Posts in Category: Our Heritage

So What? – Video

YouTube player

So What?
The Losing Strategy as the Game Plan

Oh, so what, so what! What difference does it make, like really, does it matter?

For months now, over a year, I have tuned in and followed Michael Popok, Ben Meiselas, Jack Cocchiarella, and Glenn Kirschner, just to name a few you may have watched or followed. Great to hear about the case files against the Trump administration and how Trump and his team keep losing.

It just warms the cockles of my heart to see Trump take a beating in court, one federal judge after another saying no to little Donny.

=======================================

“Hey, boss man, we’re trying, but they keep using the law against us.” The LAW

The other tactic, and this one is truly scary, because it’s starting to work on me, is fatigue. I’m tired. You’re tired. Everybody’s tired, burned out from all the BS. And “so what” is exactly where fatigue leads you. The moment you get there, they’ve already won. Not because they beat you in court. Because you stopped watching the scoreboard.

You Stopped Caring.

So while I’m still watching, I’ve got two requests for Donny.

Request one: take that damn tarp down from the Kennedy Center. It’s time to grow up.

Request two: where the hell are the Epstein/Trump files?

So What?

So What?
The Losing Strategy as the Game Plan

Oh, so what, so what! What difference does it make, like really, does it matter?

For months now, over a year, I have tuned in and followed Michael Popok, Ben Meiselas, Jack Cocchiarella, and Glenn Kirschner, just to name a few you may have watched or followed. Great to hear about the case files against the Trump administration and how Trump and his team keep losing.

It just warms the cockles of my heart to see Trump take a beating in court, one federal judge after another saying no to little Donny.

This has been going on since Trump signed his first executive order, probably to swap out the bidets in the ladies’ lounge for gilded urinals, or something else along those lines.

He tries something. A suit is filed against him or “the thing.” And odds are, he or “it” loses. Forget the waste of time and taxpayer money, it isn’t coming out of his pocket, and if it was, he’d just file another appeal, Trump fashion.

But something has become a pattern that everybody’s saying without really saying it. Bizarre, really. He keeps losing. Bizarre. Wasn’t there a comic rag with a name like that? Mad Magazine, maybe. Must be showing my age again. But it is kind of bizarre if you think about it. Bizarro, that was it.

Let’s take a look at his latest Don Quixote charge, faithful Sancho (Blanche) at his side, attacking those wild and dangerous state elections that must look to him a lot like windmills, or something else very sinister. He keeps getting thrown from his steed, but Sancho keeps his fearless leader in the righteous battle, as any good bootshiner should.Copy to a new draft

So let’s look at the record. So far: Quixote-Sancho, 0. Windmills, 15. And 60 percent of those windmills had Republican judges leading the defense. Quite the defeat. Or quite the win, depending on which side of the scorecard you’re applauding from.

So circling back to our attorneys, analyzing and dissecting and passing judgment, all happy-faced about Trump’s losses, I have to ask myself: so what? That’s what I asked myself. SO WHAT? And why aren’t these experts in law asking that question too? So what. What has changed? Not a damn thing.

If the DOJ keeps losing, why does losing not matter anymore? Hey readers, that is a really, really big question. Has losing become a deliberate strategy? “Hey, look, we’re trying, but those left-wing commies are blocking us.”

Don’t forget Trump’s latest move into McCarthyism, look it up, 1950s America, almost as ugly as the 1970s race wars. Say it often enough, and some idiot will believe it.

But back to losing as a strategy. Why lose on purpose? At the very least, the minions can say, “Hey, boss man, we’re trying, but they keep using the law against us.” That line is worth repeating because of the shear irony in it.

“Hey, boss man, we’re trying, but they keep using the law against us.” The LAW

The other tactic, and this one is truly scary, because it’s starting to work on me, is fatigue. I’m tired. You’re tired. Everybody’s tired, burned out from all the BS. And “so what” is exactly where fatigue leads you. The moment you get there, they’ve already won. Not because they beat you in court. Because you stopped watching the scoreboard.

You Stopped Caring.

So while I’m still watching, I’ve got two requests for Donny.

Request one: take that damn tarp down from the Kennedy Center. It’s time to grow up.

Request two: where the hell are the Epstein/Trump files?

The Public Investment Brick What Good Government Requires – Brick Eleven – Public Investment

Public Investment, Who Owns The Future?

Something has been happening quietly that deserves more attention than it’s getting.

The United States government now holds roughly a 10% equity stake in Intel. It has secured equity positions in rare earth mining and U.S. Steel. Bernie Sanders has proposed the government acquiring a 50% equity share of AI technology companies through a tax structure.

The era of public investment in private industry is not coming. It is already here.

YouTube player

The question nobody is asking clearly enough is, who controls those stakes? Who manages the money? What voting rights does the government hold? And most importantly, who benefits?

Because right now the answer to that last question is not the American people.

The Alaska Model

The Alaska Permanent Fund is the most successful example of public benefit investment in American history. When Alaska’s oil was extracted the state recognized a simple principle, this is a public resource being monetized by private companies and citizens should receive a direct share of the value generated.

Alaskans receive annual dividends. Not promises. Not infrastructure projects named after politicians. Actual checks.

One reason the model has survived decades of political change is exactly that tangibility. Citizens see the benefit directly. Politicians find it very difficult to raid a fund that sends checks to voters.

AI Is A Natural Resource

Here is the argument that reframes everything.

Artificial intelligence is built on the collective knowledge of humanity. Every book ever written. Every scientific paper ever published. Every conversation, creative work, and piece of human expression ever digitized. Living and dead, we all contributed to the foundation these systems are built on.

That makes AI a public resource being monetized by private companies.

Sound familiar?

If Alaska’s oil wealth belongs partly to Alaskans, if the value extracted from a public resource should benefit the public, then the wealth generated by AI belongs partly to all of us. Not to the handful of people who happened to own the compute infrastructure when the moment arrived.

Think of public pension funds. Teachers’ retirement funds own enormous amounts of stock in American companies. But teachers don’t decide what products those companies build. Ownership and control are not the same thing.

That distinction is everything.

The Public Investment Authority

What is needed is not government control of AI companies. It is a structured, independent, constitutional firewall between public ownership and political manipulation.

Call it the Public Investment Authority.

Independent management. Multi-year board terms that survive changes in administration. Strict conflict of interest rules. No elected officials serving on the board. No lobbying employment afterward. Annual public audits. Full transparency.

We must be honest about what we are building against.

Politicians will try to abuse it. Corporations will try to capture it. Lobbyists will try to influence it. Insiders will try to profit from it.

The time to build the safeguards is at the beginning, not after the insider trading scandals arrive. And they will arrive if the structure isn’t right from the start.

No insider trading. No elected officials. Fixed terms. Independent audits. Public transparency.

A fund that politicians cannot raid. A fund that sends tangible benefits to citizens rather than promises to constituents. A fund that owns shares without controlling companies, the same way Alaska owns a share of oil revenue without telling Exxon how to drill.

The Precedent Already Exists

The government taking equity stakes in strategic industries is no longer a radical proposal. It happened with Intel. It happened with rare earth mining. It happened with U.S. Steel.

The only question is whether those stakes benefit the American people or simply give politicians another lever to pull.

The Public Investment Authority answers that question before it becomes another scandal.

Build the firewall first.

The investment is already happening whether we build it or not.

The Complete Foundation Sieries

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Eleven Public Investment

It’s Not Which Side, It’s Looking In The Mirror – Video

Parades of proud people marched in Washington on the 4th, so proud they wore masks to hide their cowardly faces. Sound familiar? The Klan. You remember those rejects from laundry detergent commercials, white robes and all. Hoods with teeny weeny little holes to see through, small enough that no decent person would notice their nice neighbor was really just another piece of cow dung.

And what do we have doing the muscle work now? Federal agents. Right, I forgot — Second String Donny’s private ICE army, the ones he thinks will protect him in his little bunker after Air Force One runs out of fuel.

========================================

Here’s what I don’t think they’ve figured on. Here’s the calculation they screwed up. We the people don’t want to turn back that clock. We don’t want to be racist — we already did that, and it cost us. We don’t want to hate our neighbor — we already did that too. We’re not doing segregation again, so don’t play those games. And when you push too hard, and I know you will, because you’re stupid enough to try — here’s what happens.

At some point, and I don’t know when or where, the minorities aren’t going to just stand up and fight back. The people are going to stand up with them, and squash you like a bug.

And this 80-year-old whitey, who used to be afraid of the very people he’ll be standing next to — I’m going to be right out there with them.

The Immigration and Social Services Brick What Good Government Actually Requires – Brick Ten – Immigration and Social Services

The Immigration and Social Services Brick What Good Government Actually Requires

In the beginning, and in many ways it was before there was light, this nation needed to be built. And to build it, it needed people.

Johnny Appleseed planted apple seeds. They sprouted apple trees. Lots of apple trees produce lots and lots of apples.

YouTube player

This brings us to two intertwined topics that get separated in political debate but belong together in honest conversation. People. And the services that allow people to contribute.

I don’t have an easy answer. Nobody does. But before we can assign an answer we have to accept both the reality of the problem and the reality of the blessing.

The Statue of Liberty holds aloft a torch of welcome. She is not extending her middle finger and charging an entrance fee.

France gifted us that great work of art in 1885. Our need for immigrants was different then. But our need hasn’t disappeared, it has changed. The requirement for screening and regulation cannot be overstated. But remember those apples.

Those apples rotting on the ground because you are too good to go harvest them.

Yes. You.

The media shows us undocumented farm workers as if this is a new and alarming development. In 1885 we welcomed farm workers and cobblers, not apple pie bakers but shoemakers. Today we still need farm workers. We also need talented engineers, skilled tradespeople, and everything in between. And if you believe you have a bad job because of an immigrant you are genuinely unable to look in the mirror.

Our needs haven’t really changed. Our honesty about them has.

Any clear eyed person can see the need for immigrants. They can also see why people aren’t flooding our shores with pockets full of cash. They come with what they have and they work with what they find. We need to help them get established. That means social services. Not as charity. As investment in the people who are going to harvest the apples and build the houses and pay into the system.

This is not about rapists, grifters, or predators. We don’t have to look at immigrants to find those.

Now the social services argument, and here is where the two threads become one.

What about your neighbor? The kids next door who look hungry. The single mother. The children who need vaccinations or fell and broke an arm. The family whose father was just laid off. The farmer who lost his crops because someone in power decided to take away his fertilizer subsidy to settle a political score.

We need social services. They are generally provided by the states and generally backed by the federal government. There was a reason for this. A good one.

Social service programs and their funding must be protected from the whims of any politician regardless of who holds the office. Threatening to cut funding because a district voted against you should be an impeachable offense. Full stop. No exceptions. No party exemptions.

