversies & Criticisms

Flip-Flop on Trump: Vance was originally a vocal critic of Trump, calling him “reprehensible,” “noxious,” and “cultural heroin.” His later embrace of Trumpism has been called opportunistic and disingenuous.
Far-Right Alignments: Vance has echoed white nationalist talking points on immigration and “Great Replacement” theory. Critics argue he’s flirted with conspiracy rhetoric under the guise of populism.
Inexperience: Critics argue Vance has a thin political résumé, with limited legislative accomplishments and little foreign policy or executive experience.
Authoritarian Leanings: Publicly defended Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, opposed aid to Ukraine, and has spoken favorably about limiting the independence of the DOJ and FBI — positions viewed by many as anti-democratic.
Corporate Hypocrisy: Once critical of corporate power, Vance has taken large donations from tech and finance elites, and critics note his VC background undermines his “working-class hero” image.

Public Persona

Populist Rebrander: Vance seeks to frame himself as the intellectual arm of the Trump movement — giving academic polish to authoritarian nationalism.
Media-Savvy: Regular appearances on Fox News and conservative podcasts have helped maintain his visibility among the GOP base.
Contradictions: His shift from anti-Trump social critic to full MAGA loyalist is seen by some as a personal reinvention, and by others as political opportunism at its most cynical.

Role in 2024 Election

As Trump’s VP pick, Vance brings youth, elite credentials, and a populist sheen to the ticket. He was expected to appeal to white working-class voters in Rust Belt states and serve as a bridge between Trumpism and institutional conservatism. Critics argue he lacks the temperament or independence needed for high office — especially one a heartbeat from the presidency.

Okay, He’s Been Impeached, Now What?

On - Commentary, purple, Trumps Soldiers

Michael and Sarah Walker

Okay, He's Been Impeached, Now What?

00:00 / 5:45

Where We Actually Are (in this scenario):

Trump has been back in office since January.
By July, disillusionment is widespread:
- MAGA realizes they were sold a fantasy. Jobs aren’t returning, the “enemies” list keeps growing, and now even they are scared of his next target.
- The Left already hated him, but now even centrist Democrats and old-guard Republicans are whispering about invoking the 25th or impeachment.
- The VP? Handpicked for loyalty, not leadership—probably spineless and dangerous.

What We’re “Stuck With” If He’s Impeached/Removed Now:

1. Vice President Puppet

Could be J.D. Vance, Stefanik, Noem, Donalds, or another MAGA diehard.
Their presidency would appear calmer, but only because they’d be doing the same authoritarian playbook—just with better manners.
No one elected them. They were chosen to be a loyalist safety net.

2. Deep State of Fear

Even if Trump is removed, his influence remains through:
- Loyalty oaths and NDAs
- Stacked judiciary
- Intelligence agency blackmail files
- Pardoned loyalists in key positions
- He could be the shadow president, feeding directives from Mar-a-Lago or prison.

3. Civil Instability

MAGA diehards may riot or splinter.
The Left won’t celebrate—they’ll fear what’s next.
The Middle is numb and angry.

America breathed a half-sigh of relief when Trump was finally impeached—well into his second term of chaos, vendettas, and whispered threats. But no sooner was one fire put out, another began smoldering.

Because Trump didn’t pick a VP for strength, leadership, or vision.
He picked J.D. Vance—not for what he believes, but for how little he’d dare to believe on his own.

What We’re Stuck With: The J.D. Vance Scenario

If Trump is impeached and removed seven months into his second term, we don’t get relief—we get J.D. Vance or someone just like him. And that’s not a return to normalcy. It’s the next act of the same show, just with a cleaner face and fewer indictments.Who Is J.D. Vance, Really?

Author of Hillbilly Elegy, once a Trump critic who warned about populist rage.
Now? Full MAGA loyalist. Made his peace with Trumpism for power.
Smart, calculating, but not ideologically grounded—more opportunist than true believer.

