Posts in Category: Voting Rights

Texas Is Pushing Independents Off Ballots – 06/19/26

In recent weeks, we have shared news about the candidates running, the signatures gathered, and forward momentum for independents this cycle. This week, we’re focusing on the fight to make sure independent candidates can even get that far. The Forward Party announced support for a lawsuit against the State of Texas this week, and we want you to understand why.

81,030 is the key number here. That is the number of valid voter signatures Texas requires an independent statewide candidate to collect, with only 30 days to do it.

The Forward Party is officially supporting Texas independent candidate for Lieutenant Governor Mike Collier who filed a lawsuit challenging the state’s ballot access requirements for independent statewide candidates. It was filed in cooperation with the Center for Competitive Democracy.

Here’s what Texas law actually requires: an independent candidate for statewide office must collect more than 81,030 valid voter signatures. That alone would be a serious challenge for any campaign, but Texas adds another twist. Independent candidates are legally prohibited from beginning that signature collection process until after the partisan primary runoff elections have concluded.

This year, that meant the clock didn’t start until May 26th, when Texas’s primary runoffs wrapped up. Independent petitions are due June 25th. That leaves independent candidates just 30 days to collect more signatures than most statewide campaigns gather in six months.

It gets more restrictive. Texas law also sharply limits who is allowed to sign an independent candidate’s petition. Any voter who participated in a party primary or runoff election is disqualified from signing an independent candidate’s petition.

Combine a pressed 30-day timeline with a shrunken pool of eligible signers, and you get a system that is not only expensive but also logistically difficult to navigate. That is by design.

As the lawsuit argues, these barriers serve no public purpose other than locking independent candidates, and the voters who want to support them, out of the democratic process entirely.

Whether it’s gerrymandered districts that reduce competition or ballot access laws that keep independent candidates off the ballot entirely, the result is the same: fewer meaningful choices for voters, and a political system built to protect incumbents and party insiders rather than the people they’re supposed to serve.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

Brand new this week on The Forward Party Podcast, is John Avlon, journalist, political analyst, and host of “How to Fix It” and special guest Khalil Ekulona, former NPR host and community storyteller. Together, the hosts and Khalil explore how media has changed over the last two decades and what those changes mean for democracy.

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E09 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Episode 11

Get Involved

June 28th – Young Forwardists High School Introduction

Are you a Highschooler who wants to get involved?Ā  Do you have a Highschooler in your life who is politically engaged and wants to make real change in the world? The Young Forwardists are always looking for the next generation of leaders and they’re ready to welcome new members.

June 29th – Welcome Team Training

Learn how our state teams welcome brand new members to their party.Ā  We’ll work on phone scripts and email templates to get the most out of your new interested members.

July 1st – Town Hall Training

Ā Join us for a practical, energizing training on how to plan and run town halls that actually bring people together. You’ll learn how to choose the right venue, confirm speakers, promote the event effectively, and handle day of details with confidence.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Rick Bennett To Face Off Against Bobby Charles and Hannah Pingree in Maine

Maine’s RCV primary has finished and we now know who Rick Bennett (I) will be facing for the Governor’s seat – Bobby Charles (R) and Hannah Pingree (D).

Sen. John Curtis To Walk 250 Miles For 250 Years Of America

Utah Senator John Curtis is walking 250 miles to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the declaration of independence. He’s walking from the northernmost point of Utah to his hometown of Provo.

Georgia Republicans Scrap Current Plans to Redistrict Ahead of 2028

Changing districts on your voters to cheat your way to more seats in Washington is a bad political move… who knew?Ā  We did – and so did all of you.Ā  Some politicians are starting to realize it, too.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

All Eyes On Maine… 06/15/26

This week, we’re going to Maine, where something historic just happened quietly and deserves to be said loudly.

While Maine’s U.S Senate primary has been a focal point recently with party candidates Graham Platner and Susan Collins occupying headlines, the Governor’s race has brought voters’ optimism back to their state.

We’re featuring Rick Bennett this week – Bennett is a Harvard-educated businessman, a former President of the Maine State Senate, and a lifelong Republican who spent decades building his party — then walked away from it. On June 24, 2025, he announced he would run for governor as an independent, ending a party affiliation he’d held his entire political life.

Just a couple weeks ago, he qualified for the November gubernatorial ballot — the only independent to do so.

Here is the argument most independent candidates have to make: I’ll find a way to work with everyone once I get there. Rick Bennett doesn’t have to try to make that argument – he already has the record proving that he can. He has spent 18 years in the Maine Legislature doing exactly what he is now asking Maine voters to elect him do in the Blaine House. He has built coalitions, negotiated with Democrats and Republicans, moved legislation through a divided chamber, and delivered results on the issues Maine families actually talk about at the kitchen table.

This is not a candidate learning on the job. This is a candidate who has already done the job, at every level of the legislative process, and who is now asking for the chance to do it from the top.

___

The Maine governor’s race has gone to a ranked-choice runoff, with results expected before June 19th. On the GOP side, with 43% of votes counted Tuesday night, Bobby Charles — an attorney who ran a Trump-style campaign largely relying on social media — led with more than 38%. No candidate crossed the 50% threshold, sending the Republican primary to a ranked-choice runoff that will conclude before June 19th. Ben Midgley and Jonathan Bush were neck-and-neck for second place.

The Democratic field is even less clear, with Nirav Shah, Hannah Pingree, Troy Jackson, and Shenna Bellows all within 6% of each other.Ā  Who comes out of that field is anyone’s guess.Ā  But one thing is clear – Rick is the only candidate who is ready to win in November.

Maine loves its independents, having elected two independent governors in its modern history: James Longley, who served from 1975 to 1979, and U.S. Sen. Angus King, who served as governor from 1995 to 2003 before being elected to the Senate.

Rick was the first candidate that the Forward Party endorsed for the 2026 cycle in December of 2025. He’s the right leader for Maine, and we’re proud to support his campaign.

To learn more about Rick, check out his website here!

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

If you haven’t caught the newest episode of The Forward Party Podcast that dropped most recently, be sure to give it a watch!

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E09 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Episode 10

Get Involved

June 15th – Recruitment Training: How To Talk About Forward

Join Head of Volunteer Programs Carrie Anne Templeton and Forward National to learn how to grow the Forward Party in your home state. Dozens of Forwardists just like you attend this training every month and learn how to be a changemaker in their community – join the party!

June 17th A Conversation With Lindsey Williams Drath, Forward Party CEO

Join Forward CEO Lindsey Williams Drath for a fireside chat hosted by the Forward Women’s Committee!Ā  Get the inside scoop on all things FWD.

June 18th – Ballot Access Laws: New Mexico, Texas & Arizona with FIVE & Open Primaries

This virtual town hall hosted by the Foundation for Independent Voter Education and Open Primaries, examines ballot access and what’s at stake across Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. This is the policy conversation behind the headlines.

Featured Guests:

Jeremy Gruber — Open Primaries

Oliver Hall — Center for Competitive Democracy

Moderated by Sarah Lenti. The conversation covers state-specific ballot access barriers, real-world candidate and voter experiences, structural obstacles facing independents, and practical pathways for reform. Whether you’re a candidate, a voter, or just someone who believes the rules should be fair,Ā  this one couldn’t be more timely.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

With Charles In Lead, Republican Gubernatorial Race Headed To Ranked Choice Run-Off

With the Republican Primary set to move a very Trump oriented Republican through the nomination, others in the party, including candidates who seem poised to lose the primary, are considering Rick Bennett instead.

Kevin Kiley, Richard Pan Advance In Race For Newly Redrawn California House District

Kevin Kiley, currently the only independent serving in the House of Representatives won the primary in CA-06 this year, with Democrat Richard Pan earning the second spot and moving on to November as well.Ā  Kiley is poised to retake his seat even after mid decade redistricting tried to push him out of Washington.

State Rep. Jermaine Johnson Is Projected Winner Of 2026 Democratic Primary For South Carolina Governor

Forward endorsed Democrat and former U.S. Congressman Jermaine Johnson looks likely to receive the Democratic nomination for the Governor’s seat in South Carolina.

Independents Move Us Forward – 06/05/26

Bill —

The independent wave is building. This week, six key states held primaries that demonstrated, across the board, a growing tide of voters wanting more choice in their representatives.

 

Tuesday’s Independent Candidates

Forward has been fighting the conventional wisdom in American politics: ā€œIf you want to win, you have to pick a team.ā€

Well, voters are done with being handed two choices that no longer work for them. We are increasingly seeing candidates respond to that frustration by doing something the system has deliberately made difficult – running without a party label.

This cycle, independent candidates are qualifying for November ballots from Montana to South Dakota, to Iowa, and more. They come from different backgrounds, different ideologies, and different regions. What they share is a conviction that the people of their districts deserve a representative who answers to them, not a party.

Even more – in CA-06, the Democrats gerrymandered mid-cycle to try and gain more seats in Washington.Ā  Instead, voters are clear that they’ve had enough and an Independent is poised to win the top two primary.

 

California

California’s uses a nonpartisan Top Two primary system which allows every candidate — Democrat, Republican, independent — appears on the same ballot. The top two finishers, regardless of party, advance to November. Under this system, there is no “spoiler.” Top Two is one of the many reforms that Forward fights for nation-wide because they make our democracy better than it is today.

California’s June 2 primary was a strong test for independents (especially in a state with 30% ā€œno party preferenceā€ voter registration). Under a partisan primary system, independent candidates have to wait until November. California’s Top Two system is different. It is, as Forward has long argued, what every state’s system should be: a fair fight, on one ballot, where voters choose who moves forward. Here’s how our candidates fared.


Rep. Kevin KileyRep. Kevin Kiley

California — CA-06

Rep. Kevin Kiley did something remarkable this spring: he walked away from the Republican Party, choosing principle over party. After California’s Proposition 50 redrew his district into solidly Democratic territory, Kiley could have retired, switched parties, or found a safe Republican-leaning seat. Instead, he filed as “No Party Preference,” took the gerrymandering issue head-on, and made his case directly to voters.
With 53% of the district reporting Tuesday night, Kiley is leading all candidates in the Top Two primary with 26.8% of the vote. Final results are expected early next week.

These results are showing Kiley advancing to the November general election, making him the first sitting independent member of the House of Representatives to survive a primary in 2026.

 


Chris DemersChris Demers

California — CA-18

Chris Demers entered the race as a No Party Preference candidate in a field that included both a major-party incumbent and challengers. Like many of our candidates, he isn’t a career politician. He embodies Forward’s values by wanting to provide something better for his community.
With 54.8% of the district reporting, the race has been called for Rep. Zoe Lofgren and Republican Shane Lewis.

Demers did not advance to November. But CA-18 is among the deepest Democratic districts in California – a seat that has never been seriously contested since Lofgren first won it. The fact that Chris Demers stood up, refused PAC money, and made the case for independent representation in one of the hardest possible environments is a step we are proud to see happen.

Every independent candidate that runs in a district like this makes the next one easier. We’re thankful for Chris Demers, and we hope he stays in the fight.

 


Karen Leigh MatthewsKaren Leigh Matthews

California — CA-23

Dr. Karen Leigh Matthews is a Navy veteran, physician, radiologist, and small business owner who spent more than 20 years serving in the military. She ran for Congress as an independent because she was tired of being “caught between a party that wants government to fail and a party that wants government to do everything.” That thinking, along with her resume, is something rare.
In CA-23, Karen outraised every Democratic challenger in the field. With Democratic support solidifying in the final days, the math narrowed her path to November and she fell short of advancing.

With 61.3% of the district reporting, the race was called for incumbent Rep. Jay Obernolte (R).

We are proud of Dr. Matthews and deeply grateful for her campaign. She showed what an independent candidate can look like when they’re built for the job, not the party. Her district missed out on an exceptional public servant. We hope she runs again.

 

Before an independent candidate can even compete, they have to fight just to get their name on the ballot. Here’s how Forward candidates made that happen in this cycle.

 

Iowa

Michael BridgfordMichael Bridgford

Iowa — IA-01

Michael Bridgford is running in a district where roughly one-third of voters aren’t registered with either major party. He officially filed his nomination petitions on June 1st, the day before the primary. He expects to pass the mark handily and qualify on to the ballot for November, we just need to wait for the Secretary of State to make it official.
The general election matchup: Incumbent Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R) won her primary with 71.6% of the vote, while Christina Bohannon (D) won her primary with 81.5%. This will mark the third consecutive election in which these two candidates will face each other in the general. Iowa’s 1st District voters know both options. Bridgford offers a third — one that doesn’t arrive with three cycles of partisan theatrics.

 


Dave BushawDave Bushaw

Iowa — IA-02

Dave Bushaw is going to qualify for November’s ballot even though Iowa’s legislature “moved the goalposts in the middle of the night,” according to Dave, by raising the signature threshold mid-cycle. His campaign knocked on more than 7,000 doors and found that 88% of the people they spoke with wanted to sign. On June 2nd, Bushaw officially filed his nomination petitions. His campaign achieved 200% of the required signatures in every single county in IA-02.
We are continuing to monitor official approval, as signature challenges can be filed through next week, but Dave should sail through to November.

The general election matchup: Democrat Lindsay James, Dubuque state representative and Presbyterian minister, won with just under 60%, and will face Trump-backed Republican Joe Mitchell, who won with 61.5%. Notably, Democratic primary turnout in IA-02 outpaced Republican turnout: roughly 47,900 Democratic votes to roughly 39,700 Republican votes. Cook Political Report rates the seat Likely Republican, R+4 PVI, but calls it “increasingly competitive.”


 

Montana

Seth BodnarSeth Bodnar

Montana

Seth Bodnar needed 13,327 verified signatures from registered voters statewide to qualify for the November general election ballot as an independent in Montana. He didn’t just meet the mark; he submitted nearly 30,000 signatures from 52 of Montana’s 56 counties, collecting nearly twice the required threshold through a volunteer-driven grassroots petition effort. His campaign has also outraised every Democrat and Republican in the race, demonstrating that independent candidacy paired with serious organization is no longer a longshot strategy.
Bodnar officially filed his signatures in late May. As of May 29th, counties have accepted enough verified signatures to put Bodnar on the ballot.

The general election matchup: Kurt Alme (R) won his primary with 76.2% of the vote, while Alani Bankhead (D) won her primary with 43.8% of the vote.Ā 

 


South Dakota

 

Brian BengsBrian Bengs

South Dakota — U.S. Senate

Brian Bengs is running for U.S. Senate in South Dakota with a grassroots campaign built on small-dollar donors. To qualify for the ballot as an independent in South Dakota, Bengs needed 3,502 valid signatures. He submitted more than 4,500 — and his petition was certified by the Secretary of State with a 93.85% validity rate, the highest of any statewide candidate in South Dakota this election season. That’s better than both the Republican and Democratic candidates. The campaign called it “a testament to the strength of this movement.” We agree.
He submitted his signatures in April and is officially on the November 3rd general election ballot, certified by the South Dakota Secretary of State.

The general election matchup: Incumbent Mike Rounds (R) won his primary with 75.8% of the vote, while Julian Beaudion (D) advanced unchallenged.


These aren’t isolated data points. They are a trajectory. The independent political infrastructure – from the fundraising networks to the organizing capacity to the legal teams who know how to fight ballot challenges – is being built right now by the candidates and movements that keep showing up. Every campaign that plants a flag makes the next one possible.

Forward ProgressĀ 

It would be easy to look at Tuesday’s results and just count votes. However, the snapshot is bigger than any individual race. It is about a country that is waking up to the fact that the two-party system is not delivering for the people it’s supposed to serve.

We don’t just believe America can do better, we are actively building the infrastructure, recruiting the candidates, and making the case that voters deserve more than two choices handed to them by institutions that have long since stopped listening. Iowa, South Dakota, Montana, California, Washington, Minnesota, Maine, Tennessee, Rhode Island, and Nebraska are all seeing independent candidates qualify for ballots and create excitement. The movement is growing.

November is five months away. The work continues. And so does our question, How can we build a just and fair government that truly represents Americans?