We are a wealthy country. We are, when we choose to be, a compassionate one. We should never fail to provide basic services to the people who need them. Not because it is politically convenient. Because it is who we said we were when we put that torch in Lady Liberty’s hand.

And here is the cold hard fact that nobody wants to say out loud.

An undocumented but employed immigrant pays into Social Security and Medicare every paycheck. They will never be able to collect retirement benefits from either program.

We are accusing them of draining a system they are subsidizing.

That is not an immigration problem.

That is a mirror problem.

Look down if you want. Or look in.

The Complete Foundation Sieries

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Ten Immigration and Social Services

It’s Not Which Side, It’s Looking In The Mirror

Parades of proud people marched in Washington on the 4th, so proud they wore masks to hide their cowardly faces. Sound familiar? The Klan. You remember those rejects from laundry detergent commercials, white robes and all. Hoods with teeny weeny little holes to see through, small enough that no decent person would notice their nice neighbor was really just another piece of cow dung.

And what do we have doing the muscle work now? Federal agents. Right, I forgot — Second String Donny’s private ICE army, the ones he thinks will protect him in his little bunker after Air Force One runs out of fuel.

So White Nationalists take to the streets, masks and all. Must be Bobby-Bob over there. Confederate flag wavers too — what’s wrong with the good old Red, White and Blue? The land of Real Men, so proud they strut their stuff on Independence Day. And being the free nation that we are, we let them. Who cares that a little darker skin no longer feels safe on the streets. After all, why did we fight for integration, equal opportunity, equal rights? Why did we write laws against racial discrimination? Why did so many already die in the streets? Just to let these jerks loose again.

That’s right, freedom — we fought for freedom. But somewhere in there should be a guarantee of protection. And I don’t see anyone way up the ladder caring about protecting anyone anymore, except themselves. Have you seen that bulletproof barrier they use now? I’d have loved that contract. Bet it didn’t go to in-house cronies — not if he wanted it done right.

If it sounds like I’m climbing up on a soap box, you’re probably right. The more I sit here and write this, the angrier I get. We’ve already been through all this BS.

If you didn’t read my series on The Long View From 1964, I joined the National Guard in Manhattan Beach, California, November 1963. Had basic and engineer school in ’64, so my first summer camp got delayed by the Watts Riots of ’65.

Here’s the part I don’t dress up. In 1965, I was the enemy. I was the man. I was whitey living ten miles from East LA. I wouldn’t say I was a racist bigot but here is the thing, you grow up segregated, you grow up afraid, the black skin was different, the features were different, I’m being politically correct but the bottom line is really just fear. Intimidation works. That’s why hate works so well.

That’s the truth of who I was at nineteen. It took years, and a country tearing itself apart a few miles from my house, to teach me different.

Which is exactly why I have the right to say what comes next. Not because I was always on the right side. Because I wasn’t, and I changed anyway.

So do they really think everyone’s forgotten? Do they think all white people are racist bigots waiting to be reactivated? Do they think we’re going to sit around and let a bunch of insecure cowards in masks start another war? Because if you’ve been paying attention, that’s exactly what the playbook is calling for. Proud Boys. Masked ICE agents going after Latinos and anyone else less white than themselves. Listen to the speeches. Really listen. The barbs, the slurs, the put-downs. It’s the playbook, and it’s in play.

It’s a time machine, take your pick,  Back to the Future or Days of Future Past, doesn’t matter. They’re trying to turn the clock back to when wives wore dresses baking cookies and pearl necklaces fixing dinner, and all she knew to say was “yes dear, as you say dear, would you like another beer, and oh dear,  please fill out my ballot for me.”

Here’s what I don’t think they’ve figured on. Here’s the calculation they screwed up. We the people don’t want to turn back that clock. We don’t want to be racist — we already did that, and it cost us. We don’t want to hate our neighbor — we already did that too. We’re not doing segregation again, so don’t play those games. And when you push too hard, and I know you will, because you’re stupid enough to try — here’s what happens.

At some point, and I don’t know when or where, the minorities aren’t going to just stand up and fight back. The people are going to stand up with them, and squash you like a bug.

And this 80-year-old whitey, who used to be afraid of the very people he’ll be standing next to — I’m going to be right out there with them.

The Environment Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick Nine – Environment

The Environment Brick What Good Government Actually Requires

This is a balanced world.

Or it was. Ecologically, the planet developed over billions of years into a self-correcting system. Not perfect. Not static. But capable of absorbing disruption and finding equilibrium, when left with enough margin to do so.

We have been removing the margin.

YouTube player

There is no ideological argument required here. No party position needed. Just the observation that we are spending principal and calling it income. Extracting what took millennia to accumulate and booking it as this quarter’s profit.

That is not economics. That is the oldest con in the book.

We are not against using resources. That is not the argument. Every civilization in human history has used the resources available to it. The argument is against exploiting them foolishly when other clear options exist. And the options exist.

Wind farms. Solar farms. Solar on homes and buildings that sit in the sun regardless of whether anyone harvests it. Mini nuclear plants currently in development that can be transported on flatbeds and deployed where the grid is weakest. The technology is not theoretical. It is here or nearly here and arriving faster than the political conversation has managed to acknowledge.

We know that harnessing ocean water for industrial cooling and dumping the heat back into the sea does damage that compounds quietly until it isn’t quiet anymore. Eighteen whale deaths in Washington state in a single year. The ocean does not issue press releases. It just changes. And when it changes enough the change is no longer reversible on any timeline that matters to anyone alive.

The alternatives are not perfect. Batteries require metals. Mining those metals creates its own environmental cost. Recycling infrastructure has not kept pace with the technology it needs to process. These are real problems.

But here is what history actually shows when we choose to look honestly at it.

Human beings have solved most of their self-created environmental problems when they chose to.

The ozone layer was healing after we chose to address it. Rivers that caught fire stopped catching fire after we chose to address it. Species pulled back from the edge of extinction when we chose to address them.

The technology exists. The alternatives exist. The knowledge of what we are doing and what it costs exists.

The only variable is the last one.

When he chooses to.

That choice, made collectively, structurally, with the kind of policy teeth that don’t disappear when the next administration arrives, is the brick.

Not a perfect environmental policy. Not a zero extraction economy. Just the honest acknowledgment that exploitation without limit is not capitalism. It is not freedom. It is not progress.

It is greed. And more greed.

Every Trump golf course should be turned into a wind farm.

He does supply enough hot air.

The Complete Foundation Sieries

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Nine – Environment

The Healthcare Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick Eight – Healthcare

The Healthcare Brick What Good Government Actually Requires

Healthcare in America is not broken.

That is not a comfortable statement. But it is an accurate one.

It is strained. It is expensive. It is fragmented, administratively bloated, and structurally misaligned in ways that cost lives and savings simultaneously. But it functions imperfectly, unevenly, and at enormous cost for most of the people it serves most of the time.

YouTube player

Understanding the difference between broken and strained matters before we talk about fixing anything.

Over the past year this platform has published an extensive series examining exactly what the American healthcare system isnot what politicians say it is, not what we wish it were, but what it actually is. How the money moves. Where the risk lands. Who absorbs the consequences when care can’t wait. Why insurance and healthcare are not the same thing even though we treat them as if they are.

That work is here if you want it. It will not tell you who to vote for. It will not tell you that one system is superior to another. It will tell you how the machine works which is the only honest starting point for any conversation about changing it.

If interested please use our menu selection HEALTHCARE, articles are offered in two index orders, last related published at the top, and on the right side column, in original published order.

If you prefer, a combined presentation is available here. HEALTHCARE COMBINED.

So here is the healthcare brick. Not a policy prescription. Not a wish list. Just three honest observations.

First – this is what we have.

A layered hybrid system. Part market. Part public. Part employer obligation. Part individual burden. Already half funded by government programs. Already heavily regulated in some places and completely unregulated in others. Not socialized medicine. Not free market. Something messier and more complicated than either label suggests.

Are we okay with it?

Not as a political question. As a personal one. The system described in this series is not a conspiracy or a failure of compassion. It is a structure built over decades by people solving real problems with the tools available at the time. Layers were added for reasons. Each layer solved something and created something else.

The honest question is whether the accumulated result still serves the people it was built for.

Second – want is not a policy.

Saying I want free healthcare changes nothing. Neither does I want to keep what I have. Want is not a funding mechanism. Want is not a transition plan for 150 million people currently covered through employers. Want is not an answer to what happens to hospital revenue when payment rates change overnight.

The people who benefit most from the want debate are the people who need you distracted from the structural debate. As long as the conversation stays at the level of what we want we never get to the harder and more useful question of what is actually achievable and how.

Third – the realistic lever is insurance structure.

Not who builds the hospitals. Not whether your doctor works for the government. Not a binary choice between the system we have and a system that exists nowhere in the form being promised.

The realistic lever is how risk is pooled. How pricing is negotiated. How the administrative layers between you and your care get simplified. How the 8 to 12 cents of every dollar currently absorbed by billing, coding, prior authorization and claims processing gets redirected toward the care it was supposed to fund.

That’s where the flow can be diverted.

The Complete Foundation Sieries

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Eight Healthcare

The Long View From 1964 – 23 and Me

Some things we bury. Not for any big reason, for a lot of little reasons. Things we just don’t think about anymore because times have changed and we’ve changed. But then stuff around you happens, and you start remembering.

So let’s go back in time again. Not to Superman. To before me.

YouTube player

Manhattan Beach. Truly one of the most beautiful places you could grow up. I spent years there as a toddler, then off and on through the 1970s, since my father’s family moved there in the 1920s. Why do I mention this? Bruce’s Beach. I won’t spend paragraphs on it, go ahead, show some initiative, ask your favorite AI about Bruce’s Beach in Manhattan Beach.

Here’s how it touches me. My grandfather was the city councilman instrumental in getting the Bruce family’s property stolen through eminent domain and turned into an unnecessary park. Stolen from Manhattan Beach’s Black family.

Follow the story forward. Nearly a century later, L.A. County finally settled with the Bruce family for close to $20 million. Too bad it took so many decades. My grandfather helped take that land. I grew up ten minutes from the empty lot he helped empty, and never once thought about who used to be there.

I spent most of my life thinking of my family as quietly Southern and decent. Turns out we were also thieves, and it took me eighty years to say that plainly.

Move forward many years. In one of my Long View From 1964 commentaries, I mentioned my father tried to talk to me about women, and I, with puffed-out chest, declared I already knew candy was dandy and liquor was quicker. Five wives later, it dawned on me I should’ve put down the beer and listened.

My father was born in Alabama. A real Colonel, not the fried chicken kind. He always thought of himself as a Southern gentleman without the accent, and I honestly cannot remember ever hearing him use a cuss word or a racial slur.