What He Represents

Trumpism without Trump: Same attacks on institutions, same scapegoating, but delivered with Ivy League polish.
Obedience over leadership: He was chosen for loyalty, not backbone.
No baggage? No problem: Without Trump’s circus, he could more efficiently implement the same dangerous agenda.

Why That Might Be Worse

He’s more coherent. Vance could actually get things done. Bad things.
He lacks Trump’s legal vulnerabilities. No indictments, no porn star trials—just a clean slate and a MAGA checklist.
He appeals to the intellectual Right. Think tanks and media outlets might embrace him as a “serious” alternative.

And Don’t Forget…

The MAGA machine stays in place—courts, cabinet, enforcers.
Trump himself might still be broadcasting from Mar-a-Lago, trying to puppet the movement.
The people who enabled Trump won’t suddenly grow a spine just because Vance has a different tone.

Final Thought:Trump may be impeached, but unless the movement itself is rejected—and the people propping it up held accountable—we’re just swapping one version of autocracy for a smoother, more effective one.

“The Devil You Know vs. the Devil You Helped Groom.”

Vance will become The Inheritor of a Throne Built on Fear A decade ago, J.D. Vance was a bestselling author trying to bridge America’s class divides. Today, he’s become Trump’s polished, camera-ready protégé. More articulate. Less scandal-prone. And dangerously better at hiding the cruelty behind conservative populism.Trumpism with a law degree.

From Chaos to Competence… in the Worst WayIf Vance becomes president, the mood will shift from wild and erratic to controlled and calculating. That’s not comfort—it’s concern.

He’ll speak calmly, but push the same extremist judges.
He’ll smile politely, while slashing protections and scapegoating immigrants.
He’ll avoid the bluster, but maintain the loyalty machine Trump built—maybe even refine it.

The Deeper Trap Replacing Trump with Vance doesn’t reverse course.
It makes the authoritarian turn more palatable to the average voter. More difficult to challenge.
It trades a burning barn for a freshly painted dungeon.And worst of all, it could fracture the opposition:

Woke progressives mistrust centrist Dems.
Never-Trump Republicans claim “see, it’s normal now.”
Independents disengage again.

The Real Legacy of Trump? Not that he broke America. But that he taught someone else how to break it more effectively.

Kristi Noem – Real or a Parody

On - Trumps Soldiers

Background & Career

Longtime Republican politician: South Dakota native, first served in the state legislature (2007–2011), then in the U.S. House (2011–2019), and became South Dakota’s first female governor (2019–2025)
Now U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security under Trump’s second term (since January 25, 2025)

Theatrical Public Image

Known for “cosplays”, dressing up in themed outfits for photo ops (cowgirl style, law enforcement, etc.).
- A recent Instagram poll invited followers to vote on her best western-themed look—a move critics called “ICE Barbie” theatrics
Frequently uses dramatic visuals: horseback border patrols, livestreams, and photo ops tied to her hardline immigration stance

Controversies & Criticism

Dog-killing incident: In her memoir, she candidly described shooting her own dog after labeling it “aggressive.” The revelation sparked backlash from Democrats and conservatives alike
Claims questioned: Her memoir included anecdotes that were later disputed or retracted (e.g., alleged meeting with Kim Jong Un)
Native American tribal conflicts: Faced formal rebukes from tribes like the Oglala Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux over Mount Rushmore fireworks and anti-protest measures

Online and Public Reaction

On Reddit and elsewhere, she’s often mocked as an attention-seeking figure, with critics dubbing her a “political cosplayer” .
Her handling of the dog incident was widely condemned, with users calling it “psychotic” or “inhumane” and questioning her moral judgment—despite her defense that it was a farm-raised “tough choice”

Bottom Line

Attribute	Summary
Reality	Real politician with a long GOP resume
Persona	Embraces media-savvy stunts and “cosplay” self-portrayals
Controversy	Dog shooting, disputed memoir claims, tribal clashes
Reception	Polarizing—some praise her boldness, many see her antics as performative or misguided

So, is she a parody?

