Posts in Category: Voting Rights

Oregon Leaders Stand United in Protecting Vote-By-Mail Elections

PRESS RELEASE

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: September 8, 2026

Secretary of State Tobias Read: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Governor Tina Kotek: Governor Tina Kotek Press Office | news@govpress.oregon.gov

U.S. Senator Ron Wyden: Hank Stern | hank_stern@wyden.senate.gov

U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley: Wade Muehlhof | wade_muehlhof@merkley.senate.gov

Oregon Leaders Stand United in Protecting Vote-By-Mail Elections

New data released on the May 2026 primary indicates more ballots rejected due to late postmarks 

SALEM, OR — Today, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read held a press conference with Oregon Governor Tina Kotek and U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley to discuss their work protecting Oregon’s safe, accurate, and fair vote-by-mail elections and the ongoing battle over the federal government’s illegal actions.

A recording of the press conference can be found here.

“There is a lot of uncertainty right now. There are a lot of people trying to make voting harder or more confusing. But Oregon is not going to sit back and hope for the best. We are going to prepare. We are going to adapt. And we are going to protect every eligible Oregonian’s right to vote,” Secretary Read said.

“Vote-by-mail is what Oregonians have come to know and rely on, and that’s why protecting our elections isn’t about one political party or another,” Governor Kotek said. “We are all better off when everyone can participate in our elections without disruption, confusion, or threat. We stand united in that belief.”

“Oregon set the gold standard for vote by mail decades ago, proving that when you make voting safe, accessible, and convenient, democracy thrives,” Senator Wyden said. “Oregonians will not stand by while radical federal overreach and postal disruptions threaten to strip away our fundamental right to make our voices heard. As the first U.S. Senator to be elected entirely by mail-in voting, I’ll keep fighting in Washington to stand by mail-in voting because we know it works and has been fraud free for decades. I’ll ensure every valid vote in Oregon is counted no matter what hurdles are thrown in our way.”

“In a republic, the voters choose their leaders. But Trump is striving to flip that concept and allow one leader, himself, to choose the voters. We must do everything we can to stop his effort to rig the November election, and that includes a fierce defense of our secure, accessible, high-integrity vote-by-mail system,” Senator Merkley said.

Earlier today, Secretary Read released the official turnout and participation statistics for the May 2026 primary election, which includes new statistics and data visualizations to improve transparency in Oregon’s elections.

The data shows that more ballots were rejected in this year’s primary due to late postmarks than in other recent primary elections.

7,314 ballots received during the 7-day post-election grace period in the May 2026 primary were rejected for having a late postmark. This represents an increase of 35% compared to 5,404 ballots rejected for late postmarks in May 2022, the last midterm primary.

Put in terms of rates of rejection for ballots received in the 7-day grace period, 13.1% were rejected for having a late postmark in 2026. In the 2024 primary, that rate was 9.5%, and in 2022, it was 8.2%.

That means more Oregonians had their voices go unheard this year just because their ballots didn’t make it through the mail on time.

In response, Secretary Read is continuing to urge Oregon voters to return their ballot using one of the 324 secure, official drop boxes located across the state.

To make this option more convenient for more Oregonians, Secretary Read made emergency request to the Oregon Legislature for funds to pay for 20 additional drop boxes and to cover the costs associated with increased drop box usage. He also requested funding for an opt-in statewide ballot tracking tool that can provide Oregonians with more information about the status of their ballot so they can act quickly if there are any disruptions.

Secretary Read will advocate for those requests to the Joint Interim Subcommittee on Human Services Tuesday at 2:30 p.m.

###

7,314 ballots received during the 7-day post-election grace period in the May 2026 primary were rejected for having a late postmark. This represents an increase of 35% compared to 5,404 ballots rejected for late postmarks in May 2022, the last midterm primary.

Put in terms of rates of rejection for ballots received in the 7-day grace period, 13.1% were rejected for having a late postmark in 2026. In the 2024 primary, that rate was 9.5%, and in 2022, it was 8.2%.

That means more Oregonians had their voices go unheard this year just because their ballots didn’t make it through the mail on time.

In response, Secretary Read is continuing to urge Oregon voters to return their ballot using one of the 324 secure, official drop boxes located across the state.

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Help

This email was sent to .com using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: Oregon Secretary of State · 900 Court Street NE · Capitol Room 136 · Salem OR 97310-0722

Secretary Read Requests Emergency Funding for Election Security

PRESS RELEASE

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: September 8, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read Requests Emergency Funding for Election Security

Additional resources would provide voters with greater confidence and transparency amid federal attacks on elections 

SALEM, OR — Today, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read proposed concrete steps to provide eligible Oregonians with more ways to return their ballots and make sure their votes get counted.

In testimony before a budget subcommittee of the Oregon Legislature, Secretary Read advocated for a total of $1.25 million in emergency funding to support Oregon’s elections as the federal government continues its attempts to control and undermine election integrity.

“Our goal is simple: every eligible Oregonian should have a clear and dependable way to cast a ballot and be confident that their vote gets counted,” Secretary Read said. “Expanding drop box access and providing a means for voters to track their ballot are some of the tools we have to protect Oregonians’ right to vote. I’m grateful to the Legislature for considering the request for emergency funding on behalf of Oregon voters.”

The funding request has three main components: supporting greater access to official drop boxes, providing an opt-in ballot tracking system for voters, and taking the next step to clear out old data in the inactive voter list.

Recently, the Oregon Secretary of State’s office conducted a comprehensive study to identify gaps in drop box availability around the state. Multiple locations were identified where an additional drop box would give Oregonians better access to submitting their ballots through this secure method.

Emergency funding of $618,000 would pay for 20 drop boxes and expenses related to an increase in drop box usage. Installation requires coordination with local leaders and quick work to get as many drop boxes as possible functional before the election.

Every voter in Oregon should have access to the same tools to protect their vote, and $154,000 would expand BallotTrax statewide. Currently five counties use this opt-in service that provides updates to voters about their ballot: when it is sent, when their county receives it on the way back, and when their signature has been accepted so their ballot can be counted.

The final $480,000 would allow counties to send voter notification cards to inactive voters to continue the process of clearing out old data on the inactive voter list. Inactive voters do not receive ballots and do not impact the outcome of any election, but proper data management is important.

The funding request advanced with unanimous support and will be considered by the Emergency Board on Thursday.

###

09/08/26 Oregon – Your State Update – Is YOUR State making sure you have a fair election?? That’s a huge question and it doesn’t matter if it’s a Blue or a Red State, Our Elections are Sacred to our Freedom and our Democracy. What matters isn’t the winner as long as it is the person that we voted for. I sincerely hope you are following your State and DEMANDING they are providing you a fair election. It is your RIGHT, not a privileged. There is a great deal about Oregon’s leadership I personally disagree with but I am proud as hell of their Election Division.

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

This email was sent to  using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: Oregon Secretary of State · 900 Court Street NE · Capitol Room 136 · Salem OR 97310-0722

MEDIA ADVISORY: Vote-by-Mail Press Conference with Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley

MEDIA ADVISORY

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: September 4, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Vote-by-Mail Press Conference with Secretary of State Tobias Read, U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley 

SALEM, OR — On Tuesday, September 8, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read will hold a press conference with U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley to address Oregon’s response to the Executive Order and U.S. Postal Service rules that could restrict vote-by-mail. They will cover what actions can be taken now to protect Oregon’s safe, accurate, and fair vote-by-mail elections, in addition to the ongoing legal challenges to the actions taken by the federal government.

EVENT INFORMATION

WHO: Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden and U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley

WHAT: Vote-by-Mail Press Conference

WHERE: Oregon State Capitol Building Press Conference Room

WHEN: Tuesday, September 8 at 10:15 a.m.

MEDIA RSVP: To reserve your spot at the press conference or receive a remote access link, email connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

PUBLIC ACCESS: The press conference will stream in-full on the Oregon Secretary of State YouTube page and oregonlegislature.gov

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

Secretary Read: Ruling Reaffirms Oregon’s Vote-by-Mail Elections Will Proceed As Planned

PRESS RELEASE

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: September 4, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read: Ruling Reaffirms Oregon’s Vote-by-Mail Elections Will Proceed As Planned

SALEM, OR — Today, a federal judge extended a legal block against the U.S. Postal Service from implementing its rules that would illegally restrict vote-by-mail in the upcoming general election.

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read is releasing the following statement:

“This is an important win, and it reaffirms that our secure, fair, accurate vote-by-mail elections will go forward as they always do. While this fight is not over, this preliminary injunction should give voters and elections officials more confidence; there is now another, stronger barrier between our elections and illegal interference from the federal government. It’s time for the federal government to realize they are not above the law and respect the Constitution and Oregonians’ right to determine how our elections are run.”

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Help

Oregon Ballot Drop Off Boxes

In May 2026 (around the primary election), officials noted that Oregon has 321 official drop boxes (also called drop sites). These are available until 8 p.m. on Election Day, are monitored, and include fire-suppression features.

newsfromthestates.com

The state does not maintain a single permanent public “total” page that is always updated outside election periods. Instead:

  • The Oregon Secretary of State provides an Oregon Drop Box Locator tool (sos.oregon.gov) that lists locations statewide. It becomes available about 21 days before a statewide election.

    sos.oregon.gov
  • Individual counties publish their own lists and counts (e.g., Clackamas County has listed 26 sites; Multnomah County has listed around 30).

Oregon is an all-mail voting state, so every registered voter gets a ballot by mail and can return it by mail (postmarked by Election Day) or at any official drop box/site in the state. The number of boxes can vary slightly by election as counties adjust locations. For the most current count or map during an election window, check the Secretary of State’s Drop Box Locator or your county elections office.

This Week’s Endorsements 09/03/2026

We’d like to highlight more candidate endorsements this week. Adding to our slate of federal candidates are two Navy veterans who meet the standard we value at Forward Party.

They are John Gregory Vincent of South Carolina, running for U.S. House (SC-07) and Bob Smith of California, running for U.S. House (CA-24). They are on opposite coasts and opposite sides of the political spectrum, but both are running because they believe the communities they want to serve deserve representation that actually serves them.

John Gregory Vincent is running as a Democrat and Bob Smith is running as a Republican. As we have argued for years, the letter next to the name should not matter. Forward Party endorses candidates based on simple principles: are they prepared to serve their constituents, work with people who don’t share their politics and focus on delivering results rather than performing for their base?

In both cases, the answer is yes.


Meet John Gregory Vincent

Democratic Candidate — U.S. House
South Carolina’s 7th Congressional District

John Gregory Vincent spent 20 years in the Navy, retired as a Command Master Chief responsible for the welfare and training of service members across seven bases and five military branches, and came home to South Carolina to spend the next chapter of his career in service to his community.

He served on the Board of Directors of the Augusta Kiwanis. He is the Small and Minority Business co-chair for the Florence Chamber of Commerce. He is involved with the committee supporting the Veterans Park in Florence. And he has been sober for more than two decades, which he speaks about publicly and directly, working to reduce the stigma that keeps people from seeking treatment.

His campaign is built around four areas that reflect what he has heard in his district: affordability, jobs and small businesses and farms, schools, healthcare and veterans’ services, and government accountability and the federal budget. South Carolina’s 7th District deserves a representative who has spent his career studying what it means to serve. Vincent has been doing that work his entire life.

Meet Bob Smith

Republican Candidate — U.S. House
California’s 24th Congressional District

Bob Smith spent more than 26 years in the Navy as a combat veteran and engineer. He was named the U.S. Navy Engineer of the Year in 2023 and received the Humanitarian Service Medal for his work with international disaster relief operations. He is now running in California’s Central Coast with the same engineering discipline he brought to advanced weapons systems and international disaster relief.

His community engagement in California’s Central Coast has crossed partisan lines in ways that are not commonly seen. He has volunteered with his local Republican Party on data analysis and canvassing. He has also worked on his wife’s Democratic city council campaign. He coaches youth sports and mentors young athletes.

His campaign focuses on affordability, education, energy and water, immigration, and national defense. All are framed around their direct impact on the safety and economic security of Central Coast families. Bob’s approach to every problem he has ever faced is a testament to his training as an engineer: evaluate the options and put the best solution forward.


Why Forward Endorses Democrats and Republicans 

The Forward Party is building a different theory of representation, one that answers to constituents rather than to partisan interests and is willing to work with whoever is serious about getting things done for the American people.

Forward Party’s Fulcrum Strategy leans on the argument that across the ideological spectrum, there are people who are more interested in governing than in performing on the stage of partisan theatre. This supports that approach in building a bloc of elected officials willing to act independently of party leadership on consequential votes, ultimately helping to shift the incentive in Congress away from party loyalty and toward earning support on the merits of legislation.

A Democrat from South Carolina and a Republican from California who share that operating principle are more aligned with what Congress is supposed to do than two members from the same party who vote in lockstep with their parties on every issue. That is the Forward Party’s primary premise. John Gregory Vincent and Bob Smith are this week’s evidence for it.

Both are the kind of people Congress is supposed to have more of, and currently has far too few of.


November 3rd is 61 days away. The Forward Party has candidates on the ballot in South Carolina, California, Ohio, Montana, New York, Idaho, South Dakota, Colorado, Minnesota, Utah, and across the country. Every one of them is evidence of the same thing: good representation does not require a party. It requires the right person.

The Forward Party Podcast

In case you missed it, we had Rep. Kevin Kiley on the podcast last week with host Lindsey Drath for a discussion on leading with integrity in Washington.

Their conversations explore why experienced political leaders are stepping away from party labels, what voters are asking for, and whether independent candidates can offer a different approach to governing.

Click the image below to watch.

TFPP EP16 Thumbnail

Get Involved

National Volunteer Call – Forward Party 

September 08, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern 

Please join our director of volunteer engagement Carrie Anne for a 30 minute rundown of all things Forward Party! Meet other volunteers, hear what’s happening in the committees and other states, and stay abreast of party news. This call is for any level of volunteer in any state, and is a great starting point if this is your first time getting involved!

Forward Text Force – Text banking for candidates 

September 10, 2026 at 6:30pm Eastern

Join the Forward Text Force, a group of dedicated volunteers working remotely to support our candidates and GOTV efforts. Each Thursday from 6:30-7:00pm ET from Sept 10th through election day, we will log on together to onboard, troubleshoot, and send text messages in community. We provide the script, support, and socialization with other volunteers, all you need to bring is your computer or phone!

Meet the Forward Candidates 2026! 

September 10, 2026 at 8:00pm Eastern 

Once again this campaign season we bring you Meet the Forwardists, a virtual opportunity to get to know some of the federal and statewide candidates we have endorsed this year.

Next week will feature candidates running for various levels of office across the country on the Forward Party ballot line.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Bob Chew, Forward Party candidate running against Sen. John Hickenlooper | Colorado Point of View 

Bob Chew the Forward Party candidate running for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by John Hickenlooper joins Colorado Point of View to discuss his campaign

Democrat drops out of Utah Senate race, leaving Forward Party incumbent to face GOP challenger • Utah News Dispatch 

As Sen. Emily Buss vies to hold on to the Forward Party’s highest-ranking elected position in the country, Democrat bows out to give her a better chance at keeping the seat out of the GOP supermajority’s hands

Tennessee’s election has 5 races and hot button issues to watch 

With 47% of voters nationally identifying as independent, Columbia businesswoman Lauren Pinkston wants to give voters who don’t identify with either major political party someone to vote for.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Does you vote count, Damn Right it Does #2

🚨NEWS: Democrat Andy Thomson has won the Boca Raton mayoral race by just ONE vote.

🔵 Thomson — 7,568

🔴 Liebelson — 7,567

With 100% of votes in, Thomson becomes the first Democratic mayor of Boca Raton in over 30 years.

One vote decided the election.

Update, after a slow recount, Thomson won by 5 votes, that doesn’t change the fact that we can’t sit by and assume our vote will not matter.

 

 

The Lone Star or the Red Star?

The Lone Star or the Red Star?

A Republican-controlled Texas county that has been trending Democratic is eliminating 92 Election Day polling places. Republicans say they’re eliminating underused locations and improving efficiency; Democrats say reducing convenient polling places suppresses turnout. The facts establish the reduction. They do not, by themselves, establish the motive.

Tarrant County, Texas, is cutting 92 Election Day polling locations for the 2026 midterms. The county had 316 locations in 2022; the new plan leaves 224 locations for roughly 1.3 million registered voters.

The Republican-controlled county commissioners approved the reduction 3–2 along party lines. Republicans say they’re eliminating poorly used locations, saving money and concentrating resources where they’re needed. They also point out that the county has adopted countywide voting, meaning voters can use any polling location rather than being restricted to one assigned site.

Democrats and voting-rights groups argue that fewer polling places means less convenient access to voting, particularly in Black, Hispanic and college communities. They call it voter suppression. Tarrant County is also politically important: it has been gradually moving toward Democrats and is a major battleground in the 2026 Senate race.

Can reducing polling locations affect turnout?
Absolutely. The argument isn’t really that “you can’t vote.” It’s that making voting less convenient can cause some people not to vote at all.

And that’s where the political controversy comes from.

The interesting wrinkle is that Tarrant County really has been moving toward the Democrats, so the timing naturally raises suspicion. But correlation isn’t proof that the polling-place cuts were designed to hurt Democrats. The Republicans have a plausible administrative explanation: fewer, better-used locations and fewer poll workers needed.

So here we are less than two months from mid-terms, the Administration is against the wall, And we know which wall that is and now lets start playing with the where we can cast a vote, was Gerrymandering bad enough?

What’s next. A proctor checking your ballot before submission, oh, crap. Don’t want to give them any ideas.

A Tale of Two States

Surprising, two red states, Republican governors and candidates with different values. Take Wyoming and Maine. Opposite sides of the country, Wyoming, the strongest Trump supporter in the 2024 Election in the nation, They voted Trump 72.3% and Harris 26.1%

Maine, Harris won, 52.4 % to Trump’s 45.5% yet when we look at what is coming up for the midterms. Something strange happened.

Earlier, Trump administration officials have stated that they intend to send up to 1,000 election monitors to the polls this fall. In Fact 2 election monitors were sent as part of a “monitoring initiative aimed at promoting transparency,” to Wyoming for the States August 18 primary elections.

And…. their behavior managed to upset even Republican Gov. Mark Gordon of Wyoming.

Gordon said “I feel very strongly about the federal government coming in and taking our guns. I don’t like that. I don’t like the federal government coming in and taking our votes, either,”  Gordon said they were not made aware the monitors would be present and did not present credentials until requested to do so.

They then proceeded to ask questions “outside the scope of federal voting rights laws …about the nature, length, and timing of poll worker training. Monitors requested training guides, asked how our new election equipment was acquired, and wanted to examine our tabulators.”

Governor Gordon has asked the State AG to look into the matter.

Maine on the other hand., or at least Maine Republican gubernatorial nominee Bobby Charles told members of a Young Republican Club earlier that he intends to call his “friend” Tom Homan, Trump’s deportation czar, to ask for ICE presence at the polls.

Way to go Wyoming.

Finally! Meet the Forward candidates & text banking is LIVE 09/01/2026

​​

Hello Forward Friends-

It’s that time of year! The election is two months away, and we are in full campaign mode. Our volunteer dashboard has been updated to offer you direct links to our candidates’ volunteer signups, and text banking, which is live! If you want to know more about who we are supporting this cycle, I’ve got you covered. We have three “Meet the Forwardists” events planned, and all the Committees will be hosting candidate panels as well.

We’ll also have weekly Forward Text Force meetings. This will be your chance to get onboarded, ask questions about the candidates, and troubleshoot any technical issues with me. We plan to send out close to half a million texts this year, so we definitely need your help!

Volunteer Spotlight:

Our Volunteer of the Month for September is Chris Scott in Utah! He has stepped up to help the team there with parade organization and lobbying at the State Capitol, all very important work. When asked why he spends his time doing this, Chris said, “A majority of Americans want a viable third political party. To me, viable means less national drama, and more local results for people. I truly believe Forward can influence that and stabilize our politics. I work hard so our fellow citizens discover that we exist and associate us with being viable.” Thank you, Chris, for helping make us a viable party!

Upcoming virtual events:

Tues Sept 8th @ 7:30pm ETNational Volunteer Call

  • Your first stop to updates on the National party and how to plug into the work. We have so many new things to share that you may want to attend this again even if you have before!

Thurs Sept 10th @ 6:30pm ET- Forward Text Force

  • Every Thurs until the election we will gather to onboard people to our text banking platform and send texts for our candidates together!

Thurs Sept 10th @ 8pm ETMeet the Forwardists, Round 1

  • This first week will focus on candidates running on the Forward ballot line from various states and for different levels of office, and will be hosted by Chuck Todd!

Wed Sept 16th @ 8pm ETWomen’s Committee Candidate Panel

  • Meet impressive female candidates from all different parties!

You can find more things to do on our events calendar.

In person events:
We are working on some in person volunteer deployments this season. If you are interested in traveling to support Forward please respond to this email and let me know!

Join us in Myrtle Beach, SC the weekend of Sept 18-20th for a Forward Friends Meetup and a day of canvassing.

Staying connected:

We have so much happening that you’ll be hearing again from me in 2 weeks. You can also join our volunteer slack for faster updates on events and the ability to connect with other volunteers.

I really appreciate everyone that opens this newsletter and tries to attend our events. I do all this for you!

Have a safe and fun Labor Day,

With gratitude,

Carrie Anne
https://home.forwardparty.com/

t t t f f

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party®, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Article 3 of 3 The Long Game — Power Beyond the Ballot – Video

By now, it is clear that the 2026 midterms are unlike any we have seen in recent memory. The scale of spending, the intensity of coordination, and the precision of messaging all suggest a high-stakes contest—but the full story goes deeper than individual candidates or party control.

Agree Where You Can 08/29/2026

This week we are focusing on the work being done in Minnesota. Eight legislative candidates stood together at the Minnesota State Capitol last Thursday and made a public commitment to govern across party lines after Election Day.

Minnesota Forward Together, a coalition of DFL, Republican, Independent and Forward Independence legislative candidates, committed to working across party lines to solve problems for their constituents instead of trying to score political points

They did not promise to agree on everything. They are promising to put their constituents ahead of their party and find common ground wherever they can.

The Forward Party has been talking about the Fulcrum Strategy at the federal level all year. The argument is you don’t need a majority of independent senators or representatives to change how Congress works. You need enough members who are independent from the control of either party to hold the balance of power on votes that matter.

Minnesota Forward Together is that argument: built at the state level with eight candidates standing together who are running for office right now.

A note for readers outside Minnesota: The DFL (The Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party) is Minnesota’s Democratic Party. It was formed in 1944 through a merger of the Minnesota Democratic Party and the Farmer-Labor Party, which had been a powerful independent political force in the state since the 1920s.

The DFL name reflects Minnesota’s long tradition of coalition politics, the same tradition that Minnesota Forward Together is drawing on.

It also reflects the work and growth of the MN Forward Party that formed through a merger last year. The Independence-Alliance Party of Minnesota and the Minnesota Forward Party merged to form the Forward Independence Party of Minnesota. The merged organization is bringing candidates together that share our values and ultimately driving more choices in front of the voters. 

So when you see DFL candidates committing to govern alongside Republicans and independents, it is worth knowing that the party itself was founded on the principle that different political movements could come together around shared values.

Politicians from different parties sharing a stage and making this pledge reflects the current stage of our democracy. It reflects that this kind of promise has grown uncommon among our representatives. Putting the needs of constituents first should be expected of our state and federal leaders. What makes Minnesota Forward Together significant is the timing.

These candidates are making a public pledge before they are elected. They are choosing accountability now and presenting their intentions to voters before they are safely in office.

They are publicly announcing to the people of Minnesota that they are better served by legislators who talk to each other than by legislators who perform for their base.

The Bigger Picture

Minnesota Is the State-Level Version of What We’re Building Nationally.

The Fulcrum Strategy in the U.S. Senate says a small bloc of genuinely independent senators, two to  three members who answer only to their states and not to either party, can hold the balance of power in a closely divided chamber. Neither party can pass anything without them. That changes the incentive structure for everyone. Legislation has to earn their vote on the merits, not on party loyalty.

Minnesota Forward Together is enacting a model of that strategy with a cross-partisan coalition of state legislators who have committed publicly to governing together. Pledging to agree where they can, and disagree where they must, is a vehicle for changing how a state legislature operates. In an evenly divided state house like Minnesota currently has, this coalition would be incredibly powerful in advocating for principled reforms.

The principle is identical. You don’t need a majority. You need a committed coalition that refuses to be owned by either side. Minnesota Forward Together is what that looks like when eight people decide to do it before they even win. Imagine what it looks like when they do.

The Forward Party Podcast

What does it take to govern effectively when you leave the traditional party system behind? On this episode of The Forward Party Podcast, host Lindsey Drath sits down with independent Congressman Kevin Kiley for a discussion on leading with integrity in Washington.

Their conversations explore why experienced political leaders are stepping away from party labels, what voters are asking for, and whether independent candidates can offer a different approach to governing.

Click the image below to watch.

TFPP EP16 Thumbnail

Get Involved

Recruitment Training: How to talk about Forward

August 31, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern Time 

Ready to help Forward Party grow? This training will give you the tools and confidence to talk about our mission with others in a way that actually connects. We’ll go over a party status update so you feel knowledgeable, values to talk about, and a formula for creating your own Forward story. Whether you are already active as a volunteer or brand new to the movement, there is something for everyone in this training. Build the future, and bring a friend! 

UNLV Fall Involvement Fair 

September 02, 2026 at 10:00am Pacific  

Come meet the UNLV Forward Party at the Fall Involvement Fair! Whether you are interested in politics, civic engagement, leadership, or simply want to meet students passionate about creating a healthier democracy, we would love to connect with you 

Young Forwardists Introduction 

September 03, 2026 at 5:00pm Eastern 

Join members of the Young Forwardists as they introduce you to the Forward Party and how you can get involved in our pivotal movement to make politics better. Whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, or anything in between, there’s a place in the Forward Party for you.

Learn about how you can get involved with the Young Forwardists by joining our Young Forwardists Introduction Meetings! These introductions occur every month (1st and 3rd Wednesday, 2nd and 4th Saturday).


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Lindsey Drath Joins MS Now’s Way Too Early with Ali Vitali

Host Ali Vitali has a conversation with Forward Party CEO Lindsey Drath and MS Now Political Analyst Basil Smikle about 2028, midterms, mail-in ballots and more.

Colorado Public Radio: Can independent candidates gain traction? Maybe not, but it’s not stopping them from trying 

Independent U.S. Senate candidate Bob Chew talks about his platform and the challenges of running as an independent

Kerry Healey Joins Chad Hartman Radio Show

Chad features a conversation with Forward Party Executive Chair Kerry Healey on the viability of third-party options and the announcement of Minnesota Forward Together

Why the Independent Movement is Stronger, More Diverse, and Here to Stay. 

The Perot movement shook up American politics. The major parties reacted. Now Independent candidacies are surging

Judge allows independent candidate to remain on ballot in Bucks County state House race 

Chris Gambino, an independent candidate who is running in the 143rd state House District in Bucks County, will be allowed to stay on the ballot after a challenge to his nomination papers.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Judge’s Ruling Halts USPS Rule Restricting Mail–in Voting

PRESS RELEASE

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: August 27, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Judge’s Ruling Halts USPS Rule Restricting Mail–in Voting

SALEM, OR — Today, a federal judge again temporarily blocked the United States Postal Service (USPS) from moving forward with its new rule that would illegally restrict access to vote-by-mail, a rule that was mandated by President Trump’s Executive Order 14399. The USPS will be blocked from implementing many of the rule’s provisions related to the November election for at least 14 days.

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read is releasing the following statement:

“The Constitution is clear: states run elections. The USPS doesn’t get to pick and choose who gets ballots. Presidents don’t get to rig elections via executive decree. The USPS rule and the executive order it came from are unconstitutional.

“This order provides more certainty for voters and elections officials in the middle of a major election. While this is a win, we will continue to aggressively pursue every available tool we have to protect every Oregon citizen’s right to vote. I’ve said it before and I will say it again: Oregon elections are secure, accurate and fair, and we’re going to keep it that way.”

###

 

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
 |  Help

New Voter Registration PSA Launched by Oregon Secretary of State

PRESS RELEASE

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: August 27, 2026
Contact: Tess Seger | tess.seger@sos.oregon.gov

New Voter Registration PSA Launched by Oregon Secretary of State

SALEM, OR — Today, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read launched new public service announcements to inform all eligible Oregonians about how to register to vote. The announcements were produced and placed in partnership with the Oregon Association of Broadcasters and radio stations across Oregon. 

Our state is a stronger, better place when the people hold the powerful accountable through free and fair elections. That’s why I want every eligible Oregonian to vote, and registering is the first crucial step,” said Secretary Read. 

No citizen should be left out of our elections because they don’t know how the process works, which is why these announcements are so critical. I want to thank the Oregon Association of Broadcasters and radio stations across the state for working with us to get this important message out. 

A recording of the public service announcements can be found here, and a transcript is below: 

Voter Registration Public Service Announcement Transcript

Attention Oregonians: The deadline to register to vote in the next election is October 13th.  

If you are…   

  • A U.S. Citizen   

  • A resident of Oregon   

  • And at least 16 years old   

…you can register to vote. You must be 18 years old to get a ballot.  

You can quickly register, check, or update your voter information through the secure portal at oregonvotes.gov.   

You have the power to decide Oregon’s future. Vote.  

Sponsored by Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, the Oregon Association of Broadcasters and this station.

 

###

 

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
 |  Help

Article 2 of 3 Transparency Illusions — Money in Plain Sight – Video

The early surge of funding into the 2026 midterms is hard to ignore, yet the public is still largely in the dark about how that money actually shapes the election. Even when contributions are disclosed, transparency is often more illusory than real.

Voters see the headlines—mega-donors, super PACs, and campaign cash—but few grasp the mechanics behind it, or the strategic intent that guides these flows. In essence, visibility does not equal understanding.