One primary at a time. One candidate at a time. One voter at a time.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

In this thought-provoking episode of The Forward Party Podcast, hosts Lindsey Williams Drath, Governor Christine Todd Whitman, and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey sit down with former U.S. Congressman, Army veteran, and author Chris Gibson to explore one of the most important questions facing America today: What did the Founders get right, and what have we forgotten?

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E11 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

We’re Hosting Events All Over The Country

Find one near you, sign up, and help build a better future for America.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Or this week, what we’re watching!

Lindsey Drath Talks Gerrymandering on FOX 5

Forward CEO Lindsey Drath talks midterms, gerrymandering, and independents as a fulcrum for change on FOX5.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

 

Young Americans and the Future of Work 5/21/26

Young Americans have always believed the future would offer more opportunity than the past. That optimism has long been one of the country’s defining strengths. But new polling suggests that confidence is starting to crack and policymakers should pay attention.

A recent Gallup survey found that just 43% of Americans ages 15 to 34 believe now is a good time to find a job where they live, a stunning reversal from historic trends.

It’s not surprising. They are entering adulthood during a period of economic whiplash: pandemic disruption, inflation, housing costs that feel permanently out of reach, rising student debt, and growing uncertainty around artificial intelligence and the future of white-collar work. Axios recently reported that unemployment among recent college graduates has climbed above the national average and underemployment remains high.

Many did what society told them to do: work hard, get educated, build skills, and prepare for the future. Now,Ā  too many feel like they are walking into a system that no longer guarantees stability, affordability, or even a clear path forward. That frustration is real. But it is also a warning sign for a country that depends on innovation, entrepreneurship, and upward mobility to thrive.

The answer cannot simply be nostalgia for an older economy that is not coming back. AI is real. Automation is real. Global competition is real. The world is changing quickly, whether our political system is prepared for it or not.

That is where the Forward Party believes a different kind of politics matters.

Forward’s approach starts with a simple idea: government should focus less on ideological warfare and more on helping people successfully navigate a changing future. That means investing in workforce development, apprenticeships, modern career training, entrepreneurship, technical education, and AI literacy. It means preparing students not just for the jobs that existed 20 years ago, but for the industries and technologies that will define the next 20. It also means recognizing that dignity and purpose matter just as much as economic statistics.

The good news is that pessimism is not destiny.

The same generation expressing anxiety about the job market is also the most adaptive, technologically fluent, and entrepreneurial generation in modern history. Young Americans are already building businesses online, creating entirely new industries, using AI tools creatively, and reshaping what work looks like in real time. Even leaders in the AI sector argue this technological transformation can create enormous opportunity if the country embraces it thoughtfully and prepares people for it.

America has reinvented its economy before. We can do it again. But it will require leaders willing to stop treating every issue as a partisan fight and start treating it as a practical challenge to solve together.

Young Americans do not need empty promises. They need leaders willing to level with them about change, invest in their future, and build an economy where hard work still creates opportunity.

That is the kind of future Forward believes is still possible.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

In Episode 10 of The Forward Party Podcast, the conversation turns toward one of the biggest questions in American politics right now: Can independent leaders actually reshape Congress from the inside? Hosts Lindsey Williams Drath, Governor Christine Todd Whitman, and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey sit down with former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele for a candid discussion about party loyalty, election reform, voter frustration, and the growing demand for independent leadership across the country.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E09 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

NY Monthly Virtual Town Hall

Each month, NY Forwardists across the state meet on Google Meets to hear from a partner organization or potential endorsed candidate or to discuss a relevant topic. Open discussion follows. Email maverick@gmail.com to join!

Michigan Forward – May State Meeting

Come join us at our May state meeting for a quick discussion about what our plans for Michigan Forward are and what we can work on this summer.

Georgia Virtual May Meeting

We are excited to welcome Jerry Ramos, who is running for Sheriff in Hall County in the 2028 election. Jerry has a truly unique perspective shaped by his time in the Army, his work in security and law enforcement, and his experience raising 8 kids (!!). After seeing opportunities for improvement in the system, he decided to step up and run for office himself.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

NYC shuts out half its voters. The Forward Party supports a new bill to change that

The polarization we see in our politics is not a mystery. It is the predictable output of a system designed to produce it. Nothing meaningful can change until we fix the structure that keeps producing these outcomes.

New Mexico Forward Party officially approved as minor party

New Mexico’s Forward Party was officially approved as a minor party that can field candidates in elections. The party on Monday released the names of five candidates who plan to run in the November general election.

Independent Rick Bennett qualifies for November election for governor

Independent gubernatorial candidate Rick Bennett submitted more than 5,000 signatures to the Maine Secretary of State’s Office Wednesday in his bid to appear on the November ballot alongside Republican and Democratic party nominees.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

 

MEDIA ADVISORY: Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield to Hold Election Protection Press Conference 05/18/26

May 19 Primary is the first major Oregon election since the string of unprecedented attacks on elections from the Trump administration began
MEDIA ADVISORY
Date: May 18, 2026
Oregon Secretary of State Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Oregon Department of Justice Contact: Jenny Hansson | jenny.hansson@doj.oregon.gov

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield to Hold Election Protection Press Conference

May 19 Primary is the first major Oregon election since the string of unprecedented attacks on elections from the Trump administration began

SALEM, OR — Tomorrow, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield will hold a press conference to brief Oregon voters on the steps being taken to keep Oregon elections secure, fair, and accurate.

Secretary Read will detail the physical security measures and processes in place to ensure every legal ballot is counted and protect elections infrastructure. Attorney General Rayfield will provide an overview of the state’s election-related legal battles and response plan should the federal government continue to escalate its attempts to interfere with Oregonians’ right to vote.

EVENT INFORMATION

WHO: Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield

WHAT: Election Protection Press Conference

WHERE: Oregon State Capitol Building Press Conference Room, 900 Court St NE, Salem | Livestream link available via RSVP

WHEN: Tuesday, May 19, 2026, at 12:30 PM

RSVP: To reserve your spot in the press conference room or receive a link to the livestream, email connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov.

###

Ā Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
Ā  |Ā  Help

RVC Part 3 of 3: How to Get Involved in Ranked-Choice Voting in Your State or Community

Part 3 of 3: How to Get Involved in Ranked-Choice Voting in Your State or Community

How to Get Involved With Ranked-Choice Voting — Practical Steps

Whether you like ranked-choice voting, dislike it, or are undecided, here’s how you can actually participate in your area.Step-by-Step Action Guide

Learn What’s Happening in Your Area

  • Go to FairVote.org and RCVResources.org — they have excellent maps showing where RCV is used or being considered.

  • Check Ballotpedia.org — search ā€œRanked-choice voting [Your State]ā€.

Understand Your State’s Rules

  • Does your state allow citizen ballot initiatives?

  • What are the signature requirements?

  • Has your state banned RCV or passed a ā€œlocal optionā€ law?

Get Involved Locally (Often the Easiest Starting Point)

  • Attend your city council or county commission meetings and speak during public comment.

  • Talk to your local election clerk or county auditor.

  • Support or oppose local efforts (many cities adopt RCV through charter changes).

Connect With Existing Groups

  • FairVote has state and local partners.

  • Search online for ā€œ[Your City/County] Ranked Choice Votingā€ or ā€œ[Your State] RCV Coalitionā€.

Contact Your Representatives

  • Email or call your state legislators and tell them your thoughts — especially if you’re in a rural area. Rural voices are important in these conversations.

For Oregon Readers Specifically

  • Watch how Portland’s and Multnomah County’s RCV elections go in 2026.

  • Follow the Secretary of State’s study on RCV (due September 2026).

  • A future statewide measure is most likely in 2028 or later.

Final Advice

Start small. Even attending one meeting or sharing factual information with neighbors makes a difference. Whether you want to help bring RCV to your area, stop it, or just make sure it’s done fairly, getting informed and showing up is the most important step.

Ranked Choice Voting

The Primary Election is Only 4 Days Away! 5/15/26

Date: May 15, 2026

Follow for elections updates:Ā Facebook,Ā Instagram,Ā X,Ā Bluesky, andĀ Youtube

Ā 

Oregonians,

The big Primary Election is right around the corner: Tuesday, May 19.

Make sure to fill out your ballot, sign it, and return it, if you have not already.

With the election just four days away, your best option is to return your ballot to an official ballot drop box – there are 321 official drop boxes across the state.

All ballots returned to these boxes are collected directly by your county’s elections officials. No mailing delays. No worrying about your vote not getting counted. Just make sure to drop it in a box by 8 p.m. on Election Day.

I dropped mine off this week, and it was great to see some fellow voters there with me!

With recent service changes at USPS, mailing your ballot this close to Election Day is not recommended. Ballots now have to go all the way to Portland before they are postmarked; so, if you live more than 50 miles away from Portland, your ballot may not be postmarked or delivered on time.

So please, use an official ballot drop box!Ā You can find the closest one to you by going to oregonvotes.gov/dropbox.

If you’re an eligible voter and have not received your ballot, call your county elections office as soon as possible. It’s not too late.

Now, I want to leave you all with one very important message:

No one, and I mean no one, can intimidate, pressure, or interfere with your right to vote.

In Oregon, the law protects you from harassment, threats, misleading statements, and any attempt to block or obstruct your vote, at every step of the process. You can learn more about your rights as an Oregon voter on our website or in the video linked down below.

Sincerely,

Tobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

Make sure your ballot is returned on time.

Use an official ballot drop box near you!

Do you know your rights as an Oregon voter?

Learn what intimidation can look like and what you can do if you believe your rights have been violated in this video.

Calling all Oregon photographers!

Your photo could be selected to be on the front or back cover of the next Oregon Blue Book, the state’s official almanac and factbook!

To learn more about the Oregon Blue Book, read the contest guidelines, and submit your images, click the button below! Entries welcome until Sunday, October 31 at 11:59 p.m.

Click Here to Learn More
Ā Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
Ā  |Ā  Help

RVC Part 2 of 3: Where Ranked-Choice Voting Stands Today in the United States

Part 2 of 3: Where Ranked-Choice Voting Stands Today in the United States

Where Ranked-Choice Voting Is Being Used Right Now

Note from the author: I am an Oregonian, so I use Oregon’s 2024 experience with Measure 117 as a detailed real-world example. However, this series is written as a national guide. The information, patterns, and action steps apply to voters in every state.

Current National Picture (April 2026)

  • Only two states currently use ranked-choice voting for statewide and federal elections: Maine and Alaska.

  • About 49 cities and counties across 22 states plus D.C. use RCV for local elections, covering roughly 14–17 million voters.

  • 19 states have banned or heavily restricted it.

  • In 2024, voters in several states (including Oregon) rejected statewide RCV ballot measures.

What Happened in OregonIn November 2024, Oregon voters decided on Measure 117, which would have brought ranked-choice voting to presidential, congressional, and statewide executive races starting in 2028.Final Result:

  • Yes: 42.3%

  • No: 57.7%

The measure lost by about 15 points.Local use continues to grow:

  • Portland used RCV for the first time in 2024 for mayor and city council.

  • Multnomah County will start using it in 2026.

  • Corvallis and a few other areas already use it locally.

The Urban-Rural Divide in Oregon (and Nationally)

Support for Measure 117 was much stronger in Portland, Eugene, Corvallis, and other college towns, while it was significantly weaker in rural counties, especially in Southern and Eastern Oregon.

This is not mainly about education levels. It reflects deeper political and cultural differences.

Rural Oregon voters often feel the state is governed too much by the three largest urban areas (Portland, Eugene, and Salem), while farms, small towns, and Eastern Oregon have too little voice. Many rural and conservative voters — especially Trump supporters — have developed real mistrust toward changes in how elections are run.

Honest Perspective for Rural Readers

Ranked-choice voting would not automatically ā€œstealā€ or cancel conservative votes. In Alaska, some Republican and independent candidates have gained from second-choice votes. However, legitimate concerns remain: it can be more complicated, more expensive for small counties to run, and slower to report results. Rural election offices are often understaffed and worry about the added burden.

Many believe the best path is to let local experiments (Portland and Multnomah County) run for a few years so voters across the whole state can see real-world results before another statewide vote.

Screenshot

Screenshot

RVC Part 1 of 3: Ranked-Choice Voting Explained – What It Is, How It Works, and Why People Care

Part 1 of 3: Ranked-Choice Voting ExplainedWhat It Is, How It Works, and Why People Care

A Clear Explanation for Everyday Voters.Ā  In recent years, more Americans have heard about Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV), also known as instant-runoff voting. Supporters say it reduces negative campaigning and gives voters more voice. Critics say it’s complicated and unnecessary.

Here’s a straightforward breakdown. How Ranked-Choice Voting Works. Instead of marking just one candidate, you rank the candidates in order of preference: 1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice, etc.

  • If any candidate gets more than 50% of the first-choice votes, they win immediately.

  • If no one reaches 50%, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated.

  • Those votes are redistributed to the voters’ second choices.

  • This process repeats until one candidate reaches a majority.

Simple Example:
Three candidates — Alice, Bob, and Charlie.

  • Alice gets 40% first choices

  • Bob gets 35%

  • Charlie gets 25%

Charlie is eliminated. If most of Charlie’s voters ranked Bob second, those votes move to Bob, who then wins with a true majority.

Claimed Advantages

  • Reduces the ā€œspoilerā€ effect (third-party or independent candidates are less likely to swing the election)

  • Encourages more positive campaigning (candidates want to be your second choice too)

  • Produces winners with broader support

  • Allows voters to support their favorite without ā€œwastingā€ their vote

Common Concerns

  • More complex for voters and election workers

  • Can take longer to report final results

  • Higher costs for equipment, training, and voter education

  • May favor certain types of candidates (often moderates)

Real-World Experience

RCV has been used in Maine (since 2018), Alaska (since 2022), New York City, Minneapolis, San Francisco, Portland (OR), and dozens of other cities. Most places report it runs fairly smoothly once voters get used to it, but several states rejected it at the ballot box in 2024.

Question for readers: Have you ever used ranked-choice voting? Did you find it helpful or confusing?

Richie BallotGraphic 768x576

It’s time to mail back your ballot! The May 19th election is 1 week away. 6/12/26

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

Date: May 12, 2026

Follow for elections updates:Ā Facebook,Ā Instagram,Ā X,Ā Bluesky, andĀ YoutubeĀ 

Three ways to return your ballot: drop it off, mail it, return it to your county elections office

Oregonians,

The May 19th election is one week away!

If you are planning to return your ballot by mail, make sure to put it in the mailĀ today.Ā 

Due to service changes at the United States Postal Service (USPS), it will likely take more time for your ballot to be postmarked and received by your county elections office — most ballots have to go all the way to Portland before they are postmarked and delivered back to your local elections official.

For your vote to be counted, your ballot must be postmarked by Election Day and received by your county elections office within seven days of the Election.

So please, don’t wait until the last minute: Mail your ballot today!Ā 

If you can’t mail your ballot today, don’t worry. You have options:

Your best option to return your ballot to any official county ballot drop box before 8:00 p.m. on May 19th. Ballots returned to these boxes are collected directly by county elections officials, so there’s no need to worry about the mail.

If you still want to use the mail, go to the post office nearest you, walk up to the counter, and ask for a manual postmark — free of charge.

You can also take your ballot directly to your county elections office and return it in a drop box there. Every county elections office has a drop box on site, so you can feel confident your ballot will be received on time.

Remember: your voice matters, and voting early makes sure it’s heard.

Sincerely,

Tobias Read signatureTobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

GovDelivery logo

TODAY: Virtual Town Hall on Elections & Voting with Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley, OACC President Dag Robinson 5/11/26

Town hall will be moderated by Sandy Chung, Executive Director of ACLU of Oregon

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

GovDelivery logo

Americans Are Feeling the Squeeze. Washington Must Do Better. 05/08/2026

Americans are anxious about the economy.Ā  People feel it every time they buy groceries, fill up their gas tank, pay rent, or open a credit card bill. Across the country, families are asking the same question: why does it feel harder and harder to get ahead, even when they are working harder than ever?

New polling from Gallup shows affordability now dominates Americans’ financial worries. Inflation and high prices remain the top concern for families, while a record 55% of Americans say their financial situation is getting worse. Energy costs, housing costs, healthcare expenses, transportation, and childcare are all rising faster than many household budgets can keep up with.

At the same time, confidence in the broader economy is falling sharply. Gallup’s Economic Confidence Index dropped to -38 in April, one of the lowest readings in recent years and a sign that Americans are increasingly pessimistic about both current conditions and where the economy is heading. Even among people who are still employed and financially stable, anxiety about the future is growing. Americans are worried about layoffs, AI, inflation, debt, and whether the next generation will have the same opportunities they had.

There are warning signs at the national level as well. This week, America’s debt burden surpassed the country’s annual economic output for the first time since World War II, with public debt reaching more than $31 trillion. Economists across the political spectrum increasingly warn that long-term fiscal dysfunction in Washington is making it harder to invest in the future while also increasing pressure on interest rates and the cost of living.

And yet, despite these very real concerns, too much of our political system remains trapped in partisan theater instead of focused on practical solutions. Americans are looking for leadership willing to address affordability, energy costs, housing supply, workforce development, healthcare expenses, and the national debt with seriousness and honesty. Instead, many see constant political warfare, performative outrage, and a system designed more around scoring points than solving problems.

This is where Forward’s values matter.

The Forward Party was built around the belief that Americans are exhausted by a politics that rewards division and punishes problem solving. Most voters are not asking for ideological purity. They are asking for leaders who will listen, work together, use facts and data, and focus on outcomes that improve everyday life.

Forward believes affordability should not be a partisan issue. Making it easier to build housing, supporting energy innovation, investing in workforce training for a changing economy, modernizing infrastructure, and bringing down healthcare costs are not red or blue ideas. They are practical challenges that require serious leadership.

Forward also believes the country cannot solve long-term economic problems if elected officials are more focused on protecting political power than building public trust. Gerrymandered districts, hyper-partisan primaries, and a political culture driven by outrage make compromise politically risky even when compromise is what the country needs most.

But there is reason for optimism.

Across the country, more independent and solutions-focused leaders are stepping forward to run for office, build coalitions, and challenge the idea that Americans are permanently stuck choosing between dysfunction and extremism. Voters are increasingly open to candidates who prioritize collaboration, accountability, and results over partisan loyalty.

The economic challenges facing the country are real. Americans feel them every day. But this moment also creates an opportunity to rethink how we govern and what we reward in politics.

The future does not have to be defined by gridlock, economic anxiety, and political exhaustion. With better leadership, more accountability, and a political system that rewards solving problems instead of escalating conflict, the country can build an economy that is more affordable, more resilient, and more hopeful for the next generation.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

Episode 9Ā  – Lindsey Drath, Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey, and Governor Whitman hold a grounded and timely conversation about the future of American politics. At the center of the discussion is a pressing question: Can the system be recalibrated without starting from scratch?

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E09 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

May 14 – Women’s Committee Event – Commanding Change: From the Marine Corps to the Movement

Join the Forward Party Women’s Committee in a frank discussion about the current situation of women in the military with Forward Woman Sarah Czech, who co-chairs the Veterans & Military Families Committee.Ā  For more information and to RSVP, click here.Ā 

May 20 – AAPI Committee Launch

May is AAPI Heritage Month

Join us as we officially launch the AAPI Committee on May 20th.We will be joined by Andrew Yang and other special guestsĀ  For more information and to RSVP, click here.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Virginia’s high court strikes down voter-passed House map favoring Democrats

The finding is a major setback for Democrats in their effort to counter GOP-led redistricting in other states. The measure approved April 21 gave Democrats an edge in four districts.

U.S. debt exceeds 100 percent of GDP

The U.S. national debt crossed 100 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) at the end of March, with signs that it might cross the record of 106 percent of GDP reached immediately after World War II.

 

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

 

EVENT ALERT: Portland Election Info Town Hall with Congresswoman Dexter, Representatives Nosse & Chotzen

RSVP today!

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

GovDelivery logo

Fill Out Your Ballot with Confidence this Primary Election – Oregon

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

Date: May 5, 2026


Follow for elections updates: Facebook, Instagram, X, Bluesky, and Youtube

How to fill out your ballot in six easy steps #trustedinfoOregonians,

The big May Primary Election is exactly two weeks away (Tuesday, May 19).

County clerks started sending out ballots last week, so you should be getting yours soon – if you haven’t already.

If you need to update your address, it’s not too late to make that change. You can do so online at OregonVotes.gov/myvote. If you need to update your name or signature, you can still do that to by submitting a paper registration form. If you have any questions or concerns, don’t hesitate to give your county elections office a call.

The best part about our vote-by-mail system is that you have time. Time to make a plan. Time to talk with your friends, family, and neighbors. Time to do your research before making your selections.

You should have received your Voters’ Pamphlet in the mail to help you start your research too, which you can also access online.

When you’re ready to fill out your ballot, reference our six-step guide below. It has all the information you need to fill out your ballot clearly, correctly, and confidently.

Sincerely,

Tobias Read signatureTobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

GovDelivery logo

Are Our Leaders Focused on What Actually Matters? 05/01/2026

If you ask most Americans what is on their mind right now, the answer is simple: affordability. The cost of everyday life, from groceries and gas to housing and healthcare, has become the defining issue for families across the country. Inflation may have cooled from its peak, but prices are still significantly higher than they were just a few years ago. Home prices remain near record highs, putting ownership out of reach for many, while rent continues to strain household budgets. According to Gallup, inflation and the cost of living consistently rank among the top concerns for Americans, with a majority saying they are worried about their personal financial situation. Data from Pew Research Center shows similar trends, with many Americans saying their incomes are not keeping up with rising costs.

At the same time, confidence in leadership is near historic lows. Congressional approval is around 10 percent in recent Gallup tracking, President Trump’s approval rating has dropped to 34 percent, and trust in government more broadly remains deeply eroded. Yet despite that dissatisfaction, incumbents continue to win reelection at rates exceeding 90 percent. That disconnect tells you something important. The system is not responding to what people are actually experiencing. While affordability tops the list of concerns, Washington often appears focused elsewhere. That includes partisan maneuvering like gerrymandering, political investigations and prosecutions, and internal power struggles that have little to do with lowering costs or improving economic opportunity.

The results speak for themselves. Congress has passed relatively few major pieces of legislation that directly address the core drivers of affordability. Conversations about long term economic challenges, like preparing workers for technological change, strengthening local economies, and expanding access to good paying jobs, are not getting the attention they deserve. Meanwhile, approval ratings for both Congress and national leadership remain deeply underwater, reinforcing the sense that the system is not delivering.

This is exactly why the Forward Party is focused on building something different. We are recruiting and supporting candidates who are solutions focused, grounded in their communities, and committed to listening to what voters are actually saying. That means using data, evidence, and real world experience to shape policy, not ideology or party talking points. It means prioritizing affordability, economic opportunity, and long term stability over short term political wins.

There is a better path forward, and more Americans are starting to see it. Across the country, people are stepping up to run for office, engage in their communities, and demand a system that actually reflects their lives and priorities. Change will not happen overnight, but it is already beginning. With leaders who are willing to listen, focus on real problems, and work toward practical solutions, we can build a system that delivers again. One that makes life more affordable, expands opportunity, and gives people confidence in their future.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

Episode 8Ā  – Lindsey Drath and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey are joined by Forward National Communications Director John Goodwin for a thoughtful conversation on the growing momentum behind independent voters and what it really takes to challenge America’s entrenched two-party system. What starts as a discussion on political identity quickly expands into a deeper look at structural barriers, voter frustration, and the untapped potential sitting in plain sight across the country. At the center of the conversation is a striking reality: nearly half of Americans now identify as independents, yet the system itself makes it incredibly difficult for those voices to translate into representation. From closed primaries to limited ballot access, the episode breaks down how the current structure favors party insiders while leaving everyday voters on the outside.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

May 20 – AAPI Committee Launch

May is AAPI Heritage Month

Join us as we officially launch the AAPI Committee on May 20th.We will be joined by Andrew Yang and other special guestsĀ  For more information and to RSVP, click here.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Supreme Court decision sets off gerrymandering scrambleĀ 

A day after the Supreme CourtĀ further gutted the Voting Rights Act, Republican-led states are eying changes to boost the GOP’s gerrymandering effort at the expense of voters of color, while voting rights groups are trying to limit the impact of the ruling on this year’s midterms.

U.S. debt exceeds 100 percent of GDP

The U.S. national debt crossed 100 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) at the end of March, with signs that it might cross the record of 106 percent of GDP reached immediately after World War II.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Protecting Voting Rights is a fundamental aspect of American Democracy

Protecting voting rights is a fundamental aspect of American democracy, and your concern about potential executive overreach is valid given recent reports. While presidents have issued executive orders related to elections in the past, they don’t have unilateral authority to control how states run them, elections are primarily a state responsibility under the Constitution (Article I, Section 4), with Congress able to set or alter regulations for federal races. Any attempt to impose sweeping changes via executive order, especially if premised on unsubstantiated claims like foreign interference from past elections, would likely face immediate legal challenges and injunctions from federal courts, as happened with a similar order in March 2025.

Courts have repeatedly affirmed that such actions can’t override constitutional limits or state authority without clear statutory backing.

That said, litigation can take time, so proactive steps are key to safeguarding access to the ballot. Here’s what individuals and communities can do, based on established strategies from voting rights organizations:
20260227 1525 Image Generation simple compose 01kjgpn3xwe56sa3wwxmrszbfs

Secretary Read Responds to Supreme Court Voting Rights: ‘Another Loophole Politicians Will Use to Rig the System Against the American People’

PRESS RELEASE
Date: April 29, 2026
Contact: Tess Seger | tess.seger@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read Responds to Supreme Court Voting Rights Act Decision: ‘Another Loophole Politicians Will Use to Rig the System Against the American People’

SALEM, OR — Today, in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which guts a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read issued the following statement:

ā€œThe whole point of the Voting Rights Act was to make our democracy better reflect the will of the people. Any attempt to undermine the VRA is an attempt to make the powerful less accountable to the public. The decision out of the Supreme Court today creates yet another loophole that politicians will use to rig the system against the American people.

ā€œI will continue to do everything I can to keep Oregon a place where every eligible citizen can vote and those votes matter.ā€

###

Today’s Your Last Day to Register to Vote for the Big Primary Election!

Date: April 28, 2026

Follow for elections updates:Ā Facebook,Ā Instagram,Ā X,Ā Bluesky, andĀ YoutubeĀ 

Dear Oregonians,

It’s not too late to register to vote in the big May Primary Election!

You have until 11:59 p.m. TONIGHT to register or make any changes to your registration.

Here in Oregon, we make it quick and convenient for eligible citizens. You can register online, and it takes less than five minutes,Ā just visit OregonVotes.gov/register.

If you’ve moved recently or can’t remember the last time you checked your voter registration information, you’ll want to make sure everything is up to date to avoid delays in getting your ballot.

You can check or make a change to your registration on OregonVotes.gov/myvote.

There are some key candidate races and measures on this ballot, so you won’t want to miss out!

I do want to remind you that we have closed primary elections in Oregon.Ā 

Major political parties nominate their party candidates during the Primary Election, and because we have closed primaries, only voters registered with a party can vote for that party’s candidates.

That means if you’re not registered as a Republican or Democrat, your ballot won’t list the candidate races for those parties.

If you’re not affiliated with any party, don’t worry: you’ll still get a ballot for the May primary, but it will only list nonpartisan races, like those for our state’s judges or state measures.

If you’d like to affiliate with a party, you can also make that change on OregonVotes.gov/myvote, just make sure you do it before 11:59 p.m. tonight to get the correct ballot!

Your vote is your voice, and registering to vote is the first step to making it heard.Ā 

Sincerely,

Tobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

Click to Register Online

To download this guide visitĀ OregonVotes.gov/toolkit.

DID YOU KNOW…

Oregon’s 36 county elections offices are responsible for maintaining our voter rolls and mailing ballots and registering voters.

If you have questions, comments, or concerns regarding your registration or your ballot please contact your county elections office as soon as possible!

Click here to find the contact information for your local county elections office.

Questions about voting in Oregon?

FIND A TOWN HALL WITH SECRETARY READ NEAR YOU!

Join Secretary Read and get answers to your questions at upcoming town halls in Corvallis, Portland, and Lincoln City! More town halls to be announced soon.Ā 

Join Secretary Read in Corvallis on May 6 at 6:00 p.m. with Senator Gelser Blouin and Rep. Finger Mcdonald; in Portland on May 8 at 6:00 p.m. with Rep. Nosse and Rep. Chotzen; in Lincoln City on May 9 at 9:30 a.m. with Rep. Gomberg.

| CORVALLIS RSVP |Ā PORTLAND RSVP | LINCOLN CITY RSVP |

Ā Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
|Ā  Help

Fast Forward 04/24/2026

Bill —

Just a few years ago, Virginia voters took an important step toward fairer elections. In 2020, they approved a redistricting reform that created a bipartisan citizen-legislator commission to draw political maps, with the goal of reducing partisan influence and increasing transparency.

Tuesday’s election results show how fragile that progress can be.

Voters approved a new measure that will once again change how congressional maps are drawn in Virginia ahead of the 2026 election. That opens the door for lawmakers to redraw district lines in ways that could significantly reshape the state’s congressional delegation. Some projections suggest the current 6–5 split could shift dramatically, with Democrats potentially holding as many as 10 of Virginia’s 11 seats.

Those kinds of outcomes are driven by how the lines are drawn. In some scenarios, densely populated urban and suburban areas in Northern Virginia could be combined with more rural regions in western and southwestern parts of the state, diluting competitive districts and making results more predictable.

We have seen this pattern before. In states like Texas, Republicans have drawn maps that strongly favor their party, locking in advantages for years at a time. Moves like this have led Democrats in other states to respond in kind, creating a cycle where each side redraws maps to counter the other rather than competing for voters.

At Forward, we oppose that, no matter who is doing it.

At the same time, it is important to acknowledge that not all of these situations are identical. In states like Virginia and California, voters were consulted and approved these changes. While we respectfully disagree with the outcome, we recognize that this approach is meaningfully different from situations in states like Texas, where maps have been imposed without that same level of voter input.

The real problem is not one party. It is the system itself. What is happening in Virginia reflects a broader cycle where redistricting is used to protect incumbents and lock in advantage. The result is a system with far too little competition. In recent election cycles, only about 30 to 40 out of 435 U.S. House races are considered truly competitive. Most districts are effectively safe seats where one party is overwhelmingly favored, and incumbents rarely lose, with reelection rates typically above 90 percent.

When elections are not competitive, accountability breaks down. And voters are noticing. According to the latest Gallup poll released this week, just 10 percent of Americans approve of Congress, while 86 percent disapprove, the lowest approval rating Gallup has ever recorded.

This is not a coincidence. When politicians pick their voters, general elections become predictable, independent voices struggle to compete, and incentives shift toward appealing to a narrow base instead of the broader public. That is not a healthy democracy. It is a closed system.

Forward has been clear from the beginning. We oppose partisan gerrymandering by anyone, anywhere. It does not matter whether it benefits Democrats in Virginia or Republicans in another state. The outcome is the same. Voters are left with fewer choices and a system that becomes less representative over time. That is why we support independent redistricting commissions that put voters first.

A better system would create more competitive districts, encourage candidates to speak to a broader range of voters, and reward problem solving instead of partisanship.