No—she’s very real. But yes, she often performs like one, with a stylized image that blurs the line between policy and pageantry. Her mix of media-leaning presentation and controversial decisions cements her as one of the most distinctive (and divisive) figures in Trump-aligned politics.

Pete Hegseth – Fox News Host and Signal User

On - Trumps Soldiers

Pete Hegseth – Profile Overview

Occupation: Fox News host, author, political commentator
Military Background: Army National Guard officer; served in Iraq and Afghanistan
Political Ties: Strong Trump ally; considered for VA Secretary in 2017
Media Role: Co-host on Fox & Friends Weekend; outspoken culture-warrior

Pros – What Supporters Highlight

1. Military Service

Served honorably in combat zones.
Received a Bronze Star and Combat Infantryman Badge.
Advocates for veterans’ issues and patriotism.

2. Strong Communicator

Charismatic, media-savvy speaker.
Effective at mobilizing conservative audiences around traditionalist themes.

3. Trump Loyalist & Policy Influencer

Was a behind-the-scenes adviser to Trump, particularly on veterans’ affairs.
Helped shape Trump’s stances on education, the military, and cultural issues.

4. Author and Ideologue

Co-authored books like Battle for the American Mind, promoting traditional education values.
Seen by supporters as a thought leader on “saving Western civilization” from leftist ideology.

Cons – What Critics Point Out

1. Anti-Intellectual Culture War Rhetoric

Frequently attacks public education, diversity efforts, and “elites” with little nuance.
Accused of promoting whitewashed or revisionist history through a nationalist lens.

2. Dismissive of Public Health

Famously claimed on-air: “I haven’t washed my hands in 10 years” — later said it was a joke, but it drew widespread backlash during the COVID era.

3. Media Propaganda Allegations

Known for blending opinion with news without clear distinction.
Critics say he functions more as a partisan propagandist than a journalist.

4. Notable Hypocrisy

Criticized “liberal elites” while enjoying high-profile media status and political influence.
Promotes rugged individualism but supports government intervention on cultural issues (e.g., banning books, curriculum mandates).

Final Take


Strengths	Patriotic service, effective media voice, clear ideology
Weaknesses	Heavy bias, inflammatory language, ethics of journalism questioned
Impact	Hegseth isn’t just a commentator — he’s part of a larger conservative effort to reshape American education and culture from within, using media influence as his primary weapon.

Who Is Kash Patel?

On - Trumps Soldiers

Who Is Kash Patel?

Kashyap “Kash” Patel is a former federal prosecutor and national security official who rose to prominence during Donald Trump’s presidency. Known for his fierce loyalty to Trump and willingness to challenge intelligence and law enforcement institutions, he has played roles across several key government agencies — often in controversial ways.

Career Highlights

House Intelligence Committee Staff (2017–2019)

Helped author the Devin Nunes memo, which alleged FBI abuses in the Trump-Russia probe.
Critics say it selectively disclosed classified info to undermine the Mueller investigation.

National Security Council (2019)

Briefly served under then-National Security Adviser John Bolton.
Bolton later described Patel as a political operative, not a policy expert.

Senior Roles at DoD (2020)

Installed as chief of staff to the acting Secretary of Defense after Trump fired Pentagon leadership post-election.
Critics called this a “loyalty-based purge” — Patel had no prior defense experience.

Trump World Fixture

Spokesman, Surrogate, & Legal Ally

Regularly defends Trump on TV and Truth Social, particularly over classified documents, Jan. 6, and the “Deep State.”
Claimed Trump had given him personal authority to declassify documents — a point ridiculed by legal analysts.
Named as a potential witness in the Mar-a-Lago documents case.

Author & Culture Warrior

Wrote a children’s book The Plot Against the King, presenting the Trump-Russia investigation as a fairy tale hoax.
Promotes himself as a truth-teller who exposes government corruption — often aligned with conspiracy theorists.

Public Perception

Camp	View
Supporters	See Patel as a brave outsider, exposing corruption in the FBI, CIA, and Pentagon. Loyal, tough, fearless.
Critics	View him as a partisan bulldog with little respect for national security norms. Loyal to Trump above the Constitution.
Press	Described as one of Trump’s “fixers” and a “political grenade thrower.” Viewed with suspicion by traditional intel circles.

Bottom Line

Kash Patel isn’t just a Trump loyalist — he’s become an ideological enforcer of Trump’s agenda inside national security and intelligence. Whether acting as a lawyer, spokesman, or provocateur, he operates like a partisan commando in institutions built for neutrality.

Karoline Leavitt, Sweet Karoline

On - Trumps Soldiers

Karoline Leavitt, born on August 24, 1997, in Atkinson, New Hampshire, is a prominent Republican political spokesperson who currently serves as the 36th White House Press Secretary under President Donald Trump. At 27, she is the youngest individual ever to hold this position

Education and Early CareerLeavitt graduated from Saint Anselm College in 2019 with a degree in communications and political science. During her time there, she founded the college’s first broadcasting club and was a staff writer for the student newspaper, where she expressed conservative viewpoints . Her early experiences include interning at Fox News and the White House Office of Presidential Correspondence, where she later became associate director

Political and Professional Trajectory

White House Press Office (2020–2021): Leavitt served as an assistant press secretary under Kayleigh McEnany during President Trump’s first term
Congressional Campaign (2022): She ran for New Hampshire’s 1st Congressional District, securing the Republican primary but losing in the general election to Democrat Chris Pappas
Post-Campaign Roles (2023–2024): Following her congressional bid, Leavitt worked as a spokeswoman for Trump’s super PAC, MAGA Inc., and later as national press secretary for his 2024 presidential campaign .
White House Press Secretary (2025–Present): Appointed by President Trump in January 2025, Leavitt has been noted for her direct communication style and efforts to engage with non-traditional media outlets

Public Image and Media Relations Leavitt is recognized for her combative approach during press briefings, often challenging traditional media narratives and promoting alternative viewpoints . Her tenure has been marked by a focus on media engagement, including interactions with podcasters and social media influencers .

Future Prospects Leavitt’s rapid ascent in political communications and her strong alignment with President Trump’s policies suggest potential future roles in politics or media. Her background and public persona position her as a prominent figure within the Republican Party .the-sun.com

The 27-Year-Old Press Secretary Who ‘Speaks Trump Fluently’

Feb 15, 2025

Trump press secretary Karoline Leavitt is primed for 'future run for high office' with 'magical element' fueling success

So she’s doing a good job although she is completely biased on her press conferences. It seems that she will either avoid you or ban you if question trump actions though

ChatGPT said:

That’s a pretty fair summary.

Karoline Leavitt has been effective in her role in terms of getting Trump’s message out clearly and consistently—she’s loyal, media-savvy, and knows how to rally the base. But her style is definitely partisan and combative, often avoiding tough questions or deflecting criticism rather than engaging with it honestly.

Several reporters and critics have noted that if a journalist presses too hard on Trump’s controversies or missteps, Leavitt can become dismissive or even block questions — and in some cases, banish reporters from briefings or social media platforms.

So while she’s doing her job well as a mouthpiece and defender, it’s at the expense of traditional press transparency and accountability.

Pam Bondi “Parrot of His Agenda” — Is It Fair?

On - Trumps Soldiers

“Parrot of His Agenda” — Is It Fair?

Evidence Supporting That View:

1. Trump University Case & Campaign Donation

In 2013, Bondi’s office dropped a Trump University fraud investigation after receiving a $25,000 campaign donation from the Trump Foundation.
Though no formal wrongdoing was found, the optics led many to see it as a politically motivated decision to protect Trump.
Critics point to this as an early example of Bondi aligning legal discretion with Trump’s interests.