Disclosed vs. Hidden Influence

Campaign finance laws require certain reporting: super PACs must list their donors, and major contributions are public record. This disclosure gives the impression of accountability.

================================

And even among visible spending, both parties appear to be building something larger than a simple tally of wins and losses. Influence flows, narratives solidify, and infrastructure takes shape—often with consequences that extend well beyond Election Day.

The stage is set for a deeper exploration: how much of the opposition’s strategy is truly reactive, and how much is about quietly shaping enduring structures of influence?

Article

Secretary Read: Lawsuit to Block USPS Rule on Mail-In Ballots Will Protect Ongoing Election

PRESS RELEASE

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: August 26, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read: Lawsuit to Block USPS Rule on Mail-In Ballots Will Protect Ongoing Election

SALEM, OR — Today, Oregon joined with 23 other states and Washington, D.C., to block the final rule published by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) that would restrict vote-by-mail by giving the USPS the power to decide who gets a ballot. This rule was written in response to an executive order signed by the President.

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read is releasing the following statement:

“The November election is already underway. Now is not the time to change the rules. The USPS rule, like the executive order it arises from, is a clear attempt to make it harder for Americans to vote and undermine free, fair elections. It won’t work.

“The directive I issued yesterday instructs elections officials to proceed with running the next election as normal and according to Oregon law. If successful, this lawsuit will further protect our elections from illegal interference. Thank you to the Attorney General for his quick action to advance this critical work.

“We will continue pursuing all available options to protect Oregon’s safe, accurate, and fair elections.”

###

 

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
 |  Help

New Directive Issued by Secretary Read Confirms Oregon Vote-by-Mail Elections Will Proceed as Planned

Recording of Secretary Read’s press conference about the directive available now
PRESS RELEASE

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: August 25, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

New Directive Issued by Secretary Read Confirms Oregon Vote-by-Mail Elections Will Proceed as Planned

Recording of Secretary Read’s press conference about the directive available here

SALEM, OR — Today, in response to the uncertainty caused by the Supreme Court’s ruling that lifted the injunction on Executive Order 14399 (Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections), Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read issued a new directive to Oregon’s local elections officials instructing them to proceed with administering the election according to current Oregon law and reiterating election procedures and timelines.

The purpose of this directive is to provide certainty to elections officials and voters alike. All eligible Oregonians will receive their ballots by mail for the upcoming election and should plan to return them using the mail or a secure, official drop box,” said Secretary Read in a letter accompanying the directive.

If a later judicial decision requires immediate changes to Oregon election administration, I will provide further direction. However, we are on the eve of the first ballots for the November election being sent out to voters. Now is not the time to make major changes to how elections are run in Oregon. I will pursue all available means to protect Oregon’s gold-standard system of elections, which routinely makes us a national leader in voter participation. Our elections are secure, accurate, and fair, and we will keep them that way.

Secretary Read held a press conference to announce the directive and answer questions. A recording of the event can be found here.

###

 

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
Manage Subscriptions  |  Help

Article 1 of 3 Midterms Under Siege — The Scale of Influence – Video

Midterm elections are supposed to be smaller, quieter affairs compared to presidential contests. Yet, heading into 2026, the sums being poured into these races are unprecedented, rivaling what we normally see only in general elections. The early flood of resources, even when fully disclosed, is a stark reminder that what the public sees is rarely the full story.

While headlines often focus on candidates, slogans, and social media battles, the real game is being played behind the scenes, where money flows strategically, shaping outcomes before most voters even pay attention.

The Numbers Are Jaw-Dropping

===============================================

Setting the Stage for Deeper Questions

If the stakes of the 2026 midterms are already higher than expected, and the flow of money is more aggressive than usual, we must ask: what is the larger purpose? Is this simply about winning seats, or is there a longer-term plan to entrench influence, shape norms, and steer policy pathways?

Understanding the scale and timing of these investments is the first step toward asking the bigger question: what are voters not being shown, and what structures are quietly being built behind the curtain?

Article

Forward Party is Everywhere 08/21/2026

This week’s Fast Forward is building on the foundation we emphasized last week with the pursuits for ballot access, the expansion to 41 states, and the lasting infrastructure that will go beyond one election cycle. This week, we want to show you who that foundation is for.

In recent days, Forward Party endorsed three candidates in Ohio, New York, and Montana, whose regions could not be more different, and whose candidacies say the same thing: there are good people everywhere who are done waiting for the two parties to fix things, and they are doing something about it.

We would like to spotlight those candidates and the work they stand on.

Tracey Tackett

Independent Candidate – Ohio’s 4th Congressional District

Tracey Tackett

Tracey Tackett has been doing the essential work of local government in Springfield, Ohio for years. As Assistant Mayor, she represents the city on boards and commissions covering economic development, transportation, neighborhood engagement, historic preservation, and community relations. This is the kind of work that determines whether a city functions, businesses open, or even if neighborhoods stay together.

She has also served in leadership roles with the Epilepsy Foundation of Ohio, the Glen Helen Association, Habitat for Humanity, the Greater Springfield Chamber of Commerce, and the American Cancer Society.

Her campaign is built on the conviction that OH-04 deserves a representative who brings people together rather than using the district as a vehicle for partisan warfare. She is running as an independent not because she couldn’t choose a party but because she has decided that the party framework itself is the problem.

Alissa Ellman

Independent Candidate – New York’s 24th Congressional District

Alissa Ellman

Alissa Ellman joined the military before she was old enough to vote. She served at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan, came home, and then spent years teaching underprivileged students before helping fellow veterans navigate the Department of Veterans Affairs to obtain the benefits they earned. She was doing that VA work when the Department of Government Efficiency eliminated her position.

That loss activated her. She began hosting town halls and listening sessions across New York’s 24th District and then launched a campaign for Congress that won the Democratic primary in June. She is now in the general election, and Forward Party is standing with her.

Her platform covers affordability, healthcare access, childcare, infrastructure, responsive constituent services, and election reforms including ranked-choice voting. But what defines her campaign more than any specific issue is the operating principle underneath all of them: listen first, govern pragmatically, represent everyone in the district, not just the people who share your political affiliation. That is a Forward Party principle as much as it is a campaign message. It is why we are endorsing her even as a Democratic nominee, because Forward has always said that good representation matters more than party label.

Dr. Michael Eisenhauer

Independent Candidate – Montana’s 2nd Congressional District

Dr. Michael Eisenhauer

Dr. Michael Eisenhauer spent nearly 25 years in the United States Army as a physician and medical corps officer, serving in leadership positions around the world before deploying to Iraq as Deputy Forces Surgeon and Chief of Clinical Operations for Multi-National Forces–Iraq. He earned the Bronze Star for that service. When he retired from active duty, he came home to Montana and kept working, traveling to rural communities across the state to provide specialized cardiac care to patients who otherwise had no access to it.

He is running for Montana’s 2nd Congressional District as an independent because he believes the two-party system has stopped delivering for Montanans. Congress has dismal approval ratings, young Montanans are losing faith in the American Dream, and the people sent to Washington to fix these things keep prioritizing their party over their constituents. His platform focuses on affordability, healthcare, veterans’ issues, and reducing the partisan gridlock that has made Congress functionally useless on the issues Montana actually cares about. As an independent, he answers only to the people of Montana. That is the job as he sees it.

What These Endorsements Say

It is easy to make an argument for a better political system. Forward Party makes that argument every day. What is harder, and what matters more, is backing that argument with real candidates in real races, in places where real voters are being asked to make a choice this November.

Ohio, New York, and Montana are all very different but connected in wanting to revive faith in our democracy.

These are Forward Party’s megaphones. They speak in their own voices, from their own experience, to their own communities. That is the point. A movement that only produces candidates who sound like the party is not a movement. Forward Party is something different: a home for the kind of people who want to serve their communities and understand the needs of those communities better than any party leaders could.

As we get closer to November 3, Forward Party will continue endorsing candidates who meet our standard, wherever they are, whatever their background, ensuring more and better choices are on the ballot.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

If you haven’t caught last week’s episode, Lindsey Williams Drath, Governor Christine Todd Whitman, and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey dive in to two states where a new Governor is just around the corner.

Rick Bennett (ME) and Ken Block (RI) are both running as independents for governor in their states. They each have a unique state and a unique driver for running but they have one thing in common – an American independent spirit.

Click the image below to watch.

Get Involved

August 25, 2026 at 6:00pm Central Time

Illinois Forward Monthly Online Meetup

For our August meeting we’ll be learning about “Ranked Choice Voting”. What is it exactly? And can we/should we have it here in Illinois? As always, bring your friends, your neighbors, your questions and suggestions.

August 26, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern Time

Women’s Committee Presents: Girls just want to Volunteer

Join the FWD Women’s Committee, along with special guests, co-chairs Lt Gov Kerry Healey and Gov Christine Todd Whitman, as they share their inspiring journeys from volunteer to elected official to leaders in this movement.

We will then discuss creative ways you can help support Forward candidates this campaign season, including using our new text banking platform prompt io. We will even have a couple of campaigns live if you would like to get started texting for incumbent Forwardists!

August 27, 2026 at 8:00pm Eastern Time

Black Voters Committee Volunteer Onboarding  

Join the Black Voters Committee for our monthly call. We’ll connect, share committee updates, discuss current priorities, and plan upcoming initiatives. New and returning members are welcome.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Boulder’s Bob Chew spends big in Colorado Senate race – Axios Boulder 

Boulder independent Bob Chew is spending big to shake up Colorado’s U.S. Senate race ahead of the November election.

Harry Enten Examines Trump’s Declining Support from Indies

CNN poll says Independents are drivers of elections. The President is seeing a massive drop in Independent support-  a group known to be drivers of the elections.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Secretary Read Launches Campus Challenge to Boost Student Voter Turnout

PRESS RELEASE

Oregon Secretary of State logo

Date: August 20, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read Launches Campus Challenge to Boost Student Voter Turnout

SALEM, OR — Today, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read launched the Oregon Campus Voting Challenge to boost student voter participation in the upcoming general election.

“Our elections decide our future, and no one has more at stake in that future than young Oregonians. However, too many young people don’t vote because they don’t feel connected to the process. That’s why we launched the Oregon Campus Voting Challenge. It’s a proven approach to building civic engagement among young adults,” said Secretary Read. “We are going to keep finding ways to get Oregonians involved in our elections because our state is stronger when more people make their voices heard.”

The challenge is debuting with 20 colleges and universities from across the state. To join, the institution must commit to taking a series of actions to improve nonpartisan civic engagement on campus, including:

  • Helping students build the habits of an engaged citizen.

  • Making nonpartisan democratic participation a core value on campus.

  • Convening a nonpartisan campus-wide working group that includes students and administrators.

  • Engaging with data to improve campus resources and programming to support nonpartisan student civic engagement.

  • Developing and implementing a nonpartisan action plan to improve civic learning, political engagement, and voter participation.

“At Chemeketa, we believe education is about more than preparing students for successful careers. It’s also about helping them find their voice, recognize that their opinion matters, and see themselves as active participants in the communities they call home,” said Chemeketa Community College President Jessica Howard. “Voting is one of the most direct ways students can put that sense of belonging into action. Through the Oregon Campus Voting Challenge, we can help students build the knowledge, confidence, and habits they need to participate in our democracy, not just while they are in college, but throughout their lives.”

Oregon’s campus voting challenge is in collaboration with Civic Nation’s ALL IN Campus Democracy Challenge, a nationwide initiative that empowers colleges and universities to achieve excellence in nonpartisan student democratic engagement.

Based on past elections, campuses that are highly engaged in ALL IN programming have voter turnout rates that are 4-6 percentage points higher than their peers.

Oregon institutions and individuals who participate in the challenge are eligible for a variety of national recognitions from ALL IN. These are awarded for achievement in areas such as: creation of a strong action plan, extraordinary engagement with students, and exemplary individual nonpartisan actions boosting campus voter turnout.

“As college students return to campus ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, they will navigate new syllabi, schedules, and opportunities to make their voices heard. ALL IN commends Oregon’s commitment to nonpartisan civic engagement on college campuses, and we are proud to partner with Secretary of State Read to launch the Oregon Campus Voting Challenge to empower and support thousands of students to vote not only in November, but throughout their entire lives,” said Jen Domagal-Goldman, Executive Director of the ALL IN Campus Democracy Challenge.

The Oregon colleges and universities participating at launch are:

  • Blue Mountain Community College

  • Chemeketa Community College

  • Clackamas Community College

  • Columbia Gorge Community College

  • Eastern Oregon University

  • Lane Community College

  • Lewis & Clark College

  • Linfield University

  • Linn-Benton Community College

  • Mt. Hood Community College

  • Oregon State University

  • Pacific University

  • Portland Community College

  • Portland State University

  • Reed College

  • Rogue Community College

  • Tillamook Bay Community College

  • University of Oregon

  • University of Portland

  • Western Oregon University

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Help

Don’t Vote

As with a lot of what I write this started off in my head at 3:34am trying not to stub my toe on the bed frame. I was thinking of the reasons why someone shouldn’t vote, you know the devils advocate, that sneaky little demon that muddies the waters.

So when I sat down to tell all of you to just stay home I stumbled across an old youtube video of some jerk doing just that, and he pissed me off, how dare you tell people that it isn’t their civic and moral obligation, wait, isn’t that what I…

Except it wasn’t, not really. His argument was that your one voice doesn’t matter, so why bother. Mine was never that. Mine was don’t bother if you’re just punching holes without caring which holes. Two different kinds of not-voting, and only one of them is actually about not voting at all.

So I said to, no, not myself, but to my dog, and he in his wisdom just looked at my with his big eyes and said nothing.

Ha, you thought I was going to say woof. Gotcha.

So here is where our real duty is, we have a responsibility to participate in the process of our government, it’s an obligation, but we must be informed of the issues to do so effectively. We must broaden our horizons and actually be interested in something more than what a bobbing head on FOX or CNN tells us to think. It’s not hard, all it takes is to widen our field of view a bit.

I grew up in a Republican, not spelled RINO, household and if my Father was Republican then I must be a Republican. And for years that is how I voted. And for years I voted wrong. Not because it was Republican, but because I voted for the tribe without understanding the tribe or the other tribes. And to be fair. This paragraph could just as easily be the same with Democrat switched for Republican, wouldn’t matter.

So we have two type of voting, responsible and irresponsible.

  • Responsible voting: You look at the races you actually understand, form your own imperfect judgment, and mark those boxes.

  • Irresponsible “voting”: You check every box under one party because that’s the team, or because the hat looks good, or because “that’s what we do in this family.”

If it is mine to give, I give you permission to leave the boxes unchecked. If you don’t know who those judges are, why are you checking a box, if you don’t know how that measure will impact the community, why are you checking the box.

I also give you permission to maybe learn about that measure, a little more than what the voter pamphlet says, The pros and cons, both are slanted. Your neighbors, friends, may have an opinion.

Goodness gracious, think of what this world would be like if we actually knew what those boxes represented before we checked them.

So, it is your responsibility. Yes it matters, yes that one vote is only one, but the number 1,000 consists of one thousand ones.

And what matters most is that you understand what that box you just checked represents. That is the challenge, that is your duty

Notice of Temporary Administrative Order OAR 165-010-9901

503-986-1518 | Toll Free 1-866-673-VOTE | elections.sos@sos.oregon.gov

Notice of Temporary Administrative Order
OAR 165-010-9901

Filing Deadline for Certain Nonpartisan Vacancies Occurring Before the 2026 General Election

The Election Division hereby provides notice of rulemaking activity for OAR 165-010-9901. More information may be found below and on our website.

This temporary rule went into effect August 17, 2026.

RULE TEXT: The rule text may be found at this link.

RULE SUMMARY: 

ORS 249.205 authorizes the Secretary of State to establish filing deadlines for candidates seeking election to fill certain nonpartisan vacancies. This temporary rule establishes filing deadlines for vacancies that occur after the 80th day but on or before the 62nd day before the November 3, 2026, General Election.

NEED FOR TEMPORARY RULE:

ORS 249.205 authorizes the Secretary of State to establish filing deadlines for candidates seeking election to fill certain nonpartisan vacancies. OAR 165-010-0110 establishes filing schedules for several vacancy scenarios but does not establish a filing deadline when a vacancy occurs after the 80th day but on or before the 62nd day before the general election. This temporary rule establishes filing deadlines for vacancies occurring during that period to ensure candidates have a filing process, and the Elections Division has authority to accept declarations of candidacy.

JUSTIFICATION FOR TEMPORARY RULE:

A nonpartisan vacancy may occur after the 80th day but on or before the 62nd day before the November 3, 2026, General Election. Because the permanent rule does not establish filing deadlines for vacancies occurring during this period, a temporary rule is necessary to provide timely filing deadlines and allow the Elections Division to accept declarations of candidacy. Temporary rulemaking is required because waiting to complete the permanent rulemaking process would impair the orderly administration of the 2026 General Election.

DOCUMENTS RELIED UPON & WHERE THEY ARE AVAILABLE:

ORS 246.150, ORS 249.205, OAR 165-010-0110, 2026 State Candidate Manual and 2026 election calendar. Elections Division administrative records relating to candidate filing deadlines for nonpartisan vacancies. Documents available online or from the Elections Division.

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Help

In it for the Long Haul – 08/15/2026

The Forward Party has been building the infrastructure that serious political change requires. This week, Forward’s drivers are proving every step is one we take together for the growth of the movement.

More than anything, this is an opportunity to leave a lasting legacy, not through any single campaign or election but by helping build one of the most consequential pieces of civic infrastructure for American politics in a generation.

Brian Bengs

This Week in Texas

Mike Collier fought for the movement’s future

On Monday, U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman denied Mike Collier’s request for a temporary injunction that would have placed him on the Texas ballot as an independent candidate for Lieutenant Governor. Judge Pitman expressed sympathy for Collier’s situation, noting that the burden the law creates is not felt similarly by candidates from the Republican and Democratic parties, but he concluded that it was not clear Collier would have succeeded in getting on the ballot even if Texas had a more moderate requirement.

Collier will not be on the November ballot in Texas. That is a loss for the people of Texas who will once again have fewer choices in who to place in elected leadership. This is not the end of the story, however. Not by a long measure.

We highlighted the case in Texas previously and supported Mike in the lawsuit. As a reminder, Texas law requires that an independent candidate for statewide office must collect more than 81,030 valid voter signatures. That alone would be a serious challenge for any campaign, but Texas prohibited independent candidates from signature collection until after the primary runoff elections, which gave them only 30 days.

Collier took on Texas’s ballot access system, which, we should note, is so burdensome that no independent candidate for statewide office has ever qualified for the ballot in a Texas race with a primary runoff. Mike knew the odds were steep and that the timeline was nearly impossible.

The temporary injunction was denied but the constitutional case continues with an expected decision later this year. This ruling does not end the lawsuit. It does not settle the constitutional question. It establishes a legal record and creates precedent for future challenges. Mike Collier did not fight this battle just to get on the ballot in 2026. He fought it to build the case for changes to the ballot in 2028 and beyond.

What We Are Building with Mike Collier and Hundreds of Others Like Him

For our volunteers, donors, Fast Forward readers, and beyond, we want to say directly that our work is real. Our dedication to this country’s democracy is why we have put in the effort all these years. It is why we continue to stand behind the people who see the path to change, and we welcome more every day to join us in building something better.

When people talk about a political movement, they usually mean the candidates, the yard signs, the rallies. Those things matter. But the part of a political movement that determines whether it lasts is the part nobody talks about: the infrastructure that operates underneath it all. 

Forward has grown state-level teams, now expanding into 41 states with chapters, leaders, volunteers, and the legal standing to participate in the political process as recognized entities.

 FWD Map

We are reaching communities. The Forward Party’s presence in New Mexico, for example, has earned minor party status and is fielding candidates for Magistrate Judge, Public Education Commissioner, State Auditor, and U.S. Senate. New Mexico Forward Party even prevailed on a ballot access dispute before a single court hearing recently. The fact that the filing prompted a county clerk to reverse a disqualification decision illustrates something important about the long game Forward is playing. We are not going away. This is a local story but one that shows the movement is real. Parties that are serious about governing show up in county courthouses and school board races, not just Senate campaigns – and the Forward Party is doing both.

Real change has never happened fast. It has always happened because people did not stop their pursuit of change.

The Forward Party Podcast

What does it take to govern effectively when you leave the traditional party system behind? On this episode of The Forward Party Podcast, hosts Lindsey Drath, former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman, and former Massachusetts Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healy sit down with two independent candidates running for governor in 2026: Ken Block of Rhode Island and Rick Bennett of Maine.

Their conversations explore why experienced political leaders are stepping away from party labels, what voters are asking for, and whether independent candidates can offer a different approach to governing.

Click the image below to watch.

TFPP EP16 Thumbnail

Get Involved

Young Forwardists Introduction 

— August 15, 2026 at 5:00pm Eastern Time

Join members of the Young Forwardists as they introduce you to the Forward Party and how you can get involved in our pivotal movement to make politics better. Whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, or anything in between, there’s a place in the Forward Party for you.

Welcome Team Training – Forward Party 

— August 17, 2026 at 7:00pm Eastern Time

A quick training and show of resources for new members of the Welcome Team! Welcome Team participants will call new supporters in their state and welcome them to the Forward Party. A suggested script for conversations and email template for follow up will be provided.

Women’s Committee Presents: Girls Just Want to Volunteer 

— August 26, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern Time

Join the Forward Women’s Committee, along with special guest and Executive Co-chair Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey, for inspiring ways you can take action this campaign season.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

The Roundhouse Report: Forward Party announces Luna County judge candidate | Santa Fe New Mexican

Frances Kava of Deming, New Mexico will run for a magistrate judge seat in Luna County on the Forward Party ticket, joining Santa Fe County magistrate judge candidate Harry Montoya and Public Education Commission candidate Dennis Dinge as the party’s currently qualified candidates on the ballot.

‘Ticked off’: Third-party US Senate candidate in Colorado launches $1.3 million TV ad campaign – Denver Gazette

Bob Chew, the Forward Party nominee for U.S. Senate in Colorado, sends household objects flying in a TV ad set to run statewide through September, backed by $1.3 million in ad reservations across multiple platforms, his campaign told Colorado Politics.

Independent Michael Bridgford looks to shake up familiar race in Iowa’s 1st Congressional District

Michael Bridgford challenges Miller-Meeks, Bohannan as independent in Iowa’s 1st Congressional District race

Rick Bennett challenges fellow gubernatorial candidates to support campaign finance transparency

Independent gubernatorial candidate Rick Bennett is renewing his long-running push for campaign finance reform, calling on his opponents in Maine’s race for governor to support stronger transparency laws and disclose more information about the people and organizations supporting their campaigns.

Chuck Todd on CNN News Central

Chuck Todd breaks down the primary races this week and spotlights the Wisconsin win specifically by David Crowley.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

South Dakota is the Latest Domino to Fall 08/07/2026

Brian Bengs

Last week we told you that Idaho’s math changed in favor of Senate candidate Todd Achilles. This week, it happened again with South Dakota’s Democratic Senate Nominee Julian Beaudion dropping out of the race, leaving a clear one-on-one race between independent Senate candidate Brian Bengs and Republican candidate Mike Rounds.

The move from Beaudion verifies the direction more voters are heading, which is preferring independent leadership over partisan picks. It leaves Bengs as the main competitor against Rounds, mirroring last week’s development in Idaho.

These are the first dominoes to fall in states where Democratic nominees are unlikely to win and have historically served only to split the non-Republican vote and hand incumbents an easy victory. Legacy party nominees are beginning to recognize the overwhelming support for a new kind of leadership in these states and are stepping aside, ultimately clearing a path for independent candidates who can compete.

At the center of this South Dakota shift is Brian Bengs, Independent Senate Candidate. He is a dual-service military veteran, attorney, former criminal justice professor at Northern State University, and National Park Ranger. He served in the United States Navy and then as a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Air Force, where he spent years as a JAG officer. He has been an independent for, in his own words, “97% of my adult life.” 

We previously noted that Bengs submitted the highest-validity petition of any statewide South Dakota candidate in 2026, which was 93.85% validity, beating both major party candidates in the quality of signatures gathered.

This decision by a major party nominee to drop out is becoming an emerging pattern in one-party-rule states, with similar developments possible in additional districts and states. With under 100 days to go until midterms, this election cycle is seeing independent thinking taking root.

Our strategy at Forward has always been about math. You don’t need 51 independent senators to change the United States Senate. You need enough to hold the balance of power: three or four members who answer only to their constituents, who can’t be controlled by either party, and who will vote on the merits of what’s in front of them. That math is now closer to real than it has ever been.

The Forward Party endorses Brian Bengs in South Dakota and Todd Achilles in Idaho. We believe these candidates, and all Forward-endorsed candidates, represent the clearest path to showing that independents can win in the most difficult electoral environments in the country and that when they do, American politics changes.

Primary Highlight

Niina Baum

Republican Candidate for Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District

Niina Baum

This Tuesday (August 11) is primary day in Wisconsin, where Niina Baum is competing for the Republican nomination in the 7th Congressional District. Regardless of party label, her campaign represents the kind of candidate Forward is committed to supporting: someone who cares deeply about the voters they are pledging to represent and who is willing to fight for them while putting effective representation ahead of partisan politics.

Niina grew up on a dairy farm in northern Wisconsin and is now running to represent the same rural communities that shaped her. She co-founded Northwoods Young Professionals to help keep young talent in rural Wisconsin, organized community events that generated more than $500,000 in economic impact, helped establish the Hodag Snack Attack program to provide food for local elementary school students, and currently serves on the Rhinelander Rotary Club Board and as Planning Commissioner for the Town of Crescent.

Baum’s campaign reflects many of the qualities the Forward Party looks for in endorsed candidates: a record of community service, independence, and a focus on representing constituents over partisan interests.


The Forward Party Podcast

If you missed it last week, we had Todd Achilles (Idaho) on a brand new podcast episode with Bob Chew (Colorado)! They talk with our hosts about what drew them to the Forward Party, why they are running, and what a few good Forwardists in the Senate means for the country.

Click the image below to watch.

TFPP EP15 Thumbnail

Get Involved

National Volunteer Call

— August 10, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern Time

Please join our director of volunteer engagement Carrie Anne for a 30 minute rundown of all things Forward Party! Meet other volunteers, hear what’s happening in the committees and other states, and stay abreast of party news

Forward to the Polls: National Poll Worker 

— August 11, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern Time Recruitment Day

Getting Started: Forward to the Polls is our national virtual recruitment event celebrating civic service and showing how ordinary volunteers can play an extraordinary role in keeping democracy strong. On National Poll Worker Recruitment Day, we’ll hear from Forwardists who have served as poll workers and learn why this work matters so much to voters, communities, and the integrity of local elections.

Black Voters Committee Monthly Call

— August 12, 2026 at 8:00pm Eastern Time

Join the Black Voters Committee for our monthly call. We’ll connect, share committee updates, discuss current priorities, and plan upcoming initiatives. New and returning members are welcome.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Julian Beaudion Quits Senate Race in South Dakota, Clearing Way for Independent – The New York Times 

The decision by Julian Beaudion, the Democratic nominee, to leave the race was the third recent withdrawal by a Democratic Senate candidate in a red state 

Achilles ready to move forward as clear challenger to Risch

Todd Achilles’ path as an independent candidate for U.S. Senate becomes clearer after the Democratic nominee drops out of the Idaho race

Independent voters could have crucial role in upcoming midterms 

There is a growing independent wave this cycle. Meet three independent voters weighing their options in key races in the upcoming midterm elections.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Oregon Minor Party Status Reviewed, Two Parties Fail to Meet Qualifications

oregonvotes.gov | 503-986-1518 | Toll Free 1-866-673-VOTE | elections.sos@sos.oregon.gov

Oregon Minor Party Status Reviewed, Two Parties Fail to Meet Qualifications 

On Wednesday, August 5, in accordance with ORS 248.008, the Secretary of State Elections Division performed the final status review of Oregon’s recognized minor political parties ahead of the November general election.

A recognized minor political party may maintain its status in one of two ways:

  1. At any time during the period between the primary election and the 90th day before the general election, have registered party members equal to at least .25% of all active registered voters in Oregon; or

  2. At any time during the period between the primary election and the 90th day before the general election, have registered party members equal to at least .1% of all votes cast for Governor and, at least once in a 4-year period, secure at least 1% of all votes cast for its presidential or statewide party candidate.

Following the review, it was determined that two minor political parties did not meet the requirements to maintain their recognized status.

The Constitution Party of Oregon and the We The People political party are no longer recognized minor political parties under Oregon law.

Voters registered with either political party will still have the opportunity to participate in the upcoming November election regardless of their party affiliation. Over the coming weeks, county election officials will send every voter impacted by this change a voter notification card showing that their party affiliation is now “other.” Voters may change their party affiliation online at OregonVotes.gov or by submitting a paper voter registration card.

Following this review, six minor political parties maintained their status:

  • Independent Party

  • Libertarian Party

  • No Labels Party

  • Pacific Green Party

  • Progressive Party

  • Working Families Party

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

BBQs, Candidates, and Grassroots support! 08/07/2026

​​

Hello Forward Friends-

As the summer begins to wind down and sample ballots start to go out, I have the scoop you’ve all been waiting for: Forward endorsed candidates! Filing deadlines are past and some amazing independents have emerged in some interesting races. There are still people in the pipeline, and we’re working to keep the website updated, so check back regularly. Also our state teams are doing their own endorsements this year, so make sure you check with your state to see who they’re supporting.

Of course I wouldn’t present you with candidates unless I also had a way for you to help them! We just launched our Campaign Opportunities section on your volunteer dashboard. Let us know what skills you have, and connect directly with a campaign to volunteer. Click the button below to check it out!

Builders Movement:

This fall we are partnering with our friends at the Builders Movement, a civic nonprofit with a community of 5M+ Americans, to encourage people to fire up their grill and strike up a conversation with someone different from you in an effort to bridge the divide in this country.