Once again, guacamole, chips, a few beers, hadn’t gotten to the gin and tonics yet. Ten miles from Watts, working in Inglewood, a stone’s throw from East LA, Dad dropped one of his pearls of wisdom. This was before the gin and tonic, mind you. It’s been fifty-plus years, so I won’t fake the exact quote, but it went something like: “Son, you come from a good old Southern family. Before you pass judgment or start throwing stones, it may be your cousin you’re throwing those stones at.”

That’s not something most little white boys hear from dear old Dad. Probably a good thing Mom the Bigot was on the other side of the room.

This may look like it’s wandering without a direction, but there’s one here somewhere.

Being footloose and fancy-free in the ’60s, I always had a few questions. Decades later, when my kids started doing 23andMe and Ancestry.com, I got curious, and figured I’d probably have to prove Don Henley wasn’t their father. So I joined both. Kids were disappointed to learn I was Dad, and Don Henley was out.

You can post a photo to your profile on those sites. And I keep finding more and more second and third cousins with really, really dark tans. Maybe that should be a requirement for the whole family reunion.

Thanks, Dad, for the heads-up, all those years ago in Inglewood. He or she just may be distant family. And that stone, the one my grandfather threw, the one I nearly kept carrying, really belongs on the ground.

The Education Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick Seven – Education

The Education Brick What Good Government Actually Requires

Education in America has a marketing problem.

For decades the message was simple get a degree and get a job. The degree became the credential and the credential became the promise. Nobody mentioned that the promise had an expiration date or that the debt was forever.

We need a more honest conversation.

The Social Contract Model

YouTube player

If the public invests in your education the public has a right to expect something back. Not repayment with interest service. A known, transparent agreement made before the first dollar is spent.

We fund your medical degree. You spend three years at a VA hospital or an under served rural clinic. We fund your nursing degree. You serve in a community that needs you. We fund your accounting degree. You spend two years at the IRS or the GSA.

This is not radical. It is the oldest social contract in the book. The military has operated this way for generations we train you, you serve, you earn the benefit. The difference is we need that model applied beyond the military and into the civilian professions the country actually needs more of.

The deal is simple. The terms are known upfront. And the payback is productive rather than just financial the country gets doctors in the places doctors don’t go, nurses in the communities that can’t afford to recruit them, and accountants who actually understand the systems they’re auditing.

The Credential Is Not The Job

A white collar education does not promise a white collar job. It never honestly did but the myth persisted long enough to saddle a generation with debt for degrees that prepared them for a world that was already changing while they were still in class.

Artificial intelligence is reshaping entry level positions. That is real and it is accelerating. But it does not change the fundamental human requirement at the core of most work. Claude is not walking in the door, shaking a hand, and drinking a cup of coffee. That is still on the human.

What it does change is what preparation for that work actually needs to look like. Knowing how to effectively use the tools that exist is now as important as the credential that gets you in the door. The education system has not caught up to that reality. It needs to.

The Trade School Gap

Here is the most important and most under addressed part of this brick.

The federal government currently has one primary pipeline into trade education the military. That is not enough and it was never designed for this purpose.

Look up the pay scales for licensed electricians. Price a plumber. Find out what a licensed HVAC technician charges per hour. The market has already answered the question of whether these skills are valuable. The answer is yes emphatically and increasingly.

What is missing is a federal civilian pathway to trade certification that carries the same social contract as the degree programs. We fund your training as an electrician, a welder, a medical technician, a licensed trades person of any kind. You serve your community with that skill for a defined period at a wage that reflects the investment.

The private sector cannot fill this gap alone. It was never designed to. This is exactly the kind of investment in people, in capability, in the infrastructure of daily life that government exists to make.

The person who keeps the lights on and the water running and the roads safe is not less valuable than the person with the credential and the debt.

It is time the education system said so clearly.

And it is time the federal government built a path that reflects it.

The Complete Foundation Sieries

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Seven Education

The Capitalism Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick Six – Capitalism

Brick Six – Capitalism

The Sixth Brick What Good Government Actually RequiresPart Six

CapitalismHow Much Is Enough?

I am not an economist. I have trouble balancing my own checkbookto the point that I haven’t written a check in years. I live by the debit card and rely on the bank to keep score. They make fewer mistakes than I do.

So take what follows for what it is. Not economic theory. Just observation from someone who has been inside the system long enough to see where the seams are coming apart.

YouTube player

I believe in capitalism. I believe in free enterprise. I believe we should be innovative and be rewarded for that innovation. I was part of the technological revolutionthe gin joints of Tektronix and Intel and my own consulting workand I watched what genuine innovation looks like when it builds something real.

That’s the capitalism I believe in.

Where I get lost is somewhere between that and here.

We once built enterprises that built a nation. Railroads. Steel. Highways. Infrastructure that everyone eventually lived inside regardless of whether they owned a share of it. The Carnegies and Vanderbilts exploited laborthat’s documented and truebut the byproduct was a physical country that generations inherited.

What does the new generation of concentrated wealth build?

Delivery systems. Platforms. Apps that monetize your attention and sell it back to you as connection. The byproduct this time isn’t a nation. It’s a customer base and a stock price.

I don’t have a clean answer to when enough is enough. I haven’t reached that threshold myself so I’m not casting stones. And I’m aware that most obscene wealth exists on paperinvestment portfolios, unrealized gains, numbers on screens rather than cash in hand.

But somewhere on the path to obscene riches somebody has been cheating the system. The system the rest of us have to play by. The loopholes didn’t appear by accidentthey were written in by people who benefited from them being there and protected by people who were paid to keep them open.

Plug the loopholes. Levy fair taxes against the structure. Not punitive. Not confiscatory. Fair. And if the structure can’t survive fair taxation here then perhaps the wealth shouldn’t be made here.

Simple idea. Complicated execution. Which is why you hire people smart enough to figure out the nuts and boltswhich is itself the argument for competent government rather than a government of loyalists and donors.

If Coca Cola owned Pepsi and Dr Pepper there would be no competitive pricing. There would be one pricewhatever they decided to charge. We have agencies designed specifically to prevent that concentration. Anti-monopoly regulation exists because we learned the hard way what happens without it.

We are currently in a period of deliberate deregulation. Sold as freedom for business to grow. What it actually produceswhen the major players are left to their own devicesis consolidation until competition disappears and the consumer pays whatever the monopoly decides they pay.

Deregulation without oversight isn’t freedom. It’s the slow removal of the rules that kept the game fair for everyone playing it.

One more thing worth noting before we move on.

The most overlooked corner of capitalism is the small business. The licensed electrician. The plumber. The person who showed up at my house with a high pressure rooter and a camera and charged me six hundred dollars for an hour of work.

Good for them. Seriously. That’s skilled labor commanding fair market value and I begrudge them nothing.

We’ll talk more about trade schools and education in the next brick. But the point worth making here is that capitalism works best when it works at every levelnot just at the top where the delivery systems and platforms live but at the street level where someone with a license and a truck and a set of skills can build a life without a college degree and a venture capital round.

That’s the capitalism worth preserving.

The other kind needs some work.

The Complete Foundation Sieries

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Six Capitalism

The FCC and The News Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick Five – The FCC and The News

The Fifth Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Part Five

The FCC, The First Amendment, and The News That Used to Be News

The founding charter of the Federal Communications Commission is the Communications Act of 1934, an independent federal mandate enacted by Congress to regulate the airwaves in the public interest.

I encourage everyone to look it up. Read what it was designed to do. Then compare that to what it is currently doing.

The gap is the story.

YouTube player

The airwaves are public property. Broadcast licenses are issued in the public trust, not as private rights but as public obligations. The entity that receives a license to use the public airwaves accepts a responsibility to serve the public interest. That was the founding principle. That was the deal.

Somewhere along the way the deal changed.

Today a handful of corporations own most of what Americans see and hear. When that many outlets are controlled by that few owners the news stops being news and becomes something else. Call it perspective. Call it editorial direction. Call it what it actually is, propaganda with a news desk and a theme song.

This will be worth repeating in future segments because it touches everything. An informed citizenry is the foundation under the foundation. You cannot have accountability without information. You cannot have meaningful elections without accurate news. You cannot have a functioning democracy when the information ecosystem is owned by people with specific financial and political interests in what you believe.

Now add the Inspector Generals.

We have them. Or we had them. Their purpose is straightforward, independent oversight of the agencies they monitor, specifically designed to catch corruption and prevent regulatory capture. A check on the checkers. An independent eye on the people making the rules.

The current administration fired most of them.

The same oversight that would have monitored what the administration itself was doing, gone. Not restructured. Not replaced. Removed. Because independent oversight of your own behavior is inconvenient when your behavior requires oversight.

This is not a political attack. It is an illustration of exactly why the executive branch needs hard limits on what it can and cannot touch. There need to be areas of the civil service where executive orders have little to no effect. Where the order arrives and the response is not a court challenge but a rubbish bin. Some things should simply be beyond the reach of any single administration regardless of who won the last election.

The FCC is one of those things.

Its job is regulation. Monitor acquisitions. Prevent monopolies. Protect the public interest in the airwaves it licenses. What is not, what should not be, in its charter is any role in determining what speech is acceptable to the current occupant of the White House.

And yet.

For anyone paying attention, look up the details of what happened with Jimmy Kimmel, Stephen Colbert, and the Daily Show. The FCC was used as a direct instrument of executive pressure to coerce networks into dropping programming the president found unfavorable. Not illegal content. Not obscenity. Programming he didn’t like.

That is not regulation. That is a threat wearing a regulatory costume.

In our new foundation the safeguards have to be structural not assumed. No presidential pressure moves the needle because the president cannot fire the people holding the needle. Independence is not a courtesy, it is an architecture. Built in. Locked. Not dependent on the good faith of whoever currently holds power.

I can remember when the news was presented as news. Facts. This is what is happening. If an outlet wanted to offer opinion it was called an editorial and labeled as such. The separation was clear and it was honored because the public expected it and the license required it.

That line has been erased. Rebuilding it requires more than nostalgia. It requires structural protection with enforceable consequences.

You cannot have the First Amendment and suppress it simultaneously. That is not how the system was designed to work.

And here is the danger that goes beyond any single administration or any single network or any single late night host who said something unflattering.

When you find a way to circumvent one rule, even a small one, even quietly, even with a plausible justification, the next rule becomes easier. And the one after that. The erosion is always gradual until suddenly it isn’t gradual at all.

There need to be consequences.

Fast ones. Enforceable ones.

The First Amendment is not a suggestion. It is the first brick for a reason.

The Complete Foundation Sieries

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Five The FCC and The News

The Judicial Branch Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick Four – The Judicial Branch

Brick Four – The Judicial Branch

The Fourth Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Part Four

The Judicial Branch

The Supreme Court was never designed to be a political prize.

