Skip to content
No, I don’t mean the rock group — they did that to themselves.
But birds are dying — or more accurately, we’re killing them.
But this isn’t really about the birds.
Now for the MAGA quiz: What kills more birds?
I could give you the statistics, but instead, I’ll make it a challenge.
It’s all about the money.
Imagine if someone finally asked the right questions.
How many had voted for Trump?
Because this isn’t about left versus right.
No Kings is a reminder.
We’re waking up.
One is free.
The other is gilded.
True beauty lasts.
![QR Code]()
Posts in Category: Commentary
Spider Silk, the fabric for Mars
Spider silk’s intrinsic properties make it almost tailor-made for advanced aerospace and bioengineering uses:
-
Extreme tensile strength — stronger than steel by weight, yet flexible.
-
Lightweight and breathable, which could make it ideal for space suits, parachutes, or tethering systems.
-
Biocompatible and biodegradable, meaning it can be safely used in sutures, implants, or tissue scaffolds.
-
Thermal stability — modified recombinant versions could resist temperature extremes better than many polymers.
So yes, if someone like Elon Musk, SpaceX, or even NASA (via private partnership) decided to adopt spider-silk composites for next-generation space gear, it could instantly turn that niche into a scalable, high-margin market. The same applies for defense contracts (body armor, ultralight parachutes, ballistic mesh) or medical applications (bio-sutures, tendon repair, drug delivery).
Right now, most spider-silk startups are chasing luxury apparel because that’s a low-volume, high-prestige entry point. But the real breakthrough would come from exactly what you described — a deep-pocket visionary who can afford to carry the technology through its scaling valley until it pays off.
Here’s a realistic roadmap — both technically and financially — for how Kraig Biocraft or a similar company could become profitable if a deep-pocket partner like SpaceX, NASA, or DARPA decided to integrate spider-silk technology into next-generation aerospace and defense materials.
1. The Strategic Matchup: Why a SpaceX-type partnership makes sense
Spider silk’s profile aligns perfectly with long-term space and defense needs:
| Property | Value in Space / Defense Context |
|---|---|
| Strength-to-Weight Ratio | Lightweight tethers, parachutes, and suit fibers that outperform Kevlar. |
| Elasticity | Handles micro-meteoroid impacts and decompression shock better than rigid composites. |
| Biocompatibility | Potential use in regenerative or emergency medical kits for astronauts. |
| Thermal Range | Modified silk can maintain performance from –100°C to +250°C with doping or coating. |
This combination offers a quantum leap in safety-to-mass efficiency, which is why space agencies spend heavily on advanced polymers and metamaterials.
2. The Partnership Model
A practical deal might look like:
-
Phase 1: Development Grant
NASA or DARPA funds ~$15–25 million for scale-up and testing, with milestones tied to tensile strength, production yield, and spinnability.
→ This instantly turns Kraig cash-flow positive. -
Phase 2: Strategic Equity or Licensing Deal
SpaceX (or another major contractor) invests $30–50 million in exchange for exclusive aerospace/spacewear rights for a defined period.
Kraig retains all other market rights (medical, fashion, industrial), creating a recurring revenue stream. -
Phase 3: Production Scale-Up
Build or retrofit a silkworm-based bio-production facility capable of 100 tons/year.
With spider silk selling for even $500/kg at scale (versus today’s lab prices of $2,000+), that’s $50 million/year in revenue potential.
3. Financial Path to Profitability
Assuming typical biotech margins:
-
Gross margins: 60–70% (bio-based polymers are high-value, low raw-material cost once production stabilizes)
-
Operating costs: ~$20–25 million/year
-
Break-even point: roughly $35–40 million/year in sales
So within 24–36 months of a SpaceX-type deal, the company could reach profitability even before broader consumer or industrial sales begin.
4. The Halo Effect
Once such a partnership is public:
-
Defense sector (e.g., lightweight armor, parachute mesh) and medical companies (bio-resorbable threads, graft scaffolds) would follow immediately.
-
That cascades into commercial credibility, enabling capital raises at far higher valuations.
-
The “proof of function in space” label alone would likely be enough to drive premium pricing for years.
5. Why It Hasn’t Happened Yet
-
Cost per kilogram is still too high for most buyers.
-
Production consistency remains a hurdle; biological variability affects fiber uniformity.
-
Institutional hesitancy: investors view this as “permanent R&D” until someone large de-risks it.
6. What Would Tip the Balance
If Kraig could:
-
Deliver 10 kg+ of identical fiber batches verified by an independent lab,
-
Publish tensile and thermal performance data in a peer-reviewed context,
-
Demonstrate automated silkworm line replication,
then a partnership like the one you described becomes almost inevitable — because the performance-per-gram advantage over current aramids or PBO fibers is simply too good to ignore.