What it is
Builders Movement is asking Americans to host community gatherings across differences this summer, timed to America’s 250th anniversary. The ask is simple: invite someone you do not always agree with, sit down together, and start there.

The goal
250 gatherings across all 50 states.

How to participate
Register at BuildersBBQ.org. The first 250 host receives a free Builders Starter Kit with recipes, conversation starters, Builders Jenga, and goodies from our brand partners.

If you cannot host
Share the campaign with your community using #BiteToUnite. Even one post or mention can inspire someone in your network to host.

Why it matters
Because connection across difference does not happen on its own. Someone has to fire up the grill first!

Volunteer Spotlight:

Our volunteer of the month for August is Chris Stevens in NC! She has been an effective, organized leader in the efforts to gather signatures for ballot access, and has remained dedicated, even after having surgery! This is what she has to say about volunteering with Forward, “…because experience has taught me that positive change rarely happens without effort.  Our election system is broken and so, therefore, is our country.  The only way to fix the situation as far as I can tell is for regular people to step up and take action.” She’s right about that. We appreciate everything you do, Chris!

Upcoming Events:

Mon Aug 10th @ 7:30pm ETNational Volunteer Call

  • Your first stop to updates on the National party and how to plug into the work.

Tues Aug 11th @ 7:30pm ET- Forward to the Polls

  • Join us on National Poll Worker Recruitment Day to hear from others who have served and learn how to get involved.

Mon Aug 17th @ 7pm ETWelcome Team Training

  • Learn how to call and have friendly conversations with other FWD supporters in your state.

Mon Aug 24th @ 7:30pm ETHow to talk about Forward

  • Tips and tricks on how to discuss Forward with people in your life.

Wed Aug 26th @ 7:30pm ETGirls Just Want to Volunteer! 

  •   Special guests Lt Gov Healey and Gov Whitman inspire us to support candidates this fall!

You can find more things to do on our events calendar.

There was a lot to share with you this newsletter, thank you if you read this far. Next month I will resume bi-weekly communication to keep you informed on all our grassroots candidate support activities. Until then I hope to see you at an upcoming event, enjoy the rest of your summer!

With gratitude,

Carrie Anne
https://home.forwardparty.com/

t t t f f

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party®, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

I would be Dead

Is anyone paying attention to anything at all? Really, is anyone thinking about anything other than the Grand Putz and his minions and their daily diversions?

Let’s look at real life. I’m past retirement age, and my Social Security won’t cover my house payment. Nobody cares, because I’m one of the “chosen few” who actually owns a home. I still pay taxes, because I still work, because Medicare fixed my body, not because my country failed me. They didn’t fail me. I failed me. But without Social Security and Medicare, I wouldn’t be up shit creek. I would be dead. Medicare paid for the Tavor valve that’s keeping my heart working right now. That’s not a metaphor. That’s not hyperbole. That’s a valve, in my chest, paid for by a program he jokes about gutting.

On August 14, 1935, this government passed the Social Security Act, because older people had no money left once they could no longer work. In November 1936, the first Social Security cards were issued. In January 1937, payroll taxes were collected for the first time, and the first one-time lump-sum payments went out. In January 1940, Ida May Fuller received the first-ever monthly retirement check.

Your President Donald J. Trump wants to deport all the communists who did this terrible thing to us.

In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Social Security Act Amendments into law, though actual health coverage and benefits officially began on July 1, 1966. This is known as Medicare.

July 30, 1965: the legislation creating Medicare Part A and Part B was signed in Independence, Missouri. Former President Harry S. Truman and his wife, Bess, received the first two Medicare cards.
July 1, 1966: the program officially went into effect, providing medical coverage to more than 19 million Americans age 65 and older.

Your President Donald J. Trump wants to deport all the communists who did this terrible thing to us.

SNAP benefits trace back to two key periods: the original Food Stamp Program, launched May 16, 1939, and the modern, permanent program established by the Food Stamp Act of 1964, under President Lyndon B. Johnson. The name officially changed to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, SNAP, in 2008.

Early Program (1939–1943): On May 16, 1939, the first food stamp plan started in Rochester, New York, to help low-income families buy surplus farm goods during the Great Depression. It ended in 1943, as employment and food demand shifted during World War II.

Modern Program (1961–Present): On May 29, 1961, President John F. Kennedy revived the initiative through pilot projects. On August 31, 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the permanent Food Stamp Act into law. By July 1, 1974, the system had expanded nationwide across all states. In 2008, it was officially renamed SNAP under the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act.

Your President Donald J. Trump wants to deport all the communists who did this terrible thing to us.

Is this progress, or a step backward into the darkness? President Trump is also threatening, promising, and begging anyone and everyone to kill the Senate filibuster so he can FORCE through his SAVE America Act. Key word: FORCE. This is about elections, and apparently you need to force your way through one to protect it.

This president is trying to stay in power. That is his entire agenda. Not you. Not me. Just his bank accounts, his ego, and his power. He must not lose power, and he does not care who pays the price for that, or what it costs them.

Right now, you, the American people, are still in charge. I’m just not sure for how much longer that stays true.

What comes next isn’t up to the Democrats. It isn’t up to Trump. It isn’t up to me, either, bummer. It’s up to you.

Choose wisely.

Reclaim the Name — Or Get a New One, Or let’s get Horny – Video

YouTube player

Let me ask you a question. Do you want this to be a one party government?

Think hard before you answer. Because if we stay the course we’re on, that’s exactly where we’ll end up. And if we kick the current fools out and hand everything to the Democrats, that’s where we’ll end up too. Just with different furniture in the same room.

MAGA has put a stink on the Republican Party that no skunk could ever equal. It’s going to take decades to wash it off. So what do we do?

============================================

And you want to know something almost funny? Donny used to be a Democrat. Yes. A card carrying member of the party he now calls COMMIE. They dodged his bullet somehow. You got crapped on instead.

20251019 1224 elephant reclaiming dignity simple compose 01k7yyrxqbehgssyz024r47f59


So where does that leave us?

Dark Money,  the big PAC money, Citizens United, the Federalist Society machinery, has heavily invested in the two party system and isn’t going anywhere regardless of what happens to MAGA. They’ll pull something out of their hat or somewhere close to their back pockets. Far right groups, far left groups, same game different jerseys. Maybe they’ll call it MAGA 2.0. It will still smell the same.

===================================================

Reclaim the name. Or get a new one.

The RINO label was meant to shame you into silence or compliance. It did neither permanently. You’re still here. The party you believed in is still worth believing in, fiscal responsibility, limited government, fair elections, reasonable conservatism that doesn’t require burning anything down.

If the Republican name is too stained to salvage, get a new one. And if you want a suggestion, keep the RINO. Just put an H in it. A Rhino is a thick skinned, large horned animal that doesn’t move for anything and has been around for fifty million years.

That’s a considerably fiercer mascot than whatever crawled out of Mar-a-Lago.

Get a little Horny in the process/

 

So What? – Video

YouTube player

So What?
The Losing Strategy as the Game Plan

Oh, so what, so what! What difference does it make, like really, does it matter?

For months now, over a year, I have tuned in and followed Michael Popok, Ben Meiselas, Jack Cocchiarella, and Glenn Kirschner, just to name a few you may have watched or followed. Great to hear about the case files against the Trump administration and how Trump and his team keep losing.

It just warms the cockles of my heart to see Trump take a beating in court, one federal judge after another saying no to little Donny.

=======================================

“Hey, boss man, we’re trying, but they keep using the law against us.” The LAW

The other tactic, and this one is truly scary, because it’s starting to work on me, is fatigue. I’m tired. You’re tired. Everybody’s tired, burned out from all the BS. And “so what” is exactly where fatigue leads you. The moment you get there, they’ve already won. Not because they beat you in court. Because you stopped watching the scoreboard.

You Stopped Caring.

So while I’m still watching, I’ve got two requests for Donny.

Request one: take that damn tarp down from the Kennedy Center. It’s time to grow up.

Request two: where the hell are the Epstein/Trump files?

I would be Dead – Video

YouTube player

Is anyone paying attention to anything at all? Really, is anyone thinking about anything other than the Grand Putz and his minions and their daily diversions?

Let’s look at real life. I’m past retirement age, and my Social Security won’t cover my house payment. Nobody cares, because I’m one of the “chosen few” who actually owns a home. I still pay taxes, because I still work, because Medicare fixed my body, not because my country failed me. They didn’t fail me. I failed me. But without Social Security and Medicare, I wouldn’t be up shit creek. I would be dead. Medicare paid for the Tavor valve that’s keeping my heart working right now. That’s not a metaphor. That’s not hyperbole. That’s a valve, in my chest, paid for by a program he jokes about gutting.

On August 14, 1935, this government passed the Social Security Act, because older people had no money left once they could no longer work. In November 1936, the first Social Security cards were issued. In January 1937, payroll taxes were collected for the first time, and the first one-time lump-sum payments went out. In January 1940, Ida May Fuller received the first-ever monthly retirement check.

===================================

Your President Donald J. Trump wants to deport all the communists who did this terrible thing to us.

Is this progress, or a step backward into the darkness? President Trump is also threatening, promising, and begging anyone and everyone to kill the Senate filibuster so he can FORCE through his SAVE America Act. Key word: FORCE. This is about elections, and apparently you need to force your way through one to protect it.

This president is trying to stay in power. That is his entire agenda. Not you. Not me. Just his bank accounts, his ego, and his power. He must not lose power, and he does not care who pays the price for that, or what it costs them.

Right now, you, the American people, are still in charge. I’m just not sure for how much longer that stays true.

What comes next isn’t up to the Democrats. It isn’t up to Trump. It isn’t up to me, either, bummer. It’s up to you.

Choose wisely.

Reclaim the Name — Or Get a New One, Or let’s get Horny

Let me ask you a question. Do you want this to be a one party government?

Think hard before you answer. Because if we stay the course we’re on, that’s exactly where we’ll end up. And if we kick the current fools out and hand everything to the Democrats, that’s where we’ll end up too. Just with different furniture in the same room.

MAGA has put a stink on the Republican Party that no skunk could ever equal. It’s going to take decades to wash it off. So what do we do?

Here’s something worth remembering. The RINOs, Republicans in Name Only, as Second String Donny so helpfully labeled them, were never really MAGA to begin with. They got saddled with the yoke through lies and promises and a very effective campaign of misinformation. They saw through the BS pretty quickly. The trouble is, as I said, what about the smell now? It clings whether you earned it or not.

“Republican In Name Only” was one of the most effective political hijackings in modern history. Trump took an entire established political party, rebranded everyone who disagreed with him as frauds and traitors, and walked off with the deed to the building. The real Republicans,  the ones who believed in fiscal responsibility, limited government, and fair play,  suddenly found themselves homeless in their own house.

And you want to know something almost funny? Donny used to be a Democrat. Yes. A card carrying member of the party he now calls COMMIE. They dodged his bullet somehow. You got crapped on instead.

20251019 1224 elephant reclaiming dignity simple compose 01k7yyrxqbehgssyz024r47f59


So where does that leave us?

Dark Money,  the big PAC money, Citizens United, the Federalist Society machinery, has heavily invested in the two party system and isn’t going anywhere regardless of what happens to MAGA. They’ll pull something out of their hat or somewhere close to their back pockets. Far right groups, far left groups, same game different jerseys. Maybe they’ll call it MAGA 2.0. It will still smell the same.

Which means the real Republicans,  the ones who got bamboozled and are now standing in the wreckage wondering what happened to the party they grew up with,  have a decision to make.

Here’s what I think needs to happen. Not all at once. Not easily. But it needs to start now.

First, state election laws need to change. Not the way Trump’s Save America Steal the Election Act wants to change them. The other direction. Did you know Texas only gives a third party candidate thirty days after the primary to gather signatures to get on the ballot? Thirty days. That’s not a level playing field. That’s a locked door with a sign that says use other entrance. And Texas is not the only state doing it. Not by a long shot.

Second, look up Ranked Choice Voting. Read about it. Don’t take my word for it. Don’t take anyone else’s word against it either. RBV lets voters rank candidates in order of preference so your vote isn’t wasted if your first choice doesn’t make the cut. It can help address the Electoral College problem, reduce the stranglehold of the two party system, and give third party candidates a fighting chance without the spoiler effect. It won’t fix everything. But it fixes some important things.

Third, and this one’s for the real Republicans specifically.

Reclaim the name. Or get a new one.

The RINO label was meant to shame you into silence or compliance. It did neither permanently. You’re still here. The party you believed in is still worth believing in, fiscal responsibility, limited government, fair elections, reasonable conservatism that doesn’t require burning anything down.

If the Republican name is too stained to salvage, get a new one. And if you want a suggestion, keep the RINO. Just put an H in it. A Rhino is a thick skinned, large horned animal that doesn’t move for anything and has been around for fifty million years.

That’s a considerably fiercer mascot than whatever crawled out of Mar-a-Lago.

Get a little Horny in the process/

 

So What?

So What?
The Losing Strategy as the Game Plan

Oh, so what, so what! What difference does it make, like really, does it matter?

For months now, over a year, I have tuned in and followed Michael Popok, Ben Meiselas, Jack Cocchiarella, and Glenn Kirschner, just to name a few you may have watched or followed. Great to hear about the case files against the Trump administration and how Trump and his team keep losing.

It just warms the cockles of my heart to see Trump take a beating in court, one federal judge after another saying no to little Donny.

This has been going on since Trump signed his first executive order, probably to swap out the bidets in the ladies’ lounge for gilded urinals, or something else along those lines.

He tries something. A suit is filed against him or “the thing.” And odds are, he or “it” loses. Forget the waste of time and taxpayer money, it isn’t coming out of his pocket, and if it was, he’d just file another appeal, Trump fashion.

But something has become a pattern that everybody’s saying without really saying it. Bizarre, really. He keeps losing. Bizarre. Wasn’t there a comic rag with a name like that? Mad Magazine, maybe. Must be showing my age again. But it is kind of bizarre if you think about it. Bizarro, that was it.

Let’s take a look at his latest Don Quixote charge, faithful Sancho (Blanche) at his side, attacking those wild and dangerous state elections that must look to him a lot like windmills, or something else very sinister. He keeps getting thrown from his steed, but Sancho keeps his fearless leader in the righteous battle, as any good bootshiner should.Copy to a new draft

So let’s look at the record. So far: Quixote-Sancho, 0. Windmills, 15. And 60 percent of those windmills had Republican judges leading the defense. Quite the defeat. Or quite the win, depending on which side of the scorecard you’re applauding from.

So circling back to our attorneys, analyzing and dissecting and passing judgment, all happy-faced about Trump’s losses, I have to ask myself: so what? That’s what I asked myself. SO WHAT? And why aren’t these experts in law asking that question too? So what. What has changed? Not a damn thing.

If the DOJ keeps losing, why does losing not matter anymore? Hey readers, that is a really, really big question. Has losing become a deliberate strategy? “Hey, look, we’re trying, but those left-wing commies are blocking us.”

Don’t forget Trump’s latest move into McCarthyism, look it up, 1950s America, almost as ugly as the 1970s race wars. Say it often enough, and some idiot will believe it.

But back to losing as a strategy. Why lose on purpose? At the very least, the minions can say, “Hey, boss man, we’re trying, but they keep using the law against us.” That line is worth repeating because of the shear irony in it.

“Hey, boss man, we’re trying, but they keep using the law against us.” The LAW

The other tactic, and this one is truly scary, because it’s starting to work on me, is fatigue. I’m tired. You’re tired. Everybody’s tired, burned out from all the BS. And “so what” is exactly where fatigue leads you. The moment you get there, they’ve already won. Not because they beat you in court. Because you stopped watching the scoreboard.

You Stopped Caring.

So while I’m still watching, I’ve got two requests for Donny.

Request one: take that damn tarp down from the Kennedy Center. It’s time to grow up.

Request two: where the hell are the Epstein/Trump files?

Three Independent Governor Candidates – 06/20/2026

Bill —

This week we are looking at our slate of gubernatorial candidates. As we see in our candidates, Governors’ races are where the independent movement becomes most tangible. A governor doesn’t need a caucus to sign a veto. A governor doesn’t need party leadership to appoint a cabinet secretary. The executive office is, in many ways, the role most naturally suited to an independent. It is someone who answers only to the electorate, not to a party structure. This week, three of the most compelling independent governor candidates in the country have news worth telling.

Ken Block

Independent Candidate for Governor of Rhode Island

Ken Block

Ken Block is a software engineer, data analytics expert, and government accountability watchdog making his third run for governor. He founded the Rhode Island Moderate Party in 2010, ran as a Republican in 2014, and is now running as an independent because, as he puts it: “My flavor of politics doesn’t align well with either political party.” He is a problem solver, a manager, a builder, and he has the credentials to back it up.

Block’s most significant credential for this moment in American politics is the important work he did after the 2020 election. In the wake of the 2020 election, he was hired by the Trump campaign to search for election fraud. After a thorough, data-driven investigation, he found no evidence of fraud sufficient to change the outcome in any swing state. He then did something even more remarkable: he told them so directly, and published his findings for the entire country to see in his 2024 book, Disproven.

Ken Block This Week:

Block appeared on CNN and C-SPAN  to discuss the renewed national conversation around election integrity and what the data actually shows about the security of American elections.

Block is running because Rhode Island’s governance has frustrated him for years. He has been a leading voice speaking out against the sudden closure of the westbound Washington Bridge, a symbol of what he sees as the chronic management failures of a state run without accountability. His view of the governor’s job is to fix the systems, eliminate the waste, and manage the institution better.

Lauren Pinkston

Independent Candidate for Governor of Tennessee

Jay Reeves

Lauren Pinkston is a seventh-generation Tennessean, a former Lipscomb University professor, entrepreneur, and nonprofit leader who spent years starting businesses with survivors of human trafficking, researching employment gaps in the workforce, and advising global organizations before deciding that the most urgent injustice she could address was the system itself. She is running as an independent for governor to change a system that seems to reward political extremism and fails to represent all Tennesseans, not just party loyalists.

Her campaign slogan, Not Red, Not Blue. Just You, reflects a deliberately citizen-first approach in a state that has not elected a Democratic governor since 2006 and has long been treated as a foregone conclusion for Republican leadership. Pinkston is challenging that assumption by pointing to a growing constituency of Tennesseans who feel left behind by the partisan framework entirely. She cited 2024 Gallup data showing 43% of Americans considered themselves independent voters, affiliated with neither the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party, and is building her coalition from that reality on the ground.

The TN race this week:

The Tennessee gubernatorial race has been rocked by new reporting on Republican candidate Marsha Blackburn. New recordings allege that Senator Blackburn’s office pressured its staffers to illegally participate in political activity, warning colleagues that they would be “asked to break the law on some level.”

The story raises questions that Forward and Lauren Pinkston’s campaign are built to answer: How do voters trust their own government when those in charge believe the rules don’t apply to them?

Pinkston is the most credible independent in the governor’s field by fundraising and institutional support, running a grassroots campaign that has resonated with voters who are exhausted by the partisan binary. She launched her campaign late last year with three stops across the state making clear from the beginning that she was running for all of Tennessee, not for a party’s base.

Rick Bennett

Independent Candidate for Governor of Maine

Rick Bennett

Rick Bennett has an impressive resume by any standard. With 18 combined years in the Maine House and Senate, including a unanimous election as President of the Maine Senate, Bennett has the receipts to prove that work can be done across party lines. He has spent nearly two decades doing exactly that in Augusta. He knows every committee chairman. He has negotiated budgets with members of both parties. He has been in the room when deals get made. Ultimately, he has a legislative record that highlights a willingness to get things done.

The general election field is now set: Bennett faces Democrat Hannah Pingree and Republican Bobby Charles in a three-way November race without ranked-choice voting, meaning the winner takes a plurality, and every vote is consequential. His path runs through primary voters whose candidates didn’t survive RCV, the independents that make up an equal share of Maine’s electorate as members of either party, and whatever slice of moderate Republicans conclude that Charles is too closely aligned with Trump to be credible in a state that voted for Harris by seven points in 2024.

Bennett Campaign this week: 

Rick Bennett unveiled his tax affordability plan this week, including provisions to build income-sensitive property tax relief, eliminate corruption and misuse of government funds, and create an office of the inspector general to investigate whistleblower complaints.  “Property taxes fall hardest on people with fixed incomes, older Mainers and small business owners,” he said at a Portland event Monday. “That is where I will start.”

Bennett describes what drove him to leave the Republican Party in terms he’d clearly been sitting with for a while: the parties, he says, have gone “deeper, darker, and dumber into this cesspool of politics that is really driving a lot of ordinary people not just out of politics, but out of the public space entirely — and I think that’s intentional.” He added: “There are people who are putting their kids through college by keeping us fighting with each other rather than solving issues.”

What Three Governors’ Races Tell Us

Ken Block, Lauren Pinkston, and Rick Bennett are running with different ideologies and solutions for their home states. It is what makes the Forward Party design essential in today’s politics. Each understands what works for their constituents and what will solve the problems unique to their state. A party’s leadership should not dictate that.

The Forward Party supports leaders who reflect a more representative politics, one where problem-solving matters more than party labels and where elected officials are accountable to the people they serve.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

If you haven’t caught last week’s episode, Lindsey Williams Drath, Governor Christine Todd Whitman, Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey, and guest host Jackie Salit examine the barriers independent candidates face in getting on the ballot.

Joined by Arizona gubernatorial candidate Hugh Lytle and Texas lieutenant governor candidate Mike Collier, they discuss restrictive election laws, court challenges, and a system that often favors the two major parties.

Click the image below to watch.

Get Involved

July 29, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern Time

A Conversation with Lindsey Williams Drath, FWD Party CEO

Join the Forward Party Women’s Committee for a discussion with Forward Party CEO Lindsey Williams Drath and her outlook on the future of women in the party.

August 01, 2026 at 5:00pm Eastern Time

Young Forwardists Introduction

Join members of the Young Forwardists as they introduce you to the Forward Party and how you can get involved in our pivotal movement to make politics better.

August 02, 2026 at 8:00pm Eastern Time

Girls Just Want To Have Fun – Women’s Committee Virtual Meet and Greet

The Women’s Committee has been growing, and we want to learn more about our new members. Join us and get to know each other better.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Ken Block on C-SPAN Washington Journal

Ken Block joined the program in response to President Trump’s actions and speech last week on voting and election integrity.

Congressman Kevin Kiley on CBS News The Takeout

Representative Kevin Kiley (I-CA) joined Major Garrett to discuss the procedural hurdle in the House this week.

House passes government funding extension: NPR

Lawmakers avoided a government shutdown and proposed changes to handling budget fights in the future.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

MEDIA ADVISORY: Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read to Hold Election Security Press Conference

MEDIA ADVISORY

Date: July 20, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read to Hold Election Security Press Conference

The Trump administration has escalated its attacks on elections in recent weeks

SALEM, OR — Today, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read will hold a press conference to outline the attacks the Trump administration has leveled against free and fair elections over the past 18 months and detail what Oregonians should expect with their elections this fall.

EVENT INFORMATION

WHO: Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read

WHAT: Election Security Press Conference

WHERE: Portland Community College, Southeast Campus, 2305 SE 82nd Ave, Portland

WHEN: Monday, July 20, 2026, at 1:45 PM

RSVP: To reserve your spot at the press conference or receive a link to the livestream, email connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov. Building and room number provided upon RSVP.

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Manage Subscriptions  |  Help

This email was sent to bjones@bxbweb.com using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: Oregon Secretary of State · 900 Court Street NE · Capitol Room 136 · Salem OR 97310-0722

Ballot Access is Just the Beginning 07/18/2026

This week, we’re spotlighting endorsements in two states where Forward Party has earned party status.

It is not a fast process and requires meeting state-specific requirements for voter registration, petition thresholds at the organizational level, plus a sustained presence in the states’ politics over time. It is strong foundational building by Forward that changes everything for our candidates.

In Colorado and Minnesota specifically, for endorsed candidates Celeste Landry and Jay Reeves, that ballot line means they can bypass ballot access hurdles and focus on reaching voters.

There are certain government jobs whose entire purpose depends on the nonpartisan execution of duty. Celeste Landry, running for Colorado Secretary of State, and Jay Reeves, running for Minnesota State Auditor, are running because they understand the importance of those holders of these offices remaining loyal to the citizens first and foremost.

Both are running as Forward candidates, which mean they are also bringing the right values and credibility with them.

Colorado

Celeste Landry

Candidate for Secretary of State

Forward Party Ballot Line

Celeste Landry

Celeste Landry has been working on election integrity and voter rights in Colorado for more than two decades as a civic advocate who shows up for the process itself. She’s been a member of the League of Women Voters, testified before the Colorado legislature on voting rights legislation, and spent years identifying the unintended consequences of election laws that sound neutral but aren’t. She has worked with legislators from both parties and pushed back on both when she believed they were making things harder for voters. Her platform as Secretary of State is built on three pillars: the right to vote, better representation, and election integrity.

The Secretary of State is Colorado’s top election official. Celeste Landry’s argument is direct: elections belong to the voters, not to political parties, not to special interests, and not to whoever happens to be in power. That office exists to protect the integrity of the process for everyone. She is running to do exactly that.

Minnesota

Major Jay Reeves (Ret.)

Candidate for State Auditor

Forward Party Ballot Line

Jay Reeves

Jay Reeves grew up in a union family and earned his work ethic the hard way. He spent nearly 17 years serving in the United States Army as a lab scientist and data analyst. He is now running for State Auditor because, as he puts it, the job requires someone who follows the numbers, not the politics. His background speaks for itself: union labor, independent small business ownership as a truck driver, and nearly two decades of military healthcare leadership and data analytics. He brings a combination of experiences that is genuinely rare in a government oversight candidate and entirely suited to an office whose job is to audit public finances without fear or favor.

His platform is built on independence, transparency, data integrity, accountability, and technology modernization. He wants to build a modern data dashboard with township-level detail, create a standardized statewide reporting system, and ensure that fraud is reported to the right authorities with the law driving every decision. Jay Reeves has spent his entire adult life in service without an agenda. That is what the State Auditor’s office requires.

This is What Forward Party Infrastructure Actually Looks Like

It gives candidates who want to run outside the two-party system a real path forward. Without a party ballot line, independent candidates such as Landry and Reeves would face strict petition requirements, thousands of required signatures, and tight deadlines just to earn the right to appear on a ballot. The Forward Party’s ballot line removes those barriers entirely. Instead of spending their time and resources fighting to get on the ballot, they can put their energy into actually reaching the voters.

The Forward Party’s ballot lines in Colorado and Minnesota are proof that alternative exist. Every candidate who runs on them is evidence that the path is real and that voters can have more choices.

Celeste Landry and Jay Reeves are not just good candidates. They are proof of what this infrastructure is built for.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

On this week’s episode, Lindsey Williams Drath, Governor Christine Todd Whitman, Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey, and guest host Jackie Salit examine the barriers independent candidates face in getting on the ballot. Joined by Arizona gubernatorial candidate Hugh Lytle and Texas lieutenant governor candidate Mike Collier, they discuss restrictive election laws, court challenges, and a system that often favors the two major parties.

Click the image below to watch.

Get Involved

Young Forwardists Introduction 

July 18, 2026 at 5:00pm Eastern Time

Join members of the Young Forwardists as they introduce you to the Forward Party and how you can get involved in our pivotal movement to make politics better. Whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, or anything in between, there’s a place in the Forward Party for you.

A Conversation with Lindsey Williams Drath 

July 29, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern Time

Join the Forward Party Women’s Committee as we discuss with Forward Party CEO Lindsey Williams Drath the future of women in the party.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

NM Forward Party files lawsuit challenging state’s ballot access requirements

Forward Party nominee for Colorado’s U.S. Senate seat puts $1.1 million into his campaign – Colorado Springs Gazette

Moderates, independents push to shake up Central WA politics | Tri-City Herald

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Did I Lose You? Let Me Try Again. – Video

A follow-up for anyone who missed the point the first time

So I wrote this cool and informative piece — Why is Trump Desperate to Pass the SAVE America Act? — and I listed all the reasons the Wolf wants to eat the sheep. Really pretty comprehensive, if I do say so myself.

Then, a few days later, word starts drifting back through the grapevine. People asking, “well, so what?” What does any of that have to do with anything? Old people shouldn’t have franchises anyway.

W — T — Fudge.

It appears something may have flown a little too high, or maybe some readers were a little too high. After all, it was only ten days after the 4th, and after watching Trump stumping in his own honor in the July heat, I probably should have still been a little elevated myself.

So. Doobie out. Paying attention? Let’s go over the cryptic points one more time.

=======================================

And no. You are definitely not invited to the Ballroom Gala.

Secretary Read Pushes Back on DHS Secretary Mullin’s Newest Threats Against Election Workers

PRESS RELEASE

Date: July 17, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read Pushes Back on DHS Secretary Mullin’s Newest Threats Against Election Workers

SALEM, OR — Today, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin threatened state elections officials with fines and jail time if they don’t participate in the federal government’s unlawful attempts to control how states run elections. To date, the Trump administration is 0-13 in court when attempting to force states to provide private voter data to the federal government.

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read released the following statement:

“In Oregon, we respect the law and the Constitution of the United States, and we will not let Washington D.C. politicians compromise our elections. I will defend our elections workers, Oregonians’ private voter data, our infrastructure, or anything else they come after with every tool at my disposal.

“Secretary Mullin’s comments today are just more proof that his boss is scared of losing the elections in November, and they are looking for shortcuts instead of doing their jobs and making life better for the American people.

“Oregon will have a secure and fair election this November, the results will accurately reflect the votes of our citizens, and politicians will have to accept the outcome, whether they like it or not.”

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

This email was sent to  using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: Oregon Secretary of State · 900 Court Street NE · Capitol Room 136 · Salem OR 97310-0722

‘Elections are Decided by Voters, Not by the President’: Secretary Read Responds to President Trump’s Prime-Time Address on Elections

PRESS RELEASE

Date: July 16, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

‘Elections are Decided by Voters, Not by the President’: Secretary Read Responds to President Trump’s Prime-Time Address on Elections 

SALEM, OR — Tonight, President Trump gave a prime-time speech to once again peddle election conspiracy theories and cast doubt on the integrity of American elections. Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read issued the following statement in response:

“Too many Americans sacrificed too much to let a tired, scared politician steal our elections.