It has become one anyway.

YouTube player

Every president now treats Supreme Court appointments as the most important legacy decision of their term, not because they care deeply about judicial philosophy but because they are buying future outcomes. The pocket justice. The reliable vote. The insurance policy wearing a robe.

The result is a court whose decisions are predictable before the arguments are heard. Everyone knows which way each justice will rule on any politically charged question because everyone knows who appointed them and what was expected in return. That is not justice. That is scorekeeping in robes.

The fix is not complicated. It is just threatening to the people who benefit from the current arrangement.

More justices. Randomly assigned. Term limited. Appointed by peers not presidents.

Not a specific number, the number is less important than the principle. Enough justices that no single president can stack the composition. Assigned to rotating panels by lottery so nobody can predict which justices will hear which case. Appointed by their fellow jurists rather than by the politician who wants to own their vote. Term limited to twelve or eighteen years, long enough to develop genuine expertise, short enough to prevent the court from calcifying around a single political moment.

The lottery is the key. You cannot game a random draw. You cannot have a justice in your pocket if you don’t know which pocket they’ll be sitting in when your case arrives. The pipeline between political appointment and predetermined outcome gets broken not by ideology but by randomness.

But the most important brick in the judicial wall has nothing to do with composition.

It has to do with enforcement.

Right now the Supreme Court can rule and the executive branch can say no. And nothing happens. The court has no army. The court has no marshals with actual authority. The court has strongly worded opinions and the assumption that the executive branch will comply because it always has before.

That assumption has been tested and found wanting.

Here is a question worth sitting with.

Every lower court in America has enforcement authority. A district judge can hold anyone in contempt and have them detained. Federal marshals exist specifically to enforce court orders at every level of the federal judiciary.

Except the highest one.

The Supreme Court, the final word on constitutional law, the last institutional check on executive power, operates on the honor system.

What good is the honor system if no one honors it?

We have now seen what happens when that hope runs out.

At what point do we acknowledge that the highest court in the land deserves at least the enforcement authority we grant to every court below it?

The Supreme Court needs its own enforcement mechanism. A Marshal’s service with the specific authority to detain anyone, anyone, that the court by majority vote determines is willfully operating outside their constitutional limits and has become a national threat.

No exceptions. No immunity. No rank that places a person beyond the reach of a court order.

The moment a president, or anyone else, can look at a Supreme Court ruling and respond with effective impunity the entire architecture of the republic becomes decorative. Pretty columns on a building with no foundation.

The court says no and the no has to mean something.

That is the fourth brick.

Not a perfect court. Not an infallible court. Just one that cannot be owned before the case is filed and cannot be ignored after the ruling is issued.

Justice without enforcement is just a word.

The Complete Foundation Sieries

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Four The Judicial Branch

It Takes Two to Tango, But The More The Merrier

Did you ever play a game of snooker against yourself? Put up the other side of a ping pong table to practice? It didn’t take long until video game creators realized they made more money in a bar with a PacMan with opposing controllers. Let’s face it, playing by yourself isn’t as much fun or as satisfying. That’s why we had the post-war population explosion.

We are wired for opposition, for partnership, for the push and pull of another person across the table. It’s more rewarding together than alone, after all, taking a shower together was always nicer than showering alone.

YouTube player

But enough of beer bars and bedrooms. Off to where the real back-stabbing and dirty stuff happens, politics and government.

In my opinion, the evil creating the havoc we live with today can be traced directly to what we call the two-party system. Anyone who wants a career in politics has to align themselves with a party. They have to declare that they are eitherLiberal – Blue, or Conservative – Red. They can’t walk in and say, hey, look at me. This is what I can do for you. And the reason is twofold: money and the checkbox.

Campaigns cost money, and an independent candidate has to compete against the Superpacs. This isn’t a small thing. Since I am registered Republican, this is the only example I can give honestly, but I am positive it is equally true for Blue. I receive at least fifty give-me-money emails a day from Trump, Vance, Trump’s kids, and would probably get them from Trump’s dog if he had one. Those contributions flow into what we call a Superpac. So when a party endorses your opponent, your opponent suddenly has a war chest you can’t match, financed by people who have never heard your name and wouldn’t care if they had. If you run independent, you finance from your own pocket or whatever limited funds you can scratch together from limited supporters. A very uneven battlefield.

The second problem is who they serve once elected. They no longer can support the people who voted for them, they must support the people who paid for their election. They must vote along party lines. We see that now, every day. It has a name: partisan. Which is a polite word for captured.

Let me ask you a few questions. If we didn’t have the two-party system, would Donald Trump have been elected? If he had been elected, would those — sorry, you didn’t see the three-minute pause while I searched for words other than idiots, thieves, and suckups — cabinet secretaries ever have been confirmed? Would we be in Trump’s war of choice? Would Trump have been Article 25’d by now?

I’ll let you answer those yourself.

The two-party system isn’t in the Constitution. It isn’t carved in stone or handed down from the founders. It’s a habit. An expensive, entrenched, self-serving habit that benefits exactly two groups of people, the two parties, and leaves the rest of us standing outside the dance hall listening to music we didn’t choose and paying the cover charge anyway. Habits can be broken. Systems can be redesigned. The question isn’t whether we can do better. The question is whether enough of us get angry enough, soon enough, to demand it.

The Entire Foundation Series

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

The Long View From 1964 – The Newsboy Cap

Fish guts. What do I do with these fish guts? I don’t want to run them down the garbage disposal — I have a septic tank. So they have to go into the garbage, but oh woe is me. There isn’t any newspaper to wrap them in. What has happened to America? What has happened? No more newspaper to wrap fish guts in.

YouTube player

Ol’ English Fish and Chips, Inglewood California, 1974. Lunch time, an hour off. I worked at Inglewood Physical Therapy on Locust Street and would walk over for fast food — Ol’ English Fish and Chips, wonderful cod and french fries wrapped in fake newsprint. So good. So much better than some fast food burger. Gone now, but the memories aren’t.

Corvallis, late seventies. Walk over to the local market for a counter lunch, find a newspaper someone left waiting for me. Headlines that told what happened nationally and what the Beavers did. Good stuff, even if it was a week old.

Growing up, Mom and Dad always had the daily paper delivered. In Manhattan Beach it was the Daily Breeze and the Los Angeles Times. Wherever we lived, it was local and regional and national. That’s where we got the news — and it was the news. If you wanted an opinion, you went to the editorial page. There you read the partisan slant. If the publisher was conservative, that’s where the slant went. The front page was holy ground for the NEWS.

The best part was you didn’t throw it away that day. You saved them up for the school kid with the fundraising paper drive. What we didn’t realize at the time was that we had accidentally built an archive. You didn’t have to go to the library to look something up — you had a six month to one year record already sitting in your garage, in order, except for the few sheets that had wrapped the fish guts. And those were probably the classified ads anyway.

Try finding an article posted five minutes ago if you’re not subscribed to that thread. And even if you are, good luck.

What has really happened is we changed from printing and distributing the news — news that if found incorrect would have a redaction printed, visibly, permanently, for everyone to see — to online content that can be quietly edited into something else entirely, or simply deleted, with no trace and no accountability. Never before has the phrase Buyer Beware been so important. And most critically, we aren’t even paying for it. It’s being force fed to us, customized by an algorithm we can’t see, shaped by a bias we can’t find on any editorial page.

The newspapers had their editorial page and they had something else — Letters to the Editor. Online publications have those as well, technically. Try finding them though. Try submitting something. I have. But newspapers were more open and honest about it. If they made a mistake, they owned up to it. Sometimes on their own. Integrity was important. A reporter’s reputation was his livelihood. Nobody buys a Timex watch on an outboard motor’s prop from someone they didn’t trust. Who in mainstream media do you trust today?

The point I am really trying to make — even with the podcasters you trust, the Substack authors you trust, the elephantsinkroom.com you trust — we have a limited audience. We keep talking to the same people, over and over. The share button only shares to the same platform, the same followers, the same converted.

We hope you are spreading the word. Because what we say isn’t being left on the lunch counter anymore. It isn’t sitting in the news rack on the street corner. It isn’t landing on your doorstep to be read by whoever picks it up. If it were printed you could share it — hand it to someone, leave it somewhere, let it find a stranger. That would be better than forwarding it to someone who already agrees, or just deleting it.

Newspapers died an unwarranted death.

Oh, I would love a basket of Ol’ English Fish and Chips with a bottle of malt vinegar right now.

On a side note — some people wear baseball caps, cowboy hats, no hats at all. Last year I started wearing the classic newsboy cap. Go figure. Does look good with the grey and white hair though.

Before We Go Any Further A Reality Check

Before we go any further building a foundation for the future we have to stop and look at reality.

What we have is a mess. A partisan battlefield where ninety percent of the effort and legislation is directed toward power, who is in charge and who is making the rules. And the needs of the people are in reality not taken into consideration. Oh, lip service is given on every stump any good politician can find to state their cause. And their cause is to get themselves reelected.

So in all honesty, is this a pipe dream? Are we just sitting here grooving to Grace Slick singing White Rabbit?

Or is this doable.

YouTube player

I believe it is. Can it be done overnight? No. But it can be done.

Honesty point number two. Who will be the strongest opponents to effective change? The entrenched politicians themselves. They voted for their own terms, their own pay, their own retirement, their own power. They don’t want to give it up.

Well. F them.

What it will take is us. But not just us in numbers, an educated us. An involved us. It is like wanting to look like Arnold Schwarzenegger or Cheryl Ladd while eating another pint of Häagen-Dazs. It isn’t going to happen without the exercise. You need muscles before you can flex them.

Think of what I am proposing as a blueprint in its early stages. Something to be thrown around, talked about, redrawn, picked apart and rewritten. And when you’re done, go back and compare it to the original and start building. That is, if you truly want something better.

It isn’t going to magically appear on its own.

We will talk about many things. Healthcare, what should we expect, what do we want, and what is actually reasonable? It’s easy to say free healthcare but someone still has to pay for it. Education, what good is a PhD if you can’t get a job? Maybe trade schools are a good thing. Should the Washington reflecting pool reflect something worth reflecting or just be a pretty shade of blue? The list could go on forever. But I’m old, so I promise you it will be a reasonable list.

And we will address capitalism. After all it is what got us here. I am all for it. But let’s put it in perspective. Who gets what and how much is enough?

It’s all about the seeds. You need to supply the earth, the water and the fertilizer, if any can be found under the current regime.

We also need a label. We all like labels. We need labels. It’s the American Way. This is supposed to be a Democratic Republic we live in.

I’m not so sure that label fits very well anymore.

What do you think?

The obvious goal with this set of foundation blocks isn’t to fix the broken system. It’s to provide a structure with enough strength that it cannot be so easily broken and manipulated again.

The strength comes from simplicity.

Not complexity.

The Entire Foundation Series

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Before We Go Any Further A Reality Check

The Cabinet, Party Favors Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick Three – The Cabinet, Party Favors

The Third Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Part Three

There is a tradition in American politics so embedded that most people never question it.

The president wins. The president hands out cabinet positions. The cabinet positions go to the people who helped the president win — donors, allies, loyalists, true believers, and occasionally someone who spent the entire campaign calling for the department they now run to be abolished.

We call this governing.

It isn’t.

YouTube player

It is the thank you gift system dressed up as executive leadership. Party favors with confirmation hearings. And while career civil servants generally do the actual work underneath the political appointees, the damage happens when the unqualified person at the top starts making policy. Policy driven not by expertise or national interest but by the ideology, ego, or donor relationships of someone who got the job because they made the right phone calls at the right time.

The confirmation process was supposed to prevent the worst of this. In theory Congress evaluates the nominee and decides whether they are qualified to lead a critical department. In practice — as we have watched in painful real time — partisan confirmation is theater. When the system is controlled by one party the hearings become a formality and the outcome is predetermined regardless of qualification.

So here is the question the third brick asks.

What if the president didn’t pick the cabinet?

Not entirely. Not unilaterally. What if the senior positions in critical departments — Defense, State, Justice, Intelligence, the Federal Reserve — were filled by professionals who advanced through their own institutional ranks on merit, competence, and demonstrated performance? The way military officers advance. The way career diplomats advance. The way the civil service was designed to work before political appointees started parachuting in over the people who actually know the job.

The president would then work within that professional framework to accomplish the agenda the voters elected them to execute.

Which brings us to the vice president.

Right now the vice president is chosen to win a state, appeal to a demographic, or balance a ticket geographically. They are an electoral calculation wearing the costume of a governing partner. Your running mate is whoever helps you win. What happens after winning is a separate conversation.

What if it wasn’t?

What if the vice president was required to be a genuine working partner — someone who shared the governing agenda, complemented the president’s specific weaknesses, and was capable of actually running the country if called upon? Not a campaign asset. A co-architect.

That changes everything downstream.

A president who has to pick a genuine partner picks differently than a president assembling an electoral coalition. A ticket built around a shared agenda attracts a cabinet built around executing that agenda. If the country faces a climate crisis the executive team running on clean energy solutions has the expertise and the congressional backing to address it. If national security is the crisis the team built around genuine military and diplomatic competence has the credibility to lead.

There would still be infighting. There will always be infighting. Human nature doesn’t get reformed by better institutional design.

But more handshakes and less backstabbing is not a naive hope. It is what happens when you change the incentive structure. Right now the incentive is loyalty to one person. Change the incentive to competence in service of a shared agenda and the culture follows the incentive.

The military figured this out. You do not hand the Joint Chiefs to someone’s campaign donor. You advance through the ranks, demonstrate competence at every level, and earn the position. The fact that this system was recently dismantled in favor of loyalty appointments is not an argument against the system. It is the strongest possible argument for protecting it with something more durable than institutional habit and assumed good faith.

Professional advancement. Merit confirmation. A vice president who is a partner not a prop. A cabinet built to execute an agenda rather than reward the people who funded it.

The Entire Foundation Series

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Three The Cabinet, Party Favors

The Term Limits Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick Two – Term Limits

The Second Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Part Two

If accountability is the foundation then the second brick is simple.

Nobody stays forever.

YouTube player

Term limits. Age accountability. The systematic removal of dead wood before it becomes the structure itself. The recognition that in any healthy organization — a business, a military unit, a family — the inability to remove someone who has outlived their effectiveness isn’t loyalty. It’s institutional rot.

We have watched what happens when people stay too long. The institution bends around them rather than them serving the institution. J. Edgar Hoover ran the FBI for 48 years. Nobody could remove him because nobody could afford the cost of trying. That is not a feature of good government. That is a cautionary tale that we apparently need to be told more than once.

On Age

A hard cutoff number is both cruel and imprecise. Minds age differently. A 79 year old with a video tape memory and fifty years of accumulated pattern recognition may serve better than a 55 year old running on talking points and donor calls. A number on a birth certificate tells you nothing useful.

What tells you something useful is behavior.

A committee empowered to evaluate and recommend further medical and mental evaluation when behavior becomes noticeable. Not partisan. Not elected. Drawn from retired judges, physicians, and civic leaders with staggered appointments designed to insulate from political pressure. The process itself is the deterrent — most people approaching genuine cognitive decline would rather resign than submit to public evaluation.

The goal isn’t to humiliate. It’s to create a dignified off ramp before the institution suffers.

On Term Limits

The structure matters as much as the limit.

A president at two four year terms has enough time to govern without enough time to become permanent. A senator at two six year terms — twelve years — learns the job properly and builds something durable without becoming a resident. A representative on perpetual two year cycles is always campaigning and never governing. Move them to four year terms. Give them enough runway to actually do the work.

The goal is sufficient time to be effective without sufficient time to become immovable.

On the Two Party System

Here is the brick that will make everyone uncomfortable.

Eliminate it.

Not reform it. Not balance it. Remove the institutional infrastructure that makes it the only viable option. No party designations on ballots. No party primaries with public funding. No party based committee assignments in Congress.

Watch what happens to the PACs when there are no teams to back. Watch what happens to the dark money when the jersey colors disappear. Citizens United becomes considerably less useful when there is no party machinery to funnel the money into.

This isn’t naive. It’s the recognition that the two party system has become the primary mechanism for preventing exactly the accountability the foundation requires.

On Compensation

If we require fidelity we require fidelity.

Public servants receive public servant compensation. A PERS program like other government employees. Healthcare through the same options available to federal workers. A pathway into continued government service for those who want to contribute after their term ends.

No golden umbrellas. No lifetime pensions after a single term. No healthcare for life unavailable to the constituents who funded it.

The same standard applied to the person making the rules as the person living under them.

That is the second brick.

Nobody stays forever. Nobody lives above the system they were elected to serve.

Build on that and the walls start to mean something.

The Entire Foundation Series

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick Two Term Limits

The Accountability Brick What Good Government Actually Requires — Brick One – Accountability

The Foundation What Good Government Actually Requires — Part One

Accountability.

Not the political science version. Not the talking point. The real thing. The kind you learn before you’re old enough to vote.

YouTube player

When you break something you admit it. There is no rug. There is no sweeping. You live with what you have and if you don’t have it you earn it. If you make a promise you keep it — or you have a legitimate reason for not doing so that you share with the people you made it to.

That’s it. That’s the foundation.

Everything else — healthcare, infrastructure, justice, national security, the institutions we depend on daily without noticing — sits on top of that one simple principle. Remove it and nothing else holds. The walls crack. The roof comes down. The building that took two hundred and fifty years to construct becomes a very expensive pile of rubble with gold curtains.

We have watched what happens when accountability disappears from the top.

I will lower your taxes. What goes unspoken is that someone’s benefits will pay for it. I will protect your benefits. What goes unspoken is where the money comes from. The empty promise isn’t always an outright lie. Sometimes it’s just half the truth delivered with enough confidence that nobody does the math until the bill arrives.

The bill always arrives.

Presidential immunity is the legal formalization of unaccountability. The Supreme Court’s 2024 decision didn’t create the problem — it just removed the last pretense that the problem didn’t exist. When the president does it it isn’t illegal. Nixon said that too. It didn’t work then because the institution held.

The institution didn’t hold this time.

Which means the foundation has to be rebuilt with something stronger than institutional habit and assumed good faith. The founders were obsessed with this question. They had just lived under a king. Every check, every balance, every separation of power was the answer to one central anxiety — what happens when the wrong person gets the power?

They built a back door. A way to stop something. Checks and balances as the architectural response to the certainty that power will eventually be held by someone who shouldn’t have it.

That back door has to be properly locked from both sides. No presidential immunity. Full stop. The same standard applied to the person signing the orders as to the person receiving them.

To require fidelity requires fidelity.

That covers governance and marriage and institutional trust and the social contract simultaneously. You cannot demand loyalty from a country you are actively betraying. You cannot require honesty from institutions you are actively corrupting. You cannot ask the American people to follow rules you have granted yourself immunity from.

One standard. No exceptions. No immunity.

That is the foundation.

Without it nothing else we build will stand.

The Entire Foundation Series

 The series as a downloadable PDF

Foundation of Government

Brick One Accountability

The Long View From 1964 – The Saucepan Hat

The old elephant on a diet went into witness protection and found he no longer had a home. Looked around and didn’t really see any welcome signs that didn’t just ask for donations.

It gets lonely standing out here. Nothing looks familiar anymore. The old guard has either died off or is getting selective dementia.

YouTube player

You know what they say about growing old,  your mind keeps digging up old memories. So when I found myself standing out in the Oregon rain, my fabulous gray locks getting wet and not a hat to be found, I dashed into my outdoor BBQ ballroom, the one paid for with my own money, no taxpayer investment needed, and grabbed a saucepan and put it on my head.

What? Wearing a saucepan on your head? You’ve really lost it this time old man. Time for the dementia truck.

Hey. Hold on now.

Just good common sense and a fine memory.

Haven’t you ever read the tales of Johnny Appleseed?

I did. As a little boy. Johnny wore a saucepan for a hat and spread apple seeds through the land so apples could flourish everywhere. Smart little cuss. And that’s why we have apple pie.

After a year of political cartoons, then parody, migrating into complaints and now political commentary, I realized all I am really trying to do is plant some seeds for the future. The red versus blue war is too entrenched to flip a switch and start anew with sanity. But you can plant seeds of something better. You can suggest a better way. You can draw attention to failures that cost lives and hurt people and hurt nations.

We have elections coming up. You are going to have to make choices. I wish I could make them for you, and if so, I wish I were wise enough to make the right ones. But I am just a person with opinions and I hope you are as well.

The voters that scare me are the sheep. Here is how to vote, do it this way because I told you to. That is what keeps me up at night.

Those are people with unfertilized minds. The seeds didn’t find anything to take root in. Dead turf.

Besides, if you find the right pan, it isn’t that uncomfortable. And it keeps that mighty fine looking gray hair perfectly in place.

Appleseed

 

The Long View From 1964 – Where is Anywhere

I roast my own coffee.

This morning my latest order arrived — green beans, just waiting for the roaster. Nicaraguan Selva Negra, Guatemalan Antigua Los Volcanes Washed, Brazil Mogiana Guaxupé, Indonesian Sumatra Mandheling and six others. I can see you are thrilled that you asked.