Virginia’s result is a reminder of what is at stake. Voters should choose their representatives. Elections should be competitive. Politicians should have to earn support, not engineer it.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

Episode 8Ā  – Lindsey Drath and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey are joined by Forward National Communications Director John Goodwin for a thoughtful conversation on the growing momentum behind independent voters and what it really takes to challenge America’s entrenched two-party system. What starts as a discussion on political identity quickly expands into a deeper look at structural barriers, voter frustration, and the untapped potential sitting in plain sight across the country. At the center of the conversation is a striking reality: nearly half of Americans now identify as independents, yet the system itself makes it incredibly difficult for those voices to translate into representation. From closed primaries to limited ballot access, the episode breaks down how the current structure favors party insiders while leaving everyday voters on the outside.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

May 20 – AAPI Committee Launch

May is AAPI Heritage Month

Join us as we officially launch the AAPI Committee on May 20th.We will be joined by Andrew Yang and other special guestsĀ  For more information and to RSVP, click here.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

As political divides deepen, a new party eyes local change in Horry County

As political divisions deepen across the United States, more Americans than ever are looking for an alternative to the traditional two-party system. One group prioritizing local races and running candidates in the Grand Strand believes it has the answer. Nationally organized in 2021 by Democratic former presidential candidate Andrew Yang and Republican former New Jersey Governor and EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman, the Forward Party is recognized on ballots in six states, including South Carolina.

Op-Ed: In Arizona, Democrats and Republicans are banding together for one reason (possible paywall)

In Arizona, the two legacy political parties are in a panic. From the intensity of their response, you would think the recently renamedĀ Arizona Independent PartyĀ (AIP), with a modest footprint and a broad vision, represents an existential threat. The reaction was so strong that Democrats and Republicans banded together to prevent the AIP’s name change from the No Labels Party of Arizona.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

2026 Elections Toolkit & Voter Registration Deadline- Oregon

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

Date: April 21, 2026

Follow for elections updates: Facebook, Instagram, X, Bluesky, and Youtube

Dear Oregonians,

The next big statewide election is coming up quick: Tuesday, May 19th! That’s less than one month away.

Our office just released the official 2026 Elections Toolkit, a collection of nonpartisan voter education materials designed to help you, your friends, neighbors, and every eligible voter vote with confidence in this year’s elections.

Visit OregonVotes.gov/toolkit to find everything you need to know about…

  • Registering to vote
  • Filling out your ballot
  • Making a plan to vote
  • Signing your ballot
  • Knowing your rights as an Oregon voter

…all in one place.

Take a look and share these toolkits with your community, and do it soon because there are important dates coming up!

Tuesday, April 28th is the deadline to register to vote in the big May election.

Need to register, check, or make a change to your registration? Visit OregonVotes.gov/myvote.

Registering to vote is quick and convenient. To learn where you can register, what documents you’ll need to register, and when you need to register by to take part in this year’s elections, I encourage you to check out our guide below.

Your vote is your voice, and registering to vote is the first step to making it heard.Ā 

Sincerely,

Tobias Read signature


This email was sent to ***** using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Oregon Secretary of State Ā· 900 Court Street NE Ā· Capitol Room 136 Ā· Salem OR 97310-0722 GovDelivery logo

Fast Forward 04/17/2026

Bill —

Viktor OrbĆ”n, long a symbol of democratic backsliding and the self-proclaimed creator of “illiberal democracy,” was defeated by the very force he worked so hard to bend: the will of the voters. In Hungary, citizens were given a chance to speak clearly, and they did. Their message was bigger than one man. It was a reminder that even leaders who spend years weakening institutions, centralizing power, and putting themselves above the public are still vulnerable when people decide enough is enough.

This was not only a vote about ideology. It was also a vote about accountability. OrbĆ”n’s defeat reflected something basic but powerful: people expect leaders to serve the public, not themselves. When governments become arrogant, insulated, corrupt, or indifferent to the daily struggles of ordinary families, voters notice. And when democracy is still strong enough to give them a voice, they can use it to demand something better.

That is why Hungary’s election matters far beyond Hungary. It stands as a warning to leaders everywhere, including here in the United States, that public office is not personal property. It is a temporary trust. Leaders are sent to their capitals to solve problems, uphold democratic norms, and improve people’s lives. When they fail in that responsibility, voters not only can replace them; they should replace them.

At Forward, we believe politics should be rooted in service, responsibility, and results. We are working to support leaders who understand that holding office means stewardship, not self-preservation. Hungary may be the latest example of voters insisting on that standard, but it cannot be the last. In this election year, we will keep fighting to make sure more leaders are chosen not for their ambition but for their willingness to serve.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

Episode 7 brings the conversation back to where politics has the most immediate impact: local leadership. While national headlines tend to dominate attention, this discussion highlights how mayors and community leaders are quietly solving real problems every day without the noise of partisan division. Featuring Deke Copenhaver, former mayor of Augusta, Georgia, Brian Vincent, current mayor of Farmville, Virginia, and Clint Eisenhauer, South Carolina Forward Party Chair, the episode explores what it looks like to lead with service, accountability, and community-first thinking. These leaders share firsthand experiences navigating political pressure, earning trust at the grassroots level, and making decisions that directly shape the lives of their constituents.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

April 22 – Candidate Outreach Training

With such an impactful election year upon us, it’s important we find the right candidates to support! Join Carrie Anne and Jake Mellen, National Forward staff members, to learn what to look for in candidates and race in your area and best practices for outreach.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Forward Party Announces First Round of 2026 Congressional Endorsements

The Forward Party has announced its first round of congressional endorsements for the 2026 election cycle, backing a slate of six candidates across multiple states. Additional endorsements are expected in the coming months.

New Mexico Forward Party aims for recognition as Andrew Yang visits Santa Fe

Andrew Yang at a podium speaking in NMA former presidential candidate came to the New Mexico state Capitol on Friday to announce a new home for voters who are tired of the strife between Republicans and Democrats.Ā ā€œPolitics in the state will never be the same,ā€ Andrew Yang proclaimed to about two dozen people at a news conference where he announced the arrival of the Forward Party.

Andrew Yang Urges Action at Forward Party Utah Convention

If you’ve spent any time watching the American political landscape lately, you know the feeling of staring at a ballot and feeling like you’re being asked to choose between two versions of the same headache. For a lot of voters in the Beehive State, that frustration has moved past a quiet grumble and into a full-blown movement. We’re seeing it play out in Utah, where the Forward Party isn’t just knocking on doors—they’re attempting to rewrite the rules of engagement in a state traditionally known as a Republican stronghold.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Article 3 of 3 The Long Game — Power Beyond the Ballot

By now, it is clear that the 2026 midterms are unlike any we have seen in recent memory. The scale of spending, the intensity of coordination, and the precision of messaging all suggest a high-stakes contest—but the full story goes deeper than individual candidates or party control.

Article 2 of 3 Transparency Illusions — Money in Plain Sight

The early surge of funding into the 2026 midterms is hard to ignore, yet the public is still largely in the dark about how that money actually shapes the election. Even when contributions are disclosed, transparency is often more illusory than real.

Voters see the headlines—mega-donors, super PACs, and campaign cash—but few grasp the mechanics behind it, or the strategic intent that guides these flows. In essence, visibility does not equal understanding.

Disclosed vs. Hidden Influence

Campaign finance laws require certain reporting: super PACs must list their donors, and major contributions are public record. This disclosure gives the impression of accountability.

But disclosure is only part of the story. The ā€œwhereā€ and ā€œhowā€ of influence often remains obscured. Mega-donors channel money into targeted districts, specialized messaging, and digital campaigns whose impacts ripple quietly.

Even non-dark money—funds that are fully reported—can operate as a form of strategic opacity. Voters know that spending is happening, but rarely see the nuanced ways it shapes perceptions, priorities, and local political infrastructure.

The Mechanics of Influence

Modern political spending is surgical. The goal is rarely broad persuasion; it’s about precise leverage:

  • District targeting: Money flows into the races that are winnable or strategically critical.

  • Message amplification: Ads, mailers, and digital campaigns are coordinated to push certain narratives.

  • Network shaping: Grassroots organizations, local media, and advocacy groups can be nudged—or suppressed—through funding decisions.

In combination, these tools allow wealth and influence to shape the electoral playing field long before voters cast ballots.

Public Perception and Strategic Opacity

To most citizens, a donor check is a check. But campaigns are more than contributions—they are engines of influence. Strategic opacity allows campaigns to appear open while steering attention, framing debates, and shaping perceptions without overt coercion.

The result is a paradox: the money is in plain sight, yet its full effect and intent are largely invisible. Voters see movement, but not the levers behind it.

Setting Up the Bigger Question

If disclosed money can operate as a subtle form of hidden influence, the real question becomes: what about the truly opaque channels? Dark money, nonprofit networks, and cross-linked advocacy groups operate largely outside public scrutiny.

And even among visible spending, both parties appear to be building something larger than a simple tally of wins and losses. Influence flows, narratives solidify, and infrastructure takes shape—often with consequences that extend well beyond Election Day.

The stage is set for a deeper exploration: how much of the opposition’s strategy is truly reactive, and how much is about quietly shaping enduring structures of influence?

Article

Article 1 of 3 Midterms Under Siege — The Scale of Influence

Midterm elections are supposed to be smaller, quieter affairs compared to presidential contests. Yet, heading into 2026, the sums being poured into these races are unprecedented, rivaling what we normally see only in general elections. The early flood of resources, even when fully disclosed, is a stark reminder that what the public sees is rarely the full story.

While headlines often focus on candidates, slogans, and social media battles, the real game is being played behind the scenes, where money flows strategically, shaping outcomes before most voters even pay attention.

The Numbers Are Jaw-Dropping

Even at this early stage, hundreds of millions of dollars are being funneled into key districts. Mega-donors and super PACs dominate the headlines, their contributions fully disclosed, but the scale alone is enough to overwhelm local campaigns and influence narrative framing.

This is money that historically would have been reserved for the general election, yet now, it is strategically deployed in primary and midterm races to set the stage for longer-term control. The sheer volume highlights the stakes: these elections are about more than individual candidates—they are about shaping influence, infrastructure, and future power.

Public Awareness vs. Reality

Disclosed contributions give the appearance of transparency. The public can see who is funding campaigns, which can create a sense of clarity and accountability. But even with full disclosure, the real intent behind the spending is often obscured.

Which districts are targeted? Which messages are amplified, and which are suppressed? How are grassroots networks subtly nudged or marginalized? The mechanics of influence remain largely invisible to voters, even when the money itself is visible.

In effect, disclosed money can still function as a form of strategic opacity. Voters notice that spending is happening, but few understand the purpose behind it, or the subtle ways it shapes perception, policy priorities, and candidate viability.

Implications for Democracy

This massive influx of resources into midterms raises urgent questions. When campaigns are so heavily funded from the top down, with precise targeting and messaging strategies, the electoral process is no longer just about persuading voters—it is about shaping the environment in which voters make choices.

The concern is not only about fairness but about the concentration of influence. Large donors and outside groups can disproportionately affect outcomes, often favoring well-funded narratives over community-driven priorities. Even when the money is visible, it is wielded with an intent that is not fully apparent.

Setting the Stage for Deeper Questions

If the stakes of the 2026 midterms are already higher than expected, and the flow of money is more aggressive than usual, we must ask: what is the larger purpose? Is this simply about winning seats, or is there a longer-term plan to entrench influence, shape norms, and steer policy pathways?

Understanding the scale and timing of these investments is the first step toward asking the bigger question: what are voters not being shown, and what structures are quietly being built behind the curtain?

Article

Fast Forward 04/09/2026

Bill —

We’ve officially kicked off our 2026 congressional endorsements, and this first slate says a lot about where this movement is headed. These are not typical candidates. They are leaders who have built careers solving real problems, working in their communities, and stepping up because they believe the system should work better than it does today. They come from different backgrounds and different regions, but they share a commitment to practical leadership, accountability, and getting things done.

Looking across this first group of endorsed congressional candidates, a few things stand out. These are problem solvers first. They have spent their careers in service, whether in business, public service, or their local communities, focused on outcomes instead of ideology. They are also stepping forward at a moment when most Americans feel like the system is not listening. Nearly half the country identifies as independent, yet the system still forces binary choices between the legacy parties. Just as important, they are willing to run anyway. One of the biggest challenges in our politics today is not just who wins, but who never runs in the first place. Too many capable leaders look at the current system and opt out. These candidates are choosing to step up.

Click the image for more information on each of our 2026 endorsed candidates so far.Ā 

This election is bigger than any single race. We are operating in a system where trust in government is low, competition is limited, and outcomes are too often driven by small, partisan primaries instead of the broader public. That combination produces exactly what voters are tired of: more division, less problem solving, and fewer real choices. At the same time, there is a clear opportunity. Most Americans are not asking for more extremes. They are asking for leaders who can work across differences, focus on solutions, and represent the full community, not just one side of it.

This first slate also reflects something bigger about how change can actually happen. It does not take a majority to shift how Congress works. A small group of independent minded leaders who are focused on solutions instead of party can become a deciding force and help bridge divides. That is how incentives begin to shift toward cooperation instead of conflict and negotiation instead of gridlock.

This is just the beginning. This first group of congressional endorsements is one step in a much broader effort, with many more endorsements to come across federal, statewide, and local elections. The goal is to build a durable pipeline of leaders who reflect the country as it actually is and give voters more credible choices at every level.

That work is already underway. Earlier in the cycle, we made our first endorsement of the year with gubernatorial candidate Rick Bennett in Maine, a leader who has consistently demonstrated what it looks like to put voters ahead of party and govern with integrity. That endorsement helped set the tone for what we are building, and this first congressional slate continues that momentum.

At its core, this effort is about something simple. American politics should reflect the American people. Right now, it does not, but it can. By supporting candidates like these, leaders who are independent minded, solutions oriented, and accountable, we are helping create a system where voters have real choices again. This is an important step forward, and there is much more to come.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live!

Episode 7 brings the conversation back to where politics has the most immediate impact: local leadership. While national headlines tend to dominate attention, this discussion highlights how mayors and community leaders are quietly solving real problems every day without the noise of partisan division. Featuring Deke Copenhaver, former mayor of Augusta, Georgia, Brian Vincent, current mayor of Farmville, Virginia, and Clint Eisenhauer, South Carolina Forward Party Chair, the episode explores what it looks like to lead with service, accountability, and community-first thinking. These leaders share firsthand experiences navigating political pressure, earning trust at the grassroots level, and making decisions that directly shape the lives of their constituents.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved
 

April 10 – New Mexico Press Event with Andrew Yang

Andrew Yang has a big announcement for New Mexico! Meet us on the steps of the Capitol in Santa Fe to hear from Forward Party co-founder, Andrew Yang. Then, join us for a special evening celebration event in Downtown Albuquerque to meet Andrew in-person for a live Q&A, connect with New Mexico Forward leadership, mingle and meet fellow reform-minded New Mexicans, and learn how to get involved to help grow ballot access and voter choice statewide.Ā Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 11 – Texas Inaugural State Convention

Join a coalition of independent thinkers for the Texas Forward Party’s Inaugural State Convention—a historic weekend of action, training, and connection in Austin. We are bringing together community leaders from across the state to lower the temperature, break the gridlock, and put power back in the hands of voters.

April 11 – Colorado Forward Party Nominating Convention

On April 11th, the Colorado Forward PartyĀ is holding a virtual assembly to nominate candidates for the November ballot and conduct other party business.

April 11 – Forward Party of Utah State Convention

Join Forwardists from across the stateĀ and Forward Party Cofounder Andrew YangĀ for the Forward Party of Utah’s annual State Convention—our biggest gathering of the year. At the convention, attendees will meet and nominate Forward candidates, vote on party priorities, and help shape the direction of theĀ Forward Party of UtahĀ for the year ahead. The program will feature a strong lineup of speakers, thoughtful discussion, and meaningful opportunities for members and supporters to share ideas and perspectives on Utah’s political future.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Gavin Newsom, Ben Shapiro, and Donald Trump Finally Agree on a Major Voting rights Issue

When the conversation came to gerrymandering, both Newsom and Shapiro agreed that allowing political parties to diminish the voting power of voters who don’t join their party is an acceptable thing to do.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Fast Forward 04/02/2026

Bill —

Americans want elections that are secure and easy to participate in. Mail-in voting is one of the ways we make that possible.

It’s back in the spotlight right now because of a new executive order from President Trump that would limit how states use mail-in voting and add new federal requirements around who can receive a ballot. That kind of top-down change raises real questions, both legal and practical, for states that are responsible for running elections and for voters who rely on these systems.