“The President is once again making false claims about American elections; repeating conspiracy theories that have been disproven time and again so he can deny any election results he doesn’t like, just like he did in 2020.

“He knows Americans aren’t happy. He is afraid of facing accountability from voters this November. But, in America, elections are decided by voters, not by the President.

“Oregon’s vote-by-mail elections are secure, fair, and accurate, run by dedicated public servants who follow the law and answer directly to the communities they live in. Accountability and transparency are built into every step of our election process: from unique barcodes on each ballot envelope, to publicly certified vote counting machines that are never connected to the internet, to un-hackable paper ballots that are preserved and audited.

“I want the people of Oregon to know that as their Secretary of State, I will continue to stand up for their right to hold politicians and government accountable in free and fair elections.”

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

This email was sent to  using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: Oregon Secretary of State · 900 Court Street NE · Capitol Room 136 · Salem OR 97310-0722

Why is Trump DESPERATE to pass the SAVE America Act? – Video

YouTube player
The SAVE America Act , The Wolf in Sheeps Clothing, Hey Lamb Chop.

Who it makes voting harder for:

=================================================

Supporters’ argument

Proponents say the bill is necessary to ensure only citizens vote and that it simply enforces existing law. They argue an affidavit process exists for those without documents.

Critics’ counterargument

All available evidence, including from the Trump administration itself, indicates that only American citizens vote and the exceptions are vanishingly rare. Critics point to Kansas as a cautionary example  when Kansas adopted a similar proof-of-citizenship law in 2011, it prevented over 31,000 eligible citizens from registering to vote before it was blocked by federal courts.

Do You want to be turned away?

5c5d019f aee0 4d2e 8bed 0a519f544394

Why is Trump DESPERATE to pass the SAVE America Act?

The SAVE America Act , The Wolf in Sheeps Clothing, Hey Lamb Chop.

Who it makes voting harder for:

Ordinary Americans broadly — More than 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents. Roughly half of Americans don’t even have a passport.

Voters of color and younger voters — The SAVE Act would disenfranchise Americans of all ages and races, but younger voters and voters of color would suffer disproportionately.

Older Black Americans specifically — Decades after segregation left gaps in citizenship documents, the bill could create new barriers at the ballot box for people who were never properly documented during that era.

Married women (and anyone who changed their name) — The bill would disproportionately affect women whose current legal names differ from the names on their birth certificates or passports. It does not include exceptions for eligible voters whose names differ from those on their identification documents, and would force them to submit additional documents — such as marriage certificates, divorce decrees, or court orders to prove their identities.

People who register by mail or online — In 2022, more than seven million Americans registered to vote by mail, and almost 11 million registered online. The bill would severely threaten mail registration and require online registration systems to be overhauled.

Naturalized citizens — Naturalized citizens are particularly at risk for being inaccurately flagged for removal from voter rolls under the bill’s data-verification requirements.

People with disabilities and the elderly — People with disabilities and older voters who may not be able to register in person would also face new barriers.

Supporters’ argument

Proponents say the bill is necessary to ensure only citizens vote and that it simply enforces existing law. They argue an affidavit process exists for those without documents.

Critics’ counterargument

All available evidence, including from the Trump administration itself, indicates that only American citizens vote and the exceptions are vanishingly rare. Critics point to Kansas as a cautionary example  when Kansas adopted a similar proof-of-citizenship law in 2011, it prevented over 31,000 eligible citizens from registering to vote before it was blocked by federal courts.

Do You want to be turned away?

5c5d019f aee0 4d2e 8bed 0a519f544394

Removal of Elections Commissioners an Attempt to Disrupt Election

PRESS RELEASE

July Date: July 10, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read: Removal of Elections Commissioners an Attempt to Disrupt Election

The President terminated the remaining three commissioners on the Election Assistance Commission less than four months before a major election

SALEM, OR — Yesterday, President Donald Trump terminated the last three commissioners on the bipartisan Election Assistance Commission. The commission has several important roles in federal election administration, including certifying voting systems, accrediting testing laboratories, distributing election security grants, and maintaining the national mail voter registration form.

With all four seats on the commission currently vacant, some of these functions may be temporarily disrupted until new commissioners are appointed and confirmed.

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read is releasing the following statement:

“This is yet another attempt by the president to disrupt and sow distrust in our elections. It’s dangerous, it’s reckless, and frankly it’s desperate. The president is looking for any opportunity to seize control over the upcoming election because he is afraid of facing real accountability from voters. Regardless of what the president says or does, we are going to have a free and fair election this November, and voters will have an opportunity to make their voices heard.”

###

Calls for Explanation from USPS, Secretary Read Commends Benton County Elections,

PRESS RELEASE

Date: July 9, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read Commends Benton County Elections, Calls for Explanation from USPS

Recent reports indicate that mailed ballots were left in mailboxes on Election Day in Benton County

SALEM, OR — Today, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read is calling on the U.S. Postal Service to reassure Oregonians of its commitment to picking up ballots on or before Election Day in light of reports that ballots were left in mailboxes in Benton County on the day of the May primary election.

Secretary Read is releasing the following statement:

“My office has been in contact with the Benton County elections team, and I want to commend them for their professionalism and quick response after learning about this incident.

The U.S. Postal Service is a key partner in Oregon’s vote-by-mail system, and it is critical that voters can have confidence that when they put their ballot in the mailbox, it will be picked up by a postal carrier. That’s why I’m calling on the USPS to do a thorough review of its policies and practices regarding mail pick-up on or before Election Day. Transparency is essential for building public trust, so the results of this statewide review must be made available to the public.

Service cuts to the USPS have already slowed processing and postmarking of all mail, and voters need to know if there is a likelihood of additional delays at the mailbox. Unexpected delays cannot happen in November.

This incident also serves as a good reminder: Whenever possible, voters should return their ballot via an official ballot drop box, which ensures their ballot is delivered directly to their local elections office. If you need to use the mail, do so at least 7 days before Election Day.”

The Benton County elections team has confirmed that no election results from the May primary would be different as a result of ballots not receiving a postmark by Election Day.

###

Thank You Oregon, Highest Voter Turnout in this year’s Primary Election

Date: July 09, 2026

Follow for elections updates: FacebookInstagramXBluesky, and Youtube

 

Dear Oregonians,

I want to thank you for doing your part in this year’s Primary Election– for casting your ballot and making your voice heard. Thank you for participating in our democracy.

Voting is safe and convenient here in Oregon thanks to our vote-by-mail system. We consistently have some of the highest voter turnout in the country because of it, and this election was no exception. More than 1.28 million eligible Oregonians voted in this year’s primary. That’s the highest turnout we’ve ever seen in a midterm primary election.

And with several important measures and candidate races on the ballot, Oregonians showed up to shape the future of their communities and our state. Together, you decided who we’ll see on the November ballot and helped chart the course Oregon will take in the years ahead.

I cannot overstate how meaningful that is.

Voting is how we hold politicians accountable. It’s how we elect representatives to advocate for our communities. It’s how we shape the future of our state, and our country.

Your vote is your power. 

That’s exactly why our most fundamental right-has come under increasing attack in recent months.

We’ve seen unconstitutional executive orders that threaten the integrity of our elections get issued. We’ve seen lawsuits aimed at undermining vote-by-mail get filed. We’ve seen repeated efforts aimed at making Americans question whether their vote truly matters.

But our democracy holds strong.

We’ve gotten a lot of great news in the past few weeks, and I hope you’ll take a moment to read more on that below, but here’s the bottom line: your vote matters, and you can trust that it will be counted this November.

Just remember to vote early, and use an official ballot drop box whenever possible. 

As we ring out our nation’s 250th anniversary, the semiquincentennial, we’re reminded that the work of building a more perfect union belongs to all of us.

Every election provides us with another opportunity to do that work together, and I look forward to joining you in that effort this November.

Sincerely,

Tobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

Good News for Our Elections

Supreme Court Protects Oregon Voters’ Right to Have Their Ballots Counted

Last week, the United States Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Watson v. RNC that states have the authority to count ballots that are cast by Election Day and received within a post-Election Day grace period.

In 2022, Oregon law established a 7-day post-Election Day grace period that allowed elections officials to count ballots that were cast on or before Election Day but delivered after Election Day. The post-Election Day grace period protects thousands of Oregonians’ votes from being thrown out because of delays at the Post Office. This is a big win for Oregon voters. You can read more about this ruling here.

Federal Court Blocks Executive Order that Would Undermine Vote-by-Mail

On June 25, a federal court blocked the President’s March 2026 executive order that would have allowed the U.S. Postal Service to deny ballots to voters not on the federal government’s list of approved voters, infringing upon states’ authority to administer elections. You can read more about this win here.

Victory in Executive Order Case on Voting Rights

On June 24, a federal judge permanently blocked key parts of the President’s March 2025 executive order that would have made it harder for eligible citizens to vote due to documentation requirements. You can find more information here.

2026 Primary Election Town Halls

I’d like to give a special shout out to every Oregonian who joined me at a town hall this spring.

Whether you participated online or attended in Corvallis, Philomath, Portland, or Lincoln City, you showed up with the thoughtful questions and concerns that so many Oregonians are thinking about right now. I’m grateful for the meaningful conversations we had together.

As we head toward the November General Election, I want to make sure you have the information you need to cast your ballot with confidence. That’s why I’ll be traveling across Oregon for another round of town halls this fall. Stay tuned for dates and locations—I hope to see you there.

New Secretary of State Website is LIVE!

Exciting news: our office launched a new and improved website today, meant to help you and every Oregonian get the information you need fast

It’s easier to navigate, works better on your phone, and has improved search tools to help you find exactly what you’re looking for. 

Whether you’re registering a business, checking election information, researching Oregon history, or looking for public records, this new website will make it a whole lot easier. Please, take a look! You can visit the new website at sos.oregon.gov.

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

Trump Administration Renews Attempts to Intimidate Election Administrators, Undermine Elections – Oregon

PRESS RELEASE

Date: July 8, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Trump Administration Renews Attempts to Intimidate Election Administrators, Undermine Elections

Secretary Read pledges to stand up for Oregon as many times as it takes

SALEM, OR — Yesterday, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read received a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice stating that the federal government was ready to prosecute elections officials and renewing their attempts to unlawfully meddle in Oregon elections.

Secretary Read is releasing the following statement:

“The U.S. DOJ is knocking on our door again with more threats and no evidence to back up their fever dreams about non-existent voter fraud.

Oregon elections are secure, accurate, and fair. These are facts backed up by decades of work by local elections officials who follow the law.

I’m not intimidated by political threats or manufactured controversy. My priority is making sure Oregonians can continue to hold government accountable, free from any interference by politicians in Washington D.C. We’ve beaten back every illegal executive order and lawsuit so far. We’re ready to do it again, as many times as it takes.

If the President actually wanted to strengthen our elections, there are better places to start: adequately funding election administration, restoring the federal election cybersecurity program he cut, and expanding access to vote-by-mail, paper ballot elections – just to name a few.”

The letter to Secretary Read was signed by Harmeet Dhillon, a former Republican party official and 2020 election denier who is now leading the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division under President Trump.

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Help

The Declaration Of Independents – Forward – 07/04/2026

Happy Independence Day!

Two hundred and fifty years ago, a group of Americans signed a document that changed history.

They declared independence from a system that had stopped serving the people. They believed ordinary citizens deserved something better and were willing to build it.

Today, we are making our own declaration.

The Forward Party is proud to launch our “Declaration of Independents.”  We declare ourselves independent from a two-party system that has held this country hostage for too long. From a politics of division, dysfunction, and self-dealing. From a government machine that answers to parties instead of the people it was built to serve.

Declare your independence today. 

→ SIGN THE DECLARATION AT FWD.PARTY/DECLARE

But a declaration is only the beginning. Building a new political movement takes organizers, candidates, volunteers, technology, ballot access, and supporters willing to invest in something bigger than the next election.

If today’s message resonates with you, would you make a contribution to help build what’s next?

Every gift helps us expand ballot access, support independent candidates, and reach more Americans who are ready for something different.

Make a July 4 Gift

And if you’d like to wear your support, our limited Independence Day merchandise collection is available now!250th Shirt

→ Shop all of our collections at shop.forwardparty.com

Sign it. Share it. Wear it. Help build it.

— The Forward Party Team

If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Not On My Watch – Video

Plato may be right. All democracies will fail. But I don’t think now’s the time.

When looked at from a distance, we can see the arc of almost anything. Civilizations, movements, ideas. The beginning and the end become visible, like a landscape from altitude. But the closer we get, the more the timeline shifts and blurs. The ending moves around. Why would that be? Maybe because philosophies and people don’t always work hand in hand.

Ideas are clean. People are not.

I have been around long enough to have stood in a few crowds, carried a few convictions, and watched more than one cause rise and fade. Through all of it, every march, every movement, every upheaval, there has always been a placard somewhere in the crowd that read some version of the same thing: Power to the people.

==============================================

That truth is this. The closest thing to actual power most of us will ever hold is a vote and a voice. That’s it. That’s the whole arsenal. It isn’t much, until enough people pick it up at the same time.

But neither of those things work if we stop using them. And they stop working in a different way when we use them without thinking. When we vote the way we’re told to vote, believe what we’re told to believe, and accept what we’re told to accept.

==========================================================

The question is whether you’re willing to stop accepting the illusion in place of the real thing, and what you’re prepared to do about it.

That’s always been the question. It just hasn’t always been this urgent.

20260302 0846 Image Generation simple compose 01kjqq3dhbewmaqdrrmxxqbd89

Not On My Watch

Plato may be right. All democracies will fail. But I don’t think now’s the time.

When looked at from a distance, we can see the arc of almost anything. Civilizations, movements, ideas. The beginning and the end become visible, like a landscape from altitude. But the closer we get, the more the timeline shifts and blurs. The ending moves around. Why would that be? Maybe because philosophies and people don’t always work hand in hand.

Ideas are clean. People are not.

I have been around long enough to have stood in a few crowds, carried a few convictions, and watched more than one cause rise and fade. Through all of it, every march, every movement, every upheaval, there has always been a placard somewhere in the crowd that read some version of the same thing: Power to the people.

We both know that’s a catch phrase. It always has been. But here’s the thing about catch phrases. The good ones survive because they point at something real, even when nobody’s delivering it. The illusion has to be maintained because somewhere underneath it is a truth people can feel even when they can’t see it.

That truth is this. The closest thing to actual power most of us will ever hold is a vote and a voice. That’s it. That’s the whole arsenal. It isn’t much, until enough people pick it up at the same time.

But neither of those things work if we stop using them. And they stop working in a different way when we use them without thinking. When we vote the way we’re told to vote, believe what we’re told to believe, and accept what we’re told to accept.

Independent thought has always been the first casualty of concentrated power. Not because the people are stupid. They never are. But because every system, in every era, has had a quiet interest in discouraging it. It is easier to lead people who have already decided what they think. Easier still to lead people who believe that what they think, they arrived at on their own.

We live under a democracy, a republic if you want to be precise about it. Living under it comes with benefits most of us have stopped noticing, the way you stop noticing a foundation until it cracks. But those benefits have never been free. They have always cost something. The people who built this thing paid for it. The people who saved it, more than once, paid for it. And the people who will determine whether it survives this particular moment in its timeline will pay for it too.

The question isn’t whether you’re willing to believe in it.

The question is whether you’re willing to stop accepting the illusion in place of the real thing, and what you’re prepared to do about it.

That’s always been the question. It just hasn’t always been this urgent.

20260302 0846 Image Generation simple compose 01kjqq3dhbewmaqdrrmxxqbd89

The Purple Rose of Texas – Video

Thank God I’m not from Texas, because being a Purple Rose is being a screwed Rose in Texas not much better than being a Yellow Rose.

Only Red roses and Blue Rose have a chance there.I’m just flabergasted Vance and Rubio haven’t article 25ve

A rose by any other color is just fertilized out of luck.

Try being an independent in Texas, Oh your allowed , maybe have to sit inn the back of the bus, if they can find a seat. And that’s a big maybe. But then again, the Fight at Alamo was as much about retaining slavery as gaining independence, don’t believe me, go read your history books.

The two party system has a choke hold on us, it has to change, we have to stop and it won’t be easy. The battle will look like we are fighting the Democrats and the Republicans but in reality, we will be fighting dark money.

The fight will be against Citizens United, the Federalist Society, the Superpacs, Acs American Constitution Society, Leonard Leo, Arabella Advisors and the list goes on. It’s the dark money, they want to control and control is easier when there are fewer choices.

Open the field and the Superpacs become less effective. Then we have can have a Congress that become MORE effective.

The choices are yours.

The Purple Rose of Texas

Thank God I’m not from Texas.

Because being a Purple Rose in Texas is being a screwed rose. Only Red roses and Blue roses have a chance there. A rose by any other color is just fertilized out of luck.

Try being an independent in Texas. You’re allowed — technically. Maybe you get to sit in the back of the bus, if they can find you a seat. And that’s a big maybe.

But then again, the fight at the Alamo was as much about retaining slavery as gaining independence. Don’t believe me — go read your history books.

Here’s what Texas law actually requires of an independent candidate running for statewide office.

First — collect more than 81,000 valid voter signatures just to get on the ballot. That’s a steep hill by itself. But Texas doesn’t stop there.

Independent candidates aren’t allowed to start collecting signatures until after the party primary runoff elections are finished. This year that meant waiting until May 26th.

Read that again because it matters.

Independent candidates aren’t allowed to start collecting signatures until after the party primary runoff elections are finished.

The petitions were due June 25th.

Do the math.

Thirty days to collect over 81,000 signatures statewide — a task that would challenge even a well-funded campaign with an established organization behind it.

Then it gets more interesting.

Anyone who voted in either a party primary or runoff election is prohibited from signing an independent candidate’s petition. Texas shrinks the pool of eligible signers before the process even begins.

Thirty day deadline. Reduced pool of eligible voters. Statewide signature requirement that would be difficult under the best of circumstances.

You can decide for yourself whether that’s about election integrity or ballot access.

Texas didn’t write these laws in a vacuum. The machinery that benefits from limited choices operates at a national level even when the laws are written state by state. Similar barriers — different deadlines, different thresholds, different methods — exist across the country. The details change. The effect is the same. Fewer choices. Less competition. A political system that protects the existing parties from having to compete with anyone who doesn’t carry their label.

Whether it’s gerrymandered districts reducing competition or ballot access laws making it nearly impossible for independent candidates to qualify — the result is consistent. A chokehold.

And the hands on that chokehold aren’t just Republican or Democrat.

They’re darker than that.

Citizens United opened the floodgates. Leonard Leo built the judicial architecture. Arabella Advisors operates the left side of the same coin. Federalist Society. SuperPACs. Dark money flowing through nonprofits that don’t have to disclose their donors to anyone.

The two party system isn’t just a political habit. It’s a business model. And it’s extraordinarily well funded by people who understand that fewer choices means more control and more control means more return on their investment.

Open the field and the SuperPACs become less effective. More candidates means more variables means less predictable outcomes means less return on the dark money investment.

That’s why the field stays closed.

The Purple Rose doesn’t get fertilized by accident.

It just gets shit on.

The choices are yours.

But first you have to fight for the right to make them.

Secretary Read: Supreme Court Protects Oregon Voters’ Right to Have Their Ballots Counted – Oregon

PRESS RELEASE

Date: June 29, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read: Supreme Court Protects Oregon Voters’ Right to Have Their Ballots Counted

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states have the authority to count ballots cast by Election Day and received within a post-Election Day grace period

SALEM, OR — In response to today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Watson vs. Republican National Committee, which maintains states’ authority to count mailed ballots that were cast by Election Day but delivered to elections officials after Election Day, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read released the following update for Oregon voters:

“Today’s decision is a win for Oregon voters. The post-Election Day grace period protects thousands of Oregonians’ votes from being thrown out because of delays at the Post Office. This ruling means those legally cast ballots that arrive within 7 days of the election will be counted and those Oregonians’ voices will be heard,” Secretary Read said.

“But my advice to voters has not changed: don’t wait. Vote early and use an official drop box. If you have to return your ballot by mail, do it at least a week before Election Day, especially if you live more than 50 miles from Portland. I want every legal vote in Oregon to count. Our state is stronger when the government answers to the people.”

In 2022, Oregon law established a 7-day post-Election Day grace period that allowed elections officials to count ballots that were cast on or before Election Day but delivered after Election Day. This meant that mailed ballots postmarked by 8 p.m. on Election Day and received within that 7-day window were tallied no differently than ballots received via the mail pre-Election Day.

Over the past four years, tens of thousands of legally cast ballots were received within Oregon’s elections grace periods and counted, protecting those Oregonians’ right to vote.

The post-Election Day grace period also provided an important buffer after recent cuts to the U.S. Postal Service that slowed processing and delivery for all mail (including ballots), particularly for Oregonians who live more than 50 miles outside the Portland area.

The Secretary of State’s office strongly recommends that voters begin researching their choices early, fill out their ballot quickly upon receipt, and use an official ballot drop box to ensure their ballot gets to a county elections office by Election Day.

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

Six Candidates. Two Chambers. One Movement. 06/26/2026

The Forward Party has officially endorsed six independent candidates running for federal office — four for the U.S. Senate and two for the U.S. House. Their elections could fundamentally change how Congress works.

Six Candidates. Two Chambers. One Argument.

The Forward Party has announced the most expansive independent federal endorsement slate by any political organization in the 2026 election cycle. Four U.S. Senate candidates across Idaho, Colorado, South Dakota, and Montana, plus two U.S. House candidates in Iowa are being added to our growing list of endorsed candidates. They are veterans, business leaders, and public servants, all running without a party.

U.S. Senate Endorsements

Idaho  •  Colorado  •  South Dakota  •  Montana

Idaho

Todd Achilles

U.S. Senate  |  Independent  |  Challenging Sen. Jim Risch (R)

Todd Achilles

Todd Achilles is an Army veteran, former Idaho State Representative, technology executive, and public policy instructor from Boise. He has the military record, the legislative experience, the private-sector track record, and the classroom credibility that most Senate candidates would dream of — and he’s running without a party label against a three-term incumbent who has held Idaho office since nearly 1970.

In Idaho, unaffiliated voters now outnumber registered Democrats two to one. Achilles’ campaign polling shows him trailing Risch by 14 points among uninformed voters — and leading by 3 among voters who know both candidates. That gap shows this race gets better every time a voter hears the argument.

He is also a founder and board member of Veterans for Idaho Voters, and a member of the American Federation of Teachers union and Idaho Business for Education — the kind of cross-constituency coalition that can actually win a Senate race in a state that’s ready for something different.

Colorado

Bob Chew

U.S. Senate  |  Forward Party  |  Challenging Sen. John Hickenlooper (D)

Bob Chew

Bob Chew served as an officer on a nuclear submarine during the Cold War, then spent 30 years building a global company from four employees to 700.  He knows how to build something real and work hard for it.

He’s running on the Forward Party line in Colorado because he believes both parties have spent decades refusing to have the hard conversations: the national debt, Social Security solvency, immigration, and energy. He is self-funding his candidacy and has pledged to invest whatever it takes because conviction, not calculation, is what got him into this race.

The forward argument isn’t always about which race is easiest to win. Sometimes it’s about challenging a system that has gone unchallenged. Chew’s opponent Sen. John Hickenlooper is an incumbent in a state where one party has been unchallenged for too long.

South Dakota

Brian Bengs

U.S. Senate |  Independent  |  Challenging Sen. Mike Rounds (R)

Brian Bengs

Brian Bengs is a U.S. Navy and Air Force JAG Corps veteran, former instructor at the Air Force Academy and NATO School, law professor at Northern State University, and Wind Cave National Park Ranger. He has spent his life in service — in uniform, in the classroom, and in his community — and now he’s channeling that same ethic into a Senate campaign built on a simple foundational argument: big money in politics is the root cause of nearly every policy failure South Dakotans are living with.

He’s been a member of the American Legion, the VFW, and Veterans for All Voters as a state leader. In 2023, he led a citizen-driven constitutional amendment effort to protect voter-passed ballot measures from legislative override. He’s done this before — organized from scratch, built a coalition, fought the system.

Montana

Seth Bodnar

U.S. Senate |  Independent  |  Open Seat

Seth Bodnar

Seth Bodnar graduated first in his class at West Point, served as a Green Beret with multiple overseas deployments, built a career in business, and spent eight years as president of the University of Montana.

The story of how he got into this race tells you something about the problem he’s running to fix. Two-term incumbent Sen. Steve Daines withdrew from the race eight minutes before the filing deadline and simultaneously endorsed his chosen successor, Kurt Alme — without a primary, without voter input, without asking Montana if that’s what they wanted. Numerous elected Montana Republicans have gone on record expressing their frustration with the move. It is exactly the kind of insider self-dealing that Bodnar’s campaign is built to challenge.

He has outraised every other candidate in the race — Democrat and Republican. Montana showed up for him before a single vote was cast.

U.S. House Endorsements

Iowa’s 1st District  •  Iowa’s 2nd District

Iowa is a state with a sizable unaffiliated electorate and is about to have independent candidates in two competitive congressional districts at the same time. Both are candidates who did the strenuous door-to-door work to earn their place on the November ballot.

Michael Bridgford

U.S. House, IA-01  |  Independent  |  Challenging Mariette Miller-Meeks (R)

Michael Bridgford

Michael Bridgford is running in one of the most-watched congressional districts in the country. Cook Political Report rates Iowa’s 1st District a toss-up. Roughly one-third of voters in the district aren’t registered with either major party.

His district’s general election will be a three-way race — and this is the third consecutive cycle in which the same two major-party candidates, incumbent Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R) and Democrat Christina Bohannon, will face off. Iowa’s 1st District voters know exactly what they’re getting from both parties. Bridgford is offering them something they haven’t had: a choice. “I think 2026 is a big year for an independent movement across the country,” he has said. He’s not wrong.

Dave Bushaw

U.S. House IA-02  |  Independent  |  Open Seat

Dave_Bushaw_IA_600SQ.jpg

Dave Bushaw is a squash farmer in West Union, a labor unionist, and a folk musician who has played at union strikes across the country. “Both parties walked away from the people who built this country,” he has said. That conviction drove him to do something Iowa’s legislature tried to prevent: qualify for the November ballot as an independent after the state raised the signature threshold mid-campaign.

He knocked on more than 7,000 doors in northeast Iowa. 88% of the people who answered signed his petition. He officially filed his signatures on June 2nd — primary day itself — achieving 200% of the required number in every single county in Iowa’s 2nd District. That is not just ballot access. That is a grassroots mandate. The general election will be a three-way race against Democrat Lindsay James and Trump-backed Republican Joe Mitchell, in a district Cook now describes as “increasingly competitive.”

How These Candidates Could Change Everything

Here’s the argument both parties hope you never think about too hard.

The Senate and the House both operate on razor-thin margins right now. Whichever party holds the majority controls the committee chairs, the legislative calendar, and every procedural lever that determines what bills ever reach a vote. The minority party can obstruct. That’s it. And that majority can be as thin as one or two seats before everything changes. Independent senators and representatives are not required to caucus with either major party. That means a small enough bloc — even two or three seats in the Senate — could deny either party an outright working majority, and in exchange for agreeing to organize the chamber, demand real structural changes

Forward Party candidates are accountable to the voters. They will focus on solutions, not partisan fighting, in order to serve their constituents. In these six campaigns, it’s a description of what they’ve already done before a single November vote is cast.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

If you haven’t watched the newest episode of The Forward Party Podcast from last week with John Avlon, journalist, political analyst, and host of “How to Fix It” and special guest Khalil Ekulona, former NPR host and community storyteller, you are missing out!

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E12 Thumbnail

ICYMI: Episode 11

Get Involved

June 28, 2026 at 5:00pm Eastern Time

Young Forwardists High School Introduction

The Young Forwardists are looking for passionate students ready to bring civic engagement to their local high school! Join our growing movement to diversify politics by creating a Young Forwardists Chapter at your school, where you’ll have real exposure to political opportunities, candidates, campaigns, and policy writing.

June 29, 2026 at 7:30pm Eastern Time

Welcome Team Training

Training and a show of resources for new members of the Welcome Team! Welcome Team participants will call new supporters in their state and welcome them to the Forward Party. A suggested script for conversations and email template for follow up will be provided.

July 01, 2026 at 5:30pm Eastern Time

Town Hall Training

Join us for a practical, energizing training on how to plan and run town halls that actually bring people together. You’ll learn how to choose the right venue, confirm speakers, promote the event effectively, and handle day of details with confidence. With GOTV season upon us, we know you want to be able to hold impactful events to help your candidates, so RSVP to learn more with us!


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Or this week, what we’re watching!

Special Interview: Independent Senate Candidate Brian Bengs on US-Iran deal, ICE & CBP funding & more 

The Impeachment Trap

Sarah Czech on We Need a Revolution Podcast

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Secretary Read Certifies May Election Results, Confirms Historic Turnout – Oregon

PRESS RELEASE

Date: June 25, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Video Statement from Secretary Read

Secretary Read Certifies May Election Results, Confirms Historic Turnout

Oregon records the highest midterm primary voter turnout in state history

SALEM, OR — Today, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read certified the results of the 2026 May statewide election.

In total, more than 1.28 million eligible Oregonians voted, the most in a midterm primary election in state history. The official turnout rate was 41.87%, the second highest for a midterm primary since 1998, when Oregon became an exclusively vote-by-mail state.

“Voting is one of the most meaningful acts a citizen can take to participate in our democracy. Voting is how we hold politicians accountable, decide the direction of our state, and elect representatives to advocate for our communities,” Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read said. “I’m proud that so many Oregonians made their voices heard in this election. Our state is stronger when Oregonians hold their government accountable. Let’s set another record in November.”

Certification is the final step in the post-election day process to ensure the security, accuracy, and fairness of Oregon’s elections. As part of this process, elections officials take a variety of steps, including:

  • Resolving outstanding ballot issues, such as curing ballot signatures.

  • Publicly testing the accuracy of vote tallying machines.

  • Performing audits and hand counts to verify the results.

The Secretary of State’s office will release detailed election turnout data in the coming weeks.

###

 

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
 |  Help

Federal Court Blocks Executive Order that Would Undermine Vote-by-Mail – Oregon

PRESS RELEASE

Date: June 25, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Federal Court Blocks Executive Order that Would Undermine Vote-by-Mail

The executive order would have allowed the U.S. Postal Service to deny ballots to voters not on the federal government’s list

SALEM, OR — Today, in yet another a win for Oregon voters, a federal court blocked President Trump’s March 2026 executive order restricting mail-in voting and infringing upon states’ authority to administer elections.

Oregon joined 22 other states and the District of Columbia in this lawsuit, one of many steps Oregon elected leaders have taken to defend Oregonians’ right to vote.

“The President wants to pick and choose who gets to vote, but, in America, we don’t let Presidents interfere in elections,” Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read said. “The Constitution protects our right to run free, fair elections, and we will defend it. Oregonians decided many years ago that vote-by-mail was our preferred way of voting, and it remains the gold standard for integrity and access nationwide.”

The March 2026 executive order required states to provide sensitive voter information to the federal government, which would use that data to create a nationwide list of approved voters.

As part of his work to implement the executive order, the U.S. Postal Service postmaster recently said that states that did not provide voter information would not have mail ballots delivered at all, effectively denying the right to vote to all eligible Oregonians. Today’s ruling protects Oregon’s elections from federal interference.

Oregon pioneered vote-by-mail nearly 30 years ago and several states have joined Oregon with exclusively vote-by-mail elections.

Due to cuts at USPS, for the upcoming November general election the Secretary of State’s office recommends returning ballots via official ballot drop boxes or by mailing at least 1 week before election day.

###

 

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
 |  Help

The Electoral College: A Solution Looking for the Right Problem? – Video

Most debates about the Electoral College start with people choosing sides. One side wants to keep it. The other wants to abolish it.

I think the more interesting question is: What problem was it designed to solve, and does that problem still exist?

In 1787, information traveled at the speed of a horse. Most citizens knew little about candidates from distant states. The United States was less a single nation than a collection of states agreeing to work together. The Electoral College was part compromise, part practical necessity, and part protection against direct democracy in a world where voters had limited information.

For its time, the system made sense.

Today, none of those conditions exist.

——————————–

A constitutional convention to redesign the whole thing?

I don’t know.

What I do know is that every system solves one problem by creating another.

A pure popular vote values every vote equally, but raises concerns about population concentration.

The Electoral College protects state influence, but leaves many voters feeling irrelevant.

Winner-take-all states simplify elections, but turn most states into spectators.

There may not be a perfect answer. There may only be better compromises.

Before we argue about which system to adopt, we should at least agree on which problem we’re trying to solve.

If we can’t answer that question, we’re just rearranging the furniture.

And unlike the spare toilet paper at my house, nobody seems to know where the solution is stored.

The Electoral College asks how states should be represented.

Ranked-choice voting asks how voters should be represented.

Maybe before we decide which system is best, we should decide whose voice we are trying to hear more clearly.

The Elephant In The Room Nobody Is Looking At – Video

Trump is out. The clown is getting the hook. You’d have to be blind not to see it — and he’s too busy with his burgers to notice it himself. I have recently written about how the two party system has failed us and how dark money has made it nearly impossible for an independent candidate to even get on the ballot. The Republicans and the Democrats are not running the show. The SuperPACs are.

So when Musk threatened to start his own party during the DOGE wars all he was really doing was threatening Trump. Because Musk’s party couldn’t have gotten on 90 percent of American ballots. But it would have weakened the MAGA base — which was exactly the point.

Then Tucker Carlson said this:

“I would not support the Republican Party, there’s no chance. Not gonna support the Democratic Party. I don’t know what I’m going to do. How could I or any American voter support a political party that’s not loyal to the United States — that puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. It’s not possible to vote for people like that and I’m not going to. I voted Republican my entire life. I worked at Fox News. I’ve been a consistent defender for 35 years of the Republican Party, but there’s no defending this because it’s immoral. I’m out. And if I’m out, then I think a lot of other people are out.”

Different name. Same chokehold. Same dark money. Same result for the Purple Rose.

I don’t think I need to put the pipe down to ask that question.

I think it’s the only question worth asking right now.

And I’m genuinely puzzled why so few people are asking it.

Secretary Read Celebrates Victory in Executive Order Case on Voting Rights – Oregon

PRESS RELEASE

Date: June 24, 2026
Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read Celebrates Victory in Executive Order Case on Voting Rights

A federal judge permanently blocked key parts of an executive order that would have made voting more difficult for eligible citizens  

SALEM, OR — Today, in a victory for the rights of people to hold politicians accountable through elections, a federal judge permanently blocked key parts of President Trump’s March 2025 executive order that would have made it harder for eligible citizens to vote.

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read is releasing the following statement:

“As I’ve been saying for months and a judge agreed today, the president does not have any power over how states run elections. The Constitution is clear: states and Congress set the rules for elections, not one man in the Oval Office. Instead of trying to make voting more difficult, the president should instead focus on strengthening election security, supporting local election officials, and protecting every eligible American’s freedom to vote.”

This ruling was in response to a lawsuit brought by 19 states that sued to block President Trump’s executive order from March 2025. The order had previously been partially blocked by the same court under a preliminary injunction.

Other federal courts have also granted injunctions against this executive order, including the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in response to Oregon and Washington’s lawsuit.

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

Oregon – Campaign Finance Learning Opportunity – Voters’ Pamphlet Filing Process – Maybe what free election are all about

sos.oregon.gov/ORESTAR | 503-986-1518 | orestar-support.sos@sos.oregon.gov

Campaign Finance Learning Opportunity

Voters’ Pamphlet Filing Process

The first day to file a voters’ pamphlet statement by fee is around the corner!

Did you know that if you pay for your statement now you can make changes all the way up until the deadline to file? This gives you flexibility to make changes as the landscape changes and while you seek endorsements. Speaking of endorsements, did you know endorsers are required to fill out a form giving you permission to use their name?

Whether you’re a first-time candidate or whether you’re looking for a refresher, the Elections Division invites you to join us for a comprehensive overview of the voters’ pamphlet filing process.

Date/Time: July 1, 2026, 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM

Location: Microsoft Teams

Register here!

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

 |  Help

This email was sent to ——– using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Oregon Secretary of State · 900 Court Street NE · Capitol Room 136 · Salem OR 97310-0722

The Electoral College: A Solution Looking for the Right Problem?

Most debates about the Electoral College start with people choosing sides. One side wants to keep it. The other wants to abolish it.

I think the more interesting question is: What problem was it designed to solve, and does that problem still exist?

In 1787, information traveled at the speed of a horse. Most citizens knew little about candidates from distant states. The United States was less a single nation than a collection of states agreeing to work together. The Electoral College was part compromise, part practical necessity, and part protection against direct democracy in a world where voters had limited information.

For its time, the system made sense.

Today, none of those conditions exist.

A voter in Oregon can watch a speech made in Florida in real time. News travels instantly. Candidates campaign nationally. Americans think of themselves as citizens of one country first and residents of a state second.

The original reasons for creating the Electoral College have weakened or disappeared.

Yet replacing it raises legitimate concerns.

A pure popular vote could encourage candidates to focus heavily on large population centers. The current system encourages candidates to focus on a handful of swing states. Neither approach feels particularly representative.

Today, millions of Republicans in California and millions of Democrats in Texas know their presidential vote is unlikely to matter. At the same time, a relatively small number of voters in a few battleground states effectively decide the election.

That suggests the problem is not simply the Electoral College. The problem is that our current system leaves large numbers of Americans feeling their vote has little impact.

I don’t pretend to know the perfect answer.

Perhaps it is a modified Electoral College. Perhaps it is a national popular vote. Perhaps it is a system nobody has proposed yet.

What I do know is that institutions should be judged by whether they solve today’s problems, not yesterday’s.

The Electoral College was created to address concerns that were real in 1787.

If the Electoral College is broken, what replaces it?

A straight popular vote?

A proportional allocation of electoral votes instead of winner-take-all states?

A ranked-choice national election?

A system where states award electoral votes by congressional district?

A constitutional convention to redesign the whole thing?

I don’t know.

What I do know is that every system solves one problem by creating another.

A pure popular vote values every vote equally, but raises concerns about population concentration.

The Electoral College protects state influence, but leaves many voters feeling irrelevant.

Winner-take-all states simplify elections, but turn most states into spectators.

There may not be a perfect answer. There may only be better compromises.

Before we argue about which system to adopt, we should at least agree on which problem we’re trying to solve.

If we can’t answer that question, we’re just rearranging the furniture.

And unlike the spare toilet paper at my house, nobody seems to know where the solution is stored.

The Electoral College asks how states should be represented.

Ranked-choice voting asks how voters should be represented.

Maybe before we decide which system is best, we should decide whose voice we are trying to hear more clearly.

The Elephant In The Room Nobody Is Looking At

Ever feel like you’re on the verge of a nervous breakdown from all the noise? The he said she said, on and on, round and round. Just noise.

But is it just noise?

Sometimes the most important thing happening isn’t the loudest thing happening. Sometimes the real story is in the room nobody is looking at.

Trump is out. The clown is getting the hook. You’d have to be blind not to see it — and he’s too busy with his burgers to notice it himself. I have recently written about how the two party system has failed us and how dark money has made it nearly impossible for an independent candidate to even get on the ballot. The Republicans and the Democrats are not running the show. The SuperPACs are.

So when Musk threatened to start his own party during the DOGE wars all he was really doing was threatening Trump. Because Musk’s party couldn’t have gotten on 90 percent of American ballots. But it would have weakened the MAGA base — which was exactly the point.

Then Tucker Carlson said this:

“I would not support the Republican Party, there’s no chance. Not gonna support the Democratic Party. I don’t know what I’m going to do. How could I or any American voter support a political party that’s not loyal to the United States — that puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. It’s not possible to vote for people like that and I’m not going to. I voted Republican my entire life. I worked at Fox News. I’ve been a consistent defender for 35 years of the Republican Party, but there’s no defending this because it’s immoral. I’m out. And if I’m out, then I think a lot of other people are out.”

Thank you Heather Delaney Reese for Trump loyalists are jumping off the sinking ship

Tucker Carlson. Thirty five years. Out.

Now ask the question nobody seems to want to ask out loud.

Where are they going?

Tucker isn’t going long term. A third party takes decades to build and he doesn’t have that kind of patience or that kind of money. But somebody does.

Here is where we need to look. Here is the room nobody is looking at.

The SuperPACs. The dark money. The Federalist Society. Leonard Leo. Arabella Advisors. The entire infrastructure that has been quietly and methodically building the conservative legal and political architecture for thirty years.

They didn’t back Trump because they loved him. They backed him because he was a useful vehicle. Three Supreme Court justices. Hundreds of federal judges. Regulatory rollback. Tax structure. The return on their investment has been substantial.

But now the vehicle is embarrassing them. The stall is covered in dung. The clown is jeopardizing thirty years of careful infrastructure with daily chaos and a cognitive decline visible to anyone paying attention.

MAGA is dead. Trying to save it is a fool’s errand.

So what are the options?

Save the Republican Party — purge the MAGA element, restore something resembling functional conservatism, hope Vance or Rubio or someone with a law degree and a functioning prefrontal cortex can carry the banner forward. Vance and Rubio haven’t invoked the 25th Amendment yet because they’re still afraid of the MAGA base. But here’s the thing — if they did it the Republican establishment would put them on their shoulders. The dark money would fund the parade.

Or start over — a new right of center party, properly funded, built from the existing infrastructure that Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society have already constructed. It would have money. It would have judicial connections. It would have the organizational architecture that third parties normally spend decades trying to build.

Which brings us to the question that should keep everyone awake.

Is that a good thing?

Are we watching the dark money apparatus recognize that their vehicle has failed and quietly preparing to deploy a new one? A cleaner one. A more electable one. A saving angel that turns out to serve the same architecture in a better suit?

Or to put it another way — would a new right wing party actually break the two party system open for independents and moderates?

Or would it just be a Texas sidestep?

Different name. Same chokehold. Same dark money. Same result for the Purple Rose.

I don’t think I need to put the pipe down to ask that question.

I think it’s the only question worth asking right now.

And I’m genuinely puzzled why so few people are asking it.

Protecting Your Voting Rights – Video

Protecting voting rights is a fundamental aspect of American democracy, and your concern about potential executive overreach is valid given recent reports. While presidents have issued executive orders related to elections in the past, they don’t have unilateral authority to control how states run them, elections are primarily a state responsibility under the Constitution (Article I, Section 4), with Congress able to set or alter regulations for federal races. Any attempt to impose sweeping changes via executive order, especially if premised on unsubstantiated claims like foreign interference from past elections, would likely face immediate legal challenges and injunctions from federal courts, as happened with a similar order in March 2025.

Courts have repeatedly affirmed that such actions can’t override constitutional limits or state authority without clear statutory backing.

20260227 1538 Image Generation simple compose 01kjgqdwssfdtrr9cs1f1w4ghs

Texas Is Pushing Independents Off Ballots – 06/19/26

In recent weeks, we have shared news about the candidates running, the signatures gathered, and forward momentum for independents this cycle. This week, we’re focusing on the fight to make sure independent candidates can even get that far. The Forward Party announced support for a lawsuit against the State of Texas this week, and we want you to understand why.

81,030 is the key number here. That is the number of valid voter signatures Texas requires an independent statewide candidate to collect, with only 30 days to do it.

The Forward Party is officially supporting Texas independent candidate for Lieutenant Governor Mike Collier who filed a lawsuit challenging the state’s ballot access requirements for independent statewide candidates. It was filed in cooperation with the Center for Competitive Democracy.

Here’s what Texas law actually requires: an independent candidate for statewide office must collect more than 81,030 valid voter signatures. That alone would be a serious challenge for any campaign, but Texas adds another twist. Independent candidates are legally prohibited from beginning that signature collection process until after the partisan primary runoff elections have concluded.

This year, that meant the clock didn’t start until May 26th, when Texas’s primary runoffs wrapped up. Independent petitions are due June 25th. That leaves independent candidates just 30 days to collect more signatures than most statewide campaigns gather in six months.

It gets more restrictive. Texas law also sharply limits who is allowed to sign an independent candidate’s petition. Any voter who participated in a party primary or runoff election is disqualified from signing an independent candidate’s petition.

Combine a pressed 30-day timeline with a shrunken pool of eligible signers, and you get a system that is not only expensive but also logistically difficult to navigate. That is by design.

As the lawsuit argues, these barriers serve no public purpose other than locking independent candidates, and the voters who want to support them, out of the democratic process entirely.

Whether it’s gerrymandered districts that reduce competition or ballot access laws that keep independent candidates off the ballot entirely, the result is the same: fewer meaningful choices for voters, and a political system built to protect incumbents and party insiders rather than the people they’re supposed to serve.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

Brand new this week on The Forward Party Podcast, is John Avlon, journalist, political analyst, and host of “How to Fix It” and special guest Khalil Ekulona, former NPR host and community storyteller. Together, the hosts and Khalil explore how media has changed over the last two decades and what those changes mean for democracy.

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E09 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Episode 11

Get Involved

June 28th – Young Forwardists High School Introduction

Are you a Highschooler who wants to get involved?  Do you have a Highschooler in your life who is politically engaged and wants to make real change in the world? The Young Forwardists are always looking for the next generation of leaders and they’re ready to welcome new members.

June 29th – Welcome Team Training

Learn how our state teams welcome brand new members to their party.  We’ll work on phone scripts and email templates to get the most out of your new interested members.

July 1st – Town Hall Training

 Join us for a practical, energizing training on how to plan and run town halls that actually bring people together. You’ll learn how to choose the right venue, confirm speakers, promote the event effectively, and handle day of details with confidence.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Rick Bennett To Face Off Against Bobby Charles and Hannah Pingree in Maine

Maine’s RCV primary has finished and we now know who Rick Bennett (I) will be facing for the Governor’s seat – Bobby Charles (R) and Hannah Pingree (D).

Sen. John Curtis To Walk 250 Miles For 250 Years Of America

Utah Senator John Curtis is walking 250 miles to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the declaration of independence. He’s walking from the northernmost point of Utah to his hometown of Provo.

Georgia Republicans Scrap Current Plans to Redistrict Ahead of 2028

Changing districts on your voters to cheat your way to more seats in Washington is a bad political move… who knew?  We did – and so did all of you.  Some politicians are starting to realize it, too.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

All Eyes On Maine… 06/15/26

This week, we’re going to Maine, where something historic just happened quietly and deserves to be said loudly.

While Maine’s U.S Senate primary has been a focal point recently with party candidates Graham Platner and Susan Collins occupying headlines, the Governor’s race has brought voters’ optimism back to their state.

We’re featuring Rick Bennett this week – Bennett is a Harvard-educated businessman, a former President of the Maine State Senate, and a lifelong Republican who spent decades building his party — then walked away from it. On June 24, 2025, he announced he would run for governor as an independent, ending a party affiliation he’d held his entire political life.

Just a couple weeks ago, he qualified for the November gubernatorial ballot — the only independent to do so.

Here is the argument most independent candidates have to make: I’ll find a way to work with everyone once I get there. Rick Bennett doesn’t have to try to make that argument – he already has the record proving that he can. He has spent 18 years in the Maine Legislature doing exactly what he is now asking Maine voters to elect him do in the Blaine House. He has built coalitions, negotiated with Democrats and Republicans, moved legislation through a divided chamber, and delivered results on the issues Maine families actually talk about at the kitchen table.

This is not a candidate learning on the job. This is a candidate who has already done the job, at every level of the legislative process, and who is now asking for the chance to do it from the top.

___

The Maine governor’s race has gone to a ranked-choice runoff, with results expected before June 19th. On the GOP side, with 43% of votes counted Tuesday night, Bobby Charles — an attorney who ran a Trump-style campaign largely relying on social media — led with more than 38%. No candidate crossed the 50% threshold, sending the Republican primary to a ranked-choice runoff that will conclude before June 19th. Ben Midgley and Jonathan Bush were neck-and-neck for second place.

The Democratic field is even less clear, with Nirav Shah, Hannah Pingree, Troy Jackson, and Shenna Bellows all within 6% of each other.  Who comes out of that field is anyone’s guess.  But one thing is clear – Rick is the only candidate who is ready to win in November.

Maine loves its independents, having elected two independent governors in its modern history: James Longley, who served from 1975 to 1979, and U.S. Sen. Angus King, who served as governor from 1995 to 2003 before being elected to the Senate.

Rick was the first candidate that the Forward Party endorsed for the 2026 cycle in December of 2025. He’s the right leader for Maine, and we’re proud to support his campaign.

To learn more about Rick, check out his website here!

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

If you haven’t caught the newest episode of The Forward Party Podcast that dropped most recently, be sure to give it a watch!

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E09 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Episode 10

Get Involved

June 15th – Recruitment Training: How To Talk About Forward

Join Head of Volunteer Programs Carrie Anne Templeton and Forward National to learn how to grow the Forward Party in your home state. Dozens of Forwardists just like you attend this training every month and learn how to be a changemaker in their community – join the party!

June 17th A Conversation With Lindsey Williams Drath, Forward Party CEO

Join Forward CEO Lindsey Williams Drath for a fireside chat hosted by the Forward Women’s Committee!  Get the inside scoop on all things FWD.

June 18th – Ballot Access Laws: New Mexico, Texas & Arizona with FIVE & Open Primaries

This virtual town hall hosted by the Foundation for Independent Voter Education and Open Primaries, examines ballot access and what’s at stake across Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. This is the policy conversation behind the headlines.

Featured Guests:

Jeremy Gruber — Open Primaries

Oliver Hall — Center for Competitive Democracy

Moderated by Sarah Lenti. The conversation covers state-specific ballot access barriers, real-world candidate and voter experiences, structural obstacles facing independents, and practical pathways for reform. Whether you’re a candidate, a voter, or just someone who believes the rules should be fair,  this one couldn’t be more timely.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

With Charles In Lead, Republican Gubernatorial Race Headed To Ranked Choice Run-Off

With the Republican Primary set to move a very Trump oriented Republican through the nomination, others in the party, including candidates who seem poised to lose the primary, are considering Rick Bennett instead.

Kevin Kiley, Richard Pan Advance In Race For Newly Redrawn California House District

Kevin Kiley, currently the only independent serving in the House of Representatives won the primary in CA-06 this year, with Democrat Richard Pan earning the second spot and moving on to November as well.  Kiley is poised to retake his seat even after mid decade redistricting tried to push him out of Washington.

State Rep. Jermaine Johnson Is Projected Winner Of 2026 Democratic Primary For South Carolina Governor

Forward endorsed Democrat and former U.S. Congressman Jermaine Johnson looks likely to receive the Democratic nomination for the Governor’s seat in South Carolina.

Independents Move Us Forward – 06/05/26

Bill —

The independent wave is building. This week, six key states held primaries that demonstrated, across the board, a growing tide of voters wanting more choice in their representatives.

 

Tuesday’s Independent Candidates

Forward has been fighting the conventional wisdom in American politics: “If you want to win, you have to pick a team.”

Well, voters are done with being handed two choices that no longer work for them. We are increasingly seeing candidates respond to that frustration by doing something the system has deliberately made difficult – running without a party label.

This cycle, independent candidates are qualifying for November ballots from Montana to South Dakota, to Iowa, and more. They come from different backgrounds, different ideologies, and different regions. What they share is a conviction that the people of their districts deserve a representative who answers to them, not a party.

Even more – in CA-06, the Democrats gerrymandered mid-cycle to try and gain more seats in Washington.  Instead, voters are clear that they’ve had enough and an Independent is poised to win the top two primary.

 

California

California’s uses a nonpartisan Top Two primary system which allows every candidate — Democrat, Republican, independent — appears on the same ballot. The top two finishers, regardless of party, advance to November. Under this system, there is no “spoiler.” Top Two is one of the many reforms that Forward fights for nation-wide because they make our democracy better than it is today.

California’s June 2 primary was a strong test for independents (especially in a state with 30% “no party preference” voter registration). Under a partisan primary system, independent candidates have to wait until November. California’s Top Two system is different. It is, as Forward has long argued, what every state’s system should be: a fair fight, on one ballot, where voters choose who moves forward. Here’s how our candidates fared.


Rep. Kevin KileyRep. Kevin Kiley

California — CA-06

Rep. Kevin Kiley did something remarkable this spring: he walked away from the Republican Party, choosing principle over party. After California’s Proposition 50 redrew his district into solidly Democratic territory, Kiley could have retired, switched parties, or found a safe Republican-leaning seat. Instead, he filed as “No Party Preference,” took the gerrymandering issue head-on, and made his case directly to voters.
With 53% of the district reporting Tuesday night, Kiley is leading all candidates in the Top Two primary with 26.8% of the vote. Final results are expected early next week.

These results are showing Kiley advancing to the November general election, making him the first sitting independent member of the House of Representatives to survive a primary in 2026.

 


Chris DemersChris Demers

California — CA-18

Chris Demers entered the race as a No Party Preference candidate in a field that included both a major-party incumbent and challengers. Like many of our candidates, he isn’t a career politician. He embodies Forward’s values by wanting to provide something better for his community.
With 54.8% of the district reporting, the race has been called for Rep. Zoe Lofgren and Republican Shane Lewis.

Demers did not advance to November. But CA-18 is among the deepest Democratic districts in California – a seat that has never been seriously contested since Lofgren first won it. The fact that Chris Demers stood up, refused PAC money, and made the case for independent representation in one of the hardest possible environments is a step we are proud to see happen.

Every independent candidate that runs in a district like this makes the next one easier. We’re thankful for Chris Demers, and we hope he stays in the fight.

 


Karen Leigh MatthewsKaren Leigh Matthews

California — CA-23

Dr. Karen Leigh Matthews is a Navy veteran, physician, radiologist, and small business owner who spent more than 20 years serving in the military. She ran for Congress as an independent because she was tired of being “caught between a party that wants government to fail and a party that wants government to do everything.” That thinking, along with her resume, is something rare.
In CA-23, Karen outraised every Democratic challenger in the field. With Democratic support solidifying in the final days, the math narrowed her path to November and she fell short of advancing.

With 61.3% of the district reporting, the race was called for incumbent Rep. Jay Obernolte (R).

We are proud of Dr. Matthews and deeply grateful for her campaign. She showed what an independent candidate can look like when they’re built for the job, not the party. Her district missed out on an exceptional public servant. We hope she runs again.

 

Before an independent candidate can even compete, they have to fight just to get their name on the ballot. Here’s how Forward candidates made that happen in this cycle.

 

Iowa

Michael BridgfordMichael Bridgford

Iowa — IA-01

Michael Bridgford is running in a district where roughly one-third of voters aren’t registered with either major party. He officially filed his nomination petitions on June 1st, the day before the primary. He expects to pass the mark handily and qualify on to the ballot for November, we just need to wait for the Secretary of State to make it official.
The general election matchup: Incumbent Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R) won her primary with 71.6% of the vote, while Christina Bohannon (D) won her primary with 81.5%. This will mark the third consecutive election in which these two candidates will face each other in the general. Iowa’s 1st District voters know both options. Bridgford offers a third — one that doesn’t arrive with three cycles of partisan theatrics.

 


Dave BushawDave Bushaw

Iowa — IA-02

Dave Bushaw is going to qualify for November’s ballot even though Iowa’s legislature “moved the goalposts in the middle of the night,” according to Dave, by raising the signature threshold mid-cycle. His campaign knocked on more than 7,000 doors and found that 88% of the people they spoke with wanted to sign. On June 2nd, Bushaw officially filed his nomination petitions. His campaign achieved 200% of the required signatures in every single county in IA-02.
We are continuing to monitor official approval, as signature challenges can be filed through next week, but Dave should sail through to November.

The general election matchup: Democrat Lindsay James, Dubuque state representative and Presbyterian minister, won with just under 60%, and will face Trump-backed Republican Joe Mitchell, who won with 61.5%. Notably, Democratic primary turnout in IA-02 outpaced Republican turnout: roughly 47,900 Democratic votes to roughly 39,700 Republican votes. Cook Political Report rates the seat Likely Republican, R+4 PVI, but calls it “increasingly competitive.”


 

Montana

Seth BodnarSeth Bodnar

Montana

Seth Bodnar needed 13,327 verified signatures from registered voters statewide to qualify for the November general election ballot as an independent in Montana. He didn’t just meet the mark; he submitted nearly 30,000 signatures from 52 of Montana’s 56 counties, collecting nearly twice the required threshold through a volunteer-driven grassroots petition effort. His campaign has also outraised every Democrat and Republican in the race, demonstrating that independent candidacy paired with serious organization is no longer a longshot strategy.
Bodnar officially filed his signatures in late May. As of May 29th, counties have accepted enough verified signatures to put Bodnar on the ballot.

The general election matchup: Kurt Alme (R) won his primary with 76.2% of the vote, while Alani Bankhead (D) won her primary with 43.8% of the vote. 

 


South Dakota

 

Brian BengsBrian Bengs

South Dakota — U.S. Senate

Brian Bengs is running for U.S. Senate in South Dakota with a grassroots campaign built on small-dollar donors. To qualify for the ballot as an independent in South Dakota, Bengs needed 3,502 valid signatures. He submitted more than 4,500 — and his petition was certified by the Secretary of State with a 93.85% validity rate, the highest of any statewide candidate in South Dakota this election season. That’s better than both the Republican and Democratic candidates. The campaign called it “a testament to the strength of this movement.” We agree.
He submitted his signatures in April and is officially on the November 3rd general election ballot, certified by the South Dakota Secretary of State.

The general election matchup: Incumbent Mike Rounds (R) won his primary with 75.8% of the vote, while Julian Beaudion (D) advanced unchallenged.


These aren’t isolated data points. They are a trajectory. The independent political infrastructure – from the fundraising networks to the organizing capacity to the legal teams who know how to fight ballot challenges – is being built right now by the candidates and movements that keep showing up. Every campaign that plants a flag makes the next one possible.

Forward Progress 

It would be easy to look at Tuesday’s results and just count votes. However, the snapshot is bigger than any individual race. It is about a country that is waking up to the fact that the two-party system is not delivering for the people it’s supposed to serve.

We don’t just believe America can do better, we are actively building the infrastructure, recruiting the candidates, and making the case that voters deserve more than two choices handed to them by institutions that have long since stopped listening. Iowa, South Dakota, Montana, California, Washington, Minnesota, Maine, Tennessee, Rhode Island, and Nebraska are all seeing independent candidates qualify for ballots and create excitement. The movement is growing.

November is five months away. The work continues. And so does our question, How can we build a just and fair government that truly represents Americans?

One primary at a time. One candidate at a time. One voter at a time.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

In this thought-provoking episode of The Forward Party Podcast, hosts Lindsey Williams Drath, Governor Christine Todd Whitman, and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey sit down with former U.S. Congressman, Army veteran, and author Chris Gibson to explore one of the most important questions facing America today: What did the Founders get right, and what have we forgotten?

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E11 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

We’re Hosting Events All Over The Country

Find one near you, sign up, and help build a better future for America.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Or this week, what we’re watching!

Lindsey Drath Talks Gerrymandering on FOX 5

Forward CEO Lindsey Drath talks midterms, gerrymandering, and independents as a fulcrum for change on FOX5.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

 

Young Americans and the Future of Work 5/21/26

Young Americans have always believed the future would offer more opportunity than the past. That optimism has long been one of the country’s defining strengths. But new polling suggests that confidence is starting to crack and policymakers should pay attention.

A recent Gallup survey found that just 43% of Americans ages 15 to 34 believe now is a good time to find a job where they live, a stunning reversal from historic trends.

It’s not surprising. They are entering adulthood during a period of economic whiplash: pandemic disruption, inflation, housing costs that feel permanently out of reach, rising student debt, and growing uncertainty around artificial intelligence and the future of white-collar work. Axios recently reported that unemployment among recent college graduates has climbed above the national average and underemployment remains high.

Many did what society told them to do: work hard, get educated, build skills, and prepare for the future. Now,  too many feel like they are walking into a system that no longer guarantees stability, affordability, or even a clear path forward. That frustration is real. But it is also a warning sign for a country that depends on innovation, entrepreneurship, and upward mobility to thrive.

The answer cannot simply be nostalgia for an older economy that is not coming back. AI is real. Automation is real. Global competition is real. The world is changing quickly, whether our political system is prepared for it or not.

That is where the Forward Party believes a different kind of politics matters.

Forward’s approach starts with a simple idea: government should focus less on ideological warfare and more on helping people successfully navigate a changing future. That means investing in workforce development, apprenticeships, modern career training, entrepreneurship, technical education, and AI literacy. It means preparing students not just for the jobs that existed 20 years ago, but for the industries and technologies that will define the next 20. It also means recognizing that dignity and purpose matter just as much as economic statistics.

The good news is that pessimism is not destiny.

The same generation expressing anxiety about the job market is also the most adaptive, technologically fluent, and entrepreneurial generation in modern history. Young Americans are already building businesses online, creating entirely new industries, using AI tools creatively, and reshaping what work looks like in real time. Even leaders in the AI sector argue this technological transformation can create enormous opportunity if the country embraces it thoughtfully and prepares people for it.

America has reinvented its economy before. We can do it again. But it will require leaders willing to stop treating every issue as a partisan fight and start treating it as a practical challenge to solve together.

Young Americans do not need empty promises. They need leaders willing to level with them about change, invest in their future, and build an economy where hard work still creates opportunity.

That is the kind of future Forward believes is still possible.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

In Episode 10 of The Forward Party Podcast, the conversation turns toward one of the biggest questions in American politics right now: Can independent leaders actually reshape Congress from the inside? Hosts Lindsey Williams Drath, Governor Christine Todd Whitman, and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey sit down with former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele for a candid discussion about party loyalty, election reform, voter frustration, and the growing demand for independent leadership across the country.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E09 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

NY Monthly Virtual Town Hall

Each month, NY Forwardists across the state meet on Google Meets to hear from a partner organization or potential endorsed candidate or to discuss a relevant topic. Open discussion follows. Email maverick@gmail.com to join!

Michigan Forward – May State Meeting

Come join us at our May state meeting for a quick discussion about what our plans for Michigan Forward are and what we can work on this summer.

Georgia Virtual May Meeting

We are excited to welcome Jerry Ramos, who is running for Sheriff in Hall County in the 2028 election. Jerry has a truly unique perspective shaped by his time in the Army, his work in security and law enforcement, and his experience raising 8 kids (!!). After seeing opportunities for improvement in the system, he decided to step up and run for office himself.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

NYC shuts out half its voters. The Forward Party supports a new bill to change that

The polarization we see in our politics is not a mystery. It is the predictable output of a system designed to produce it. Nothing meaningful can change until we fix the structure that keeps producing these outcomes.

New Mexico Forward Party officially approved as minor party

New Mexico’s Forward Party was officially approved as a minor party that can field candidates in elections. The party on Monday released the names of five candidates who plan to run in the November general election.

Independent Rick Bennett qualifies for November election for governor

Independent gubernatorial candidate Rick Bennett submitted more than 5,000 signatures to the Maine Secretary of State’s Office Wednesday in his bid to appear on the November ballot alongside Republican and Democratic party nominees.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

 

MEDIA ADVISORY: Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield to Hold Election Protection Press Conference 05/18/26

May 19 Primary is the first major Oregon election since the string of unprecedented attacks on elections from the Trump administration began
MEDIA ADVISORY
Date: May 18, 2026
Oregon Secretary of State Contact: Connor Radnovich | connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov

Oregon Department of Justice Contact: Jenny Hansson | jenny.hansson@doj.oregon.gov

Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield to Hold Election Protection Press Conference

May 19 Primary is the first major Oregon election since the string of unprecedented attacks on elections from the Trump administration began

SALEM, OR — Tomorrow, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield will hold a press conference to brief Oregon voters on the steps being taken to keep Oregon elections secure, fair, and accurate.

Secretary Read will detail the physical security measures and processes in place to ensure every legal ballot is counted and protect elections infrastructure. Attorney General Rayfield will provide an overview of the state’s election-related legal battles and response plan should the federal government continue to escalate its attempts to interfere with Oregonians’ right to vote.

EVENT INFORMATION

WHO: Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield

WHAT: Election Protection Press Conference

WHERE: Oregon State Capitol Building Press Conference Room, 900 Court St NE, Salem | Livestream link available via RSVP

WHEN: Tuesday, May 19, 2026, at 12:30 PM

RSVP: To reserve your spot in the press conference room or receive a link to the livestream, email connor.radnovich@sos.oregon.gov.

###

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
  |  Help

RVC Part 3 of 3: How to Get Involved in Ranked-Choice Voting in Your State or Community

Part 3 of 3: How to Get Involved in Ranked-Choice Voting in Your State or Community

How to Get Involved With Ranked-Choice Voting — Practical Steps

Whether you like ranked-choice voting, dislike it, or are undecided, here’s how you can actually participate in your area.Step-by-Step Action Guide

Learn What’s Happening in Your Area

  • Go to FairVote.org and RCVResources.org — they have excellent maps showing where RCV is used or being considered.

  • Check Ballotpedia.org — search “Ranked-choice voting [Your State]”.

Understand Your State’s Rules

  • Does your state allow citizen ballot initiatives?

  • What are the signature requirements?

  • Has your state banned RCV or passed a “local option” law?

Get Involved Locally (Often the Easiest Starting Point)

  • Attend your city council or county commission meetings and speak during public comment.

  • Talk to your local election clerk or county auditor.

  • Support or oppose local efforts (many cities adopt RCV through charter changes).

Connect With Existing Groups

  • FairVote has state and local partners.

  • Search online for “[Your City/County] Ranked Choice Voting” or “[Your State] RCV Coalition”.

Contact Your Representatives

  • Email or call your state legislators and tell them your thoughts — especially if you’re in a rural area. Rural voices are important in these conversations.

For Oregon Readers Specifically

  • Watch how Portland’s and Multnomah County’s RCV elections go in 2026.

  • Follow the Secretary of State’s study on RCV (due September 2026).

  • A future statewide measure is most likely in 2028 or later.

Final Advice

Start small. Even attending one meeting or sharing factual information with neighbors makes a difference. Whether you want to help bring RCV to your area, stop it, or just make sure it’s done fairly, getting informed and showing up is the most important step.

Ranked Choice Voting

The Primary Election is Only 4 Days Away! 5/15/26

Date: May 15, 2026

Follow for elections updates: FacebookInstagramXBluesky, and Youtube

 

Oregonians,

The big Primary Election is right around the corner: Tuesday, May 19.

Make sure to fill out your ballot, sign it, and return it, if you have not already.

With the election just four days away, your best option is to return your ballot to an official ballot drop box – there are 321 official drop boxes across the state.

All ballots returned to these boxes are collected directly by your county’s elections officials. No mailing delays. No worrying about your vote not getting counted. Just make sure to drop it in a box by 8 p.m. on Election Day.

I dropped mine off this week, and it was great to see some fellow voters there with me!

With recent service changes at USPS, mailing your ballot this close to Election Day is not recommended. Ballots now have to go all the way to Portland before they are postmarked; so, if you live more than 50 miles away from Portland, your ballot may not be postmarked or delivered on time.

So please, use an official ballot drop box! You can find the closest one to you by going to oregonvotes.gov/dropbox.

If you’re an eligible voter and have not received your ballot, call your county elections office as soon as possible. It’s not too late.

Now, I want to leave you all with one very important message:

No one, and I mean no one, can intimidate, pressure, or interfere with your right to vote.

In Oregon, the law protects you from harassment, threats, misleading statements, and any attempt to block or obstruct your vote, at every step of the process. You can learn more about your rights as an Oregon voter on our website or in the video linked down below.

Sincerely,

Tobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

Make sure your ballot is returned on time.

Use an official ballot drop box near you!

Do you know your rights as an Oregon voter?

Learn what intimidation can look like and what you can do if you believe your rights have been violated in this video.

Calling all Oregon photographers!

Your photo could be selected to be on the front or back cover of the next Oregon Blue Book, the state’s official almanac and factbook!

To learn more about the Oregon Blue Book, read the contest guidelines, and submit your images, click the button below! Entries welcome until Sunday, October 31 at 11:59 p.m.

Click Here to Learn More
 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
  |  Help

RVC Part 2 of 3: Where Ranked-Choice Voting Stands Today in the United States

Part 2 of 3: Where Ranked-Choice Voting Stands Today in the United States

Where Ranked-Choice Voting Is Being Used Right Now

Note from the author: I am an Oregonian, so I use Oregon’s 2024 experience with Measure 117 as a detailed real-world example. However, this series is written as a national guide. The information, patterns, and action steps apply to voters in every state.

Current National Picture (April 2026)

  • Only two states currently use ranked-choice voting for statewide and federal elections: Maine and Alaska.

  • About 49 cities and counties across 22 states plus D.C. use RCV for local elections, covering roughly 14–17 million voters.

  • 19 states have banned or heavily restricted it.

  • In 2024, voters in several states (including Oregon) rejected statewide RCV ballot measures.

What Happened in OregonIn November 2024, Oregon voters decided on Measure 117, which would have brought ranked-choice voting to presidential, congressional, and statewide executive races starting in 2028.Final Result:

  • Yes: 42.3%

  • No: 57.7%

The measure lost by about 15 points.Local use continues to grow:

  • Portland used RCV for the first time in 2024 for mayor and city council.

  • Multnomah County will start using it in 2026.

  • Corvallis and a few other areas already use it locally.

The Urban-Rural Divide in Oregon (and Nationally)

Support for Measure 117 was much stronger in Portland, Eugene, Corvallis, and other college towns, while it was significantly weaker in rural counties, especially in Southern and Eastern Oregon.

This is not mainly about education levels. It reflects deeper political and cultural differences.

Rural Oregon voters often feel the state is governed too much by the three largest urban areas (Portland, Eugene, and Salem), while farms, small towns, and Eastern Oregon have too little voice. Many rural and conservative voters — especially Trump supporters — have developed real mistrust toward changes in how elections are run.

Honest Perspective for Rural Readers

Ranked-choice voting would not automatically “steal” or cancel conservative votes. In Alaska, some Republican and independent candidates have gained from second-choice votes. However, legitimate concerns remain: it can be more complicated, more expensive for small counties to run, and slower to report results. Rural election offices are often understaffed and worry about the added burden.

Many believe the best path is to let local experiments (Portland and Multnomah County) run for a few years so voters across the whole state can see real-world results before another statewide vote.

Screenshot

Screenshot

RVC Part 1 of 3: Ranked-Choice Voting Explained – What It Is, How It Works, and Why People Care

Part 1 of 3: Ranked-Choice Voting ExplainedWhat It Is, How It Works, and Why People Care

A Clear Explanation for Everyday Voters.  In recent years, more Americans have heard about Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV), also known as instant-runoff voting. Supporters say it reduces negative campaigning and gives voters more voice. Critics say it’s complicated and unnecessary.

Here’s a straightforward breakdown. How Ranked-Choice Voting Works. Instead of marking just one candidate, you rank the candidates in order of preference: 1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice, etc.

  • If any candidate gets more than 50% of the first-choice votes, they win immediately.

  • If no one reaches 50%, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated.

  • Those votes are redistributed to the voters’ second choices.

  • This process repeats until one candidate reaches a majority.

Simple Example:
Three candidates — Alice, Bob, and Charlie.

  • Alice gets 40% first choices

  • Bob gets 35%

  • Charlie gets 25%

Charlie is eliminated. If most of Charlie’s voters ranked Bob second, those votes move to Bob, who then wins with a true majority.

Claimed Advantages

  • Reduces the “spoiler” effect (third-party or independent candidates are less likely to swing the election)

  • Encourages more positive campaigning (candidates want to be your second choice too)

  • Produces winners with broader support

  • Allows voters to support their favorite without “wasting” their vote

Common Concerns

  • More complex for voters and election workers

  • Can take longer to report final results

  • Higher costs for equipment, training, and voter education

  • May favor certain types of candidates (often moderates)

Real-World Experience

RCV has been used in Maine (since 2018), Alaska (since 2022), New York City, Minneapolis, San Francisco, Portland (OR), and dozens of other cities. Most places report it runs fairly smoothly once voters get used to it, but several states rejected it at the ballot box in 2024.

Question for readers: Have you ever used ranked-choice voting? Did you find it helpful or confusing?

Richie BallotGraphic 768x576

It’s time to mail back your ballot! The May 19th election is 1 week away. 6/12/26

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

Date: May 12, 2026

Follow for elections updates: FacebookInstagramXBluesky, and Youtube 

Three ways to return your ballot: drop it off, mail it, return it to your county elections office

Oregonians,

The May 19th election is one week away!

If you are planning to return your ballot by mail, make sure to put it in the mail today. 

Due to service changes at the United States Postal Service (USPS), it will likely take more time for your ballot to be postmarked and received by your county elections office — most ballots have to go all the way to Portland before they are postmarked and delivered back to your local elections official.

For your vote to be counted, your ballot must be postmarked by Election Day and received by your county elections office within seven days of the Election.

So please, don’t wait until the last minute: Mail your ballot today! 

If you can’t mail your ballot today, don’t worry. You have options:

Your best option to return your ballot to any official county ballot drop box before 8:00 p.m. on May 19th. Ballots returned to these boxes are collected directly by county elections officials, so there’s no need to worry about the mail.

If you still want to use the mail, go to the post office nearest you, walk up to the counter, and ask for a manual postmark — free of charge.

You can also take your ballot directly to your county elections office and return it in a drop box there. Every county elections office has a drop box on site, so you can feel confident your ballot will be received on time.

Remember: your voice matters, and voting early makes sure it’s heard.

Sincerely,

Tobias Read signatureTobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

GovDelivery logo

TODAY: Virtual Town Hall on Elections & Voting with Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley, OACC President Dag Robinson 5/11/26

Town hall will be moderated by Sandy Chung, Executive Director of ACLU of Oregon

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

GovDelivery logo

Americans Are Feeling the Squeeze. Washington Must Do Better. 05/08/2026

Americans are anxious about the economy.  People feel it every time they buy groceries, fill up their gas tank, pay rent, or open a credit card bill. Across the country, families are asking the same question: why does it feel harder and harder to get ahead, even when they are working harder than ever?

New polling from Gallup shows affordability now dominates Americans’ financial worries. Inflation and high prices remain the top concern for families, while a record 55% of Americans say their financial situation is getting worse. Energy costs, housing costs, healthcare expenses, transportation, and childcare are all rising faster than many household budgets can keep up with.

At the same time, confidence in the broader economy is falling sharply. Gallup’s Economic Confidence Index dropped to -38 in April, one of the lowest readings in recent years and a sign that Americans are increasingly pessimistic about both current conditions and where the economy is heading. Even among people who are still employed and financially stable, anxiety about the future is growing. Americans are worried about layoffs, AI, inflation, debt, and whether the next generation will have the same opportunities they had.

There are warning signs at the national level as well. This week, America’s debt burden surpassed the country’s annual economic output for the first time since World War II, with public debt reaching more than $31 trillion. Economists across the political spectrum increasingly warn that long-term fiscal dysfunction in Washington is making it harder to invest in the future while also increasing pressure on interest rates and the cost of living.

And yet, despite these very real concerns, too much of our political system remains trapped in partisan theater instead of focused on practical solutions. Americans are looking for leadership willing to address affordability, energy costs, housing supply, workforce development, healthcare expenses, and the national debt with seriousness and honesty. Instead, many see constant political warfare, performative outrage, and a system designed more around scoring points than solving problems.

This is where Forward’s values matter.

The Forward Party was built around the belief that Americans are exhausted by a politics that rewards division and punishes problem solving. Most voters are not asking for ideological purity. They are asking for leaders who will listen, work together, use facts and data, and focus on outcomes that improve everyday life.

Forward believes affordability should not be a partisan issue. Making it easier to build housing, supporting energy innovation, investing in workforce training for a changing economy, modernizing infrastructure, and bringing down healthcare costs are not red or blue ideas. They are practical challenges that require serious leadership.

Forward also believes the country cannot solve long-term economic problems if elected officials are more focused on protecting political power than building public trust. Gerrymandered districts, hyper-partisan primaries, and a political culture driven by outrage make compromise politically risky even when compromise is what the country needs most.

But there is reason for optimism.

Across the country, more independent and solutions-focused leaders are stepping forward to run for office, build coalitions, and challenge the idea that Americans are permanently stuck choosing between dysfunction and extremism. Voters are increasingly open to candidates who prioritize collaboration, accountability, and results over partisan loyalty.

The economic challenges facing the country are real. Americans feel them every day. But this moment also creates an opportunity to rethink how we govern and what we reward in politics.

The future does not have to be defined by gridlock, economic anxiety, and political exhaustion. With better leadership, more accountability, and a political system that rewards solving problems instead of escalating conflict, the country can build an economy that is more affordable, more resilient, and more hopeful for the next generation.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

Episode 9  – Lindsey Drath, Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey, and Governor Whitman hold a grounded and timely conversation about the future of American politics. At the center of the discussion is a pressing question: Can the system be recalibrated without starting from scratch?

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.TFPP E09 Thumbnail

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

May 14 – Women’s Committee Event – Commanding Change: From the Marine Corps to the Movement

Join the Forward Party Women’s Committee in a frank discussion about the current situation of women in the military with Forward Woman Sarah Czech, who co-chairs the Veterans & Military Families Committee.  For more information and to RSVP, click here. 

May 20 – AAPI Committee Launch

May is AAPI Heritage Month

Join us as we officially launch the AAPI Committee on May 20th.We will be joined by Andrew Yang and other special guests  For more information and to RSVP, click here.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Virginia’s high court strikes down voter-passed House map favoring Democrats

The finding is a major setback for Democrats in their effort to counter GOP-led redistricting in other states. The measure approved April 21 gave Democrats an edge in four districts.

U.S. debt exceeds 100 percent of GDP

The U.S. national debt crossed 100 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) at the end of March, with signs that it might cross the record of 106 percent of GDP reached immediately after World War II.

 

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

 

EVENT ALERT: Portland Election Info Town Hall with Congresswoman Dexter, Representatives Nosse & Chotzen

RSVP today!

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

GovDelivery logo

Fill Out Your Ballot with Confidence this Primary Election – Oregon

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

Date: May 5, 2026


Follow for elections updates: Facebook, Instagram, X, Bluesky, and Youtube

How to fill out your ballot in six easy steps #trustedinfoOregonians,

The big May Primary Election is exactly two weeks away (Tuesday, May 19).

County clerks started sending out ballots last week, so you should be getting yours soon – if you haven’t already.

If you need to update your address, it’s not too late to make that change. You can do so online at OregonVotes.gov/myvote. If you need to update your name or signature, you can still do that to by submitting a paper registration form. If you have any questions or concerns, don’t hesitate to give your county elections office a call.

The best part about our vote-by-mail system is that you have time. Time to make a plan. Time to talk with your friends, family, and neighbors. Time to do your research before making your selections.

You should have received your Voters’ Pamphlet in the mail to help you start your research too, which you can also access online.

When you’re ready to fill out your ballot, reference our six-step guide below. It has all the information you need to fill out your ballot clearly, correctly, and confidently.

Sincerely,

Tobias Read signatureTobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

GovDelivery logo

Are Our Leaders Focused on What Actually Matters? 05/01/2026

If you ask most Americans what is on their mind right now, the answer is simple: affordability. The cost of everyday life, from groceries and gas to housing and healthcare, has become the defining issue for families across the country. Inflation may have cooled from its peak, but prices are still significantly higher than they were just a few years ago. Home prices remain near record highs, putting ownership out of reach for many, while rent continues to strain household budgets. According to Gallup, inflation and the cost of living consistently rank among the top concerns for Americans, with a majority saying they are worried about their personal financial situation. Data from Pew Research Center shows similar trends, with many Americans saying their incomes are not keeping up with rising costs.

At the same time, confidence in leadership is near historic lows. Congressional approval is around 10 percent in recent Gallup tracking, President Trump’s approval rating has dropped to 34 percent, and trust in government more broadly remains deeply eroded. Yet despite that dissatisfaction, incumbents continue to win reelection at rates exceeding 90 percent. That disconnect tells you something important. The system is not responding to what people are actually experiencing. While affordability tops the list of concerns, Washington often appears focused elsewhere. That includes partisan maneuvering like gerrymandering, political investigations and prosecutions, and internal power struggles that have little to do with lowering costs or improving economic opportunity.

The results speak for themselves. Congress has passed relatively few major pieces of legislation that directly address the core drivers of affordability. Conversations about long term economic challenges, like preparing workers for technological change, strengthening local economies, and expanding access to good paying jobs, are not getting the attention they deserve. Meanwhile, approval ratings for both Congress and national leadership remain deeply underwater, reinforcing the sense that the system is not delivering.

This is exactly why the Forward Party is focused on building something different. We are recruiting and supporting candidates who are solutions focused, grounded in their communities, and committed to listening to what voters are actually saying. That means using data, evidence, and real world experience to shape policy, not ideology or party talking points. It means prioritizing affordability, economic opportunity, and long term stability over short term political wins.

There is a better path forward, and more Americans are starting to see it. Across the country, people are stepping up to run for office, engage in their communities, and demand a system that actually reflects their lives and priorities. Change will not happen overnight, but it is already beginning. With leaders who are willing to listen, focus on real problems, and work toward practical solutions, we can build a system that delivers again. One that makes life more affordable, expands opportunity, and gives people confidence in their future.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

Episode 8  – Lindsey Drath and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey are joined by Forward National Communications Director John Goodwin for a thoughtful conversation on the growing momentum behind independent voters and what it really takes to challenge America’s entrenched two-party system. What starts as a discussion on political identity quickly expands into a deeper look at structural barriers, voter frustration, and the untapped potential sitting in plain sight across the country. At the center of the conversation is a striking reality: nearly half of Americans now identify as independents, yet the system itself makes it incredibly difficult for those voices to translate into representation. From closed primaries to limited ballot access, the episode breaks down how the current structure favors party insiders while leaving everyday voters on the outside.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

May 20 – AAPI Committee Launch

May is AAPI Heritage Month

Join us as we officially launch the AAPI Committee on May 20th.We will be joined by Andrew Yang and other special guests  For more information and to RSVP, click here.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Supreme Court decision sets off gerrymandering scramble 

A day after the Supreme Court further gutted the Voting Rights Act, Republican-led states are eying changes to boost the GOP’s gerrymandering effort at the expense of voters of color, while voting rights groups are trying to limit the impact of the ruling on this year’s midterms.

U.S. debt exceeds 100 percent of GDP

The U.S. national debt crossed 100 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) at the end of March, with signs that it might cross the record of 106 percent of GDP reached immediately after World War II.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Protecting Voting Rights is a fundamental aspect of American Democracy

Protecting voting rights is a fundamental aspect of American democracy, and your concern about potential executive overreach is valid given recent reports. While presidents have issued executive orders related to elections in the past, they don’t have unilateral authority to control how states run them, elections are primarily a state responsibility under the Constitution (Article I, Section 4), with Congress able to set or alter regulations for federal races. Any attempt to impose sweeping changes via executive order, especially if premised on unsubstantiated claims like foreign interference from past elections, would likely face immediate legal challenges and injunctions from federal courts, as happened with a similar order in March 2025.

Courts have repeatedly affirmed that such actions can’t override constitutional limits or state authority without clear statutory backing.

That said, litigation can take time, so proactive steps are key to safeguarding access to the ballot. Here’s what individuals and communities can do, based on established strategies from voting rights organizations:
20260227 1525 Image Generation simple compose 01kjgpn3xwe56sa3wwxmrszbfs

Secretary Read Responds to Supreme Court Voting Rights: ‘Another Loophole Politicians Will Use to Rig the System Against the American People’

PRESS RELEASE
Date: April 29, 2026
Contact: Tess Seger | tess.seger@sos.oregon.gov

Secretary Read Responds to Supreme Court Voting Rights Act Decision: ‘Another Loophole Politicians Will Use to Rig the System Against the American People’

SALEM, OR — Today, in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which guts a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read issued the following statement:

“The whole point of the Voting Rights Act was to make our democracy better reflect the will of the people. Any attempt to undermine the VRA is an attempt to make the powerful less accountable to the public. The decision out of the Supreme Court today creates yet another loophole that politicians will use to rig the system against the American people.

“I will continue to do everything I can to keep Oregon a place where every eligible citizen can vote and those votes matter.”

###

Today’s Your Last Day to Register to Vote for the Big Primary Election!

Date: April 28, 2026

Follow for elections updates: FacebookInstagramXBluesky, and Youtube 

Dear Oregonians,

It’s not too late to register to vote in the big May Primary Election!

You have until 11:59 p.m. TONIGHT to register or make any changes to your registration.

Here in Oregon, we make it quick and convenient for eligible citizens. You can register online, and it takes less than five minutes, just visit OregonVotes.gov/register.

If you’ve moved recently or can’t remember the last time you checked your voter registration information, you’ll want to make sure everything is up to date to avoid delays in getting your ballot.

You can check or make a change to your registration on OregonVotes.gov/myvote.

There are some key candidate races and measures on this ballot, so you won’t want to miss out!

I do want to remind you that we have closed primary elections in Oregon. 

Major political parties nominate their party candidates during the Primary Election, and because we have closed primaries, only voters registered with a party can vote for that party’s candidates.

That means if you’re not registered as a Republican or Democrat, your ballot won’t list the candidate races for those parties.

If you’re not affiliated with any party, don’t worry: you’ll still get a ballot for the May primary, but it will only list nonpartisan races, like those for our state’s judges or state measures.

If you’d like to affiliate with a party, you can also make that change on OregonVotes.gov/myvote, just make sure you do it before 11:59 p.m. tonight to get the correct ballot!

Your vote is your voice, and registering to vote is the first step to making it heard. 

Sincerely,

Tobias Read
Oregon Secretary of State

Click to Register Online

To download this guide visit OregonVotes.gov/toolkit.

DID YOU KNOW…

Oregon’s 36 county elections offices are responsible for maintaining our voter rolls and mailing ballots and registering voters.

If you have questions, comments, or concerns regarding your registration or your ballot please contact your county elections office as soon as possible!

Click here to find the contact information for your local county elections office.

Questions about voting in Oregon?

FIND A TOWN HALL WITH SECRETARY READ NEAR YOU!

Join Secretary Read and get answers to your questions at upcoming town halls in Corvallis, Portland, and Lincoln City! More town halls to be announced soon. 

Join Secretary Read in Corvallis on May 6 at 6:00 p.m. with Senator Gelser Blouin and Rep. Finger Mcdonald; in Portland on May 8 at 6:00 p.m. with Rep. Nosse and Rep. Chotzen; in Lincoln City on May 9 at 9:30 a.m. with Rep. Gomberg.

| CORVALLIS RSVPPORTLAND RSVP | LINCOLN CITY RSVP |

 Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
Help

Fast Forward 04/24/2026

Bill —

Just a few years ago, Virginia voters took an important step toward fairer elections. In 2020, they approved a redistricting reform that created a bipartisan citizen-legislator commission to draw political maps, with the goal of reducing partisan influence and increasing transparency.

Tuesday’s election results show how fragile that progress can be.

Voters approved a new measure that will once again change how congressional maps are drawn in Virginia ahead of the 2026 election. That opens the door for lawmakers to redraw district lines in ways that could significantly reshape the state’s congressional delegation. Some projections suggest the current 6–5 split could shift dramatically, with Democrats potentially holding as many as 10 of Virginia’s 11 seats.

Those kinds of outcomes are driven by how the lines are drawn. In some scenarios, densely populated urban and suburban areas in Northern Virginia could be combined with more rural regions in western and southwestern parts of the state, diluting competitive districts and making results more predictable.

We have seen this pattern before. In states like Texas, Republicans have drawn maps that strongly favor their party, locking in advantages for years at a time. Moves like this have led Democrats in other states to respond in kind, creating a cycle where each side redraws maps to counter the other rather than competing for voters.

At Forward, we oppose that, no matter who is doing it.

At the same time, it is important to acknowledge that not all of these situations are identical. In states like Virginia and California, voters were consulted and approved these changes. While we respectfully disagree with the outcome, we recognize that this approach is meaningfully different from situations in states like Texas, where maps have been imposed without that same level of voter input.

The real problem is not one party. It is the system itself. What is happening in Virginia reflects a broader cycle where redistricting is used to protect incumbents and lock in advantage. The result is a system with far too little competition. In recent election cycles, only about 30 to 40 out of 435 U.S. House races are considered truly competitive. Most districts are effectively safe seats where one party is overwhelmingly favored, and incumbents rarely lose, with reelection rates typically above 90 percent.

When elections are not competitive, accountability breaks down. And voters are noticing. According to the latest Gallup poll released this week, just 10 percent of Americans approve of Congress, while 86 percent disapprove, the lowest approval rating Gallup has ever recorded.

This is not a coincidence. When politicians pick their voters, general elections become predictable, independent voices struggle to compete, and incentives shift toward appealing to a narrow base instead of the broader public. That is not a healthy democracy. It is a closed system.

Forward has been clear from the beginning. We oppose partisan gerrymandering by anyone, anywhere. It does not matter whether it benefits Democrats in Virginia or Republicans in another state. The outcome is the same. Voters are left with fewer choices and a system that becomes less representative over time. That is why we support independent redistricting commissions that put voters first.

A better system would create more competitive districts, encourage candidates to speak to a broader range of voters, and reward problem solving instead of partisanship.