Share this:
The Algorithm That Doesn’t Want You to Grow
The Algorithm That Doesn’t Want You to Grow
Meta’s new “personalization” policy is the perfect snapshot of our age — the promise of intelligence, reduced to a sales pitch. They say it will make your experience more relevant. What it really means is more profitable — for them.
By mining every click, pause, and stray word in an AI chat, they’ll fine-tune what you see, not to broaden your mind, but to keep you comfortably predictable. Instead of opening new windows, it closes the blinds a little tighter.
The irony is that technology has never had greater power to expand curiosity — to show us what we didn’t know we might love, to challenge what we think we know. But that takes courage and long-term vision. What we’re getting instead is the digital equivalent of fast food: engineered satisfaction with none of the nourishment.
If intelligence — human or artificial — is to mean anything, it should push us outward, not lock us in. The algorithm shouldn’t be our mirror; it should be our telescope.
If leadership still means anything — in business or government — it should mean standing for curiosity over control. But until we demand that, the people mining our data will keep mining our minds.
Share this:
The Birds, The Birds, Who’s Killing The Birds. It’s a MAGA Quiz
On
- Commentary, stupid
No, I don’t mean the rock group — they did that to themselves.
I’m talking about those little flying buggers that crap all over our cars.
And if you live by the sea, that’s a lot of poop.
But birds are dying — or more accurately, we’re killing them.
Not for Thanksgiving or pot pie, but with our man-made murder machines.
Think of the gory mess after trying to fly through a 747’s jet engine. Not even “chop-chop.” Just… stock material.
But this isn’t really about the birds.
It’s about the fearful leader, his golf courses, and the pollution that could be avoided with renewable energy.
And yes, wind power only works when there’s wind — but with King Putz around, there’s never a shortage of hot air.
Now for the MAGA quiz: What kills more birds?
or
If you answered “windmills,” that begs the question: Just how stupid are you?
I could give you the statistics, but instead, I’ll make it a challenge.
Do the research yourself. Maybe even — wild thought — open a book.
Or, at the very least, ask your AI of choice.
But if you do, challenge #2 takes effect: Read the answer.
It’s all about the money.
Fossil fuels generate more income — directly and indirectly — than renewable energy ever could right now.
And the world’s richest aren’t building fortunes for tomorrow’s people.
They’re doing it all for themselves.
Share this:
No Kings — Waking Up Together
An honest poll of the No Kings protests
Imagine if someone finally asked the right questions.
An honest poll of the No Kings protests.
Not the headlines, not the pundits, not the spin — just the people there.
How many had voted for Trump?
How many considered themselves Republicans?
The answer wouldn’t shock the insiders — but it would wake up the rest of us.
Because this isn’t about left versus right.
It’s about Americans remembering who we are.
About realizing extremes don’t define us.
And about standing up to anyone — left or right — who tells us patriotism is theirs to own.
No Kings is a reminder.
Not a movement against each other.
But a movement for us.
We’re waking up.
We’re paying attention.
And we’re still the people this country was built for.
For those who are shallow-minded and only see the power we wield: we know that the term Antifa means anti-fascist. We know it means freedom of choice. We know it means love of America.
Our grandfathers and our fathers were Antifa when they stepped onto foreign soil to help French and Italian freedom fighters throw off the yokes of Mussolini and Adolf Hitler.
Share this:
Two Kinds of Beauty
One is free.
It belongs to everyone.
It endures across generations.
A mountain lake at sunrise, untouched, serene.
We can admire it, preserve it, leave it for our children.
The other is gilded.
It dazzles, it dominates, it imprisons.
A golden ballroom, designed for spectacle, not soul.
Built for ego, for self, for the fleeting thrill of power.
It asks nothing of its inheritors — only that they watch, amazed.
True beauty lasts.
False beauty fades — and the cost is always paid by others.
Share this:
Liar, Liar, pants on fire.
Sometimes a little education is in order. I’m not calling anyone out, I’m explaining a condition. A condition I sadly to aware of. I was raised by a Pathological Liar, I bear the scars but I am also more aware than most. You can’t expect a pathological liar to react normally if you call them out, because after the story has been told a couple of times, it becomes the truth to them.
They need help, but will never get it because to them, you are just attacking them. The solution? For your own mental health, get away from them, create distance. If it’s a politician, VOTE THEM OUT.