Before getting lost in the politics of the moment, it’s worth stepping back and looking at how mail-in works, and why so many Americans use it.

Mail-in voting is not new. Americans have been voting by mail for generations, starting with military members serving overseas and expanding over time to include seniors, rural voters, and anyone who needs more flexibility. Today, it is a part of how elections are run across the country. In states like Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Utah, and Hawaii, elections are conducted almost entirely by mail. Across the country, millions of voters use it every cycle, regardless of party.

In fact, about one in three Americans has voted by mail in recent national elections – including the President himself. That alone tells you something important: this is not a niche system. It is a normal, widely used way Americans participate in democracy.

Security is often where the conversation turns around mail-in ballots. A system only works if people trust it. Mail-in voting includes multiple layers of protection. Ballots are tied to registered voters, signatures are verified, and many states use tracking systems so voters can see when their ballot is sent, received, and counted. Like any system, it is not perfect, but there is no evidence of widespread fraud. What there is, instead, is a system that has been tested at scale and continues to work.

For many people, mail-in voting is not about convenience. It is about access. It allows a parent working two jobs, a senior who cannot stand in line, or a voter living miles from the nearest polling place to still have a voice. For military families and Americans overseas, it is often the only realistic option.

That is why sudden, nationwide changes to the system could cause confusion, disenfranchisement, and barriers to voting. The current proposal would require states to adjust how they administer mail-in voting and who qualifies for it. Even setting aside the legal questions about whether a president can direct those changes, the practical impact could be significant. States would need to rework systems quickly. Voters could face confusion about eligibility. Ballots could be delayed or rejected under new rules.

That is not how you build confidence in elections. It is how you create uncertainty.

At Forward, we believe this should not be an either-or debate. Americans want elections that are both secure and accessible. Those goals are not in conflict. In fact, the best systems do both well. The answer is not to restrict access or to ignore concerns about integrity. It is to improve the system in ways that are transparent, consistent, and based on what actually works.

The bigger issue here is not just mail-in voting. It is whether our political system is focused on serving voters or fighting over the rules of the game. Too often, the conversation is about control instead of outcomes, about process instead of people.

Americans are looking for something different. They want a system that works. They want to know their vote counts and that they have a real voice in the outcome.

That means making it easier for eligible voters to participate while strengthening trust in how elections are run. It means working with states, not around them. And it means focusing on solutions that bring people in, not push them out.

That is how we move forward.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 6, the conversation moves beyond national headlines and into the places where real political change is quietly taking shape. State and local communities are becoming the proving ground for new ideas, fresh leadership, and a growing demand for alternatives to the traditional two-party system. The episode features three voices working at the front lines of that shift: Michelle Quist in Utah, Kayla Sullivan in South Carolina, and Rick KennedyĀ in Texas. Each brings a different perspective, but together they paint a clear picture of what modern political reform looks like when it starts from the ground up.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

April 8 – Recruiting New Forwardists

The midterm year is upon us and we need as many voters and volunteers as possible to support the incredible candidates we endorse this year! Join Carrie Anne our Head of Volunteer Programs to learn how to help us recruit more supporters. We will go over how to talk about Forward with your friends and family, and how to share your recruitment link so you can earn points that are redeemable for items in our merch shop! Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 10 – New Mexico Press Event with Andrew Yang

Andrew Yang has a big announcement for New Mexico! Meet us on the steps of the Capitol in Santa Fe to hear from Forward Party co-founder, Andrew Yang. Then, join us for a special evening celebration event in Downtown Albuquerque to meet Andrew in-person for a live Q&A, connect with New Mexico Forward leadership, mingle and meet fellow reform-minded New Mexicans, and learn how to get involved to help grow ballot access and voter choice statewide.Ā Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 11 – Texas Inaugural State Convention

Join a coalition of independent thinkers for the Texas Forward Party’s Inaugural State Convention—a historic weekend of action, training, and connection in Austin. We are bringing together community leaders from across the state to lower the temperature, break the gridlock, and put power back in the hands of voters.

April 11 – Colorado Forward Party Nominating Convention

On April 11th, the Colorado Forward PartyĀ is holding a virtual assembly to nominate candidates for the November ballot and conduct other party business.

April 11 – Forward Party of Utah State Convention

Join Forwardists from across the stateĀ and Forward Party Cofounder Andrew YangĀ for the Forward Party of Utah’s annual State Convention—our biggest gathering of the year. At the convention, attendees will meet and nominate Forward candidates, vote on party priorities, and help shape the direction of theĀ Forward Party of UtahĀ for the year ahead. The program will feature a strong lineup of speakers, thoughtful discussion, and meaningful opportunities for members and supporters to share ideas and perspectives on Utah’s political future.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Kevin Kiley Leaves GOP, Bets on Independent Voters in California’s 6th District

Kevin Kiley spent nine years in California politics as a Republican. He won an election to the State Assembly as a Republican. He ran in the Gavin Newsom recall as a Republican. He won a coveted congressional seat as a Republican and won it again two years later.

But on March 9, 2026, he held a press conference and announced he was breaking up with the GOP.

Bringing Power Back to the American Voter

The American political landscape is often described as a choice between two sides, but our guest today argues it is actually a closed loop. It is a duopoly designed to protect itself, reward office retention, and keep new ideas off the ballot through complex legal hurdles and massive financial barriers. In this episode, Kevin and John sit down with John Goodwin, Communications Director for the Forward Party. third option than they are of each other.

Colorado’s growing share of unaffiliated voters is making it harder for candidates to get on the ballot

Democratic and Republican candidates collecting signatures to make their party’s primary ballot can only collect signatures from voters in their party. With unaffiliated voters now making up half of the statewide electorate, partisans are harder to find.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

I said Trump would screw with the midterms.

Ā I said Trump would screw with the midterms.

He signed the illegal EO attacking mail-in voting.

Nonpartisan election expert David Becker (executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research and former DOJ Voting Section lawyer) posted: ā€œSome may freak out about this, but honestly, this is hilarious. It’s clearly unconstitutional, will be blocked immediately… He might as well sign an EO banning gravity.ā€

Power grab is DOA. Courts will kill it fast.Ā  https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-signs-order-mail-ballots-escalating-election-overhaul-push-2026-03-31/

Unconstitutional

I told you and Congress what he was going to do, guess what?

“He will try to rig the mid-term, pay attention, because that won’t work.”

He Signed An Executive Order:

Trump directed DHS and the Social Security Administration to build a national list of verified eligible voters. The Postal Service will only send mail-in ballots to people on that list. States that don’t comply lose federal funding.

Election law experts called it unconstitutional on its face. Legal challenges are already forming. Midterm primaries are already underway in many states.

The Constitution gives states the authority to run elections. Not the president. Not by executive order.

That is the most important thing you must remember, what he says is just noise, just noise. Always check with your state election officials. They are in charge.

He knows that. He signed it anyway.

Pay attention.

We eat tacos.

Fast Forward 03/27/2026

Bill —

Right now, people across the country are watching the same thing play out again in Washington, and a lot of them are asking a simple question: why does it always have to be like this?

A fight over funding for the Department of Homeland Security has turned into another standoff. Tens of thousands of workers are not getting paid. Travelers are stuck in long airport lines. Things that should just work are not working. This is not complicated. It is a breakdown, and people can see it clearly in their daily lives. But it is also a reminder that we can do better.

The DHS shutdown started in mid-February and is still going because lawmakers cannot agree on a funding deal. The impact is not abstract. More than 50,000 TSA workers are working without pay. Hundreds of officers have already quit, and more are calling out. At airports across the country, people are waiting hours just to get through security, and some airports are warning they may have to shut down parts of their operations if this continues.

Airport leaders are warning Congress that the situation is getting worse and could have lasting effects. Behind all of this are real people trying to get by. Some TSA workers are sleeping in their cars. Some are picking up second jobs. Some are donating plasma just to make it through. Families are missing flights, and workers are missing paychecks. This is what a broken system looks like.

This did not have to happen. This is not some unavoidable crisis. It is a political fight. Lawmakers are arguing over immigration policy and trying to attach other demands to a basic funding bill. Talks have stalled, and each side is blaming the other. On top of that, the White House has pushed to tie this funding fight to the SAVE Act, a controversial voting bill. As a result, funding for airport security and paychecks for workers has been pulled into a much larger political battle.

The frustrating part is that this is not what most Americans are asking for. People are not looking for political wins. They are looking for things to work. They want leaders who solve problems, work with others, and get things done. A majority of Americans now say they are independent, not strongly tied to either party, yet our system keeps producing the same kind of gridlock.

It does not have to be this way. If there were more independent minded members in Congress, you would likely see deals happen sooner, more focus on real people, and a clearer path out of standoffs like this. Even a small group can make a difference in close votes and help move both sides toward a solution.

That is exactly why the Forward Party is recruiting and running candidates for Congress across the country. The goal is not to add more noise, but to change how things work. We are supporting leaders who care more about solving problems than picking sides, leaders who reflect their communities and are willing to work with anyone to get results. Even a handful of leaders like this can break up political standoffs, push for real debate, and represent the millions of Americans who feel stuck between the two parties.

This shutdown will end. Funding will get passed, and people will get paid. But the bigger question is what happens next. Do we keep going through this over and over again, or do we send people to Washington who will do things differently?

More Americans are ready for that change than ever before, and Forward is working to make it happen.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 6, the conversation moves beyond national headlines and into the places where real political change is quietly taking shape. State and local communities are becoming the proving ground for new ideas, fresh leadership, and a growing demand for alternatives to the traditional two-party system. The episode features three voices working at the front lines of that shift: Michelle Quist in Utah, Kayla Sullivan in South Carolina, and Rick KennedyĀ in Texas. Each brings a different perspective, but together they paint a clear picture of what modern political reform looks like when it starts from the ground up.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

April 8 – Recruiting New Forwardists

The midterm year is upon us and we need as many voters and volunteers as possible to support the incredible candidates we endorse this year! Join Carrie Anne, our Head of Volunteer Programs, to learn how to help us recruit more supporters. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 11 – Texas Inaugural State Convention

Join a coalition of independent thinkers for the Texas Forward Party’s Inaugural State Convention—a historic weekend of action, training, and connection in Austin. We are bringing together community leaders from across the state to lower the temperature, break the gridlock, and put power back in the hands of voters.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

A Home for independents: Why I Joined the forward Party

Today, more Americans identify as independent than either political party. Voters are exhausted by division and hungry for practical solutions. And yet, the structure of our system still limits competition, filters out capable leaders, and rewards ideological extremes.

We are producing outcomes that don’t reflect how most Americans actually think.

For a long time, I believed we could fix that from the outside.

I no longer believe that’s enough.

Independent candidate for Maine governor Rick Bennet offers healthcare affordability planĀ 

State Senator Rick BennettĀ proposed a broad health care affordability planĀ on Monday, intended to lower costs and help Mainers get healthier.

Speaking at the Skowhegan Free Public Library, Bennett espoused a “prevention first” approach, with greater access to primary and behavioral care that too many Mainers lack.

The national Forward Party, which backs independent candidates,Ā has endorsed Bennett’s campaign.

 

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Why is Trump DESPERATE to pass the SAVE America Act?

The SAVE America Act , The Wolf in Sheeps Clothing, Hey Lamb Chop.

Who it makes voting harder for:

Ordinary Americans broadly — More than 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents. Roughly half of Americans don’t even have a passport.

Voters of color and younger voters — The SAVE Act would disenfranchise Americans of all ages and races, but younger voters and voters of color would suffer disproportionately.

Older Black Americans specifically — Decades after segregation left gaps in citizenship documents, the bill could create new barriers at the ballot box for people who were never properly documented during that era.

Married women (and anyone who changed their name) — The bill would disproportionately affect women whose current legal names differ from the names on their birth certificates or passports. It does not include exceptions for eligible voters whose names differ from those on their identification documents, and would force them to submit additional documents — such as marriage certificates, divorce decrees, or court orders to prove their identities.

People who register by mail or online — In 2022, more than seven million Americans registered to vote by mail, and almost 11 million registered online. The bill would severely threaten mail registration and require online registration systems to be overhauled.

Naturalized citizens — Naturalized citizens are particularly at risk for being inaccurately flagged for removal from voter rolls under the bill’s data-verification requirements.

People with disabilities and the elderly — People with disabilities and older voters who may not be able to register in person would also face new barriers.

Supporters’ argument

Proponents say the bill is necessary to ensure only citizens vote and that it simply enforces existing law. They argue an affidavit process exists for those without documents.

Critics’ counterargument

All available evidence, including from the Trump administration itself, indicates that only American citizens vote and the exceptions are vanishingly rare. Critics point to Kansas as a cautionary exampleĀ  when Kansas adopted a similar proof-of-citizenship law in 2011, it prevented over 31,000 eligible citizens from registering to vote before it was blocked by federal courts.

Do You want to be turned away?

5c5d019f aee0 4d2e 8bed 0a519f544394

The DOJ (Putz’s personal law firm) Trying to revive that dead horse (Arizona’s 2020 Election)

As of 06/19/2026 this hasn’t been resolved or gone away, just lost in the diversions of Trumps war of choice and other NOISE.

The LIES and Just how Gullible we are supposed to be.

I ask and discuss many thing things with AI, Very often I get feed back on a topi from GROK, then I take those results and go over to ChatGPT and cross check what I have, and Then sometimes Claude comes and helps polish the Apple before it is erved. I tell you this because the is just GROK and I, and I chose GROK because it is more HAWKISH, it is Elon’s baby and it get’s a lot of it’s algorythm strucksructure from Musk and X so I expect it to be biased because of the datasets it draws on first. That very fact maked the following even more alarming. This isn’t a quick read, although it isn’t a deap read either. It does give insight to some of the ā€˜what the heck are they doing, behind the scenes though’.

The DOJ has seized these old records, just what can they hope to claim from them: the actual physical ballots from 2020 no longer exist. Arizona law requires ballots to be destroyed two years after an election They went straight for the Cyber Ninja files, the most discredited, procedural compromised, legally indefensible trove of election data in modern American history.

The DOJ (via FBI grand jury subpoena) didn’t seize physical 2020 ballots from Arizona—they couldn’t, because those were legally destroyed years ago. Arizona law (A.R.S. 16-624 and related retention rules) requires ballots from federal elections to be destroyed after two years. Maricopa County’s were held a bit longer due to litigation and the audit but were shredded in August 2023. Multiple sources, including county officials, confirm: ā€œThey’re gone.ā€

What the FBI actually obtained (late last week, per Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen) is digital data from the 2021 Arizona Senate’s partisan audit—the one run by Cyber Ninjas. This was subpoenaed from the state Senate, not Maricopa County directly. It’s the ā€œCyber Ninja filesā€ you’re referencing: a trove of electronic records the firm compiled during its six-month review of Maricopa County’s ~2.1 million ballots.
What exactly is in these files?

  • Digital scans and photos of every ballot (the audit team imaged them).

  • Voter rolls and related voter data.

  • Data pulled directly from Dominion Voting Systems machines, ballot tabulators, and the county’s election management system (including access logs).

  • Tally sheets the auditors used to track votes and flag ā€œanomalies.ā€

  • Other supporting materials the Senate held from the audit process.

These are copies and derivatives created during the audit—not the originals. The physical ballots that generated them no longer exist.What can the DOJ realistically hope to ā€œclaimā€ from them?In theory, investigators could:

  • Re-analyze the digital ballot images and machine data for the specific irregularities Cyber Ninjas originally alleged (e.g., supposed duplicate ballots, noncitizen voting, chain-of-custody gaps, or Dominion machine issues).

  • Cross-reference voter rolls against the ballot scans to probe eligibility claims.

  • Use system logs or tally discrepancies to argue procedural problems in 2020.