Virginia’s result is a reminder of what is at stake. Voters should choose their representatives. Elections should be competitive. Politicians should have to earn support, not engineer it.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

Episode 8  – Lindsey Drath and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey are joined by Forward National Communications Director John Goodwin for a thoughtful conversation on the growing momentum behind independent voters and what it really takes to challenge America’s entrenched two-party system. What starts as a discussion on political identity quickly expands into a deeper look at structural barriers, voter frustration, and the untapped potential sitting in plain sight across the country. At the center of the conversation is a striking reality: nearly half of Americans now identify as independents, yet the system itself makes it incredibly difficult for those voices to translate into representation. From closed primaries to limited ballot access, the episode breaks down how the current structure favors party insiders while leaving everyday voters on the outside.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

May 20 – AAPI Committee Launch

May is AAPI Heritage Month

Join us as we officially launch the AAPI Committee on May 20th.We will be joined by Andrew Yang and other special guests  For more information and to RSVP, click here.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

As political divides deepen, a new party eyes local change in Horry County

As political divisions deepen across the United States, more Americans than ever are looking for an alternative to the traditional two-party system. One group prioritizing local races and running candidates in the Grand Strand believes it has the answer. Nationally organized in 2021 by Democratic former presidential candidate Andrew Yang and Republican former New Jersey Governor and EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman, the Forward Party is recognized on ballots in six states, including South Carolina.

Op-Ed: In Arizona, Democrats and Republicans are banding together for one reason (possible paywall)

In Arizona, the two legacy political parties are in a panic. From the intensity of their response, you would think the recently renamed Arizona Independent Party (AIP), with a modest footprint and a broad vision, represents an existential threat. The reaction was so strong that Democrats and Republicans banded together to prevent the AIP’s name change from the No Labels Party of Arizona.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

2026 Elections Toolkit & Voter Registration Deadline- Oregon

Oregon Secretary of State color logo

Date: April 21, 2026

Follow for elections updates: Facebook, Instagram, X, Bluesky, and Youtube

Dear Oregonians,

The next big statewide election is coming up quick: Tuesday, May 19th! That’s less than one month away.

Our office just released the official 2026 Elections Toolkit, a collection of nonpartisan voter education materials designed to help you, your friends, neighbors, and every eligible voter vote with confidence in this year’s elections.

Visit OregonVotes.gov/toolkit to find everything you need to know about…

  • Registering to vote
  • Filling out your ballot
  • Making a plan to vote
  • Signing your ballot
  • Knowing your rights as an Oregon voter

…all in one place.

Take a look and share these toolkits with your community, and do it soon because there are important dates coming up!

Tuesday, April 28th is the deadline to register to vote in the big May election.

Need to register, check, or make a change to your registration? Visit OregonVotes.gov/myvote.

Registering to vote is quick and convenient. To learn where you can register, what documents you’ll need to register, and when you need to register by to take part in this year’s elections, I encourage you to check out our guide below.

Your vote is your voice, and registering to vote is the first step to making it heard. 

Sincerely,

Tobias Read signature


This email was sent to ***** using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Oregon Secretary of State · 900 Court Street NE · Capitol Room 136 · Salem OR 97310-0722 GovDelivery logo

Fast Forward 04/17/2026

Bill —

Viktor Orbán, long a symbol of democratic backsliding and the self-proclaimed creator of “illiberal democracy,” was defeated by the very force he worked so hard to bend: the will of the voters. In Hungary, citizens were given a chance to speak clearly, and they did. Their message was bigger than one man. It was a reminder that even leaders who spend years weakening institutions, centralizing power, and putting themselves above the public are still vulnerable when people decide enough is enough.

This was not only a vote about ideology. It was also a vote about accountability. Orbán’s defeat reflected something basic but powerful: people expect leaders to serve the public, not themselves. When governments become arrogant, insulated, corrupt, or indifferent to the daily struggles of ordinary families, voters notice. And when democracy is still strong enough to give them a voice, they can use it to demand something better.

That is why Hungary’s election matters far beyond Hungary. It stands as a warning to leaders everywhere, including here in the United States, that public office is not personal property. It is a temporary trust. Leaders are sent to their capitals to solve problems, uphold democratic norms, and improve people’s lives. When they fail in that responsibility, voters not only can replace them; they should replace them.

At Forward, we believe politics should be rooted in service, responsibility, and results. We are working to support leaders who understand that holding office means stewardship, not self-preservation. Hungary may be the latest example of voters insisting on that standard, but it cannot be the last. In this election year, we will keep fighting to make sure more leaders are chosen not for their ambition but for their willingness to serve.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast

REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is live!

Episode 7 brings the conversation back to where politics has the most immediate impact: local leadership. While national headlines tend to dominate attention, this discussion highlights how mayors and community leaders are quietly solving real problems every day without the noise of partisan division. Featuring Deke Copenhaver, former mayor of Augusta, Georgia, Brian Vincent, current mayor of Farmville, Virginia, and Clint Eisenhauer, South Carolina Forward Party Chair, the episode explores what it looks like to lead with service, accountability, and community-first thinking. These leaders share firsthand experiences navigating political pressure, earning trust at the grassroots level, and making decisions that directly shape the lives of their constituents.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

April 22 – Candidate Outreach Training

With such an impactful election year upon us, it’s important we find the right candidates to support! Join Carrie Anne and Jake Mellen, National Forward staff members, to learn what to look for in candidates and race in your area and best practices for outreach.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading

Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Forward Party Announces First Round of 2026 Congressional Endorsements

The Forward Party has announced its first round of congressional endorsements for the 2026 election cycle, backing a slate of six candidates across multiple states. Additional endorsements are expected in the coming months.

New Mexico Forward Party aims for recognition as Andrew Yang visits Santa Fe

Andrew Yang at a podium speaking in NMA former presidential candidate came to the New Mexico state Capitol on Friday to announce a new home for voters who are tired of the strife between Republicans and Democrats. “Politics in the state will never be the same,” Andrew Yang proclaimed to about two dozen people at a news conference where he announced the arrival of the Forward Party.

Andrew Yang Urges Action at Forward Party Utah Convention

If you’ve spent any time watching the American political landscape lately, you know the feeling of staring at a ballot and feeling like you’re being asked to choose between two versions of the same headache. For a lot of voters in the Beehive State, that frustration has moved past a quiet grumble and into a full-blown movement. We’re seeing it play out in Utah, where the Forward Party isn’t just knocking on doors—they’re attempting to rewrite the rules of engagement in a state traditionally known as a Republican stronghold.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Article 3 of 3 The Long Game — Power Beyond the Ballot

By now, it is clear that the 2026 midterms are unlike any we have seen in recent memory. The scale of spending, the intensity of coordination, and the precision of messaging all suggest a high-stakes contest—but the full story goes deeper than individual candidates or party control.

Article 2 of 3 Transparency Illusions — Money in Plain Sight

The early surge of funding into the 2026 midterms is hard to ignore, yet the public is still largely in the dark about how that money actually shapes the election. Even when contributions are disclosed, transparency is often more illusory than real.

Voters see the headlines—mega-donors, super PACs, and campaign cash—but few grasp the mechanics behind it, or the strategic intent that guides these flows. In essence, visibility does not equal understanding.

Disclosed vs. Hidden Influence

Campaign finance laws require certain reporting: super PACs must list their donors, and major contributions are public record. This disclosure gives the impression of accountability.

But disclosure is only part of the story. The “where” and “how” of influence often remains obscured. Mega-donors channel money into targeted districts, specialized messaging, and digital campaigns whose impacts ripple quietly.

Even non-dark money—funds that are fully reported—can operate as a form of strategic opacity. Voters know that spending is happening, but rarely see the nuanced ways it shapes perceptions, priorities, and local political infrastructure.

The Mechanics of Influence

Modern political spending is surgical. The goal is rarely broad persuasion; it’s about precise leverage:

  • District targeting: Money flows into the races that are winnable or strategically critical.

  • Message amplification: Ads, mailers, and digital campaigns are coordinated to push certain narratives.

  • Network shaping: Grassroots organizations, local media, and advocacy groups can be nudged—or suppressed—through funding decisions.

In combination, these tools allow wealth and influence to shape the electoral playing field long before voters cast ballots.

Public Perception and Strategic Opacity

To most citizens, a donor check is a check. But campaigns are more than contributions—they are engines of influence. Strategic opacity allows campaigns to appear open while steering attention, framing debates, and shaping perceptions without overt coercion.

The result is a paradox: the money is in plain sight, yet its full effect and intent are largely invisible. Voters see movement, but not the levers behind it.

Setting Up the Bigger Question

If disclosed money can operate as a subtle form of hidden influence, the real question becomes: what about the truly opaque channels? Dark money, nonprofit networks, and cross-linked advocacy groups operate largely outside public scrutiny.

And even among visible spending, both parties appear to be building something larger than a simple tally of wins and losses. Influence flows, narratives solidify, and infrastructure takes shape—often with consequences that extend well beyond Election Day.

The stage is set for a deeper exploration: how much of the opposition’s strategy is truly reactive, and how much is about quietly shaping enduring structures of influence?

Article

Article 1 of 3 Midterms Under Siege — The Scale of Influence

Midterm elections are supposed to be smaller, quieter affairs compared to presidential contests. Yet, heading into 2026, the sums being poured into these races are unprecedented, rivaling what we normally see only in general elections. The early flood of resources, even when fully disclosed, is a stark reminder that what the public sees is rarely the full story.

While headlines often focus on candidates, slogans, and social media battles, the real game is being played behind the scenes, where money flows strategically, shaping outcomes before most voters even pay attention.

The Numbers Are Jaw-Dropping

Even at this early stage, hundreds of millions of dollars are being funneled into key districts. Mega-donors and super PACs dominate the headlines, their contributions fully disclosed, but the scale alone is enough to overwhelm local campaigns and influence narrative framing.

This is money that historically would have been reserved for the general election, yet now, it is strategically deployed in primary and midterm races to set the stage for longer-term control. The sheer volume highlights the stakes: these elections are about more than individual candidates—they are about shaping influence, infrastructure, and future power.

Public Awareness vs. Reality

Disclosed contributions give the appearance of transparency. The public can see who is funding campaigns, which can create a sense of clarity and accountability. But even with full disclosure, the real intent behind the spending is often obscured.

Which districts are targeted? Which messages are amplified, and which are suppressed? How are grassroots networks subtly nudged or marginalized? The mechanics of influence remain largely invisible to voters, even when the money itself is visible.

In effect, disclosed money can still function as a form of strategic opacity. Voters notice that spending is happening, but few understand the purpose behind it, or the subtle ways it shapes perception, policy priorities, and candidate viability.

Implications for Democracy

This massive influx of resources into midterms raises urgent questions. When campaigns are so heavily funded from the top down, with precise targeting and messaging strategies, the electoral process is no longer just about persuading voters—it is about shaping the environment in which voters make choices.

The concern is not only about fairness but about the concentration of influence. Large donors and outside groups can disproportionately affect outcomes, often favoring well-funded narratives over community-driven priorities. Even when the money is visible, it is wielded with an intent that is not fully apparent.

Setting the Stage for Deeper Questions

If the stakes of the 2026 midterms are already higher than expected, and the flow of money is more aggressive than usual, we must ask: what is the larger purpose? Is this simply about winning seats, or is there a longer-term plan to entrench influence, shape norms, and steer policy pathways?

Understanding the scale and timing of these investments is the first step toward asking the bigger question: what are voters not being shown, and what structures are quietly being built behind the curtain?

Article

Fast Forward 04/09/2026

Bill —

We’ve officially kicked off our 2026 congressional endorsements, and this first slate says a lot about where this movement is headed. These are not typical candidates. They are leaders who have built careers solving real problems, working in their communities, and stepping up because they believe the system should work better than it does today. They come from different backgrounds and different regions, but they share a commitment to practical leadership, accountability, and getting things done.

Looking across this first group of endorsed congressional candidates, a few things stand out. These are problem solvers first. They have spent their careers in service, whether in business, public service, or their local communities, focused on outcomes instead of ideology. They are also stepping forward at a moment when most Americans feel like the system is not listening. Nearly half the country identifies as independent, yet the system still forces binary choices between the legacy parties. Just as important, they are willing to run anyway. One of the biggest challenges in our politics today is not just who wins, but who never runs in the first place. Too many capable leaders look at the current system and opt out. These candidates are choosing to step up.

Click the image for more information on each of our 2026 endorsed candidates so far. 

This election is bigger than any single race. We are operating in a system where trust in government is low, competition is limited, and outcomes are too often driven by small, partisan primaries instead of the broader public. That combination produces exactly what voters are tired of: more division, less problem solving, and fewer real choices. At the same time, there is a clear opportunity. Most Americans are not asking for more extremes. They are asking for leaders who can work across differences, focus on solutions, and represent the full community, not just one side of it.

This first slate also reflects something bigger about how change can actually happen. It does not take a majority to shift how Congress works. A small group of independent minded leaders who are focused on solutions instead of party can become a deciding force and help bridge divides. That is how incentives begin to shift toward cooperation instead of conflict and negotiation instead of gridlock.

This is just the beginning. This first group of congressional endorsements is one step in a much broader effort, with many more endorsements to come across federal, statewide, and local elections. The goal is to build a durable pipeline of leaders who reflect the country as it actually is and give voters more credible choices at every level.

That work is already underway. Earlier in the cycle, we made our first endorsement of the year with gubernatorial candidate Rick Bennett in Maine, a leader who has consistently demonstrated what it looks like to put voters ahead of party and govern with integrity. That endorsement helped set the tone for what we are building, and this first congressional slate continues that momentum.

At its core, this effort is about something simple. American politics should reflect the American people. Right now, it does not, but it can. By supporting candidates like these, leaders who are independent minded, solutions oriented, and accountable, we are helping create a system where voters have real choices again. This is an important step forward, and there is much more to come.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live!

Episode 7 brings the conversation back to where politics has the most immediate impact: local leadership. While national headlines tend to dominate attention, this discussion highlights how mayors and community leaders are quietly solving real problems every day without the noise of partisan division. Featuring Deke Copenhaver, former mayor of Augusta, Georgia, Brian Vincent, current mayor of Farmville, Virginia, and Clint Eisenhauer, South Carolina Forward Party Chair, the episode explores what it looks like to lead with service, accountability, and community-first thinking. These leaders share firsthand experiences navigating political pressure, earning trust at the grassroots level, and making decisions that directly shape the lives of their constituents.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved
 

April 10 – New Mexico Press Event with Andrew Yang

Andrew Yang has a big announcement for New Mexico! Meet us on the steps of the Capitol in Santa Fe to hear from Forward Party co-founder, Andrew Yang. Then, join us for a special evening celebration event in Downtown Albuquerque to meet Andrew in-person for a live Q&A, connect with New Mexico Forward leadership, mingle and meet fellow reform-minded New Mexicans, and learn how to get involved to help grow ballot access and voter choice statewide. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 11 – Texas Inaugural State Convention

Join a coalition of independent thinkers for the Texas Forward Party’s Inaugural State Convention—a historic weekend of action, training, and connection in Austin. We are bringing together community leaders from across the state to lower the temperature, break the gridlock, and put power back in the hands of voters.

April 11 – Colorado Forward Party Nominating Convention

On April 11th, the Colorado Forward Party is holding a virtual assembly to nominate candidates for the November ballot and conduct other party business.

April 11 – Forward Party of Utah State Convention

Join Forwardists from across the state and Forward Party Cofounder Andrew Yang for the Forward Party of Utah’s annual State Convention—our biggest gathering of the year. At the convention, attendees will meet and nominate Forward candidates, vote on party priorities, and help shape the direction of the Forward Party of Utah for the year ahead. The program will feature a strong lineup of speakers, thoughtful discussion, and meaningful opportunities for members and supporters to share ideas and perspectives on Utah’s political future.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Gavin Newsom, Ben Shapiro, and Donald Trump Finally Agree on a Major Voting rights Issue

When the conversation came to gerrymandering, both Newsom and Shapiro agreed that allowing political parties to diminish the voting power of voters who don’t join their party is an acceptable thing to do.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Fast Forward 04/02/2026

Bill —

Americans want elections that are secure and easy to participate in. Mail-in voting is one of the ways we make that possible.

It’s back in the spotlight right now because of a new executive order from President Trump that would limit how states use mail-in voting and add new federal requirements around who can receive a ballot. That kind of top-down change raises real questions, both legal and practical, for states that are responsible for running elections and for voters who rely on these systems.

Before getting lost in the politics of the moment, it’s worth stepping back and looking at how mail-in works, and why so many Americans use it.

Mail-in voting is not new. Americans have been voting by mail for generations, starting with military members serving overseas and expanding over time to include seniors, rural voters, and anyone who needs more flexibility. Today, it is a part of how elections are run across the country. In states like Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Utah, and Hawaii, elections are conducted almost entirely by mail. Across the country, millions of voters use it every cycle, regardless of party.

In fact, about one in three Americans has voted by mail in recent national elections – including the President himself. That alone tells you something important: this is not a niche system. It is a normal, widely used way Americans participate in democracy.

Security is often where the conversation turns around mail-in ballots. A system only works if people trust it. Mail-in voting includes multiple layers of protection. Ballots are tied to registered voters, signatures are verified, and many states use tracking systems so voters can see when their ballot is sent, received, and counted. Like any system, it is not perfect, but there is no evidence of widespread fraud. What there is, instead, is a system that has been tested at scale and continues to work.

For many people, mail-in voting is not about convenience. It is about access. It allows a parent working two jobs, a senior who cannot stand in line, or a voter living miles from the nearest polling place to still have a voice. For military families and Americans overseas, it is often the only realistic option.

That is why sudden, nationwide changes to the system could cause confusion, disenfranchisement, and barriers to voting. The current proposal would require states to adjust how they administer mail-in voting and who qualifies for it. Even setting aside the legal questions about whether a president can direct those changes, the practical impact could be significant. States would need to rework systems quickly. Voters could face confusion about eligibility. Ballots could be delayed or rejected under new rules.

That is not how you build confidence in elections. It is how you create uncertainty.

At Forward, we believe this should not be an either-or debate. Americans want elections that are both secure and accessible. Those goals are not in conflict. In fact, the best systems do both well. The answer is not to restrict access or to ignore concerns about integrity. It is to improve the system in ways that are transparent, consistent, and based on what actually works.

The bigger issue here is not just mail-in voting. It is whether our political system is focused on serving voters or fighting over the rules of the game. Too often, the conversation is about control instead of outcomes, about process instead of people.

Americans are looking for something different. They want a system that works. They want to know their vote counts and that they have a real voice in the outcome.

That means making it easier for eligible voters to participate while strengthening trust in how elections are run. It means working with states, not around them. And it means focusing on solutions that bring people in, not push them out.

That is how we move forward.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 6, the conversation moves beyond national headlines and into the places where real political change is quietly taking shape. State and local communities are becoming the proving ground for new ideas, fresh leadership, and a growing demand for alternatives to the traditional two-party system. The episode features three voices working at the front lines of that shift: Michelle Quist in Utah, Kayla Sullivan in South Carolina, and Rick Kennedy in Texas. Each brings a different perspective, but together they paint a clear picture of what modern political reform looks like when it starts from the ground up.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

April 8 – Recruiting New Forwardists

The midterm year is upon us and we need as many voters and volunteers as possible to support the incredible candidates we endorse this year! Join Carrie Anne our Head of Volunteer Programs to learn how to help us recruit more supporters. We will go over how to talk about Forward with your friends and family, and how to share your recruitment link so you can earn points that are redeemable for items in our merch shop! Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 10 – New Mexico Press Event with Andrew Yang

Andrew Yang has a big announcement for New Mexico! Meet us on the steps of the Capitol in Santa Fe to hear from Forward Party co-founder, Andrew Yang. Then, join us for a special evening celebration event in Downtown Albuquerque to meet Andrew in-person for a live Q&A, connect with New Mexico Forward leadership, mingle and meet fellow reform-minded New Mexicans, and learn how to get involved to help grow ballot access and voter choice statewide. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 11 – Texas Inaugural State Convention

Join a coalition of independent thinkers for the Texas Forward Party’s Inaugural State Convention—a historic weekend of action, training, and connection in Austin. We are bringing together community leaders from across the state to lower the temperature, break the gridlock, and put power back in the hands of voters.

April 11 – Colorado Forward Party Nominating Convention

On April 11th, the Colorado Forward Party is holding a virtual assembly to nominate candidates for the November ballot and conduct other party business.

April 11 – Forward Party of Utah State Convention

Join Forwardists from across the state and Forward Party Cofounder Andrew Yang for the Forward Party of Utah’s annual State Convention—our biggest gathering of the year. At the convention, attendees will meet and nominate Forward candidates, vote on party priorities, and help shape the direction of the Forward Party of Utah for the year ahead. The program will feature a strong lineup of speakers, thoughtful discussion, and meaningful opportunities for members and supporters to share ideas and perspectives on Utah’s political future.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Kevin Kiley Leaves GOP, Bets on Independent Voters in California’s 6th District

Kevin Kiley spent nine years in California politics as a Republican. He won an election to the State Assembly as a Republican. He ran in the Gavin Newsom recall as a Republican. He won a coveted congressional seat as a Republican and won it again two years later.

But on March 9, 2026, he held a press conference and announced he was breaking up with the GOP.

Bringing Power Back to the American Voter

The American political landscape is often described as a choice between two sides, but our guest today argues it is actually a closed loop. It is a duopoly designed to protect itself, reward office retention, and keep new ideas off the ballot through complex legal hurdles and massive financial barriers. In this episode, Kevin and John sit down with John Goodwin, Communications Director for the Forward Party. third option than they are of each other.

Colorado’s growing share of unaffiliated voters is making it harder for candidates to get on the ballot

Democratic and Republican candidates collecting signatures to make their party’s primary ballot can only collect signatures from voters in their party. With unaffiliated voters now making up half of the statewide electorate, partisans are harder to find.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

I said Trump would screw with the midterms.

 I said Trump would screw with the midterms.

He signed the illegal EO attacking mail-in voting.

Nonpartisan election expert David Becker (executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research and former DOJ Voting Section lawyer) posted: “Some may freak out about this, but honestly, this is hilarious. It’s clearly unconstitutional, will be blocked immediately… He might as well sign an EO banning gravity.”

Power grab is DOA. Courts will kill it fast.  https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-signs-order-mail-ballots-escalating-election-overhaul-push-2026-03-31/

Unconstitutional

I told you and Congress what he was going to do, guess what?

“He will try to rig the mid-term, pay attention, because that won’t work.”

He Signed An Executive Order:

Trump directed DHS and the Social Security Administration to build a national list of verified eligible voters. The Postal Service will only send mail-in ballots to people on that list. States that don’t comply lose federal funding.

Election law experts called it unconstitutional on its face. Legal challenges are already forming. Midterm primaries are already underway in many states.

The Constitution gives states the authority to run elections. Not the president. Not by executive order.

That is the most important thing you must remember, what he says is just noise, just noise. Always check with your state election officials. They are in charge.

He knows that. He signed it anyway.

Pay attention.

We eat tacos.

Fast Forward 03/27/2026

Bill —

Right now, people across the country are watching the same thing play out again in Washington, and a lot of them are asking a simple question: why does it always have to be like this?

A fight over funding for the Department of Homeland Security has turned into another standoff. Tens of thousands of workers are not getting paid. Travelers are stuck in long airport lines. Things that should just work are not working. This is not complicated. It is a breakdown, and people can see it clearly in their daily lives. But it is also a reminder that we can do better.

The DHS shutdown started in mid-February and is still going because lawmakers cannot agree on a funding deal. The impact is not abstract. More than 50,000 TSA workers are working without pay. Hundreds of officers have already quit, and more are calling out. At airports across the country, people are waiting hours just to get through security, and some airports are warning they may have to shut down parts of their operations if this continues.

Airport leaders are warning Congress that the situation is getting worse and could have lasting effects. Behind all of this are real people trying to get by. Some TSA workers are sleeping in their cars. Some are picking up second jobs. Some are donating plasma just to make it through. Families are missing flights, and workers are missing paychecks. This is what a broken system looks like.

This did not have to happen. This is not some unavoidable crisis. It is a political fight. Lawmakers are arguing over immigration policy and trying to attach other demands to a basic funding bill. Talks have stalled, and each side is blaming the other. On top of that, the White House has pushed to tie this funding fight to the SAVE Act, a controversial voting bill. As a result, funding for airport security and paychecks for workers has been pulled into a much larger political battle.

The frustrating part is that this is not what most Americans are asking for. People are not looking for political wins. They are looking for things to work. They want leaders who solve problems, work with others, and get things done. A majority of Americans now say they are independent, not strongly tied to either party, yet our system keeps producing the same kind of gridlock.

It does not have to be this way. If there were more independent minded members in Congress, you would likely see deals happen sooner, more focus on real people, and a clearer path out of standoffs like this. Even a small group can make a difference in close votes and help move both sides toward a solution.

That is exactly why the Forward Party is recruiting and running candidates for Congress across the country. The goal is not to add more noise, but to change how things work. We are supporting leaders who care more about solving problems than picking sides, leaders who reflect their communities and are willing to work with anyone to get results. Even a handful of leaders like this can break up political standoffs, push for real debate, and represent the millions of Americans who feel stuck between the two parties.

This shutdown will end. Funding will get passed, and people will get paid. But the bigger question is what happens next. Do we keep going through this over and over again, or do we send people to Washington who will do things differently?

More Americans are ready for that change than ever before, and Forward is working to make it happen.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 6, the conversation moves beyond national headlines and into the places where real political change is quietly taking shape. State and local communities are becoming the proving ground for new ideas, fresh leadership, and a growing demand for alternatives to the traditional two-party system. The episode features three voices working at the front lines of that shift: Michelle Quist in Utah, Kayla Sullivan in South Carolina, and Rick Kennedy in Texas. Each brings a different perspective, but together they paint a clear picture of what modern political reform looks like when it starts from the ground up.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

April 8 – Recruiting New Forwardists

The midterm year is upon us and we need as many voters and volunteers as possible to support the incredible candidates we endorse this year! Join Carrie Anne, our Head of Volunteer Programs, to learn how to help us recruit more supporters. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 11 – Texas Inaugural State Convention

Join a coalition of independent thinkers for the Texas Forward Party’s Inaugural State Convention—a historic weekend of action, training, and connection in Austin. We are bringing together community leaders from across the state to lower the temperature, break the gridlock, and put power back in the hands of voters.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

A Home for independents: Why I Joined the forward Party

Today, more Americans identify as independent than either political party. Voters are exhausted by division and hungry for practical solutions. And yet, the structure of our system still limits competition, filters out capable leaders, and rewards ideological extremes.

We are producing outcomes that don’t reflect how most Americans actually think.

For a long time, I believed we could fix that from the outside.

I no longer believe that’s enough.

Independent candidate for Maine governor Rick Bennet offers healthcare affordability plan 

State Senator Rick Bennett proposed a broad health care affordability plan on Monday, intended to lower costs and help Mainers get healthier.

Speaking at the Skowhegan Free Public Library, Bennett espoused a “prevention first” approach, with greater access to primary and behavioral care that too many Mainers lack.

The national Forward Party, which backs independent candidates, has endorsed Bennett’s campaign.

 

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Why is Trump DESPERATE to pass the SAVE America Act?

The SAVE America Act , The Wolf in Sheeps Clothing, Hey Lamb Chop.

Who it makes voting harder for:

Ordinary Americans broadly — More than 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents. Roughly half of Americans don’t even have a passport.

Voters of color and younger voters — The SAVE Act would disenfranchise Americans of all ages and races, but younger voters and voters of color would suffer disproportionately.

Older Black Americans specifically — Decades after segregation left gaps in citizenship documents, the bill could create new barriers at the ballot box for people who were never properly documented during that era.

Married women (and anyone who changed their name) — The bill would disproportionately affect women whose current legal names differ from the names on their birth certificates or passports. It does not include exceptions for eligible voters whose names differ from those on their identification documents, and would force them to submit additional documents — such as marriage certificates, divorce decrees, or court orders to prove their identities.

People who register by mail or online — In 2022, more than seven million Americans registered to vote by mail, and almost 11 million registered online. The bill would severely threaten mail registration and require online registration systems to be overhauled.

Naturalized citizens — Naturalized citizens are particularly at risk for being inaccurately flagged for removal from voter rolls under the bill’s data-verification requirements.

People with disabilities and the elderly — People with disabilities and older voters who may not be able to register in person would also face new barriers.

Supporters’ argument

Proponents say the bill is necessary to ensure only citizens vote and that it simply enforces existing law. They argue an affidavit process exists for those without documents.

Critics’ counterargument

All available evidence, including from the Trump administration itself, indicates that only American citizens vote and the exceptions are vanishingly rare. Critics point to Kansas as a cautionary example  when Kansas adopted a similar proof-of-citizenship law in 2011, it prevented over 31,000 eligible citizens from registering to vote before it was blocked by federal courts.

Do You want to be turned away?

5c5d019f aee0 4d2e 8bed 0a519f544394

The DOJ (Putz’s personal law firm) Trying to revive that dead horse (Arizona’s 2020 Election)

As of 06/19/2026 this hasn’t been resolved or gone away, just lost in the diversions of Trumps war of choice and other NOISE.

The LIES and Just how Gullible we are supposed to be.

I ask and discuss many thing things with AI, Very often I get feed back on a topi from GROK, then I take those results and go over to ChatGPT and cross check what I have, and Then sometimes Claude comes and helps polish the Apple before it is erved. I tell you this because the is just GROK and I, and I chose GROK because it is more HAWKISH, it is Elon’s baby and it get’s a lot of it’s algorythm strucksructure from Musk and X so I expect it to be biased because of the datasets it draws on first. That very fact maked the following even more alarming. This isn’t a quick read, although it isn’t a deap read either. It does give insight to some of the ‘what the heck are they doing, behind the scenes though’.