2. Role in Trump’s Impeachment Defense

In 2020, Bondi joined Trump’s legal defense team during his first impeachment trial, where she echoed Trump’s arguments and focused on attacking the Bidens, despite lack of direct relevance to the abuse-of-power charge.
Legal analysts noted she spent more time repeating Fox News-style talking points than addressing the constitutional issues at hand.

3. Post-AG Political Work and Loyalty

After leaving the Florida AG post, Bondi joined Trump’s America First Policy Institute and became a key legal surrogate during his re-election efforts and election-related lawsuits.
She promoted the claim of a “stolen election,” though no evidence supported widespread fraud.

4. Current Role as U.S. Attorney General (2025)

Bondi, confirmed as AG under Trump’s second term, has been widely criticized for:
- Shutting down investigations into Trump allies
- Delaying or redirecting cases against key donors
- Retaliating against perceived political enemies (journalists, whistleblowers, Democratic prosecutors)
Several former DOJ officials described her department as a “legal shield for the president” rather than a guardian of independent justice.
She has also promoted conspiracy theories — such as claiming possession of Epstein-related videos — without producing evidence.

What Could Be Seen as Independent?

1. Opioid Crisis Work (Earlier in Florida)

Bondi was praised for pursuing aggressive action against Florida pill mills, long before Trump made opioids a political issue.

2. Human Trafficking Initiatives

She launched programs to raise awareness and improve law enforcement coordination — some bipartisan support for these efforts existed.

However, even these actions are not part of her federal service under Trump, and critics argue they don’t counterbalance her later partisan conduct.

Verdict:

While Bondi has legal credentials and prosecutorial experience, her service under Donald Trump — especially as U.S. Attorney General — has been defined by loyalty over independence. From the dropped Trump U case to her actions at DOJ, her public role has consistently reinforced Trump’s narrative, often at the expense of institutional credibility.

So yes — it’s fair to say she has mostly served as a parrot to his agenda, with few, if any, notable breaks from that alignment.

Comments About The Current Administration

On - Menu, Trumps Soldiers

Know the Players
With so much lying, bashing, and hate, it’s easy to lose track of what’s an obvious lie and what’s just troll bait. So, with the help of AI, here’s a short history lesson about Trump’s “cabinet.”

Is it biased? Of course. I’m about as anti-Trump as you can get. But I do believe him when he says, “Loyalty to me, above all else” — including the Constitution.

Still, they’re human beings. And here, I’m trying to be fair to them.

A Text Message and FDA Approval – A COMPANION PIECE TO THE SERIES: MAKING AMERICA SICK — ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.

Good outcomes for bad reasons are still good outcomes. But they do not absolve the bad reasons. And they do not fill the staff positions that were cut last month.

Do some elites or movements support depopulation — quietly or not?

RFK Jr.’s rhetoric around detoxing children, rejecting vaccines, and elevating “natural immunity” taps into those old, unscientific veins — and when implemented from a position of power, they do carry population-level consequences.

J.D. Vance – Take Two

The Big Contradiction J.D. Vance is either: a bold truth-teller who finally aligned with the political movement he believes can save America, or an ambitious chameleon who betrayed his values for power. His selection as

Continue reading J.D. Vance – Take Two

J.D. Vance, is he wearing Flip Flops or is that just Him?

Flip-Flop on Trump: Vance was originally a vocal critic of Trump, calling him “reprehensible,” “noxious,” and “cultural heroin.” His later embrace of Trumpism has been called opportunistic and disingenuous. Far-Right Alignments: Vance has echoed white

Continue reading J.D. Vance, is he wearing Flip Flops or is that just Him?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr – Who Is He

On - Trumps Soldiers

1. Anti-Vaccine Disinformation

Core Concern: He’s one of the most influential spreaders of vaccine misinformation in the 21st century.
Vaccines & Autism: RFK Jr. has promoted the long-debunked claim that vaccines cause autism, particularly targeting thimerosal (a preservative). This has had long-term public health consequences, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 Vaccines: He spread conspiracy theories that COVID vaccines are part of a global plot, labeling Anthony Fauci as corrupt and even comparing vaccine mandates to Nazi-era atrocities.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD): His organization was labeled a “disinformation superspreader” by the Center for Countering Digital Hate. CHD played a central role in discouraging vaccine uptake during a public health emergency.

Public Trust Erosion: Kennedy helped seed skepticism that undermines routine childhood vaccinations, risking disease resurgences like measles and polio.

Danger: Increased vaccine hesitancy has already led to preventable outbreaks, especially in underserved communities.

2. Erosion of Public Trust in Institutions

Core Concern: RFK Jr. consistently portrays science, media, and government as part of a grand conspiracy.
Paranoia over Institutions: He suggests the CDC, WHO, and pharmaceutical companies are working together to suppress truth and profit from illness.

Use of ‘Free Speech’ as a Shield: While free speech is a core American value, Kennedy often frames misinformation as dissent, making it harder to distinguish truth from deliberate distortion.
Conspiracies as a Campaign Platform: His campaign is built on suspicion and grievance—often appealing to both far-left and far-right populists.

Danger: This amplifies political polarization, tribalism, and a rejection of evidence-based policymaking.

3. Environmental Legacy and Hypocrisy

Core Concern: Though once a respected environmental lawyer, his credibility has been tarnished.
Past Successes: He worked for decades on water quality and environmental justice, including suing polluters.
Now: His environmental credibility is undermined by alliances with anti-science figures and pseudoscientific health claims.

Contradictions: He claims to stand for health and the environment while promoting wellness snake oil and conspiracies that increase disease risk.

Danger: Undermines legitimate environmental advocacy by associating it with fringe beliefs.

4. Alliances with Extremist Figures

Core Concern: Kennedy’s coalition includes conspiracy theorists, anti-government militias, and figures on both far ends of the spectrum.

Podcasts & Interviews: He appears on shows like InfoWars and with Steve Bannon—platforms known for lies and manipulation.

Bipartisan Trojan Horse: By claiming to unite left and right, he actually gives extreme ideas mainstream exposure, often without accountability.

Danger: Normalizes fringe ideologies and muddies the waters between rational centrism and destabilizing extremism.

5. False Equivalency and the “Truth Warrior” Illusion

Core Concern: He brands himself as someone “asking questions” or “just seeking the truth,” but often uses this tactic to inject disproven claims into public debate.

Censorship Martyrdom: Claims he’s being silenced while getting enormous press coverage.
Science-Speak without Substance: He’s skilled at co-opting scientific language to sound credible to the layperson while cherry-picking data.

Danger: Makes it harder for the public to discern actual science from pseudoscience—critical during health crises or environmental disasters.

Summary: What Are the Real Dangers He Poses?

Danger	Impact
Vaccine misinformation	Increased disease outbreaks, lower herd immunity
Undermining trust in science/government	Public paralysis during future crises
Empowering fringe ideologies	Destabilizes rational discourse and civic trust
Hijacking environmental credibility	Damages legitimate climate and health movements
Promoting conspiracy-laden populism	Fuels political extremism, especially among disillusioned voters

Robert F. Kennedy Jr – Part 1

On - Commentary, The Fallout, Trumps Soldiers

Michael and Sarah Walker

Robert F. Kennedy Jr - Part 1

00:00 / 2:24

RFK Jr.’s Cabinet Position Below is a list of the damage he has done in only 6 months of service.

On February 13, 2025, President Trump signed the nomination for RFK Jr. as the 26th HHS Secretary, and he was confirmed by the Senate by a narrow 52–48 vote

Major Actions Since Taking Office

1. Slashed ~10,000 HHS jobs
A department-wide restructuring reduced approximately 10,000 positions across the FDA, CDC, NIH, and other agencies
A federal judge has temporarily blocked parts of this plan in response to a lawsuit by 19 states

2. Dismantled CDC immunization advisory board
In May 2025, he disbanded the 17-member CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, replacing them with individuals aligned with vaccine skepticism

3. Revoked COVID‑19 vaccine recommendation for children & pregnant women
Released a directive removing the blanket CDC recommendation for COVID-19 vaccines in these groups
This has prompted multiple lawsuits from bodies like AAP, ACP, and Infectious Disease Society of America

4. Prompted mass resignations from FDA officials
Tensions over vaccine safety led to the resignation of Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Biologics division, along with other senior staff people.com.

5. Established the ‘Make America Healthy Again’ (MAHA) Commission
Chaired a new presidential commission launched simultaneously with his swearing-in, focusing on chronic diseases and reexamining vaccines, psychiatric medications, environmental chemicals, and processed foods .
The MAHA report, issued May 22, featured significant citation errors—some studies even appeared fabricated

6. Promoted food‑related initiatives for Medicaid & Medicare beneficiaries
On July 7, he endorsed Mom’s Meals—claiming they are “without additives”—despite criticism that their offerings are ultraprocessed with high sodium and fats

7. Public approval is low
As of early May 2025, 43% of U.S. adults disapprove of his performance, versus 36% approval; disapproval is especially high (~70%) among Democrats

Why These Moves Spark Controversy
Removing vaccine recommendations and advisory experts undermines established science-based policies, according to public health groups

The job cuts and restructuring are viewed as potentially crippling key agencies (CDC, FDA, NIH) during outbreaks

The MAHA report’s shaky sourcing and alleged AI-created citations cast doubt on its legitimacy

Summary: What He’s Done Since Entering Office up to 7/7/2025
Confirmed as HHS Secretary on Feb 13, 2025
Led major downsizing of HHS staff (~10k cuts)
Dismantled CDC immunization advisory board
Revoked COVID‑19 vaccine guidance for children & pregnant women
Faced multiple lawsuits from leading medical groups
Sparked resignations of senior FDA personnel
Created and chaired the MAHA Commission (report issued May 22)
Public health professionals overwhelmingly disapprove of his direction

Posts in Category: Trumps Soldiers

If you have read this far and are feeling the particular kind of helplessness that comes from watching something important being dismantled by someone who cannot be reasoned with, this part is for you.

Because the resistance is real, it is organized, and some of it is winning.

We knew. Now we act.

He was given those keys through a political transaction. They can be taken back through a democratic one.

That is not optimism. That is how the system is supposed to work, and right now, imperfectly and under enormous pressure, it is working.

Pay attention. Show up. Talk to your pediatrician.

The burger and the shake are not going to fix this either.

Share this:

Like this:

How does he look at this and not stop?

That is what makes him so dangerous.

And the children getting measles in South Carolina cannot tell the difference between a broken compass and a working one. They just get sick.

Those structures exist. They are fighting back. And that is where we are going next.

Share this:

Like this:

That is what happened anyway.

But it is the vaccine story that will be most immediately felt in pediatricians’ offices and school hallways across the country.

Share this:

Like this:

There is a version of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that history should remember favorably.

That understanding, that institutions lie when money is involved, is important. Because it wasn’t wrong. It was the seed of everything that came later, and like a lot of things that start from a kernel of truth, it eventually grew into something that consumed the original plant entirely.

He has broken nearly all of them.

Share this:

Like this:

When good things happen for the wrong reasons, and the wrong things happen anyway

So credit where it is due: if this research is conducted properly, it could save lives. That matters. That is real.

“Sounds great. Do you want FDA approval? Let’s do it.” — President Trump, responding to a text from Joe Rogan

Policy by Text Message

But here is where the story gets complicated, and where the parallels to my ongoing series on Robert F. Kennedy Jr. become impossible to ignore.

The mechanism is identical. The outcomes just happen to point in opposite directions.

The Hypocrisy the Headlines Won’t Tell You

The Thalidomide Shadow

The research should proceed. The clinical trials should be funded. The veterans who have traveled to Mexico to access ibogaine treatments because they had no legal option at home deserve a legitimate pathway. All of that is true.

But “do you want FDA approval? Let’s do it” is not a drug approval process. It is a vibe. And we have seen, in this administration’s approach to public health writ large, what governing by vibe costs us.

Hold Both Truths

Good outcomes for bad reasons are still good outcomes. But they do not absolve the bad reasons. And they do not fill the staff positions that were cut last month.

This is a companion piece to the ongoing series Making America Sick: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., examining the Trump administration’s approach to public health, science, and the machinery of medical governance.

Published April 2026

Share this:

Like this:

Our next series will take on Robert F. Kennedy Jr and what he has done to America’s Health and Youth, and why, in the year he has been in Office.

This is a 4 part series.

Making America Sick — Part 1 of 4: The Man Who Knew Better

Making America Sick — Part 2 of 4: The Damage

Making America Sick — Part 3 of 4: Why He’s Doing It? The Broken Compass

Making America Sick — Part 4 of 4: The Fight Back

Share this:

Like this:

White House Planning Commisions Recomendations. Room for the entire administration. And he can keep his name on it.

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

You try to write a joke about the U.S. Navy being “too intimidated” to capture those big, bad, fiberglass outboard-powered drug boats — you know, the ones running on lawnmower engines and vibes — but then reality steps in and writes something better.

Apparently the Navy’s standard operating procedure now is:See fast boat → panic → blow it up → hope nobody asks questions.All hands lost, problem solved, paperwork minimal.

Meanwhile, Little Sister Coast Guard didn’t get the memo.

You can’t even parody this anymore.The Navy vaporizes fishing boats like they’re the Death Star, and the Coast Guard arrests an entire tanker crew like they’re checking fishing licenses.

When the joke becomes more realistic than the real event, satire just packs up and goes home.

Could it be, Trump wants the Oil and there wasn’t any Drugs?

Share this:

Like this:

So: Was this “they were in a fight,” or people just trying to survive / not drown?

From what’s publicly documented:

The two survivors reportedly were clinging to wreckage, not visibly armed or engaged in combat. The Washington Post+2Al Jazeera+2

So yes — there is a credible, public-report based interpretation that they were trying to stay alive, not fight, when the second strike happened.

That means the narrative of “stay in the fight” — or justification of the strike as combat — is highly contested, deeply ambiguous, and legally dubious given what is known so far.

Got news for you folks, it’s up to you now. accept this obvious coverup or force it out, force it to stop. It’s up to us to stop Pumpkin because the Republican castrated cowards aren’t doing it. The great Pumpkin isn’t God, although he thinks so.

Impeachment is a right.

Share this:

Like this:

Democrats have been throwing a temper tantrum to try and thwart President Trump’s agenda.

And so, Senate Republicans did what we had to do…

…We invoked the “Nuclear Option.”

Please read my emergency briefing to you >>

Thank you,

Ted Cruz

After recieving this (another plea for more money) my first reaction was unprintable. So in the spirit of sharing, may I just say AFTER YOU.

And as a after thought, have you ever noticed how Trump Supporters always repeat the last stupid word Trump uses. maybe it’s so fearless leader thinks he’s smart. Golly Jee Louise, Groceries, a new word, I think I'[ll say it at least a godzillion times everyday, pass it around. Putz

Share this:

Apparently the Navy’s standard operating procedure now is:
See fast boat → panic → blow it up → hope nobody asks questions.
All hands lost, problem solved, paperwork minimal.

You can’t even parody this anymore.
The Navy vaporizes fishing boats like they’re the Death Star, and the Coast Guard arrests an entire tanker crew like they’re checking fishing licenses.