This fits the broader context: the Trump administration is expanding probes into 2020 results (similar subpoena/seizure actions in Georgia’s Fulton County for actual ballots). Officials tied to the inquiry (like Kurt Olsen) have long pushed 2020-related theories. Proponents might hope to surface ā€œevidenceā€ justifying election reforms, voter ID rules, or challenges to past outcomes ahead of 2026 midterms.But here’s the reality check on their valueThe Cyber Ninjas audit was already the most scrutinized and criticized election review in recent history—even its own leaders privately called parts of the recount ā€œscrewy,ā€ and it ultimately confirmed Biden’s win in Arizona (finding more votes for him in some tallies, with no widespread fraud proven). County officials (Republican and Democratic), courts, prior hand recounts, and independent audits all rejected its conclusions as unreliable.

Experts who watched the audit firsthand say the digital files are ā€œfatally flawedā€ for any serious probe:

  • Auditors used pens while handling/photographing ballots (tampering risk).

  • They kept multiple inconsistent tally sheets per batch.

  • Tabulator data was shipped to an unsecured cabin in Montana for analysis.

  • They misread routine election processes as fraud (e.g., mail ballots delivered in person).

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs and Secretary of State Adrian Fontes have both dismissed confidence in anything derived from it. Election tech consultants call it ā€œinvalid dataā€ that would lead to ā€œinaccurate conclusions.ā€ Even the audit’s Senate liaison (a Republican) found only minor, irrelevant county errors. Arizona AG Kris Mayes labeled the whole federal effort ā€œweaponization… in service of crackpots and lies.ā€

Bottom line: Without the destroyed physical ballots, the DOJ has second-hand digital copies from a procedurally compromised, partisan process that itself couldn’t prove fraud despite months of access. Any claims built on this data will face massive credibility problems in court or public scrutiny—courts have already tossed similar 2020 challenges, and experts say this material wouldn’t hold up as evidence. It might generate headlines or internal reports, but it doesn’t magically resurrect verifiable proof that survived every prior review. The physical originals are gone for good, as Arizona law required.

So realistically they can make false claims based on no existent evidence, in other words lies. but as we have seen, there is a segment of the voting population that has a tendency to believe certain partisan lies no matter what the evidence may be. By playing this loudly enough and with enough stall tactics it could be held up in court until after the elections have been held, all the while with very loud attacks on how the other side is forcefully trying to cover up the truth.

Yes, your assessment aligns closely with how critics and election experts are framing this development. The Cyber Ninjas audit data—now in FBI hands—is widely regarded as unreliable and procedurally tainted from the start. Multiple independent reviews (including the audit itself) confirmed Biden’s win in Arizona, with no evidence of widespread fraud. Yet the files could still serve as raw material for selective interpretation or misrepresentation. Potential for ā€œFalse Claimsā€ or Exaggerated Narratives

  • Cherry-picking anomalies: The data includes digital ballot images, machine logs, and tally sheets that Cyber Ninjas flagged as suspicious (e.g., supposed ā€œduplicates,ā€ chain-of-custody issues, or Dominion glitches). Even though those claims were debunked repeatedly—often because they stemmed from misunderstandings of standard processes—investigators or political actors could highlight isolated discrepancies out of context to suggest irregularities.

  • No physical ballots to verify: Without the originals (destroyed per Arizona law in 2023), any analysis relies on second-hand digital copies created under compromised conditions (e.g., unsecured handling, inconsistent tallies). Experts, including those cited in recent reporting, describe the material as ā€œfatally flawedā€ and incapable of producing credible new evidence.

    Amplification via media and rhetoric: Loud, repeated assertions of ā€œnew proofā€ or ā€œcover-upsā€ can resonate with segments of the electorate predisposed to distrust official results, regardless of counter-evidence. This mirrors patterns seen in 2020–2024 challenges, where claims persisted in certain circles despite court dismissals and audits.

Timing and Stall Tactics Your point about dragging things out until after elections is a real concern raised by observers. Here’s how that could play out:

  • Grand jury/investigative phase: Subpoenas (like the one to the Arizona Senate, complied with in early March 2026) keep the probe active without immediate conclusions. Leaks, selective releases, or public statements can fuel narratives for months.

  • Litigation delays: If the DOJ (or related actors) pursues civil or criminal angles—perhaps targeting county officials or pushing for ā€œreformsā€ā€”courts could see motions, appeals, and discovery fights that extend well into or past 2026 midterms. Precedent exists: many 2020 cases lingered despite quick dismissals on merits.

  • Parallel political pressure: Public attacks framing resistance (e.g., from Arizona AG Kris Mayes or county officials calling it ā€œunseriousā€ or ā€œweaponizedā€) as suppression of truth can energize bases and justify further probes. Recent coverage notes this fits a broader Trump administration push on ā€œelection integrity,ā€ including similar actions in Georgia and voter-roll demands in multiple states.

Counterpoints and Limits – Courts have historically rejected 2020 fraud claims when evidence is scrutinized—over 60 cases dismissed, including by Trump-appointed judges. Any attempt to use this data for formal challenges (e.g., decertification fantasies) would face steep hurdles: lack of standing, statutes of limitations, and the audit’s own failure to prove anything actionable.Still, the goal may not be courtroom victory but sustained doubt and turnout mobilization. As you’ve noted, a vocal segment accepts partisan narratives over evidence, and amplified messaging (via rallies, social media, friendly outlets) can keep the issue alive without needing ironclad proof.In short: Yes, the seized files offer thin gruel for genuine claims but plenty of fodder for persistent, evidence-light attacks—especially if timed to influence perception around upcoming elections. The physical evidence is long gone, but the political theater isn’t.

Fast Forward 3/19/2026

Bill —

Virginia State Flag and US flag

Early voting is now underway in Virginia. On April 21, voters will decide whether to allow a mid-decade redraw of congressional maps, revisiting a system designed to limit direct political control.

In 2020, Virginia adopted a redistricting commission made up of legislators and citizens, evenly split between Republicans and Democrats. The maps drawn after the last census were intended to last through 2031, providing consistency and predictability for voters.

The current measure would temporarily change that system. It would allow the General Assembly to redraw congressional districts before the next census, with a new map already approved that would take effect for the 2026 elections if voters agree.

Supporters say this allows Virginia to respond to similar moves in other states. Opponents, including the Forward Party, are concerned it could reintroduce more direct political influence into a process voters intended to make more independent.

Below is our official statement

VA Gerrymandering Statement

This moment in Virginia reflects a broader national challenge. Across the country, both parties have increasingly looked to redraw maps in ways that strengthen their position, raising questions about consistency and trust in the rules that govern elections.

As Brian Vincent, Forward-aligned independent mayor of Farmville, Virginia, recently wrote, stable rules and clear standards are essential to building public confidence. You can read his full perspective here.

That same principle was echoed by Lindsey Drath, CEO of the Forward Party, in a recent Fox 5 DC interview, where she emphasized that voters want a system that is fair, transparent, and consistent over time.

How districts are drawn shapes how elections function, from how competitive races are to how responsive leaders are to the people they represent.

At Forward, we believe the goal should be simple: fair processes, consistent rules, and elections where voters feel their voices truly matter.

Virginia voters will make their decision soon, but this issue goes well beyond one state.

Across the country, rules like gerrymandering, closed primaries, and complicated ballot access requirements often shape who gets to run and who voters actually get to choose from. Too often, they narrow the field instead of opening it up.

That can leave independent voters with fewer real options and make it harder to support leaders who truly reflect their values or make them feel proud to cast a ballot.

It also keeps a lot of strong civic leaders on the sidelines. Many people who have led in their communities, businesses, or public service simply do not want to sign up for strict party labels or ideological lines just to run for office.

If we want a healthier democracy, it starts with making sure the system invites more people in, not keeps them out, and gives voters real choices they can believe in.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 5, Lindsey Williams Drath, Kerry Healey, and Christine Todd WhitmanĀ talk with Bob Perls, chair of Forward Party New Mexico and a former state legislator, and Sarah Czech, a U.S. military veteran and leader of the Forward Party Veterans and Military Families Committee, about the role of service in strengthening democracy. Drawing on Bob’s experience in public office and grassroots organizing and Sarah’s leadership advocating for veterans and military families, the conversation explores how civic engagement, nonpartisan leadership, and a commitment to community can help rebuild trust in American politics.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

Promo Shot forThe Forward Party Podcast E05

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

March 25 – Virginia Statewide Virtual Meeting

Politicians should not choose their voters.

Yet Virginia is facing a renewed redistricting effort that risks undoing the will of voters who approved reform in 2020.

TheĀ Forward PartyĀ in Virginia is hosting a statewide virtual meeting to discuss what this means and what we can do about it. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 8 – Recruiting New Forwardists

The midterm year is upon us and we need as many voters and volunteers as possible to support the incredible candidates we endorse this year! Join Carrie Anne our Head of Volunteer Programs to learn how to help us recruit more supporters.Ā  Click here for more information and to RSVP.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Ranked Choice Voting for All Elections

State Senator Mark Spreitzer (D-Beloit) and Representative Clinton Anderson (D-Beloit) introduced LRB-5709 on March 5,Ā legislationĀ that would implement ranked choice voting for state, federal, and local elections in Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin legislation would also eliminate the need for February primaries in nonpartisan elections.

 

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Does you vote count, Damn Right it Does

This is a repost from Substack from the MeidasTouch NetworkĀ  1 VOTE

🚨NEWS: Democrat Andy Thomson has won the Boca Raton mayoral race by just ONE vote.

šŸ”µ Thomson — 7,568

šŸ”“ Liebelson — 7,567

With 100% of votes in, Thomson becomes the first Democratic mayor of Boca Raton in over 30 years.

One vote decided the election.

Sunday Update, after a slow recount, Thomson won by 5 votes, that doesn’t change the fact that we can’t sit by and assume our vote will not matter.

 

 

Fast Forward 03/12/2026

Bill —

For generations, Americans have relied on a simple principle to protect our democracy: no branch of government should hold too much power.

But in recent years, that balance has been shifting.

This week we’re highlighting an important new piece from members of Forward’s Veterans and Military Families Committee: ā€œThe Two‑Party Drift Toward Executive Power.ā€

The article looks at how presidents from both parties have increasingly used military force without meaningful congressional oversight – a trend that raises serious questions about the erosion of constitutional checks and balances.

 

Click the image to read the blog post

The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war, reflecting the founders’ belief that decisions about military force should involve democratic accountability.

But over time, presidents from both parties have increasingly acted without formal congressional approval. The Forward blog argues that the erosion of oversight has made it easier for the executive branch to wield military power with limited restraint.

This isn’t just about one president or one party.

It reflects a broader pattern in American politics where the two‑party system has allowed power to consolidate in the executive branch while Congress struggles to assert its role.

When those checks weaken, so does public confidence in the system. When institutions work properly, power is balanced and decisions carry broader legitimacy.

When those guardrails erode, it becomes easier for any administration — Republican or Democrat — to expand executive authority without sufficient accountability.

One of the core ideas behind the Forward movement is that political incentives shape political outcomes. If the system rewards partisan loyalty and discourages independent oversight, we should not be surprised when institutions weaken. That is why Forward supports reforms that strengthen democratic accountability and encourage leaders who are willing to work across differences.

Healthy competition in politics leads to stronger institutions. Stronger institutions help preserve the constitutional balance that protects our freedoms.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 5, Lindsey Williams Drath, Kerry Healey, and Christine Todd WhitmanĀ talk with Bob Perls, chair of Forward Party New Mexico and a former state legislator, and Sarah Czech, a U.S. military veteran and leader of the Forward Party Veterans and Military Families Committee, about the role of service in strengthening democracy. Drawing on Bob’s experience in public office and grassroots organizing and Sarah’s leadership advocating for veterans and military families, the conversation explores how civic engagement, nonpartisan leadership, and a commitment to community can help rebuild trust in American politics.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

Promo Shot forThe Forward Party Podcast E05

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved
 

RECAP: Forward Voices: ICE and the Rule of Law

At a recent Forward Voices event, speakers discussed the importance of upholding the rule of law and protecting constitutional rights in federal law enforcement, with a focus on ICE practices and due process protections. The conversation reflected Forward’s core values of respecting the Constitution and strengthening democratic accountability. Speakers highlighted the need for clearer oversight, accountability, and thoughtful immigration reform that puts people and constitutional principles first. Click here to watch a recording of the event.

Tonight – Gulf Coast Regional Call

Join other Forward supporters in the states of Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana on a Gulf Coast Regional Call. Hear national party updates and brainstorm ways to spread the Forward message in your area. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

March 16 – NY Monthly Virtual Townhall

Each month, NY Forwardists across the state meet on Google Meets to hear from a partner organization or potental endorsed candidate or to discuss a relevant topic.

March 25 – Virginia Statewide Virtual Meeting

Politicians should not choose their voters.

Yet Virginia is facing a renewed redistricting effort that risks undoing the will of voters who approved reform in 2020.

TheĀ Forward PartyĀ in Virginia is hosting a statewide virtual meeting to discuss what this means and what we can do about it. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

 


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
šŸ‘„ Volunteer | šŸ—³ļø Run for Office | šŸ’ø Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Forward Veterans and Military Families Chair Sarah Czech on News NationĀ 

Forward Veterans and Military Families Chair Sarah Czech discusses how the public deserves answers and transparency around the conflict with Iran.

Empowering Independent Voters Can Fix Primary Elections

Today, there is a growing recognition that the way we run primary elections isn’t working. They’re too partisan. Too low turnout. Too dominated by ideological activists.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Protecting Your Voting Rights

Protecting voting rights is a fundamental aspect of American democracy, and your concern about potential executive overreach is valid given recent reports. While presidents have issued executive orders related to elections in the past, they don’t have unilateral authority to control how states run them, elections are primarily a state responsibility under the Constitution (Article I, Section 4), with Congress able to set or alter regulations for federal races. Any attempt to impose sweeping changes via executive order, especially if premised on unsubstantiated claims like foreign interference from past elections, would likely face immediate legal challenges and injunctions from federal courts, as happened with a similar order in March 2025.

Courts have repeatedly affirmed that such actions can’t override constitutional limits or state authority without clear statutory backing.

That said, litigation can take time, so proactive steps are key to safeguarding access to the ballot. Here’s what individuals and communities can do, based on established strategies from voting rights organizations:1. Stay Informed and Monitor Changes

Follow reliable sources for updates on election laws and any proposed executive actions. Organizations like the ACLU, Brennan Center for Justice, and League of Women Voters track voter suppression efforts and provide alerts.
Sign up for their newsletters or use tools like the Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) website to check your state’s rules.

Track bills in Congress, such as efforts to restore the full protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (e.g., the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act), which could counter discriminatory changes.

The Act’s preclearance provision historically required federal approval for changes in states with discrimination histories, though it was weakened by the Supreme Court in 2013.

2. Register, Vote, and Help Others Do the Same

Ensure you’re registered and update your information if needed—use the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) provisions, which allow registration at DMVs or online in many states.
Encourage friends, family, and neighbors to register early to avoid last-minute barriers.
Vote in every election, including primaries and locals, where turnout can influence who shapes voting rules. If mail voting or early voting is available in your state, use it to reduce reliance on Election Day logistics that could be disrupted.

Know your rights: Federal laws like the Voting Rights Act prohibit discrimination based on race, color, or language, and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) ensures provisional ballots if your eligibility is questioned. If you face issues at the polls (e.g., intimidation or denial), report them immediately to the DOJ’s Voting Section or the Election Protection Hotline (866-OUR-VOTE).

3. Support Advocacy and Legal Efforts
Donate to or volunteer with groups fighting voter suppression, such as the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Common Cause, or the Brennan Center. They file lawsuits to block unlawful changes and have successfully challenged past executive orders.

For instance, multiple courts blocked key parts of the 2025 election integrity order.

Push for state-level Voting Rights Acts, which some states have adopted to fill gaps left by federal weakenings.

Contact your state legislators to advocate for expansions like automatic voter registration or protections against purges.

4. Engage Civically and Build Community

Contact your members of Congress to oppose bills like the SAVE America Act if they create unnecessary barriers (e.g., strict proof-of-citizenship requirements), and support reforms like the Freedom to Vote Act for national standards on early voting and mail ballots.

Volunteer as a poll worker, watcher, or nonpartisan monitor through groups like the EAC or local election boards. This helps ensure transparency and can deter irregularities.
Join or form community groups to educate others—host voter registration drives or workshops on recognizing misinformation about elections.

5. Prepare for Potential Challenges
If an executive order is issued attempting to mandate things like nationwide voter ID, bans on mail voting, or federal oversight of state systems, expect rapid court action.

Advocacy groups are already poised to challenge them, arguing they exceed presidential authority and violate states’ rights.

In the meantime, focus on state-level protections, as federal overreach often gets enjoined quickly.

Document and report any suspicious activity, like voter purges or intimidation, to the FBI or state attorneys general.
Ultimately, the strongest defense is high participation and collective action—history shows that when voters mobilize, attempts to restrict access often fail. If things escalate, resources like the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division can provide enforcement.

Stay engaged, and remember that protections like the 14th, 15th, and 19th Amendments provide a solid foundation against discrimination.

20260227 1538 Image Generation simple compose 01kjgqdwssfdtrr9cs1f1w4ghs

Voting Rights under Attack

Trump signed an executive order in March 2025 that would add proof of citizenship to voter registration forms, prompting multiple lawsuits that are working their way through the courts. Ā Beyond that, a draft executive order to declare a national emergency to allow Trump to take unprecedented control over voting is being circulated by anti-voting activists who say they are in coordination with the White House. The White House has denied it. Who are you going to believe?

Trump raised alarms by suggesting Republicans should “nationalize” elections and wrote on social media: “There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!”

The constitutional firewall

The good news is that the U.S. Constitution gives both states and Congress responsibility for regulating federal elections — the president has no constitutional authority over federal election administration. State and local officials are charged with administering elections, serving voters, and counting ballots. Courts have been actively enforcing this. A 2025 executive order from Trump, which sought to require proof of citizenship for voter registration, has been halted by federal judges who say the order’s provisions exceed a president’s authority.

What you can do

Here are concrete actions, from individual to collective:

  1. Make sure you’re registered and stay registered. Check your registration status regularly at vote.gov, especially if new rules take effect. Don’t assume your registration carries over automatically.

  2. Vote in person if you can. With mail-in voting under pressure, in-person voting is harder to block. If you do vote by mail, return it as early as possible — don’t wait until close to Election Day.

  3. Support and donate to voting rights organizations that are actively litigating these issues: the Brennan Center for Justice, Democracy Docket (which tracks every voting rights lawsuit in real time), the ACLU, and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. These groups are the ones actually blocking the illegal orders in court.

  4. Contact your state officials. State and local election officials have vowed to protect voters’ rights, with Maine’s Secretary of State saying “I am confident we will have safe, free and secure elections in 2026, but it is going to be up to state and local election officials.” Ā Your state attorney general and secretary of state matter enormously here — let them know you’re watching and want them to push back.

  5. Sign up to be a poll worker. Election administration happens at the local level, and having engaged, trained citizens involved is a direct form of protection.

  6. Stay informed through Democracy Docket (democracydocket.com), which tracks every legal challenge to voting restrictions in real-time. It’s the best resource for understanding what’s being blocked and what isn’t.

  7. Push your U.S. Senators to block the SAVE America Act. The SAVE America Act narrowly passed the House but faces an uphill battle in the Senate due to Democratic opposition and the 60-vote threshold to clear the filibuster. Ā Senate opposition is the legislative choke point right now.

Trumps strategy of issuing orders and letting courts sort them out creates real harm in the delay, but courts have been moving quickly on this, and the constitutional structure genuinely does limit presidential power over elections more than in most areas of policy.

Do not believe what you hear on the news, after all TRump does say it’s Fake News. So keep up to date on what is happening.

20260228 1838 Image Generation simple compose 01kjkm3z4te2ftx3mkcwzgwcvt

Sorry Charley, were closed.

Every election cycle brings headlines about court rulings and polling changes.

In a recent Texas primary, a lower court temporarily extended voting hours in some areas. Later, a higher court clarified how ballots cast after the statutory closing time would be handled.

That created confusion for some voters who believed they still had time.

No machine failure. No conspiracy claims here.
Just legal procedure unfolding in real time.

Here’s the lesson for 2026:

Don’t wait until the final hour.

Verify your polling location and hours directly with your county election office.
Confirm the week before you vote.
And if possible, vote early.

Election laws are strict about closing times.
If something changes late in the day, ballots can become subject to legal review.

Protect your vote the simple way:
Check locally. Confirm early. Vote early.

The only way your Vote counts is if you cast it.

20260304 1057 Closed Voting Center simple compose 01kjx3b75zeea92an7ca8z7cqm

Fast Forward 03/05/2026

Bill —

With Operation Epic Fury, the United States is now engaged in a serious military confrontation with Iran. The situation is dangerous and still unfolding. Six American service members have already been killed, and others wounded. Civilians in the region are also paying a heavy price.

First and foremost, we mourn the Americans who have lost their lives in service to this country, and we hold their families in our thoughts. We hope for the speedy recovery of those injured and for the safe return of every American in harm’s way. War also brings suffering to innocent people. Civilians often bear the cost of decisions made far from their homes. Our hearts are with those families as well.

Iran’s government has long supported terrorism and destabilized the region. At the same time, the Iranian people themselves have repeatedly shown courage in demanding freedom, dignity, and opportunity. The Forward Party stands with the Iranian people and hopes for a future where they can determine their own destiny free from repression.

Link to Official Statement on Operation Epic Fury

Click the image for our official statement on Operation Epic Fury

But moments like this also raise serious questions about the health of our own democracy and the checks and balances that were installed by the founders.

The Constitution is clear. The power to declare war belongs to Congress. The founders put that responsibility in the legislative branch so decisions about war would be debated openly and decided collectively by the representatives of the American people.

Over time, that system has eroded. Presidents of both parties have increasingly used military force without clear authorization from Congress. Meanwhile, Congress has too often avoided the responsibility the Constitution assigns to it. When members of Congress fail to debate and vote on war, they are not only avoiding politics; they are avoiding accountability.

This is exactly why the War Powers Resolution was passed in 1973. The law was meant to ensure that Congress had a clear role in approving and overseeing military action. Yet again and again, Washington finds ways to sidestep it.

The Forward Party believes that America can be strong and responsive to world events and national security threats while still faithful to the Constitution. Supporting our troops and defending the rule of law are not competing values. They reinforce each other.

This moment also shows why our political system needs more voices at the table.

Today, the two major parties often treat national security debates as partisan battles instead of constitutional responsibilities. Members of Congress frequently line up behind or against a president based on party loyalty rather than institutional duty. That leaves the branch of government responsible for declaring war acting more like a spectator than a decision maker.

This is why the Forward Party exists. When independent and third-party lawmakers hold seats in Congress, they can act as a forcing function for accountability. They are less tied to the incentives of the two-party system and more able to insist that Congress actually vote on the most important questions the country faces. War should never be decided by default or drift. It should be decided by debate and by votes.

That is what checks and balances are supposed to look like.

America is strongest when our institutions work as the Constitution intended. That means a president who leads, a Congress that does its job, and a political system that rewards courage instead of silence.

Our troops deserve nothing less. The American people deserve nothing less. And the future of our democracy depends on it.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 4, Lindsey Williams Drath, Kerry Healey, and Christine Todd Whitman go deeper on the question they hear everywhere: What can I do that actually matters? The answer is bigger than a single election cycle and bigger than any one candidate.

This episode makes the case for building a durable political movement that restores voter choice, rewards problem-solving, and helps everyday Americans step into leadership where it counts.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

Promo Shot forThe Forward Party Podcast

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved
 

Forward Voices: ICE and the Rule of Law – March 11

This virtual discussion, hosted by the Veterans and Military Families Committee and the Hispanic and Latino Committee of the Forward Party, centers on Forward’s core value of the Rule of Law and examines recent cases in which American citizens, including veterans and their family members, have been unlawfully detained or deported by ICE, raising serious concerns about due process, accountability, and government overreach. The conversation will focus on what the Rule of Law means in practice: holding government agencies accountable when they exceed their legal authority, while also respecting and enforcing immigration law in a lawful, transparent, and constitutional manner rooted in human dignity.

 

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Virginia court allows a referendum on Democratic-led redistricting that could flip 4 US House seats

For the second time, Virginia’s Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that voters can cast ballots on a Democratic-led congressional redistricting plan that could help the party win four more U.S. House seats, as the justices review legal challenges to the effort.

GOP Sen. Steve Daines last-minute withdrawal from Senate race was meant to block Democrats from fielding a top-tier recruit

Daines was aware that if he withdrew too soon then Democrats would have a chance at fielding one of several potential Democrats — namely former Sen. Jon Tester or former Govs. Brian Schweitzer or Steve Bullock.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

I Get It

Plato may be right. All democracies will fail. But I don’t think now’s the time.

When looked at from a distance, we can see the arc of almost anything. Civilizations, movements, ideas. The beginning and the end become visible, like a landscape from altitude. But the closer we get, the more the timeline shifts and blurs. The ending moves around. Why would that be? Maybe because philosophies and people don’t always work hand in hand.

Ideas are clean. People are not.

I have been around long enough to have stood in a few crowds, carried a few convictions, and watched more than one cause rise and fade. Through all of it, every march, every movement, every upheaval, there has always been a placard somewhere in the crowd that read some version of the same thing: Power to the people.

We both know that’s a catch phrase. It always has been. But here’s the thing about catch phrases. The good ones survive because they point at something real, even when nobody’s delivering it. The illusion has to be maintained because somewhere underneath it is a truth people can feel even when they can’t see it.

That truth is this. The closest thing to actual power most of us will ever hold is a vote and a voice. That’s it. That’s the whole arsenal. It isn’t much, until enough people pick it up at the same time.

But neither of those things work if we stop using them. And they stop working in a different way when we use them without thinking. When we vote the way we’re told to vote, believe what we’re told to believe, and accept what we’re told to accept.

Independent thought has always been the first casualty of concentrated power. Not because the people are stupid. They never are. But because every system, in every era, has had a quiet interest in discouraging it. It is easier to lead people who have already decided what they think. Easier still to lead people who believe that what they think, they arrived at on their own.

We live under a democracy, a republic if you want to be precise about it. Living under it comes with benefits most of us have stopped noticing, the way you stop noticing a foundation until it cracks. But those benefits have never been free. They have always cost something. The people who built this thing paid for it. The people who saved it, more than once, paid for it. And the people who will determine whether it survives this particular moment in its timeline will pay for it too.

The question isn’t whether you’re willing to believe in it.

The question is whether you’re willing to stop accepting the illusion in place of the real thing, and what you’re prepared to do about it.

That’s always been the question. It just hasn’t always been this urgent.

20260302 0846 Image Generation simple compose 01kjqq3dhbewmaqdrrmxxqbd89

BEWARE THE NAME The more patriotic the name, the more suspicious you should be.

Something I want everyone to understand before 2026:

When you hear a bill called the “SAVE America Act” or anything with FREEDOM, PROTECT, PATRIOT, or AMERICA in the title — slow down. Don’t let the name do your thinking for you.

That’s exactly what it’s designed to do.

The SAVE America Act is currently working its way toward becoming law, and it would make it harder for real, eligible American citizens to vote — particularly seniors, low-income voters, and people of color who may not have easy access to the specific documents it requires.

It doesn’t save America. It narrows who gets to participate in it.

A wolf in sheep’s clothing is still a wolf. The sheep’s clothing is just there so you don’t run.

Please — before you share, before you support, before you assume something is good because it sounds good — look it up. Sites like GovTrack, Congress.gov, and Democracy Docket break down what bills actually do in plain language.

Our rights are worth five minutes of reading.

20260228 1849 Image Generation simple compose 01kjkmrntfegq80as3v8m7djrk

How to Protect your Voting Rights

In the coming months we will told up is down, right is wrong and a myriad of lies designed to confuse and intimidate the way you vote in the 2026 Midterm Elections.

Question what you are being told, check with your State, The State controls voting, not the Federal Government and especially not the current administration.Ā  You will lied to and you will be threatened.

Follow these common sense guidelines to insure your vote will count and above ALL. vote early, do not wait until the last day to be heard as that will be when most efforts to disrupt the voting process will be.

Register, Vote, and Help Others Do the Same

  • Ensure you’re registered and update your information if needed—use the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) provisions, which allow registration at DMVs or online in many states. Encourage friends, family, and neighbors to register early to avoid last-minute barriers.

  • Vote in every election, including primaries and locals, where turnout can influence who shapes voting rules. If mail voting or early voting is available in your state, use it to reduce reliance on Election Day logistics that could be disrupted.

  • Know your rights: Federal laws like the Voting Rights Act prohibit discrimination based on race, color, or language, and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) ensures provisional ballots if your eligibility is questioned. If you face issues at the polls (e.g., intimidation or denial), report them immediately to the DOJ’s Voting Section or the Election Protection Hotline (866-OUR-VOTE).

20260227 1517 Secure Your Vote simple compose 01kjgp7wsbevt8tw3nmkczqs93

Fast Forward 02/26/2026

Bill —

Tuesday’s State of the Union was another reminder of how divided Washington has become. Instead of laying out a vision that spoke to the whole country, the President spent much of the speech framing the moment as Republicans versus Democrats. (Independents anyone?) At times he talked down to Democrats and suggested they were the problem rather than partners in governing. That kind of language may excite partisans, but it does not lower costs, secure the border, strengthen families, or rebuild trust. Many Americans already feel the country is on the wrong track, and they are tired of politics that puts winning over working together.

The President also outlined some of his legislative agenda for the year ahead. He urged Congress to codify his plans to reduce prescription drug prices, fully fund DHS, enact election reforms, ban Congressional stock trading and pursue other major policy changes. Forward believes these ideas should be aired openly with honest debate and real cost estimates, not used as partisan talking points. Important changes to taxes, spending, elections, and immigration policy affect every American. Congress should treat these issues with seriousness and work across party lines to find solutions.

There were parts of the speech we welcomed. The President’s proposal to expand retirement savings accounts could help more workers build long-term financial security. People deserve better tools to save and invest for their future. We also support the idea of restricting members of Congress from trading individual stocks so that public service is not a path to personal profit. Forward will push lawmakers in both parties to build upon good ideas such as these and make them a reality.

The speech included a number of claims that were exaggerated or did not hold up to scrutiny. Independent fact-checkers found that the President’s statements about economic growth, investment figures, jobs, and border security did not match the available data. For example, his claim that he had secured more than $18 trillion in new investment was far higher than the actual numbers reported by the White House and analysts. Other claims about record-low crime, instantly falling gas prices, or ending multiple wars were either misleading or overstated when checked against official data and outside reporting. These kinds of broad, unsupported statements make it harder for the public to have an honest conversation about how well policies are working and what should come next.

On the ceremonial side, the President honored several Americans for service and sacrifice, and those moments deserve recognition. He awarded the Medal of Honor to Captain Royce Williams, a 100-year-old Navy veteran, and to Chief Warrant Officer Eric Slover, a wounded Army helicopter pilot. He announced the Presidential Medal of Freedom for Olympic hockey goaltender Connor Hellebuyck for helping bring home gold. He presented the Legion of Merit to Coast Guard rescue swimmer Scott Ruskan for saving lives during devastating floods in Texas. And he recognized Staff Sergeant Andrew Wolfe and Specialist Sarah Beckstrom with Purple Hearts for their service after Specialist Beckstrom was killed and Staff Sergeant Wolfe severely injured in an attack on the streets of Washington, D.C. These individuals represent courage and sacrifice that all Americans can respect.

But most families are focused on everyday costs that keep going up. Groceries cost more. Housing costs more. Some types of Energy cost more. People feel squeezed and are looking for real relief. Respected voices across the political spectrum have warned that dismissing concerns about affordability is out of touch with reality. Forward believes affordability is not a talking point. It is the daily reality for millions of Americans. Congress needs to stop ceding its authority to the WH or trying to score points and start working together on real solutions that lower costs and expand opportunity.