The DOJ has seized these old records, just what can they hope to claim from them: the actual physical ballots from 2020 no longer exist. Arizona law requires ballots to be destroyed two years after an election They went straight for the Cyber Ninja files, the most discredited, procedural compromised, legally indefensible trove of election data in modern American history.

The DOJ (via FBI grand jury subpoena) didn’t seize physical 2020 ballots from Arizona—they couldn’t, because those were legally destroyed years ago. Arizona law (A.R.S. 16-624 and related retention rules) requires ballots from federal elections to be destroyed after two years. Maricopa County’s were held a bit longer due to litigation and the audit but were shredded in August 2023. Multiple sources, including county officials, confirm: “They’re gone.”

What the FBI actually obtained (late last week, per Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen) is digital data from the 2021 Arizona Senate’s partisan audit—the one run by Cyber Ninjas. This was subpoenaed from the state Senate, not Maricopa County directly. It’s the “Cyber Ninja files” you’re referencing: a trove of electronic records the firm compiled during its six-month review of Maricopa County’s ~2.1 million ballots.
What exactly is in these files?

  • Digital scans and photos of every ballot (the audit team imaged them).

  • Voter rolls and related voter data.

  • Data pulled directly from Dominion Voting Systems machines, ballot tabulators, and the county’s election management system (including access logs).

  • Tally sheets the auditors used to track votes and flag “anomalies.”

  • Other supporting materials the Senate held from the audit process.

These are copies and derivatives created during the audit—not the originals. The physical ballots that generated them no longer exist.What can the DOJ realistically hope to “claim” from them?In theory, investigators could:

  • Re-analyze the digital ballot images and machine data for the specific irregularities Cyber Ninjas originally alleged (e.g., supposed duplicate ballots, noncitizen voting, chain-of-custody gaps, or Dominion machine issues).

  • Cross-reference voter rolls against the ballot scans to probe eligibility claims.

  • Use system logs or tally discrepancies to argue procedural problems in 2020.

This fits the broader context: the Trump administration is expanding probes into 2020 results (similar subpoena/seizure actions in Georgia’s Fulton County for actual ballots). Officials tied to the inquiry (like Kurt Olsen) have long pushed 2020-related theories. Proponents might hope to surface “evidence” justifying election reforms, voter ID rules, or challenges to past outcomes ahead of 2026 midterms.But here’s the reality check on their valueThe Cyber Ninjas audit was already the most scrutinized and criticized election review in recent history—even its own leaders privately called parts of the recount “screwy,” and it ultimately confirmed Biden’s win in Arizona (finding more votes for him in some tallies, with no widespread fraud proven). County officials (Republican and Democratic), courts, prior hand recounts, and independent audits all rejected its conclusions as unreliable.

Experts who watched the audit firsthand say the digital files are “fatally flawed” for any serious probe:

  • Auditors used pens while handling/photographing ballots (tampering risk).

  • They kept multiple inconsistent tally sheets per batch.

  • Tabulator data was shipped to an unsecured cabin in Montana for analysis.

  • They misread routine election processes as fraud (e.g., mail ballots delivered in person).

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs and Secretary of State Adrian Fontes have both dismissed confidence in anything derived from it. Election tech consultants call it “invalid data” that would lead to “inaccurate conclusions.” Even the audit’s Senate liaison (a Republican) found only minor, irrelevant county errors. Arizona AG Kris Mayes labeled the whole federal effort “weaponization… in service of crackpots and lies.”

Bottom line: Without the destroyed physical ballots, the DOJ has second-hand digital copies from a procedurally compromised, partisan process that itself couldn’t prove fraud despite months of access. Any claims built on this data will face massive credibility problems in court or public scrutiny—courts have already tossed similar 2020 challenges, and experts say this material wouldn’t hold up as evidence. It might generate headlines or internal reports, but it doesn’t magically resurrect verifiable proof that survived every prior review. The physical originals are gone for good, as Arizona law required.

So realistically they can make false claims based on no existent evidence, in other words lies. but as we have seen, there is a segment of the voting population that has a tendency to believe certain partisan lies no matter what the evidence may be. By playing this loudly enough and with enough stall tactics it could be held up in court until after the elections have been held, all the while with very loud attacks on how the other side is forcefully trying to cover up the truth.

Yes, your assessment aligns closely with how critics and election experts are framing this development. The Cyber Ninjas audit data—now in FBI hands—is widely regarded as unreliable and procedurally tainted from the start. Multiple independent reviews (including the audit itself) confirmed Biden’s win in Arizona, with no evidence of widespread fraud. Yet the files could still serve as raw material for selective interpretation or misrepresentation. Potential for “False Claims” or Exaggerated Narratives

  • Cherry-picking anomalies: The data includes digital ballot images, machine logs, and tally sheets that Cyber Ninjas flagged as suspicious (e.g., supposed “duplicates,” chain-of-custody issues, or Dominion glitches). Even though those claims were debunked repeatedly—often because they stemmed from misunderstandings of standard processes—investigators or political actors could highlight isolated discrepancies out of context to suggest irregularities.

  • No physical ballots to verify: Without the originals (destroyed per Arizona law in 2023), any analysis relies on second-hand digital copies created under compromised conditions (e.g., unsecured handling, inconsistent tallies). Experts, including those cited in recent reporting, describe the material as “fatally flawed” and incapable of producing credible new evidence.

    Amplification via media and rhetoric: Loud, repeated assertions of “new proof” or “cover-ups” can resonate with segments of the electorate predisposed to distrust official results, regardless of counter-evidence. This mirrors patterns seen in 2020–2024 challenges, where claims persisted in certain circles despite court dismissals and audits.

Timing and Stall Tactics Your point about dragging things out until after elections is a real concern raised by observers. Here’s how that could play out:

  • Grand jury/investigative phase: Subpoenas (like the one to the Arizona Senate, complied with in early March 2026) keep the probe active without immediate conclusions. Leaks, selective releases, or public statements can fuel narratives for months.

  • Litigation delays: If the DOJ (or related actors) pursues civil or criminal angles—perhaps targeting county officials or pushing for “reforms”—courts could see motions, appeals, and discovery fights that extend well into or past 2026 midterms. Precedent exists: many 2020 cases lingered despite quick dismissals on merits.

  • Parallel political pressure: Public attacks framing resistance (e.g., from Arizona AG Kris Mayes or county officials calling it “unserious” or “weaponized”) as suppression of truth can energize bases and justify further probes. Recent coverage notes this fits a broader Trump administration push on “election integrity,” including similar actions in Georgia and voter-roll demands in multiple states.

Counterpoints and Limits – Courts have historically rejected 2020 fraud claims when evidence is scrutinized—over 60 cases dismissed, including by Trump-appointed judges. Any attempt to use this data for formal challenges (e.g., decertification fantasies) would face steep hurdles: lack of standing, statutes of limitations, and the audit’s own failure to prove anything actionable.Still, the goal may not be courtroom victory but sustained doubt and turnout mobilization. As you’ve noted, a vocal segment accepts partisan narratives over evidence, and amplified messaging (via rallies, social media, friendly outlets) can keep the issue alive without needing ironclad proof.In short: Yes, the seized files offer thin gruel for genuine claims but plenty of fodder for persistent, evidence-light attacks—especially if timed to influence perception around upcoming elections. The physical evidence is long gone, but the political theater isn’t.

Fast Forward 3/19/2026

Bill —

Virginia State Flag and US flag

Early voting is now underway in Virginia. On April 21, voters will decide whether to allow a mid-decade redraw of congressional maps, revisiting a system designed to limit direct political control.

In 2020, Virginia adopted a redistricting commission made up of legislators and citizens, evenly split between Republicans and Democrats. The maps drawn after the last census were intended to last through 2031, providing consistency and predictability for voters.

The current measure would temporarily change that system. It would allow the General Assembly to redraw congressional districts before the next census, with a new map already approved that would take effect for the 2026 elections if voters agree.

Supporters say this allows Virginia to respond to similar moves in other states. Opponents, including the Forward Party, are concerned it could reintroduce more direct political influence into a process voters intended to make more independent.

Below is our official statement

VA Gerrymandering Statement

This moment in Virginia reflects a broader national challenge. Across the country, both parties have increasingly looked to redraw maps in ways that strengthen their position, raising questions about consistency and trust in the rules that govern elections.

As Brian Vincent, Forward-aligned independent mayor of Farmville, Virginia, recently wrote, stable rules and clear standards are essential to building public confidence. You can read his full perspective here.

That same principle was echoed by Lindsey Drath, CEO of the Forward Party, in a recent Fox 5 DC interview, where she emphasized that voters want a system that is fair, transparent, and consistent over time.

How districts are drawn shapes how elections function, from how competitive races are to how responsive leaders are to the people they represent.

At Forward, we believe the goal should be simple: fair processes, consistent rules, and elections where voters feel their voices truly matter.

Virginia voters will make their decision soon, but this issue goes well beyond one state.

Across the country, rules like gerrymandering, closed primaries, and complicated ballot access requirements often shape who gets to run and who voters actually get to choose from. Too often, they narrow the field instead of opening it up.

That can leave independent voters with fewer real options and make it harder to support leaders who truly reflect their values or make them feel proud to cast a ballot.

It also keeps a lot of strong civic leaders on the sidelines. Many people who have led in their communities, businesses, or public service simply do not want to sign up for strict party labels or ideological lines just to run for office.

If we want a healthier democracy, it starts with making sure the system invites more people in, not keeps them out, and gives voters real choices they can believe in.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 5, Lindsey Williams Drath, Kerry Healey, and Christine Todd Whitman talk with Bob Perls, chair of Forward Party New Mexico and a former state legislator, and Sarah Czech, a U.S. military veteran and leader of the Forward Party Veterans and Military Families Committee, about the role of service in strengthening democracy. Drawing on Bob’s experience in public office and grassroots organizing and Sarah’s leadership advocating for veterans and military families, the conversation explores how civic engagement, nonpartisan leadership, and a commitment to community can help rebuild trust in American politics.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

Promo Shot forThe Forward Party Podcast E05

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved

March 25 – Virginia Statewide Virtual Meeting

Politicians should not choose their voters.

Yet Virginia is facing a renewed redistricting effort that risks undoing the will of voters who approved reform in 2020.

The Forward Party in Virginia is hosting a statewide virtual meeting to discuss what this means and what we can do about it. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

April 8 – Recruiting New Forwardists

The midterm year is upon us and we need as many voters and volunteers as possible to support the incredible candidates we endorse this year! Join Carrie Anne our Head of Volunteer Programs to learn how to help us recruit more supporters.  Click here for more information and to RSVP.


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Ranked Choice Voting for All Elections

State Senator Mark Spreitzer (D-Beloit) and Representative Clinton Anderson (D-Beloit) introduced LRB-5709 on March 5, legislation that would implement ranked choice voting for state, federal, and local elections in Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin legislation would also eliminate the need for February primaries in nonpartisan elections.

 

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Does you vote count, Damn Right it Does

This is a repost from Substack from the MeidasTouch Network  1 VOTE

🚨NEWS: Democrat Andy Thomson has won the Boca Raton mayoral race by just ONE vote.

🔵 Thomson — 7,568

🔴 Liebelson — 7,567

With 100% of votes in, Thomson becomes the first Democratic mayor of Boca Raton in over 30 years.

One vote decided the election.

Sunday Update, after a slow recount, Thomson won by 5 votes, that doesn’t change the fact that we can’t sit by and assume our vote will not matter.

 

 

Fast Forward 03/12/2026

Bill —

For generations, Americans have relied on a simple principle to protect our democracy: no branch of government should hold too much power.

But in recent years, that balance has been shifting.

This week we’re highlighting an important new piece from members of Forward’s Veterans and Military Families Committee: “The Two‑Party Drift Toward Executive Power.”

The article looks at how presidents from both parties have increasingly used military force without meaningful congressional oversight – a trend that raises serious questions about the erosion of constitutional checks and balances.

 

Click the image to read the blog post

The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war, reflecting the founders’ belief that decisions about military force should involve democratic accountability.

But over time, presidents from both parties have increasingly acted without formal congressional approval. The Forward blog argues that the erosion of oversight has made it easier for the executive branch to wield military power with limited restraint.

This isn’t just about one president or one party.

It reflects a broader pattern in American politics where the two‑party system has allowed power to consolidate in the executive branch while Congress struggles to assert its role.

When those checks weaken, so does public confidence in the system. When institutions work properly, power is balanced and decisions carry broader legitimacy.

When those guardrails erode, it becomes easier for any administration — Republican or Democrat — to expand executive authority without sufficient accountability.

One of the core ideas behind the Forward movement is that political incentives shape political outcomes. If the system rewards partisan loyalty and discourages independent oversight, we should not be surprised when institutions weaken. That is why Forward supports reforms that strengthen democratic accountability and encourage leaders who are willing to work across differences.

Healthy competition in politics leads to stronger institutions. Stronger institutions help preserve the constitutional balance that protects our freedoms.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 5, Lindsey Williams Drath, Kerry Healey, and Christine Todd Whitman talk with Bob Perls, chair of Forward Party New Mexico and a former state legislator, and Sarah Czech, a U.S. military veteran and leader of the Forward Party Veterans and Military Families Committee, about the role of service in strengthening democracy. Drawing on Bob’s experience in public office and grassroots organizing and Sarah’s leadership advocating for veterans and military families, the conversation explores how civic engagement, nonpartisan leadership, and a commitment to community can help rebuild trust in American politics.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

Promo Shot forThe Forward Party Podcast E05

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved
 

RECAP: Forward Voices: ICE and the Rule of Law

At a recent Forward Voices event, speakers discussed the importance of upholding the rule of law and protecting constitutional rights in federal law enforcement, with a focus on ICE practices and due process protections. The conversation reflected Forward’s core values of respecting the Constitution and strengthening democratic accountability. Speakers highlighted the need for clearer oversight, accountability, and thoughtful immigration reform that puts people and constitutional principles first. Click here to watch a recording of the event.

Tonight – Gulf Coast Regional Call

Join other Forward supporters in the states of Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana on a Gulf Coast Regional Call. Hear national party updates and brainstorm ways to spread the Forward message in your area. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

March 16 – NY Monthly Virtual Townhall

Each month, NY Forwardists across the state meet on Google Meets to hear from a partner organization or potental endorsed candidate or to discuss a relevant topic.

March 25 – Virginia Statewide Virtual Meeting

Politicians should not choose their voters.

Yet Virginia is facing a renewed redistricting effort that risks undoing the will of voters who approved reform in 2020.

The Forward Party in Virginia is hosting a statewide virtual meeting to discuss what this means and what we can do about it. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

 


If you’re tired of waiting for the system to fix itself — this is your moment.
👥 Volunteer | 🗳️ Run for Office | 💸 Donate | 🌐 forwardparty.com

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Forward Veterans and Military Families Chair Sarah Czech on News Nation 

Forward Veterans and Military Families Chair Sarah Czech discusses how the public deserves answers and transparency around the conflict with Iran.

Empowering Independent Voters Can Fix Primary Elections

Today, there is a growing recognition that the way we run primary elections isn’t working. They’re too partisan. Too low turnout. Too dominated by ideological activists.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

Protecting Your Voting Rights

Protecting voting rights is a fundamental aspect of American democracy, and your concern about potential executive overreach is valid given recent reports. While presidents have issued executive orders related to elections in the past, they don’t have unilateral authority to control how states run them, elections are primarily a state responsibility under the Constitution (Article I, Section 4), with Congress able to set or alter regulations for federal races. Any attempt to impose sweeping changes via executive order, especially if premised on unsubstantiated claims like foreign interference from past elections, would likely face immediate legal challenges and injunctions from federal courts, as happened with a similar order in March 2025.

Courts have repeatedly affirmed that such actions can’t override constitutional limits or state authority without clear statutory backing.

That said, litigation can take time, so proactive steps are key to safeguarding access to the ballot. Here’s what individuals and communities can do, based on established strategies from voting rights organizations:1. Stay Informed and Monitor Changes

Follow reliable sources for updates on election laws and any proposed executive actions. Organizations like the ACLU, Brennan Center for Justice, and League of Women Voters track voter suppression efforts and provide alerts.
Sign up for their newsletters or use tools like the Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) website to check your state’s rules.

Track bills in Congress, such as efforts to restore the full protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (e.g., the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act), which could counter discriminatory changes.

The Act’s preclearance provision historically required federal approval for changes in states with discrimination histories, though it was weakened by the Supreme Court in 2013.

2. Register, Vote, and Help Others Do the Same

Ensure you’re registered and update your information if needed—use the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) provisions, which allow registration at DMVs or online in many states.
Encourage friends, family, and neighbors to register early to avoid last-minute barriers.
Vote in every election, including primaries and locals, where turnout can influence who shapes voting rules. If mail voting or early voting is available in your state, use it to reduce reliance on Election Day logistics that could be disrupted.

Know your rights: Federal laws like the Voting Rights Act prohibit discrimination based on race, color, or language, and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) ensures provisional ballots if your eligibility is questioned. If you face issues at the polls (e.g., intimidation or denial), report them immediately to the DOJ’s Voting Section or the Election Protection Hotline (866-OUR-VOTE).

3. Support Advocacy and Legal Efforts
Donate to or volunteer with groups fighting voter suppression, such as the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Common Cause, or the Brennan Center. They file lawsuits to block unlawful changes and have successfully challenged past executive orders.

For instance, multiple courts blocked key parts of the 2025 election integrity order.

Push for state-level Voting Rights Acts, which some states have adopted to fill gaps left by federal weakenings.

Contact your state legislators to advocate for expansions like automatic voter registration or protections against purges.

4. Engage Civically and Build Community

Contact your members of Congress to oppose bills like the SAVE America Act if they create unnecessary barriers (e.g., strict proof-of-citizenship requirements), and support reforms like the Freedom to Vote Act for national standards on early voting and mail ballots.

Volunteer as a poll worker, watcher, or nonpartisan monitor through groups like the EAC or local election boards. This helps ensure transparency and can deter irregularities.
Join or form community groups to educate others—host voter registration drives or workshops on recognizing misinformation about elections.

5. Prepare for Potential Challenges
If an executive order is issued attempting to mandate things like nationwide voter ID, bans on mail voting, or federal oversight of state systems, expect rapid court action.

Advocacy groups are already poised to challenge them, arguing they exceed presidential authority and violate states’ rights.

In the meantime, focus on state-level protections, as federal overreach often gets enjoined quickly.

Document and report any suspicious activity, like voter purges or intimidation, to the FBI or state attorneys general.
Ultimately, the strongest defense is high participation and collective action—history shows that when voters mobilize, attempts to restrict access often fail. If things escalate, resources like the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division can provide enforcement.

Stay engaged, and remember that protections like the 14th, 15th, and 19th Amendments provide a solid foundation against discrimination.

20260227 1538 Image Generation simple compose 01kjgqdwssfdtrr9cs1f1w4ghs

Voting Rights under Attack

Trump signed an executive order in March 2025 that would add proof of citizenship to voter registration forms, prompting multiple lawsuits that are working their way through the courts.  Beyond that, a draft executive order to declare a national emergency to allow Trump to take unprecedented control over voting is being circulated by anti-voting activists who say they are in coordination with the White House. The White House has denied it. Who are you going to believe?

Trump raised alarms by suggesting Republicans should “nationalize” elections and wrote on social media: “There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!”

The constitutional firewall

The good news is that the U.S. Constitution gives both states and Congress responsibility for regulating federal elections — the president has no constitutional authority over federal election administration. State and local officials are charged with administering elections, serving voters, and counting ballots. Courts have been actively enforcing this. A 2025 executive order from Trump, which sought to require proof of citizenship for voter registration, has been halted by federal judges who say the order’s provisions exceed a president’s authority.

What you can do

Here are concrete actions, from individual to collective:

  1. Make sure you’re registered and stay registered. Check your registration status regularly at vote.gov, especially if new rules take effect. Don’t assume your registration carries over automatically.

  2. Vote in person if you can. With mail-in voting under pressure, in-person voting is harder to block. If you do vote by mail, return it as early as possible — don’t wait until close to Election Day.

  3. Support and donate to voting rights organizations that are actively litigating these issues: the Brennan Center for Justice, Democracy Docket (which tracks every voting rights lawsuit in real time), the ACLU, and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. These groups are the ones actually blocking the illegal orders in court.

  4. Contact your state officials. State and local election officials have vowed to protect voters’ rights, with Maine’s Secretary of State saying “I am confident we will have safe, free and secure elections in 2026, but it is going to be up to state and local election officials.”  Your state attorney general and secretary of state matter enormously here — let them know you’re watching and want them to push back.

  5. Sign up to be a poll worker. Election administration happens at the local level, and having engaged, trained citizens involved is a direct form of protection.

  6. Stay informed through Democracy Docket (democracydocket.com), which tracks every legal challenge to voting restrictions in real-time. It’s the best resource for understanding what’s being blocked and what isn’t.

  7. Push your U.S. Senators to block the SAVE America Act. The SAVE America Act narrowly passed the House but faces an uphill battle in the Senate due to Democratic opposition and the 60-vote threshold to clear the filibuster.  Senate opposition is the legislative choke point right now.

Trumps strategy of issuing orders and letting courts sort them out creates real harm in the delay, but courts have been moving quickly on this, and the constitutional structure genuinely does limit presidential power over elections more than in most areas of policy.

Do not believe what you hear on the news, after all TRump does say it’s Fake News. So keep up to date on what is happening.

20260228 1838 Image Generation simple compose 01kjkm3z4te2ftx3mkcwzgwcvt

Sorry Charley, were closed.

Every election cycle brings headlines about court rulings and polling changes.

In a recent Texas primary, a lower court temporarily extended voting hours in some areas. Later, a higher court clarified how ballots cast after the statutory closing time would be handled.

That created confusion for some voters who believed they still had time.

No machine failure. No conspiracy claims here.
Just legal procedure unfolding in real time.

Here’s the lesson for 2026:

Don’t wait until the final hour.

Verify your polling location and hours directly with your county election office.
Confirm the week before you vote.
And if possible, vote early.

Election laws are strict about closing times.
If something changes late in the day, ballots can become subject to legal review.

Protect your vote the simple way:
Check locally. Confirm early. Vote early.

The only way your Vote counts is if you cast it.

20260304 1057 Closed Voting Center simple compose 01kjx3b75zeea92an7ca8z7cqm

Fast Forward 03/05/2026

Bill —

With Operation Epic Fury, the United States is now engaged in a serious military confrontation with Iran. The situation is dangerous and still unfolding. Six American service members have already been killed, and others wounded. Civilians in the region are also paying a heavy price.

First and foremost, we mourn the Americans who have lost their lives in service to this country, and we hold their families in our thoughts. We hope for the speedy recovery of those injured and for the safe return of every American in harm’s way. War also brings suffering to innocent people. Civilians often bear the cost of decisions made far from their homes. Our hearts are with those families as well.

Iran’s government has long supported terrorism and destabilized the region. At the same time, the Iranian people themselves have repeatedly shown courage in demanding freedom, dignity, and opportunity. The Forward Party stands with the Iranian people and hopes for a future where they can determine their own destiny free from repression.

Link to Official Statement on Operation Epic Fury

Click the image for our official statement on Operation Epic Fury

But moments like this also raise serious questions about the health of our own democracy and the checks and balances that were installed by the founders.

The Constitution is clear. The power to declare war belongs to Congress. The founders put that responsibility in the legislative branch so decisions about war would be debated openly and decided collectively by the representatives of the American people.

Over time, that system has eroded. Presidents of both parties have increasingly used military force without clear authorization from Congress. Meanwhile, Congress has too often avoided the responsibility the Constitution assigns to it. When members of Congress fail to debate and vote on war, they are not only avoiding politics; they are avoiding accountability.

This is exactly why the War Powers Resolution was passed in 1973. The law was meant to ensure that Congress had a clear role in approving and overseeing military action. Yet again and again, Washington finds ways to sidestep it.

The Forward Party believes that America can be strong and responsive to world events and national security threats while still faithful to the Constitution. Supporting our troops and defending the rule of law are not competing values. They reinforce each other.

This moment also shows why our political system needs more voices at the table.

Today, the two major parties often treat national security debates as partisan battles instead of constitutional responsibilities. Members of Congress frequently line up behind or against a president based on party loyalty rather than institutional duty. That leaves the branch of government responsible for declaring war acting more like a spectator than a decision maker.

This is why the Forward Party exists. When independent and third-party lawmakers hold seats in Congress, they can act as a forcing function for accountability. They are less tied to the incentives of the two-party system and more able to insist that Congress actually vote on the most important questions the country faces. War should never be decided by default or drift. It should be decided by debate and by votes.

That is what checks and balances are supposed to look like.

America is strongest when our institutions work as the Constitution intended. That means a president who leads, a Congress that does its job, and a political system that rewards courage instead of silence.

Our troops deserve nothing less. The American people deserve nothing less. And the future of our democracy depends on it.

Please forward this to your friends, family, and coworkers. It helps us introduce them to Forward and to what we are building. Also consider inviting them to one of our upcoming events listed below. We’d love to meet them.

The Forward Party Podcast
REMINDER: The next episode of The Forward Party Podcast is now live! In Episode 4, Lindsey Williams Drath, Kerry Healey, and Christine Todd Whitman go deeper on the question they hear everywhere: What can I do that actually matters? The answer is bigger than a single election cycle and bigger than any one candidate.

This episode makes the case for building a durable political movement that restores voter choice, rewards problem-solving, and helps everyday Americans step into leadership where it counts.

We hope you enjoy! Don’t forget to let us know what you think.

Click the image below to watch.

Promo Shot forThe Forward Party Podcast

ICYMI: The Forward Party Podcast – Behind the Scenes reel

Get Involved
 

Forward Voices: ICE and the Rule of Law – March 11

This virtual discussion, hosted by the Veterans and Military Families Committee and the Hispanic and Latino Committee of the Forward Party, centers on Forward’s core value of the Rule of Law and examines recent cases in which American citizens, including veterans and their family members, have been unlawfully detained or deported by ICE, raising serious concerns about due process, accountability, and government overreach. The conversation will focus on what the Rule of Law means in practice: holding government agencies accountable when they exceed their legal authority, while also respecting and enforcing immigration law in a lawful, transparent, and constitutional manner rooted in human dignity.

 

What we're reading
Contrary to what our detractors on social media say, YES, we read!

Virginia court allows a referendum on Democratic-led redistricting that could flip 4 US House seats

For the second time, Virginia’s Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that voters can cast ballots on a Democratic-led congressional redistricting plan that could help the party win four more U.S. House seats, as the justices review legal challenges to the effort.

GOP Sen. Steve Daines last-minute withdrawal from Senate race was meant to block Democrats from fielding a top-tier recruit

Daines was aware that if he withdrew too soon then Democrats would have a chance at fielding one of several potential Democrats — namely former Sen. Jon Tester or former Govs. Brian Schweitzer or Steve Bullock.

X / Twitter Bluesky Instagram LinkedIn Facebook YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Forward Party, all rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1701 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Paid for by Forward Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
ForwardParty.com

I Get It

Plato may be right. All democracies will fail. But I don’t think now’s the time.

When looked at from a distance, we can see the arc of almost anything. Civilizations, movements, ideas. The beginning and the end become visible, like a landscape from altitude. But the closer we get, the more the timeline shifts and blurs. The ending moves around. Why would that be? Maybe because philosophies and people don’t always work hand in hand.

Ideas are clean. People are not.

I have been around long enough to have stood in a few crowds, carried a few convictions, and watched more than one cause rise and fade. Through all of it, every march, every movement, every upheaval, there has always been a placard somewhere in the crowd that read some version of the same thing: Power to the people.

We both know that’s a catch phrase. It always has been. But here’s the thing about catch phrases. The good ones survive because they point at something real, even when nobody’s delivering it. The illusion has to be maintained because somewhere underneath it is a truth people can feel even when they can’t see it.

That truth is this. The closest thing to actual power most of us will ever hold is a vote and a voice. That’s it. That’s the whole arsenal. It isn’t much, until enough people pick it up at the same time.

But neither of those things work if we stop using them. And they stop working in a different way when we use them without thinking. When we vote the way we’re told to vote, believe what we’re told to believe, and accept what we’re told to accept.

Independent thought has always been the first casualty of concentrated power. Not because the people are stupid. They never are. But because every system, in every era, has had a quiet interest in discouraging it. It is easier to lead people who have already decided what they think. Easier still to lead people who believe that what they think, they arrived at on their own.

We live under a democracy, a republic if you want to be precise about it. Living under it comes with benefits most of us have stopped noticing, the way you stop noticing a foundation until it cracks. But those benefits have never been free. They have always cost something. The people who built this thing paid for it. The people who saved it, more than once, paid for it. And the people who will determine whether it survives this particular moment in its timeline will pay for it too.

The question isn’t whether you’re willing to believe in it.

The question is whether you’re willing to stop accepting the illusion in place of the real thing, and what you’re prepared to do about it.

That’s always been the question. It just hasn’t always been this urgent.

20260302 0846 Image Generation simple compose 01kjqq3dhbewmaqdrrmxxqbd89

BEWARE THE NAME The more patriotic the name, the more suspicious you should be.

Something I want everyone to understand before 2026:

When you hear a bill called the “SAVE America Act” or anything with FREEDOM, PROTECT, PATRIOT, or AMERICA in the title — slow down. Don’t let the name do your thinking for you.

That’s exactly what it’s designed to do.

The SAVE America Act is currently working its way toward becoming law, and it would make it harder for real, eligible American citizens to vote — particularly seniors, low-income voters, and people of color who may not have easy access to the specific documents it requires.

It doesn’t save America. It narrows who gets to participate in it.

A wolf in sheep’s clothing is still a wolf. The sheep’s clothing is just there so you don’t run.

Please — before you share, before you support, before you assume something is good because it sounds good — look it up. Sites like GovTrack, Congress.gov, and Democracy Docket break down what bills actually do in plain language.

Our rights are worth five minutes of reading.

20260228 1849 Image Generation simple compose 01kjkmrntfegq80as3v8m7djrk