Alliance build 8/13/2025
What If: Sovereignty Alliance
Episode 1 — The First Sparks
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Summary
On June 14, 2026, Congress passed the National Resource Security Act (NRSA), a sweeping federal measure granting Washington emergency powers to control “critical state-managed resources” — including water rights, energy production, and key agricultural outputs. Framed as a national response to global supply shortages, the bill passed narrowly after a late-night session and was signed within hours.
Initial Reactions
-
California — Governor announces the law “tramples state constitutional protections and environmental safeguards,” vowing to explore all legal options to block it.
-
Texas — Governor calls it “an outright seizure of private contracts and state economic lifeblood,” ordering state agencies to halt compliance until further review.
-
Market Response — Energy futures surge 8% overnight. California agricultural co-ops warn of “instant chaos” if water distribution shifts to federal control.
Unconfirmed Developments (June 15–20)
-
Multiple sources report quiet backchannel communications between California Attorney General Melissa Cortez and Texas Attorney General Brandon Hale, exploring joint legal action under the 10th Amendment.
-
Political operatives note that both states, despite being ideological opposites, are framing this as an issue of state sovereignty, not policy preference.
-
Federal briefings suggest White House advisors are “monitoring closely for signs of multi-state coordination.”
The Breaking Point (June 22)
In a joint press conference unprecedented in modern U.S. politics, the governors of California and Texas stood side-by-side in Sacramento to announce the formation of the Sovereignty Alliance — an interstate coalition to resist enforcement of the NRSA.
“We disagree on nearly everything. But we agree on this: No president, no Congress, has the right to seize the core economic engines of our states without consent,”
— Governor Reynolds (TX)
“If they can take our water, they can take your oil. If they can take your oil, they can take anyone’s freedom to govern themselves,”
— Governor Martinez (CA)
Next Steps
-
Alliance Invitation — Both governors have invited “any state valuing its sovereignty” to join the coalition.
-
Legal Offensive — Coordinated lawsuits to be filed in the 5th and 9th Circuit Courts within 72 hours.
-
Political Shockwaves — Early reports indicate interest from Oregon, Oklahoma, and Louisiana.
Analyst Note
The NRSA was intended as an emergency economic stabilizer. Instead, it has triggered the most unlikely alliance in modern political memory. Whether this remains symbolic or grows into a true multi-state front will depend on the next two weeks.
POTENTIAL RISK LEVEL: Elevated — structural political challenge to federal authority emerging.
What If: Sovereignty Alliance
Episode 2 — The First Wave Joins
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Summary
Following the joint declaration by California and Texas on June 22, the political aftershocks have accelerated. Within 72 hours, three additional states formally joined the Sovereignty Alliance, each citing distinct threats to their own autonomy under the National Resource Security Act (NRSA).
June 24–26: Early Expansion
Oregon
Governor Diane Keating declared, “The federal government has no authority to dictate water allocations that were settled by interstate compacts decades ago.” Oregon’s agricultural sector depends heavily on existing agreements with California and Washington — agreements now superseded by NRSA mandates.
Oklahoma
Governor Thomas Whitfield, standing with oil executives in Tulsa, warned of “federal confiscation by another name,” accusing Washington of “treating energy states as colonies.”
Louisiana
Governor Paul Delacroix argued that offshore drilling rights belong to the state, not the Department of Energy. He authorized the Louisiana State Police to “secure all critical facilities” against federal agents pending court rulings.
Coordinated Legal Offensive (Filed June 25)
Case 1 — 5th Circuit: State of Texas et al. v. United States — Asserts NRSA violates the 10th Amendment by commandeering state resources without consent.
Case 2 — 9th Circuit: State of California et al. v. United States — Adds environmental law violations, claiming NRSA illegally overrides state-level ecological protections.
Both suits request immediate injunctions to halt NRSA enforcement.
Federal Response (June 27)
The White House issued Executive Directive 2026-14, ordering federal marshals to “ensure uninterrupted operation” of facilities designated as critical under the NRSA.
Department of Justice warns that “state interference” with federal operations will result in prosecution.
Federal Energy Authority confirms “temporary federal stewardship” of two oil refineries in Texas and one water pumping station in California.
Escalation Indicators
State Security Mobilization — Louisiana and Oklahoma authorize state police to “escort” federal agents off certain sites.
Resource Redirection — California begins diverting water shipments to Oregon and Washington under an “Alliance Compact,” ignoring federal allocation orders.
Public Messaging Shift — Alliance governors begin framing the NRSA as “the first step toward full economic federalization.”
Analyst Note
The pace of expansion suggests the Alliance is gaining momentum faster than Washington anticipated. By framing the conflict around sovereignty rather than ideology, they are attracting both conservative and progressive states with vulnerable resource sectors. The federal government’s decision to physically take control of facilities marks a dangerous inflection point.
POTENTIAL RISK LEVEL: High — physical confrontations between state and federal authorities increasingly likely.
What If: Sovereignty Alliance
Episode 3 — The First Confrontations
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Summary
By early July 2026, the Sovereignty Alliance had grown to six states: California, Texas, Oregon, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Washington. With federal enforcement orders in motion, the first direct confrontations between Alliance authorities and federal agents are underway.
July 2–5: Federal Moves and State Counters
Texas Refinery Standoff
Federal Energy Authority teams attempt to take control of two major Texas refineries.
Texas Department of Public Safety units, under Governor Reynolds’ orders, block access roads.
Local law enforcement is explicitly instructed not to cooperate with federal marshals.
Media reports show heavily armed security perimeters; tension escalates but no shots fired.
California Water Stations
Federal engineers arrive at pumping stations in Central Valley.
California Department of Water Resources deploys state security and technical crews to reroute water flows to Alliance-approved channels.
Engineers report being unable to operate under federal directives.
Alliance Messaging and Coordination
Governors hold a joint televised press conference:
“We are not declaring war on the United States; we are defending the sovereignty guaranteed to our citizens. Federal overreach will not stand.”
Social media accounts affiliated with the Alliance report real-time updates of resource redirections and security deployments.
Early polling in Alliance states shows 65–70% public support for defiance of federal orders.
Federal Response
DOJ issues criminal warnings against individual Alliance officials interfering with federal operations.
President publicly labels the Alliance actions as “unconstitutional obstruction,” pledging that federal authority will be maintained.
Strategic advisors debate National Guard deployment, but federal leadership hesitates due to potential political fallout and the risk of violent escalation.
Critical Incidents
Oregon–Washington Water Transfer — Alliance trucks redirect federally-allocated water to northern farms. Federal officials threaten fines and arrests.
Louisiana Port Watch — State police secure key shipping channels, preventing federal inspectors from accessing offshore platforms.
Media Amplification — Alliance begins framing incidents as citizens vs. Washington, increasing national attention and pressure on Congress.
Analyst Note
The Alliance is testing the boundaries of federal authority without initiating armed conflict, relying on legal cover and physical presence. The situation is delicate: a misstep by either side could escalate into violence. Coordination between ideologically diverse states suggests a shared recognition that sovereignty is a unifying cause in this specific context.
POTENTIAL RISK LEVEL: Very High — next moves could trigger violent standoffs or force federal negotiation.
What If: Sovereignty Alliance
Episode 4 — Trigger Month Begins
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Summary
July 15, 2026 marks the beginning of the trigger month, when federal enforcement intensifies and the Sovereignty Alliance begins its coordinated countermeasures in full. The Alliance now controls critical resource infrastructure across multiple states and is actively resisting federal seizure orders.
July 15–20: Federal Escalation
National Guard Contingency Orders
Federal National Guard units are placed on alert to secure disputed sites in Texas, California, and Louisiana.
Orders emphasize “non-lethal enforcement,” but stress readiness for rapid deployment.
White House public messaging warns that “failure to comply with federal law may result in removal of state officials from office.”
Economic Shockwaves
Oil futures spike due to Texas refinery standoff.
California water redirection causes crop disruptions in federal-designated agricultural zones.
Louisiana port delays create temporary shortages of imported goods in eastern U.S. markets.
Alliance Countermoves
Day 1: Joint Communications
Governors issue a public declaration: “We are prepared to defend our citizens’ livelihoods while avoiding unnecessary violence.”
Alliance coordination centers established in Sacramento and Austin, linking state emergency management offices.
Day 3: Interstate Compacts in Action
Texas & Oklahoma redirect energy exports to Alliance states.
California, Oregon, and Washington reroute water flows to protect local agriculture.
Louisiana maintains port security, effectively controlling offshore export channels.
Day 5: Legal Blitz
5th and 9th Circuit Courts issue temporary injunctions halting some federal actions, citing immediate economic harm.
Alliance attorneys file a consolidated appeal in the Supreme Court, arguing 10th Amendment and interstate compact protections.
Public Messaging & Perception
Alliance spins the standoff as “citizen-first governance,” appealing to both conservative and progressive constituencies.
Federal messaging warns of economic consequences but avoids labeling Alliance states as “rebellious” to prevent political fallout.
Early polling: Alliance approval holds at 60–65%, with strongest support among farmers, energy workers, and water-dependent communities.
Critical Incidents
Texas Refinery Lockdown — State police and private security maintain physical control, preventing federal engineers from assuming operations.
California Water Transfer Surge — Emergency rerouting prevents federal allocation; downstream crops survive, proving Alliance operational effectiveness.
Louisiana Port Stand — Federal inspectors delayed for 48 hours; Alliance publicly posts real-time updates, framing Washington as “overreaching.”
Analyst Note
The trigger month has begun with high-stakes maneuvering but no armed conflict.
The Alliance is demonstrating organizational capacity, legal defensibility, and public messaging savvy.
Federal authorities are testing options: financial penalties, legal injunctions, and limited National Guard mobilization.
Risks remain extremely high — miscommunication or a violent incident could escalate into a full national crisis.
POTENTIAL RISK LEVEL: Extreme — very narrow window to de-escalate before violent confrontation becomes possible.
What If: Sovereignty Alliance
Episode 5 — Escalation and Expansion
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Summary
Late July 2026 sees the Sovereignty Alliance expanding and testing the limits of federal authority. The Alliance now controls major resource hubs, and federal leadership is under pressure to respond without sparking nationwide violence.
July 21–25: Alliance Expansion
New States Join
New York — Governor announces participation, citing economic autonomy and precedent-setting federal overreach.
Wyoming & North Dakota — Energy-producing states join, leveraging oil, gas, and mineral exports as strategic leverage.
Arizona — Joins over water-rights concerns stemming from Colorado River reallocation.
Effect: The Alliance now spans coast-to-coast, with key agricultural, energy, and water resources under coordinated state control.
July 22: First Physical Confrontations
Texas Refinery Incident
Federal agents attempt to enter a refinery under court injunction.
Texas state police and private security form human barricades; scuffles occur, no fatalities reported.
Media livestreams amplify the confrontation, showing federal authority being physically challenged for the first time.
California Water Diversions
Federal engineers dispatched to monitor dams are physically blocked by Alliance crews rerouting water.
Engineers attempt to override state controls remotely; state IT specialists counteract within hours.
Louisiana Port Blockade
Federal inspectors attempting to board ships are detained temporarily by state police; released after legal consultation.
The incident prompts national debate about “federal overreach vs. state rights.”
Federal Response
DOJ escalates criminal warnings; some federal officers request clarity on engagement rules.
White House debates limited National Guard deployment to enforce NRSA, balancing risk of political backlash.
Emergency Congressional session convened to discuss legal and economic implications.
Alliance Strategy
Central Coordination
Governors convene via secure video conference; daily operational briefings begin.
Alliance establishes resource prioritization protocols to ensure critical services continue while resisting federal orders.
Public Messaging
Alliance frames confrontations as defensive, emphasizing protection of local economies and citizens.
Social media campaigns amplify state autonomy successes, portraying federal attempts as disruptive.
Legal Maneuvering
Supreme Court appeal is expedited; temporary injunctions remain in place but federal leadership pressures lower courts to lift them.
Lawyers across Alliance states prepare contingency briefs for rapid response to any federal escalation.
Analyst Note
The Alliance has moved from symbolic defiance to tangible, high-risk standoffs, testing the limits of federal enforcement.
Risks of miscalculation or accidental injury are rising sharply.
The national spotlight intensifies; every state action is now politically charged.
Federal leadership must balance legal authority with potential backlash — the situation teeters on the edge of a true constitutional crisis.
POTENTIAL RISK LEVEL: Critical — next week likely determines whether de-escalation or full-scale crisis occurs.
What If: Sovereignty Alliance
Episode 5 — Escalation and Expansion
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Summary
Late July 2026 sees the Sovereignty Alliance expanding and testing the limits of federal authority. The Alliance now controls major resource hubs, and federal leadership is under pressure to respond without sparking nationwide violence.
July 21–25: Alliance Expansion
New States Join
New York — Governor announces participation, citing economic autonomy and precedent-setting federal overreach.
Wyoming & North Dakota — Energy-producing states join, leveraging oil, gas, and mineral exports as strategic leverage.
Arizona — Joins over water-rights concerns stemming from Colorado River reallocation.
Effect: The Alliance now spans coast-to-coast, with key agricultural, energy, and water resources under coordinated state control.
July 22: First Physical Confrontations
Texas Refinery Incident
Federal agents attempt to enter a refinery under court injunction.
Texas state police and private security form human barricades; scuffles occur, no fatalities reported.
Media livestreams amplify the confrontation, showing federal authority being physically challenged for the first time.
California Water Diversions
Federal engineers dispatched to monitor dams are physically blocked by Alliance crews rerouting water.
Engineers attempt to override state controls remotely; state IT specialists counteract within hours.
Louisiana Port Blockade
Federal inspectors attempting to board ships are detained temporarily by state police; released after legal consultation.
The incident prompts national debate about “federal overreach vs. state rights.”
Federal Response
DOJ escalates criminal warnings; some federal officers request clarity on engagement rules.
White House debates limited National Guard deployment to enforce NRSA, balancing risk of political backlash.
Emergency Congressional session convened to discuss legal and economic implications.
Alliance Strategy
Central Coordination
Governors convene via secure video conference; daily operational briefings begin.
Alliance establishes resource prioritization protocols to ensure critical services continue while resisting federal orders.
Public Messaging
Alliance frames confrontations as defensive, emphasizing protection of local economies and citizens.
Social media campaigns amplify state autonomy successes, portraying federal attempts as disruptive.
Legal Maneuvering
Supreme Court appeal is expedited; temporary injunctions remain in place but federal leadership pressures lower courts to lift them.
Lawyers across Alliance states prepare contingency briefs for rapid response to any federal escalation.
Analyst Note
The Alliance has moved from symbolic defiance to tangible, high-risk standoffs, testing the limits of federal enforcement.
Risks of miscalculation or accidental injury are rising sharply.
The national spotlight intensifies; every state action is now politically charged.
Federal leadership must balance legal authority with potential backlash — the situation teeters on the edge of a true constitutional crisis.
POTENTIAL RISK LEVEL: Critical — next week likely determines whether de-escalation or full-scale crisis occurs.
What If: Sovereignty Alliance
Episode 6 — Brinkmanship
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Summary
Late July 2026 marks the apex of the trigger month, as federal authorities and the Sovereignty Alliance push toward the edge of a full national confrontation. The Alliance now spans coast-to-coast, controlling key water, energy, and agricultural resources, while Washington deliberates on a high-stakes response.
July 26–31: Heightened Tensions
Texas & Oklahoma Energy Lockdown
Federal National Guard units are deployed near key refineries.
State police, supported by private security, block all federal access points.
Clashes are limited to physical barriers; no lethal force used, but media coverage shows standoffs and tense negotiations.
California & Western Water Defense
Alliance engineers maintain control of water flows from major dams.
Federal attempts to override controls remotely are thwarted by state cybersecurity teams.
Farmers in Oregon and Washington report uninterrupted water supply, strengthening public support.
Louisiana Port Standoff
Federal inspectors attempt to board ships for regulatory checks; Alliance police prevent access.
National media broadcasts images of federal authority being physically resisted — a first in U.S. history.
New Federal Moves
Executive Review
White House and DOJ consider selective asset seizure, but advisers warn it could trigger violent escalation.
National Guard is on standby but restricted to non-lethal enforcement.
Economic Pressure
Federal funds to Alliance states threatened but not fully cut; banking and supply channels remain functional.
Federal messaging emphasizes “legal authority” but begins to acknowledge potential negotiation.
Alliance Coordination
Emergency Council Meetings
Governors and AGs convene daily operational briefings via secure video link.
Resource allocation is adjusted dynamically to prevent shortages in member states.
Legal teams prepare for both Supreme Court rulings and rapid federal countermeasures.
Public Messaging
Alliance emphasizes that “our actions protect citizens, not disrupt them.”
Livestreams and press releases highlight federal attempts to override state law, framing Washington as the aggressor.
Public support in Alliance states holds steady at 60–70%, with some states nearing 75% approval.
Critical Incidents
Texas Refinery Barricades — National Guard units wait outside barricades; standoff continues with no escalation.
California Dams — Federal engineers unable to intervene; Alliance engineers maintain full operational control.
Louisiana Ports — Shipping delays minimal; Alliance maintains functional export/import operations.
Analyst Note
The Sovereignty Alliance has reached its first real test under maximum pressure.
All actions remain within a legal and defensive framework, avoiding violent escalation.
Federal leadership is cautious; a misstep could trigger a constitutional crisis or wider civil unrest.
The Alliance has demonstrated operational capability, legal resilience, and public support at a level Washington did not anticipate.
POTENTIAL RISK LEVEL: Critical — next decisions will determine whether the standoff is resolved, prolonged, or escalates into broader conflict.
What If: Sovereignty Alliance
Episode 7 — Resolution Options
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Summary
August 1, 2026, begins the critical phase in which both federal authorities and the Sovereignty Alliance must decide whether to escalate, negotiate, or de-escalate. After two weeks of standoffs, legal battles, and resource control, public attention is at a peak, and the nation waits to see if compromise or confrontation will prevail.
August 1–7: Federal Deliberations
White House Considerations
Military advisors caution against deploying National Guard or federal troops to enforce NRSA mandates; risk of casualties and political fallout is extreme.
DOJ suggests economic penalties and selective injunctions rather than physical enforcement.
Congress begins emergency hearings to explore legislative compromise.
Federal Messaging
Emphasis on law and order, but toned down to avoid inflaming Alliance states.
Calls for “negotiation over confrontation” start to appear in major speeches and press briefings.
August 2–8: Alliance Strategy
Continued Coordination
Alliance governors maintain daily video briefings to ensure consistent messaging and resource control.
Legal teams focus on Supreme Court appeal, citing 10th Amendment and interstate compact protections.
Public Engagement
Alliance states emphasize citizen-first policies: water flows stabilized, energy deliveries maintained, ports operating.
Media campaigns frame Alliance as responsible stewards of state resources, contrasting with Washington’s heavy-handed mandates.
August 9–14: Negotiation Initiatives
Congressional Mediation
Bipartisan congressional leaders request a joint Alliance–federal negotiation.
Alliance representatives demand:
Repeal or suspension of NRSA mandates.
Federal acknowledgment of state authority over energy, water, and agriculture.
Formal interstate compacts legalized to prevent future unilateral federal overreach.
Federal Offer
White House proposes partial suspension of NRSA, leaving key national security powers intact, but promising consultation with affected states.
Possible Outcomes
1. Negotiated Settlement (Most Likely)
NRSA partially repealed or amended.
Alliance states retain practical control over key resources.
Political compromise framed as “mutual respect for sovereignty.”
2. Prolonged Standoff
Federal authorities maintain threat of enforcement.
Alliance continues legal and logistical defiance.
National tension persists; economy and political climate remain fragile.
3. Constitutional Crisis / Escalation
Miscalculation or accident leads to confrontation at a key resource site.
National Guard and Alliance state forces could clash.
Risk of broader civil unrest and lasting political fracture.
Analyst Note
After nearly a month of coordinated standoffs, the Sovereignty Alliance has demonstrated strategic, operational, and legal capacity to challenge federal authority without triggering mass violence.
The resolution phase will define the precedent for federal-state relations for decades.
Public opinion and economic stability remain the ultimate leverage points; both sides recognize the high cost of escalation.
POTENTIAL RISK LEVEL: Variable — contingent on willingness to negotiate vs. push for hard enforcement.
Episodes 1–7, fully formatted in “confidential brief” style.
Timeline references so you can track events day by day.
Key characters and states for continuity.
Future episode placeholders for Episodes 8–10+ so you can pick up right where you left off.
Here’s the compiled document:
What If: Sovereignty Alliance — Compiled Episodes 1–7
CONFIDENTIAL — INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Key Characters & States
Founding Alliance States:
California (Governor Martinez) — environmental & water sovereignty
Texas (Governor Reynolds) — energy & economic sovereignty
Early Joiners:
Oregon (Governor Keating) — water rights
Oklahoma (Governor Whitfield) — energy & contracts
Louisiana (Governor Delacroix) — offshore drilling rights
Washington (Governor Harper) — water & environmental control
Mid-Stage Joiners:
New York — economic autonomy & federal precedent
Wyoming — energy & mineral resources
North Dakota — energy & farmland sovereignty
Arizona — Colorado River water rights
Episode 1 — The First Sparks
Date: June 14–22, 2026
Summary: Congress passes the NRSA, granting federal control over state-managed critical resources. California and Texas issue separate condemnations, then form the Sovereignty Alliance.
Key Events:
June 14: NRSA passes.
June 15–20: Backchannel communications between CA & TX AGs.
June 22: Public joint declaration forming the Alliance.
Risk Level: Elevated
Episode 2 — The First Wave Joins
Date: June 24–27, 2026
Summary: Oregon, Oklahoma, and Louisiana join the Alliance. Coordinated lawsuits filed; federal warning issued.
Key Events:
June 25: 5th & 9th Circuit lawsuits filed.
June 27: Federal marshals ordered to secure critical facilities.
Risk Level: High
Episode 3 — The First Confrontations
Date: July 2–5, 2026
Summary: First direct confrontations occur at Texas refineries, California dams, and Louisiana ports. No lethal force, but physical resistance and standoffs begin.
Key Events:
Texas refinery standoff with state police.
California water rerouted by Alliance engineers.
Louisiana port security prevents federal inspectors from boarding ships.
Risk Level: Very High
Episode 4 — Trigger Month Begins
Date: July 15–20, 2026
Summary: Full-scale standoff begins. Alliance controls critical resources, federal orders intensify, and economic ripple effects appear.
Key Events:
National Guard placed on alert.
Alliance establishes interstate resource compacts.
Supreme Court appeal initiated.
Risk Level: Extreme
Episode 5 — Escalation and Expansion
Date: July 21–25, 2026
Summary: New states join: New York, Wyoming, North Dakota, Arizona. First physical confrontations occur at refineries, dams, and ports.
Key Events:
Texas refinery barricades.
California dams controlled by Alliance engineers.
Louisiana ports remain under state security.
Risk Level: Critical
Episode 6 — Brinkmanship
Date: July 26–31, 2026
Summary: The Alliance faces maximum federal pressure; standoffs continue nationwide.
Key Events:
Texas & Oklahoma energy lockdowns.
California & Western water defense.
Louisiana port standoffs continue.
Risk Level: Critical
Episode 7 — Resolution Options
Date: August 1–14, 2026
Summary: Federal and Alliance leaders explore negotiation, standoff continuation, or escalation. Supreme Court and Congress become involved.
Possible Outcomes:
Negotiated Settlement — Partial NRSA repeal, states retain practical resource control.
Prolonged Standoff — Continued legal and logistical defiance, ongoing national tension.
Constitutional Crisis / Escalation — Risk of armed confrontation or civil unrest.
Risk Level: Variable
Future Episodes Placeholder (Episodes 8–10+)
Episode 8: Post-crisis consolidation — how Alliance states adjust to negotiated settlement or continue standoff.
Episode 9: Long-term legal, political, and economic fallout — including federal/state relations reforms.
Episode 10: Reflection & precedent — implications for future federal mandates, interstate coordination, and national unity.
This document gives you a complete, coherent record of everything so far and a roadmap for future episodes. You can pick it up anytime and continue building the series without losing continuity.
Sovereignty Alliance — Timeline of Events
June 14, 2026
Event: Congress passes the National Resource Security Act (NRSA).
Impact: Federal control over state-managed critical resources begins; CA & TX immediately protest.
June 15–20, 2026
Event: Secret backchannel communications between CA & TX attorneys general.
Impact: Early coordination on legal strategy; ideological differences set aside for state sovereignty.
June 22, 2026
Event: California & Texas publicly form the Sovereignty Alliance.
Impact: Nationwide attention; other states begin considering joining.
June 24–26, 2026
Event: First wave of new states joins: Oregon, Oklahoma, Louisiana.
Impact: Alliance begins coordinating legal challenges; federal warning issued.
June 25, 2026
Event: 5th Circuit lawsuit (TX et al.) and 9th Circuit lawsuit (CA et al.) filed.
Impact: Legal front established to resist NRSA enforcement.
June 27, 2026
Event: Federal marshals ordered to secure critical facilities.
Impact: Standoff potential increases; Alliance states mobilize state security.
July 2–5, 2026
Event: First physical confrontations:
Texas refinery standoff
California dams physically controlled by Alliance
Louisiana ports block federal inspectors
Impact: High-stakes standoff begins; media attention escalates.
July 15–20, 2026 — Trigger Month Begins
Event: National Guard placed on alert; federal enforcement intensifies.
Alliance Actions: Interstate resource compacts implemented, Supreme Court appeal filed.
Impact: Extreme risk of escalation; Alliance proves operational and legal coordination.
July 21–25, 2026 — Escalation and Expansion
Event: New states join: New York, Wyoming, North Dakota, Arizona.
Impact: Alliance now spans coast-to-coast; first serious physical standoffs occur at resource sites.
July 26–31, 2026 — Brinkmanship
Event: Maximum federal pressure; standoffs at Texas refineries, California water facilities, Louisiana ports.
Impact: Alliance maintains operational control; federal leadership hesitates to escalate.
August 1–14, 2026 — Resolution Options
Event: Federal & Alliance leaders consider negotiation or escalation. Congress and Supreme Court involved.
Impact: Three potential outcomes emerge:
Negotiated settlement (partial NRSA repeal, state resource control retained)
Prolonged standoff (continued defiance)
Constitutional crisis (risk of armed confrontation)
This timeline tracks key states, dates, and events, and it can be used as a visual reference for future episodes, media publication, or storyboards.
If you want, I can also make a graphical timeline map showing:
States joining
Standoff locations
Legal & physical escalation points
This would make it easy for readers to see the entire unfolding story at a glance.