YouTube player

Roasting coffee sounds wonderful. I have a secret for you. It stinks. The aroma of freshly brewed coffee is heaven on earth. Coffee beans going into a dark roast after the second crack — well. You only do that inside the house once.

Everyone who hears I roast my own coffee asks the same question. What’s your favorite? What do you roast? As if there is a simple answer to either question and as if they actually want to hear it.

Here is the thing about roasting your own coffee at 79. I am losing my sense of taste. Too many good bourbons. Too many excellent cigars. If I am being completely honest I might as well buy French Roast from Costco and be done with it.

But then I couldn’t sit in my two thirds enclosed BBQ smoker’s paradise and roast coffee, could I?

And that matters. Not because of the coffee. Because of the sitting. Because of the practice. Because some things retain their value after the practical justification has quietly slipped away and you do them anyway because the doing itself is the point.

Which, it turns out, has everything to do with politics today.

Or rather — it all tastes the same.

Red. Blue. I brew it carefully, I tend it with genuine attention, and what comes out is noise. It’s the evil Democrats, they ruined everything. Blame the Republicans, they tore it all down. The Democrats want this. The Republicans are taking that. For whoever’s sake — insert deity of choice — just stop.

We don’t even know what a Republican or a Democrat is anymore. I asked that question at the beginning of this series and I am no closer to an answer. I suspect you aren’t either.

Maybe that’s the beginning of something.

Because what we have is broken. The two party system that limits our choices to two flavors of the same noise, backed by dark money from both directions that you mostly never hear about. Citizens United didn’t just open the door — it took the door off the hinges. The Federalist Society on one side, the Tides Foundation and Priorities USA on the other, and the rest of us standing in the room where the door used to be wondering why it’s so cold.

Here is a what if. Offered with open hands, no god complex, no manifesto.

What if we dropped the party labels altogether? Not reformed them. Not rebranded them. Just — dropped them. Watch the dark money groups scramble for a target. Watch Citizens United try to decide who to back when the teams dissolve. It would give them fits and I confess that brings me more satisfaction than it probably should.

And while we are at it — what if the Supreme Court had fifteen justices? Twenty one? Enough that no single president could stack the deck in a term or two. Enough that the Constitution might once again be interpreted rather than used as a party tool. Enough that the word justice recovered some of its original meaning.

These are seeds. I know that. Nothing on the next ballot. Nothing in the next cycle. Maybe nothing in my lifetime.

But I still roast the coffee.

Not because my palate is what it was. Not because I can reliably taste the difference between the Nicaraguan and the Sumatran on any given morning. But because I sit in my smoker’s paradise and tend something carefully and the practice itself is worth preserving even when the justification has gotten complicated.

That’s what this series has been. Not solutions. Not a platform. Not a party. Just someone who has been paying attention since 1964 sitting with the question honestly and refusing the checkboxes that don’t fit.

Harry Chapin understood it. His little man said it best.

‘Cause I know I’m goin’ nowhere. And anywhere’s a better place to be.

We may not know what we’re building yet.

But anywhere is a better place to be than where we are standing.

That’s enough to start.

ChatGPT Image Apr 26, 2026, 10 43 23 AM

The Long View From 1964 – The Road and The Ground Beneath It

The Road and The Ground Beneath It

We didn’t just appear here.

YouTube player

That sounds obvious until you watch a government systematically dismantle the evidence of how we arrived. Then it becomes the most urgent thing anyone could say.

You cannot navigate a broken road if you don’t understand how the road was built. Not the mythology of it. Not the sanitized version that fits a current political narrative. The actual road — the compromises, the failures, the corrections, the moments we got it wrong and the generations it took to get it less wrong. That’s not weakness. That’s the only honest map we have.

America’s history is short. Embarrassingly short by the standards of civilization. Europe measures itself in centuries stacked on centuries. Asia and the Middle East reach back to the beginning of recorded human organization. We are a snap of the fingers by comparison.

And yet.

In that brief moment we accomplished things that took the rest of human history combined to make possible. Not because we were exceptional in the way the mythology claims — chosen, destined, superior. But because we inherited every road every previous civilization had built and had the specific historical moment to run further down it than anyone before us. Science. Medicine. Communication. The accumulated knowledge of every civilization that preserved its history honestly enough to pass it forward.

We built on what was kept.

The Europeans understood something we never quite learned. You preserve the castle not because you miss the king but because the castle tells you what you were capable of — the beauty and the brutality equally. Auschwitz stands deliberately. The Tower of London gives tours. The Bastille is gone but its memory is written into French identity so deeply that a nation still organizes itself around it. This is where we came from. This is what we were. We keep it so we never mistake ourselves for something we aren’t.

America tears things down when they become inconvenient.

The Rivera mural at Rockefeller Center. Commissioned by the capitalist establishment, destroyed by the capitalist establishment the moment it included Lenin. The artist recreated it in Mexico where it still stands. The original is rubble. That was 1933 and we apparently learned nothing from it because here we are watching exhibits get quietly edited at the Smithsonian to fit a political narrative that will be irrelevant in a decade and dead in a generation.

Rivera Diego finished mural in Mexico City to show details and color

The WPA murals in federal buildings — painted by artists who lived the Depression, who rendered the New Deal in pigment on plaster as primary sources of a specific American moment — are being treated as inconvenient decoration. You cannot tear them off the walls. They are the walls. But the impulse to try tells you everything about what this administration understands about history. Which is nothing. Or worse — enough to know that an honest history is dangerous to a dishonest present.

Service pnp highsm 24800 24811v

The Wealth of the Nation Seymour Fogel

Service pnp highsm 24800 24817v

Here is the thing about salting the earth. Nothing grows. Not their seeds. Not yours. Not anyone’s.

And here is the thing about manufactured hate — because it is manufactured, most of it. People are not born hating their neighbors. Love comes naturally when you are loved. You kick back when you are kicked. The cattle prod of algorithmic rage, the deliberate cultivation of an enemy to look down at instead of a mirror to look into — that is not human nature expressing itself. That is human nature being weaponized by people who need you angry and need you certain and above all need you not paying attention to the road and how it was built.

We have a short history. Painfully, precariously short.

And we are letting it be rewritten to fit a narrative that is popular today and will be dust tomorrow.

What will we have left to learn from.

That is not a rhetorical question. It is the most practical question anyone can ask right now.

Seeds need ground. Ground needs memory. Memory needs honesty.

We are running out of all three.

The Fastest Gun Alive — A Case for the Second Amendment

Christmas morning. There I stand dressed in my finest — my Christmas cowboy outfit, six shooter hung low. Maybe a Hopalong Cassidy rig. Roy Rogers. Red Ryder. Doesn’t matter. There I am, the fastest gun alive. Darn tootin. Six years old and nobody faster.

YouTube player

Fast forward to 1964. Too many westerns under my belt and James Bond takes on Dr. No. I sit in a theater in St. Louis Missouri waiting for the bus to Fort Leonard Wood and advanced training. First chance at the PX I buy my first James Bond book. By Christmas I have read them all and can field strip a Walther PPK in my sleep.

A couple of years later I order my first pistol from the big hardware catalog at the local hardware store , a Bernardelli Model 60. Looks and feels just like James’s Walther. Just costs a whole lot less. I am officially hooked.

More years go by. More firearms. Smith and Wesson Model 19s, K38s, Browning Challengers, and finally Dirty Harry’s S&W Model 29 a 44 Magnum. I join the Corvallis Sheriff’s Department and can’t resist competitive shooting. Back in the seventies it was PPC and revolvers. I took home trophies, even a few first places for the 2½ inch revolver category.

The fastest gun alive.

50 years later, I still go to the range. Speed drills now with 10mm competition Tanfoglios and Nighthawks. Always felt you should stay a step ahead.

Which brings me to a film, The Fastest Gun Alive, an old western starring Glenn Ford. He plays George Kelby, a quiet storekeeper in a small town. He proves his skill to the townspeople by shooting two silver dollars tossed simultaneously into the air. Now they know who the storekeeper really is. More than a merchant. A man with six notches on his father’s gun.

But here is the thing about George Kelby. He is the fastest gun alive, and he has never once drawn against another man. The notches aren’t his. He has the skill, the nerve, the weapon. What he has never had to do is use it against another human being.

In six years in the Army and my time with the Sheriff’s Department I never once drew my weapon and pointed it at another person. Let alone fired it at one.

That is not a confession of weakness. That is the point.

The Second Amendment was never about Vinney the desperado riding into town looking for a fight. It was never about bravado or immunity or masks or the performance of toughness by people who have never actually been tested.

It was about George Kelby. The storekeeper. The neighbor. The man who can shoot two silver dollars out of the air and hopes he never has to prove it to anything other than a paper target.

I still go to the range.

I still stay a step ahead.

And I still hope, genuinely, completely hope, that the cap gun stays on the shelf where it belongs.

But I know what I’m doing if it doesn’t.

Vinney may not.

In today’s uncertain world, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution affirms a simple principle: responsible, law-abiding citizens have the right to protect themselves and their families.

Christmas in Atascadero, probably 1951.

Christmas in Atascadero, probably 1951.

The Long View From 1964 – The Land Moved While You Slept

The Land Moved While You Slept

I didn’t leave the Republican Party.

I didn’t leave the Democratic Party either.

YouTube player

They left. Both of them. While I was paying attention to other things — raising a family, building a life, watching the news with a growing sense that something wasn’t adding up — the ground shifted underneath the labels and nobody announced it.

It’s like waking up and finding yourself a stranger in a strange land. Except you never went anywhere. The land moved. You just didn’t notice until you tried to take a step in the direction you always walked and found nothing there.

So I looked left. If I couldn’t call myself a Republican by the standards of what that word means today, maybe I was a Democrat. Except that didn’t fit either. The Democratic Party of the New Deal built the American middle class. It passed labor protections, created social infrastructure, and pointed at the people standing beside you and said — here is what you share, here is what you can build together. The Democratic Party of JFK spoke of sacrifice and responsibility and American strength without apology.

I don’t know what the Democratic Party of today is. And I don’t think it does either.

So I’m back to independent. Which has the numbers — somewhere between 40 and 45 percent of the American electorate by most honest measures — but not the official label, not the infrastructure, not the primary, not the power.

It’s like being a marionette with two sets of strings pulled from opposite sides of the stage. And if you cut the strings you have free movement but nowhere to go.

Here is what I think happened.

The wealthy have always used the rest of us. That’s not a new observation and it’s not a simple condemnation. The Carnegies and the Vanderbilts exploited labor — no unions, poor wages, dangerous conditions. We had to fight for every right we eventually won. But here is the difference that doesn’t get said clearly enough — they were building something. Railroads. Steel. Infrastructure. A physical nation that everyone eventually lived inside. We got something for our sacrifice, even if we had to bleed for it.

What does the new generation of concentrated wealth build? Platforms. Delivery systems. Social media that monetizes your attention and sells it back to you as connection. Electric cars for people who can afford them. The byproduct this time isn’t a nation. It’s a customer base.

We got something for our sacrifice. Now we want something for our tolerance. And nothing is being offered.

But here is the part that keeps me up at night. Most people didn’t notice. They bought stock. They got a 401k. They watched the Dow. The system handed them a small thread connecting their personal security to its performance and somewhere along the way they stopped identifying with the people beside them and started identifying with the people above them.

It was the most elegant capture imaginable. You don’t silence dissent by force. You give people a small piece of the thing they might otherwise resent and watch them defend it like it’s their own.

I have a brother. Smarter than me by any standard measure. He can’t see it. He watches his portfolio.

He’s not foolish. He’s captured. There’s a difference. And the system that captured him is the same system that pulled the strings on both parties until neither one represents the people who are actually holding them up.

The donkey and the elephant. I’m not sure either animal still exists in any form I recognize.

What replaced them nobody has named yet.

That’s what we’re here to figure out.

Democratsgone

1776 — The Number That Tells You Everything

( I Don’t Trust Blanche )

Let’s start with the number.

YouTube player

Not the policy. Not the legal arguments. Not the court battles that were always going to happen and were always going to produce the same result.

The number.

$1.776 billion.

In a country where political messaging is tested and retested before it reaches the public, nothing that specific is accidental. The amount could have been $2 billion. It could have been $1.5 billion. It could have been any number that accomplished the stated policy goal.

It wasn’t. It was $1.776 billion.

To most Americans 1776 means one thing. The founding. The declaration. The birth of the republic.

To a specific and carefully cultivated audience it means something additional. It means the patriots. It means the people who showed up on January 6th because they believed the republic was being stolen from them. It means the people who have been told repeatedly that their country is being taken away and that only one man is fighting to give it back.

The number was a message. Delivered in plain sight.

Now ask the question that Captain Renault never quite got around to asking before he rounded up the usual suspects.

Why propose something you know will be rejected?

Because the rejection is the point.

Here is how the playbook reads when you step back far enough to see the whole page.

Propose something dramatic and specifically coded for your base. Watch it get challenged in court. Watch it get rejected by the institutions designed to reject exactly this kind of unconstitutional overreach. Then turn to your base and say — you see? They stole it. Not just the election. Not just the country. Now they stole the $1.776 billion I was trying to give you. The money with your founding fathers’ number on it. The money that was yours.

Who stole it?

The rest of us. Of course.

This is not a new play. It is the same play run repeatedly with different props. The stolen election narrative wasn’t born on January 6th. It was constructed methodically for months before that day so that when the result arrived the audience was already primed to reject it. The architecture of grievance is always built before the grievance is needed.

What concerns me — and I want to be precise here because this is pattern recognition not accusation — is that the structural fingerprints look familiar.

Unless something dramatically changes the electoral landscape the midterms should produce significant Democratic gains. The math of an unpopular administration historically produces that result. Fair elections should deliver it.

But we have already established in this country that fair elections and accepted elections are not always the same thing.

I have a sinking feeling we will find ourselves watching Second String Donny screaming foul again. Not just about the midterms. About the $1.776 billion that was stolen from his patriots along with everything else.

Is this proof of intent? No.

Is this a history of behavior that gives us every reason to watch carefully and prepare honestly?

Oh hell yes.

The number told us. Right there in plain sight.

1776

Round up the usual suspects.

The Long View From 1964 – The Checkbox Problem

The Checkbox Problem

YouTube player

I am not a Democrat.

I am not a Republican.

I am not whatever “Independent” means on a form that was designed to make that choice feel like surrender.

I grew up with a Republican Party that meant something specific, a set of principles, a temperament, a way of approaching governance that I could argue with or agree with but at least recognize. That party is gone. What carries the label today bears no resemblance to what the label used to mean. Calling yourself a Republican in 2026 means something that would have been unrecognizable,  and I think deeply alarming,  to most of the people who built that party.

So I am not that either.

What I am is a moderate. A person who believes in making decisions carefully, in recognizing complexity, in not burning the house down because you’re angry at the neighbors. A person who wants others to make their own informed choices rather than be handed a script.

There is no checkbox for that.

There is no party infrastructure, no primary, no institutional home for the person who looks at both options and says,  honestly, clearly, without drama, neither of these fits.

The labels don’t fit anymore. And the system was not built for the moment when the labels stop fitting.

I am 79 years old. I have been voting since 1968. And this is the first time I have felt genuinely politically homeless.

But here is the thing about being lost, recognizing it is not the end. It is actually the beginning. Before you can define where you are going, you have to be honest about where you are. That is what this is. The first step in figuring out what a political identity looks like when the old labels have stopped telling the truth.

This is the beginning of that conversation. Not answers. Just honest questions from someone who has been paying attention for a long time and is tired of being handed choices that don’t fit.

More to follow.

Republicansgone

The 20th century begins on a midnight ride by Steve Schmidt

My series looks at the world through the eyes of one young, and naive man who was first eligible to vote in 1964. The Long View From 1964.

Steve Steve Schmidt takes us on journey of American Politics from day one, an excellent piece that could replace volumes of rhetoric in classroom texts. I am bringing you into his series with segment seven, but links to the previous 6 segments are prominent in the beginning. This isn’t a dry reading of the facts, but engaging and well worth the read if you interested in more than just outrage at our current predicament. You can’t fix it, if you done’ understand the mechanics.. I encourage you to engage. I believe it is worth it.

The 20th century begins on a midnight ride by Steve Schmidt

PLUS: Watch “Bad Faith” as counter-programming to Trump’s “National Jubilee of Prayer” from 4 – 6 pm ET TODAY

Read on Substack

The Long View From 1964 – Maybe Just Listen

So often we sit there and tune him out.

YouTube player

Not another war story. I have heard it before. I know, I know. Dad, Reagan isn’t President anymore and I don’t know who he is anyway except some cowboy on TV.

Everything is moving so fast today. We have AI. We have instant everything. And somewhere in that acceleration we forgot that Dad — and Mom, I’m just shortening the typing process — are the ones who actually built the infrastructure we are all living inside.

Our children forget that Dads started Intel. Built Tektronix. Worked at Texas Instruments. That the company that became Texas Instruments was created by GSI — Geophysical Services Incorporated — because analog computing wasn’t getting the job done. That Dads spent years in Southern California discovering the oil that Standard Oil and Chevron pumped out of the LA Basin and the Santa Barbara Channel. That these things did not build themselves.

The grandchildren watch Saving Private Ryan. But they forget that Great Grandpa was the one bleeding in Europe and the Philippines. They just see old people without opinions worth hearing.

Maybe we rant because nobody will listen.

But here is what I think the real problem is. They can’t see what politics is anymore. All they see is TikTok. All they see is YouTube. All they see is one outlet calling another outlet fake news while being called fake news in return. And then they watch it all falling down and they can’t even find the question to ask, let alone the answer.

Maybe if Grandpa and Dad had stopped ranting and started explaining. And maybe if Johnny and Jane had stopped scrolling and started listening. Maybe some of this could have been avoided.

Maybe. Just maybe.

I don’t have all the answers. I want to be clear about that. This entire series has been questions more than answers and that is entirely intentional. But there is one truth I know from experience — and I have the scars on my shoulder and chest to prove it is experience and not theory.

When you pull a boiling coffee pot off the stove and it comes down on you, you get burned. You don’t do it a second time. You learned something real in a way that no amount of telling could have taught you.

So yes. You have to make mistakes to learn. You have to touch something hot to understand burns. You have to get things wrong before you understand what right costs.

But the secret — the thing the scars actually teach you if you pay attention — is to get a small burn and learn your lesson. Not go down in the flames.

And right now it looks very much like we are headed for the flames.

Grandpa is not ranting.

Grandpa is pointing at the stove.

ChatGPT Image Apr 26, 2026, 01 59 02 PM

The Long View From 1964 – Superman

I grew up watching a small black and white television in the living room. Not the family room, because we didn’t have family rooms in 1,300 square foot ranches in 1955. My older brother and I would watch the Mickey Mouse Club, heart throbbing as Annette would grace the screen — all 1.5 inches of grainy image of her. That was high tech back then.

YouTube player

Lassie would dash back into the one room farmhouse and announce that Timmy had fallen in the well again, and Superman would boldly declare that he stood for Truth, Justice and the American Way. Oh, the patriotic pride we would feel — young army brats, freshly back from Germany where our father had been stationed for three years. But that’s another story of concentration camps and sausage restaurants on the Danube.

Back to Superman, because that’s what this is all about. Truth, Justice and the American Way. Straight from the 1940’s comic books — not graphic novels. They were comic books. A graphic novel was Classics Illustrated doing The Last of the Mohicans.

Truth was the TRUTH. It was telling the truth. Real truth. What do we have today? We have Truth Social, and we are told to believe it. But what is it? It is whatever Donald Trump and the MAGA movement wants you to believe. I’m not saying it’s all lies, because everything has to have an element of truth to stand. But believe at your own peril.

How about X.com? Look at the bots. Look at how many times posts have been reposted — not 5 or 6 times, but hundreds. That’s a machine. Posted by Betsy, a housewife from Atlanta. Check her profile — courtesy of Elon, finally — and you find that Betsy has changed her name 83 times and is posting from Asia or Eastern Europe.

Get a clue.

Justice. That’s a good one. Look at what our courts have become. We have so much partisan influence that the very word has little meaning anymore. I learned the hard way fifty years ago that all you can reasonably expect is a decision. But fifty years ago it was a mostly unbiased and impartial one.

Today at the federal level that’s an ongoing war. A war because we do still have honorable people in power — but they are outnumbered and outfunded, all the way to the very top. It’s a stacked deck.

And lastly, perhaps the most ambiguous but most important — The American Way.

When you’re ten years old watching the Mickey Mouse Club, Superman, Zorro, Father Knows Best and the rest, the American Way seems perfectly clear. We were strong. We were proud. We had clear cut enemies. At school we were told to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance with pride, and when the air raid sirens went off we got under our desks — as if that would actually do any good. But it made us feel safe.

We had presidents who built America. Eisenhower chose highways over rail because he saw how disabling rail lines stopped troop movements. He should have prioritized both. JFK, with all his faults, still told us that our strength was to stand together and build a great nation. Not a monument.

Sometime after that I took a break. I married, I divorced, I had children — not necessarily in that order. I raised families. I now have grandchildren. I learned how to build businesses and was part of the great technological revolution — time spent at gin joints like Tektronix, Intel, my own consulting and more.

And when I stopped and took a breath, I looked around and saw an America that had become super wealthy and gone to hell at the same time.