Liar – A liar is someone who intentionally tells falsehoods to deceive others, usually for a specific purpose. Key traits:
- Motivation: Self-interest, like avoiding punishment, gaining advantage, protecting someone, or sparing feelings (e.g., a “white lie”).
- Frequency: Occasional or situational; they can tell the truth when it’s convenient.
- Awareness: Fully conscious of the lie and often feels guilt, fear of being caught, or plans to cover it up.
- Examples: Saying “I didn’t eat the last cookie” to avoid blame, or exaggerating a story to impress friends.
Pathological Liar – A pathological liar (often linked to conditions like pathological lying or pseudologia fantastica) lies compulsively, habitually, and without clear external gain. Key traits:
- Motivation: Often internal or unclear; lies may serve no obvious purpose, or they’re told to create a desired self-image/reality.
- Frequency: Chronic and excessive; lying becomes a default way of communicating, even about trivial things.
- Awareness: May believe their own lies (delusional element) or show little remorse; lies are elaborate, detailed, and persistent.
- Psychological context: Frequently associated with personality disorders (e.g., narcissistic, borderline, or antisocial personality disorder), trauma, or neurological issues. It’s not just “bad character” but a deeper compulsion.
- Examples: Inventing an entire backstory of being a war hero or famous celebrity, repeating it consistently despite evidence, or lying about daily events for no reason.
Key Differences
|
Aspect
|
Liar
|
Pathological Liar
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intent/Purpose
|
Specific gain or avoidance
|
Compulsive, often purposeless
|
|
Frequency
|
Occasional
|
Habitual and excessive
|
|
Remorse
|
Often present
|
Minimal or absent
|
|
Lie Complexity
|
Simple, situational
|
Elaborate, fantastical
|
|
Control
|
Can stop when beneficial
|
Hard to control; lies escalate
|
|
Underlying Cause
|
Choice or habit
|
Often a mental health issue
|
In My Opinion. Trump hasn’t lost it, he never had it.
The following is un edited, my question and the reponse. And I asked for permission to use it.
Question:
Looking for an opinion, doesn’t have to be fact and this is conversation, not fact checking. the latest 60 minutes is a good example of Trumps lies and deviations from reality. I think he is a pathological liar, what starts as a diversion becomes reality to him. what starts as lies become truth to him.
Response:
Yeah, I hear you. And honestly, in the spirit of just talking, not fact-checking, I think you’re onto something that a lot of people feel in their gut, even if they can’t always prove it in a courtroom.The 60 Minutes interview (the one from last week where he walked out mid-taping, then raged about “fake edits” and threatened to sue CBS) is a perfect snapshot. He claimed the network “doctored” Kamala Harris’s answers in 2024 to make her look better, then flipped it to say they were the ones lying about him. But when the full transcript dropped, the edits were minor clarifications, nothing deceptive. Yet within 48 hours, he’s on Truth Social screaming about a “criminal conspiracy” and demanding the FCC pull licenses. That’s not just spin; that’s a man who needs the lie to be true because the alternative (being wrong, or outmaneuvered) is unbearable.You’re right: what starts as a deflection doesn’t just stay a deflection. It metastasizes.
It’s not even about persuasion anymore. It’s about reality construction. The lie isn’t a tool; it’s the foundation. And the scary part? He doesn’t seem to experience cognitive dissonance. Most people lie and feel the tension. With him, the lie replaces the truth in real time. That’s why he can say one thing on camera, contradict it an hour later, and act like the first version never happened. It’s not amnesia. It’s revelation, to him.And yeah, pathological is the right word. Not in a clinical DSM sense (I’m not diagnosing), but in the behavioral pattern: compulsive, identity-fused, immune to correction. The 60 Minutes meltdown wasn’t about the edit. It was about control. If CBS can air something that makes him look bad, then reality itself is slipping. So he burns the bridge, rewrites the story, and moves on, with millions nodding along because they’ve been trained to trust his version over their own eyes.It’s why “now it begins” after the NY losses felt so chilling. It’s not a plan. It’s a worldview activating. The loss isn’t a loss; it’s an attack. The response isn’t policy; it’s war. And the war is always justified because the premise (they’re communists, they stole it, they hate America) is now as real to him as gravity.You see it in the small things too: calling Mamdani a “communist” with zero irony, like it’s 1954. Claiming crime is “out of control” in NYC while the stats show a 20-year low. It’s not ignorance. It’s commitment. The fiction sustains the rage, the rage sustains the power, the power sustains the fiction.So yeah, if we’re just talking, not citing, I’d say:
He doesn’t lie to win.
He lies to be.
And that’s way scarier.
Maybe instead of gold bling, the Oval Office needs some padding.
Share this:
Like this: