Halligan: Yes, there’s a real risk. The bar complaint is serious, and the judge’s rebuke strengthens the case that her prosecutorial conduct was not just sloppy but may have violated foundational legal standards (grand jury procedure, prosecutorial ethics). If the bar investigation finds deliberate misconduct, disbarment or suspension is possible.
Bondi: The ethics complaint here is broader — less about a single prosecutorial act and more about her leadership and influence. Disbarment is less obviously imminent compared to Halligan, but she could face professional discipline if the Florida Bar decides there was a pattern of “ethically problematic” behavior. Whether that becomes disbarment or something less depends a lot on how the Bar views intent, frequency, and severity.
Bottom Line (Right Now)
Yes, both Halligan and Bondi are under serious scrutiny, legally and ethically.
The allegations are significant, especially for Halligan: abuse of power, potential violation of appointment law, and prosecutorial misconduct.
But disbarment is not guaranteed — it’s a process. These are allegations and complaints, not final bar rulings.
There are also ongoing legal challenges: Comey’s lawyers have argued Halligan’s appointment is invalid, which could lead to dismissals of the indictments if the court agrees. CBS News
A lot depends on the outcomes of:
The bar investigations (Florida and Virginia)
The court’s rulings on the legality of Halligan’s appointment
Whether her prosecutorial decisions will stand up under scrutiny
Comments are Disabled