There were uplifting moments, like honoring our brave troops and celebrating Americans’ achievements. But unity requires leaders who respect differences and refuse to treat political opponents as enemies. Forward will continue to call for calm, practical leadership from our officials and recruit candidates focused on solving problems and strengthening trust. Americans deserve a government that isn’t so at odds with itself that it can’t solve problems.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 4, Lindsey Williams Drath, Kerry Healey, and Christine Todd Whitman go deeper on the question they hear everywhere: What can I do that actually matters? The answer is bigger than a single election cycle and bigger than any one candidate.

This episode makes the case for building a durable political movement that restores voter choice, rewards problem-solving, and helps everyday Americans step into leadership where it counts.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

Promo Shot forThe Forward Party Podcast

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved
 

Welcome Team Training – March 2

A quick training and show of resources for new members of the Welcome Team! Welcome Team participants will call new supporters in their state and welcome them to the Forward Party. A suggested script for conversations and an email template for follow up will be provided.

FWD TN Statewide Call w/ Khalil Ekulona – March 2

Forward Tennessee needs YOU! With our endorsement of Lauren Pinkston for governor and other exciting developments in the state, it’s time to put a team together. Please join us for a statewide call to discuss all things Forward Tennessee.

AAPI Committee Meeting – March 4

You are invited to the first meeting of the Forward Party AAPI Committee. This meeting brings together members and supporters who want to ensure Asian American and Pacific Islander communities are seen, heard, and represented in shaping the future of our democracy.Ā 

This first meeting will focus on connection, listening, and alignment.Ā We’llĀ introduce the committee’s mission and values, hear from participants about the issues and opportunities facing our communities, and beginĀ identifyingĀ priorities for the months ahead.

Forward Voice: ICE and the Rule of Law – March 11

This virtual discussion, hosted by the Veterans and Military Families Committee and the Hispanic and Latino Committee of the Forward Party, centers on Forward’s core value of the Rule of Law and examines recent cases in which American citizens, including veterans and their family members, have been unlawfully detained or deported by ICE, raising serious concerns about due process, accountability, and government overreach. The conversation will focus on what the Rule of Law means in practice: holding government agencies accountable when they exceed their legal authority, while also respecting and enforcing immigration law in a lawful, transparent, and constitutional manner rooted in human dignity.

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Joe Manchin, Andrew Yang, & Justin Amash: The Two-Party ProblemĀ 

On Saturday, February 21, Forward Party co-founder Andrew Yang joined former West Virginia Governor and Senator Joe Manchin, and former Michigan Congressman Justin Amash on America’s largest nonprofit speaker series, The Richmond Forum, for a conversation called The Two-party Problem. The leaders discussed how ā€œpolitical tribalism stifles innovation and consensusā€ andĀ  explored “alternative voting systems, the rise of independents, and whether a post-partisan future is possible.” They also ā€œchallenged the audience to rethink the foundations of American democracy in a time when the old rules are not working.ā€ A clip of Andrew speaking can be viewed here and a write up of the event is featured at this link.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Is This You?

I must say terms like RINO are offensive and inaccurate. It should also be noted that the largest percentage of voters, over 45% align themselves as independents, maybe that’s why both parties fight so hard to keep this a two party system and are against ranked choice voting. If given the opportunity, both sides would lose.

Rank them in the order you prefer šŸ™‚

  • “I’ve always thought of myself as a [Republican/Democrat], but it feels like the party has moved in a direction that doesn’t quite match where I’ve always stood. I haven’t really changed—it’s more that things have shifted around me.”

  • “I’m still the same [Republican/Democrat] I’ve always been, but lately the party seems to have gone in a different direction from the values I first signed up for.”

  • “I get why people might think I’ve switched sides, but honestly, I haven’t left the party—it just feels like the party’s priorities have drifted away from what drew me to it in the first place.”

  • “My views haven’t really changed over the years, but I do feel like the party as a whole has evolved in ways that don’t line up with mine anymore.”

20260219 1243 Image Generation simple compose 01khvt8q6afjyt3rs040p8rsyk

Fast Forward 02/19/2026

Bill —

As we read the news and see Americans concerned about the costs imposed on them by tariffs, Presidential and Congressional approval ratings exploring new lows, continuously swirling questions about accountability and association with Jeffrey Epstein among U.S. officials, and more, we are reminded of our roots. Why does Forward exist?

Forward Party was born of the simple but profound idea that what ails our competitive American democracy is “lack thereof”: competition. Real, healthy competition. The current political system rewards division, stifles competition, and has literally devolved into one-party rule in several states. It is a system meant to preserve power and status quo, not one meant to lead Americans into and solve the problems of the future.

Americans want a system that hears them. Hearing implies active listening. Care. Concern. A genuine desire to touch the lives of many in a positive, intentional manner. To do this, a certain type of candidate–a certain type of person–must be able to win elections. This requires a system that draws people of high integrity into politics and builds electoral systems that allow them to fairly compete and win on the basis of their accomplishments and merits.

This is what we at Forward, with your help, seek to build. And we are. You are.

This is an election year and a very critical one. (As they all are, really.) We encourage you to be engaged, involved, and informed. We encourage you contact your elected leadership and to vote. And we thank you for your support of our mission and ask for your continued help getting our message out. Tell your friends about us: Together, stronger. Let us build a future on the lessons of the past and present.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 3 of The Forward Party Podcast*, Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey, and Lindsey Williams Drath take a wide-angle look at one of the most important shifts in American politics: the rise of independent voters and the growing demand for a new political approach.

Joined by veteran political journalist Chris Cillizza and professor and historian Dr. Jeremi Suri, the conversation explores what this moment means for the future of democracy and whether a new party can move the country forward. With nearly half of Americans now identifying as independent, the hosts dig into what that really signals. Is it frustration with polarization? A rejection of party loyalty? Or a deeper desire for common-sense solutions that neither major party seems willing to prioritize?

Chris Cillizza offers an unfiltered look at today’s political climate, arguing that while the appetite for change is real, building a successful third party requires more than a headline-grabbing announcement. It takes grassroots organizing, credible candidates, and proof that independent leaders can win and govern.

Dr. Jeremi Suri, chair of Leadership in Global Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, places this political moment in context. He draws parallels to the 1850’s and the Progressive Era, times when economic upheaval and social change disrupted existing party systems and opened space for new movements.

According to Dr. Suri, when major parties fail to address pressing concerns, voters eventually realign around leaders and ideas that better reflect their lived realities. Together, the guests explore how today’s transformations, from artificial intelligence and workforce disruption to health care affordability and political disengagement, are reshaping expectations of government. The conversation challenges the idea that Americans are divided on everything. In reality, there is broad agreement on many core issues, but the current system amplifies the smallest points of conflict.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

Promo Shot forThe Forward Party Podcast

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

FWD Headlines

Forward Party’s Schultz, independent Sweet join crowded race for county treasurer

Christina Schultz, a financial professional, and Andy Sweet, a Main Street business owner, are also running for the position. Schultz, endorsed by former U.S. Presidential candidate and businessman Andrew Yang’s Forward Party, announced her candidacy Wednesday. Sweet, running with no affiliation, launched his campaign early in the year.

Get Involved

Georgia FWD Statewide Call with Former Mayor Copenhaver

Join us Monday, February 23 at 7:00 PMĀ for what might be the most inspiring (and entertaining) 45 minutes of your month. Former Augusta Mayor Deke Copenhaver is dropping by to share how Forward can bring collaborative leadership to Georgia.

Minnesota Special State Convention Feb26

Join FWD-MN for an ad hoc state convention to address a plethora of party building and election year issues on February 25!

Welcome Team Training

A quick training and show of resources for new members of the Welcome Team! Welcome Team participants will call new supporters in their state and welcome them to the Forward Party. A suggested script for conversations and an email template for follow up will be provided.

FWD TN Statewide Call w/ Khalil Ekulona

Forward Tennessee needs YOU! With our endorsement of Lauren Pinkston for governor and other exciting developments in the state, it’s time to put a team together. Please join us for a statewide call to discuss all things Forward Tennessee.

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Bill takes aim at Arizona Independent Party name change

What’s in a name? For new political parties in Arizona, it won’t be terms like “independent” if a recently proposed bill gets through the Legislature.

Virginia House of Delegates Passes Ranked Choice Voting Expansion

A bill that expands ranked choice voting in Virginia has passed the state House of Delegates not long after it was referred out of committee. If signed into law, the bill will allow cities and counties to adopt the reform for all elections.

Chat: What lies ahead for redistricting and the Voting Rights Act?

Six states have drawn new congressional maps this cycle — but experts say a Supreme Court case could kick mid-decade redistricting into overdrive.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright Ā© 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Control of Voting – If Trump Is Ousted: Does It Die on the Vine?

Control of Voting – If Trump Is Ousted: Does It Die on the Vine?

Not entirely, it would slow at the federal level, but these efforts are bigger than one person. Project 2025 isn’t just a Trump playbook; it’s a Heritage Foundation-led blueprint from over 100 conservative groups, predating his second term. By October 2025, Trump had implemented ~47% of its domestic agenda (e.g., workforce cuts via shutdown, executive orders on election “integrity”).

If impeached/removed:

Federal Slowdown: A new admin (e.g., under Vance or a Democrat post-midterms) could reverse executive orders, like Biden did with Trump’s first-term policies. DOJ probes into “fraud” might halt, and appointees like Cleta Mitchell’s network could be ousted. But some changes (e.g., embedded federal observers, voter roll purges) could linger if not actively undone, per experts at the Center for American Progress.

State and Local Persistence: Much of this is decentralized. GOP-led states have passed 100+ “integrity” laws since 2020 (e.g., voter ID, mail ballot restrictions), independent of Trump. Groups like the Election Integrity Network or RNC’s Protect the Vote operate at grassroots levels, training poll watchers and filing lawsuits, stuff that doesn’t vanish overnight. Even without Trump, red states resist federal overreach (e.g., some GOP secretaries of state withholding full voter data from DOJ).

Think Tank and Donor Networks: Heritage, Federalist Society, and funders like Leonard Leo would pivot. Project 2025 is framed as a “conservative promise” for any GOP admin, not Trump-specific. If Trump goes, they’d rebrand for 2028 (e.g., focusing on state ballot initiatives, litigation).

It wouldn’t “die quickly”—more like a temporary federal retreat, with momentum shifting to states and courts. Post-2020, GOP election denialism rewarded incumbents (e.g., no electoral penalty for “stop the steal” supporters in 2022). But backlash (e.g., bipartisan criticism of Georgia raids) could erode support if overreach backfires.
Will They Shift Gears?

Absolutely, conservative networks are adaptive. Without Trump, tactics might soften federally (e.g., less overt “nationalization” talk) but intensify locally: more state laws, voter challenges, or “audit” pushes. X chatter and op-eds suggest prepping for 2028 census fights or midterms as a “blue tsunami” opportunity for Dems. Critics (ACLU, Brennan) warn it could evolve into subtler subversion, like weakening DOJ voting rights enforcement.

In my view, this is a long-game ecosystem (think tanks, donors, state parties) that’s survived presidents before. Trump’s a catalyst, but removal would force a tactical reset—not abandonment. The midterms are the pivot point; if GOP holds, it accelerates. If not, it decentralizes.

20260211 1331 Image Generation simple compose 01kh79v28seq8t505xg3ywtg5x

Seize Control of Voting, Who is Behind the Curtain

Feb 11, 2026, I read this informative article about the FBI seizing the voting records in Georgia.

“The Silent Coup Is Already Underway: How Trump is moving to seize control of voting — starting in Georgia” by Glenn Kessler (published on his Substack: glennkessler.substack.com).

It discusses concerns over Donald Trump’s statements and actions aimed at influencing or “nationalizing” election processes, with a focus on Georgia as an early example. The article opens with a quote from Trump in a February 2 interview with Dan Bongino: ā€œThe Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.ā€ It revisits Trump’s past claims of election fraud and frames current moves (like potential federal involvement in state voting systems, ballot handling, or oversight) as steps toward greater control ahead of future elections, such as the 2026 midterms.

My question is who is actually the architect? I don’t believe Trump ever had the smarts to do this on his own and certainly not now. Someone or some organization is orchestrating everything behind the scenes

Key Players and Enablers from the Article and Related Context

The Kessler article doesn’t name an overarching “architect” but points to several individuals and groups actively involved in pushing this agenda, particularly in Georgia as a testing ground:

Cleta Mitchell: She’s a prominent conservative lawyer who was on the infamous 2021 call where Trump pressured Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” votes. Mitchell now leads the Election Integrity Network, a group focused on challenging election processes and training poll watchers. The article notes her influence through appointees like Heather Honey (Deputy Assistant Secretary for Election Integrity), who has ties to Mitchell’s network and has floated ideas like declaring a “national emergency” to override state voting rules.

Kurt Olsen: Appointed by Trump as Director of Election Security and Integrity, he’s been sanctioned in the past for baseless election fraud claims. He referred the warrant that led to the FBI seizing Fulton County ballots in January 2026, reviving old 2020 conspiracies.

Tulsi Gabbard: As Director of National Intelligence, she oversaw the FBI raid on Fulton County for a vague “national security issue,” which the article suggests is a pretext for federal overreach.

These folks aren’t new; they’ve been part of Trump’s orbit since his first term or the 2020 challenges. The Georgia focus—using a Trump-friendly state election board to potentially seize county boards—seems designed as a blueprint for scaling up nationally, per the article.

Broader Influences and Organizations

Looking beyond the piece, reporting ties this to a more structured conservative playbook that’s been in development since at least 2024-2025:

Heritage Foundation and Project 2025: This stands out as the most likely “organizational architect.” Project 2025, a detailed policy roadmap from the Heritage Foundation (a major conservative think tank), explicitly calls for using the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate and prosecute alleged voter fraud, even based on debunked claims. It proposes federal interventions like proof-of-citizenship requirements for voting and empowering agencies to audit state elections. Trump’s administration has implemented parts of this, such as shifting the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division toward “fraud” probes under appointees like Harmeet Dhillon (a 2020 election denier) and Kash Patel (FBI pick who’s vowed to go after perceived election riggers).

Critics from groups like the Brennan Center have called it a “MAGA fever dream” for nationalizing voter suppression tactics, like banning mail ballots or overhauling voter registration.

Other Advisors and Networks: Figures like Stephen Miller (Trump’s policy whisperer on immigration and now broader issues) or Steve Bannon (who’s pushed election denialism via his “War Room” podcast) often get credited in analyses for strategizing these moves. There’s also overlap with groups like the Center for Internet Security (CIS), which handles election cybersecurity and has DHS ties—some X discussions speculate it’s part of a deeper infrastructure for monitoring elections.

In Georgia specifically, the push involves embedding federal observers and audits, which echoes tactics from Project 2025.

As for the Federalist Society: They’re hugely influential in judicial appointments (shaping courts that could rule on election cases), and their co-founder Leonard Leo has funneled big money into conservative causes, including election-related litigation through networks like the Honest Elections Project. But they’re not the primary driver here—that seems more Heritage’s lane for policy blueprints. Federalist Society folks might advise on legal strategies to make this stick, though.

Trump isn’t devising this solo; his style is more improvisational and grievance-driven than master-planner. In my view, the real “architecture” is a decentralized but aligned network of conservative think tanks (led by Heritage via Project 2025) and loyalists like Mitchell, Olsen, and Patel, who’ve been gaming out ways to centralize election oversight under the guise of “integrity.” It’s not a conspiracy in the tin-foil sense—it’s out in the open, rooted in post-2020 frustrations and amplified by Trump’s platform.

The goal appears to be tilting the system toward Republicans by federalizing controls that states have historically managed, which raises constitutional red flags (elections are state-run per the Constitution, as even some GOP allies like Gov. Greg Abbott have pushed back on).

Whether this succeeds depends on courts, Congress, and public push back—it’s already facing bipartisan criticism and could backfire if it erodes trust further.

20260211 1205 Image Generation simple compose 01kh74wcqff3et9yhd5n0qp2sg

2026 Midterm Elections