So I ask you — by today’s standards, what is the American Way?

The Long View From 1964

YouTube player

Adventures of superman

A War Being Run By the Second String

I was in the Army Corps of Engineers for six years. Sounds impressive. I must know my stuff.

YouTube player

Let me tell you war stories. Let me show you my tattoos. Let me regale you with heroics that will make you swoon. I will lead into battle and command troops like no other. Just look at me — a true American hero. All you have to do is be stupid enough to believe me.

Now for the truth.

Yes, I was in the Army for six years. Yes, I was trained as a Pioneer Combat Engineer. Yes, I was taught to clear minefields with a bayonet, build bridges between our infantry and theirs, and duck when the bullets screamed by.

But what wasn’t said — what never gets said by people like me — is that I enlisted right after my 17th birthday, still in high school, in the California National Guard. November 1963. Monthly Guard meetings until graduation, then off to basic training at Fort Ord.

For anyone who went through basic training, you know the first thing they try to do is intimidate, confuse, and disorient you. That’s a pretty hard thing to accomplish when you and your brother had the run of the base because your father had been the East Garrison Commander — but that’s another story.

Basic done. Off to Fort Leonard Wood for advanced training. Back by Christmas. Monthly meetings. First summer camp and we had the Watts Riots — not nice, but afterwards a walk in the park.

Why? Because I did the worst thing you can do in the military. I volunteered.

During monthly meetings there isn’t much to do except clean things. So when they needed a cook I raised my hand. I like to cook. Every summer camp afterward, instead of going to the desert and sleeping in the dirt, I went to Camp San Luis Obispo and cooked for the California Military Academy. Didn’t ride in a deuce and a half for 200 miles — I drove my ’48 MG TC and later my ’68 Plymouth GTX. Rough six years. Great war stories — catching flies and drag racing up the main entrance.

I tell you all of this for one reason.

The people who tell you heroic war stories are liars. The people who actually saw the horrors of war keep it to themselves. My father served in the Pacific, was stationed in Japan, served in Korea, was stationed in Germany. My brother’s National Guard unit was one of the very few activated and sent to Vietnam. I had close friends drafted who went. None of them ever told me war stories. And I never asked.

I also tell you this because I know what I am talking about. I am an Army brat — born and bred. And I know BS when I smell it.

You don’t have to be Rambo. You just have to be honest with and about yourself.

Which is why I am bothered — genuinely, deeply bothered — when a Fox News broadcaster covered in tattoos has the unmitigated gall to believe he has the experience and wisdom to lead our fine service personnel into battle.

He is such a leader that his spiritual pep talks are plagiarized from Tarantino movies.

Perhaps that explains why Major General William Green Jr., Army Chief of Chaplains, was fired in April 2026. He may have thought the Bible was a better source for scripture than Pulp Fiction.

He wasn’t alone. Here is what the first string looks like after the second string finished with it:

General Randy George, Army Chief of Staff — removed and asked to retire, April 2026, following disputes with Hegseth. Major General William Green Jr., Army Chief of Chaplains — fired — the first time in history this role was terminated by the Secretary of Defense. General David Hodne — removed from command of the Transformation and Training Command. General C.Q. Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs — fired. General James Slife, Air Force Vice Chief of Staff — removed. Admiral Lisa Franchetti, Chief of Naval Operations — fired. Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse, Defense Intelligence Agency — fired.

The first string was either fired or asked to resign. What we have left is the second string. At best.

And at the very top — bone spurs and all — a man now talking about bringing back firing squads because he finds other people’s free speech inconvenient. Only his own has value.

Pete’s Crusader Cross tattoo is going to look real interesting sagging off an eighty year old man’s bitch tits in about twenty years. But that’s the least of our problems right now.

We have the second string running the show.

Makes you proud to be an American, doesn’t it?

A clarification worth making. Every incoming president replaces cabinet members. That is normal, expected, and appropriate. The president’s political appointees serve at the president’s pleasure and a new administration brings new priorities.

What is not normal — what career military officers and national security experts have described as unprecedented — is the systematic purge of decorated senior military leadership based on personal loyalty rather than performance or strategic need. Previous presidents fired specific generals for specific cause. Truman fired MacArthur for public insubordination. Bush replaced commanders in Iraq as part of a documented strategic shift.

Firing more than a dozen four star generals and admirals — including the first woman to lead the Navy, the second Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency days after his agency contradicted the president’s claims — is a different thing entirely.

That is not transition. That is the second string replacing the first string because the first string wouldn’t salute the right person.

Signal

The Ash Didn’t Disappear

I was seven years old, an American officer’s son, when I walked through Dachau.

YouTube player

I remember the ovens. I remember the showers. I remember the stains still on the walls. I remember the ash piles,  this was 1954, nine years after liberation, and the ash still hadn’t disappeared. It had not yet soaked completely into the dirt.

If you think seven years old is too young to remember something like that, you don’t know a child whose memory is a video recorder without an erase feature.

As I grew older I could never understand how the German people had allowed it to happen. How ordinary men and women watched it unfold and did nothing. How a civilization that produced Beethoven and Goethe looked away while the ovens ran.

I am getting a better understanding these days.

Ignorance and apathy go a long way. Distance from history plays a large role as well. And the road has to stretch far enough that the people who remember are gone before the circle closes.

But not all of us are gone.

My father was stationed in postwar Germany, Army Corps of Engineers officially. When you read through his documents as an adult he appears to have played larger roles — why else would his pancreatic cancer have been attributed to White Sands testing? He was 6’2″, quiet, decorated. Purple Hearts. Bronze Star. Never talked about any of it.

Dachau was probably a Saturday or Sunday outing. Dad, Mom, my brother and I. Before the monuments, before the cleanup, before the ash was removed or fully absorbed. Just the ovens and the showers and the stains and the silence of a place where the horror was still present enough to touch.

We went home afterward. I honestly don’t remember if we were still driving the 1951 red Ford convertible my mother had bought when my father turned his back and left for Germany, or the new 1955 Austin Healey,  all red, red leather, red top. Either way there were four of us, none of us small, a full sized long haired dachshund, and a very little car touring a lot of postwar Germany. One of us boys on the padded hump, the other between Mom’s legs, the dog on the floorboard. I don’t remember any of us complaining much.

But I am drifting from what brought me here.

A brief history is in order.

On February 27, 1933, the German Reichstag building burned. Within hours Hitler’s government blamed the Communists. The following day the Reichstag Fire Decree suspended civil liberties across Germany. Within weeks political opponents were being arrested for using their voices to warn about the man in power.

Whether the fire was set by the Nazis themselves remains disputed. What is not disputed is what they did with it. The crisis,  real or manufactured,  became the mechanism. The emergency became the justification. And by the time people understood what was happening the machinery was already running.

We don’t need to know who fired the shots at the White House Correspondents Dinner. What matters is what came immediately after.

The White House Press Secretary,  who by any reasonable standard should have been on maternity leave,  delivered remarks that directly attacked the First Amendment. What we say going forward will not be treated as political commentary. It will be treated as slander. As sedition.

This was delivered shortly after the Department of Justice had been instructed to explore reinstating firing squads as a form of capital punishment.

I am not speculating about the shooting. I am not attributing motive. I am simply observing the sequence. Crisis. Immediate response. Threats against speech. Escalating consequences for dissent.

I have seen this sequence before.

Not in a textbook. In the dirt. In the ash that hadn’t yet disappeared nine years after the fact.

We look at history as a linear line. We open the textbook at the beginning and work forward to where we are standing. But I cannot help feeling, standing on this hill in time and looking at that line from the side, that it has taken a detour and made a circle back onto itself.

The problem is that the road stretched far enough that most of the people who would recognize the circle have died.

But not all of us.

I walked through Dachau at eight years old. The ash was still there.

I am still here too.

And I remember everything.

Image (18)

Your Grandchildren Will Search Your Name

A plea to those who still have a choice

YouTube player

I want to be honest with you about something.

When I watch the bulldozer move through what took three hundred years to build, my first response is physical. Not political. Physical. The kind of nausea that arrives when you watch something irreplaceable disappear and understand with complete clarity that it is not coming back.

I am not writing this to attack you. I am writing this because I think you may not have fully considered what you are standing in the middle of.

The Oval Office is not his. The Smithsonian is not his. The murals on the walls of federal buildings painted by artists who lived through the Depression and rendered that American moment in pigment on plaster — not his. He is a temporary tenant. You are helping him renovate a historic property he does not own and cannot replace.

Ask yourself a simple question. What has he actually built?

Hotels. Golf courses. And a long list of ventures driven into bankruptcy. Contractors unpaid. Partners abandoned. Institutions that trusted him left holding the debt while he moved to the next project.

We are the next project.

But here is what I really want you to consider this morning over your coffee.

It is not only our heritage being dismantled. It is yours. Your children’s. Your grandchildren’s. The America being hollowed out and redecorated as a monument to a man who has never successfully monumentalized anything — that is the America your family lives in too. The portfolio may grow. But you will not be able to spend it in the country that remains when this is finished.

And look to your right. Not politics — direction.

Look at Bondi. Look at what she has become. Look at Patel. Look at Hegseth — a man who had every opportunity to be taken seriously and is now a cautionary footnote. Look at what proximity to this man does to the people who believed they were using him and discovered the arrangement only works one direction.

Do you believe you are different? Do you believe you are smarter than they were? More careful? Better positioned to emerge intact?

History is not waiting to render its verdict. It is writing right now. Your name is going into it in real time. Your grandchildren will search for you and find exactly what you are doing today preserved perfectly and permanently.

No bankruptcy protection covers that.

Here is the thing about three hundred years of American political heritage. It is embarrassingly short by the standards of human civilization. Europe has a thousand years of preserved darkness and beauty both — they kept it not because it was comfortable but because they understood you cannot know where you are going without knowing where you came from. We have a fraction of that. A snap of the fingers. And in that brief moment we built something that the world used as a model even when it disagreed with us.

That is what is being bulldozed.

Not to build something better. To build a monument to a man whose monuments have a consistent history of ending in court.

You are in the room. You still have a choice that most of us don’t have. We can vote, we can write, we can refuse the checkbox that no longer fits — and we will. But you can do something more immediate.

You can slow the bulldozer.

Not for us. For yourself. For the verdict already being written. For the grandchildren who will search your name and find today staring back at them.

Is the portfolio worth that?

I am asking honestly. Not as your enemy. As someone who has been paying attention for a very long time and has watched enough history to know how these particular stories end.

The gold can be removed from the walls. The statesman’s office can be restored. Exhibits can be returned. Murals can be uncovered if they are not first destroyed.

But only if someone in the room decides that their own legacy matters more than their current proximity to his.

You know who you are.

Assholegrandpa